[Bug 1779435] [NEW] package argonaut-client (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: installed argonaut-client package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

Public bug reported: Causes crashes during boot. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 Package: argonaut-client (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-20.21-lowlatency 4.15.17 Uname: Linux 4.15.0-20-lowlatency x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.1 Architecture: amd64

[Bug 1768103] Re: Lancer A0 Asic HBA's won't boot with 18.04

Kleber, Sorry to be obtuse, but where exactly is the download for the latest update kernel to 18.04? My test team and I can't seem to locate it. thank you Laurie -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1768103] Re: Lancer A0 Asic HBA's won't boot with 18.04

Ok thank you for clarifying. I've asked Vinay to verify it in the kernel. Laurie -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768103 Title: Lancer A0 Asic HBA's won't boot with 18.04 To manage

[Bug 1768103] Re: Lancer A0 Asic HBA's won't boot with 18.04

Is Canonical waiting for additional testing from Broadcom Emulex? Please clarify; I thought we already validated the patch in comment #20? thx Laurie -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1776250] [NEW] r8168 driver won't install on 16.04 basic

of the following items, the first three of which can be obtained from the output of gcc -v: * the exact version of GCC; * the system type; * the options given when GCC was configured/built; barry@NZXT:~/Downloads/r8168-8.045.08$ gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc

[Bug 1768103] Re: Lancer A0 Asic HBA's won't boot with 18.04

Most excellent, thank you Vinay. Joseph - and thank you for your patience. Please include in your next errata kernel for 18.04. Do you have an ETA on when that might release so that I can inform my team. thank you again Laurie -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1768103] Re: Lancer A0 Asic HBA's won't boot with 18.04

Yes, I've asked Vinay to test it again. thank you Laurie -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768103 Title: Lancer A0 Asic HBA's won't boot with 18.04 To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1768103] Re: Lancer A0 Asic HBA's won't boot with 18.04

I've asked the maintainer to engage asap on this bug. Laurie -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768103 Title: Lancer A0 Asic HBA's won't boot with 18.04 To manage notifications about

[Bug 1768103] Re: Lancer A0 Asic HBA's won't boot with 18.04

Please let us know when there's a revised kernel we can verify. thx Laurie -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768103 Title: Lancer A0 Asic HBA's won't boot with 18.04 To manage

[Bug 1768103] Re: Lancer A0 Asic HBA's won't boot with 18.04

Joseph, Please minimally pull in patches 4/6 and 5/6 from the following upstream submit to address this regression. Apologies for this ongoing hassle. The 12.0.0.4 patch set was pushed upstream. The patches 4 and 5 are the minimum that should be applied to fix this issue. [PATCH 4/6] lpfc: Fix

[Bug 1768103] Re: Lancer A0 Asic HBA's won't boot with 18.04

We apparently have a bug in our patch for this regression and have a fix in hand that we are verifying internally. Once we push that fix upstream and have a commit id, we will update this bug. thank you Laurie -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1772770] [NEW] package mailman3-web 0+20170523-14 failed to install/upgrade: installed mailman3-web package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

Public bug reported: During configuration in post install, there was a error while trying to configure MySQL. I was using the automatic configuration settings for MySQL. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 Package: mailman3-web 0+20170523-14 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu

[Bug 1768103] Re: Lancer A0 Asic HBA's won't boot with 18.04

Canonical Team, Not sure why - but this kernel didn't appear to solve the issue. Laurie [reply] [-] Comment 8 Vinay Kumar Laghavarapu 2018-05-08 01:45:19 PDT Hi Laurie, We have installed Ubuntu 18.04 OS with latest patches provided in comment7. But still LPe16002-M6

[Bug 1768103] Re: Lancer A0 Asic HBA's won't boot with 18.04

Yes, we will test it out. Thank you Laurie -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768103 Title: Lancer A0 Asic HBA's won't boot with 18.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1768103] Re: Lancer A0 Asic HBA's won't boot with 18.04

The original reporter didn't provide logs...logs would not help. Here's the original text of this issue as reported by NetApp test engineer. Problem report from NetApp: We’re testing Ubuntu 18.04 before its upcoming release this month and have found that the most recent kernel that they have

[Bug 1768103] [NEW] Lancer A0 Asic HBA's won't boot with 18.04

Public bug reported: We have discovered that an early asic model (A0) of our 16/32GB HBA's doesn't boot with the lpfc driver in Ubuntu 18.04. After further review and discussion, this has been deemed a low risk issue since early A0 HBA's were only ever shipped to OEMs for test purposes.

[Bug 921889] Re: package ttf-mscorefonts-installer (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 128

Hi! Possibly not that much help but the problem I was having was while installing WINE the system was waiting for me to acknowledge the EULA for MSFonts -- something close -- sorry. The problem was the acknowledgement window was behind the installation window, so it appeared the system was just

[Bug 1766770] Re: 4.15.0-15-generic can't find root device

I've confirmed this issue on a second G7 with the same model of RAID controller but a simpler disk setup (no bcache or mdraid): https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/bK5xQrXZmD/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1766770] UdevDb.txt

apport information ** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766770/+attachment/5126873/+files/UdevDb.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766770 Title:

[Bug 1766770] ProcInterrupts.txt

apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766770/+attachment/5126871/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1766770] ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt

apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766770/+attachment/5126869/+files/ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1766770] ProcModules.txt

apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766770/+attachment/5126872/+files/ProcModules.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766770

[Bug 1766770] Lspci.txt

apport information ** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766770/+attachment/5126866/+files/Lspci.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766770 Title:

[Bug 1766770] ProcEnviron.txt

apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcEnviron.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766770/+attachment/5126870/+files/ProcEnviron.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766770

[Bug 1766770] CurrentDmesg.txt

apport information ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766770/+attachment/5126865/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1766770] WifiSyslog.txt

apport information ** Attachment added: "WifiSyslog.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766770/+attachment/5126874/+files/WifiSyslog.txt ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1766770] ProcCpuinfo.txt

apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766770/+attachment/5126868/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766770

[Bug 1766770] Lsusb.txt

apport information ** Attachment added: "Lsusb.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766770/+attachment/5126867/+files/Lsusb.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766770 Title:

[Bug 1766770] Re: 4.15.0-15-generic can't find root device

apport information ** Tags added: apport-collected xenial ** Description changed: This is on a Hewlett-Packard ProLiant DL380 G7, with a Smart Array P410i RAID controller containing a RAID 1+0 array of four SATA hard drives. It's running Ubuntu 16.04 with the

[Bug 1766770] Re: 4.15.0-15-generic can't find root device

** Attachment added: "version.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1766770/+attachment/5126847/+files/version.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766770 Title:

[Bug 1766770] [NEW] 4.15.0-15-generic can't find root device

Public bug reported: This is on a Hewlett-Packard ProLiant DL380 G7, with a Smart Array P410i RAID controller containing a RAID 1+0 array of four SATA hard drives. It's running Ubuntu 16.04 with the linux-image-generic-hwe-16.04-edge packages installed. The root partition consists of a simple

[Bug 1752182] Re: [Feature]Update Ubuntu 18.04 lpfc FC driver with 32/64GB HBA support and bug fixes

Seth, Thank you for you note, this patch was updated by the upstream SCSI maintainer after we submitted it. We are agree with this modification, please pull it in. thank you Laurie -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

Re: [Bug 1752182] Re: Update Ubuntu 18.04 lpfc FC driver with 32/64GB HBA support and bug fixes

Excellent! *Laurie Barry* Software Program Manager | Emulex Connectivity Division office/soft phone: 978-719-1503 | mobile: 603-930-1771 200 Brickstone Square | Andover, MA 01810 laurie.ba...@broadcom.com | broadcom.com On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 11:37 AM, Jeff Lane <jeffre

[Bug 1752182] [NEW] Update Ubuntu 18.04 lpfc FC driver with 32/64GB HBA support and bug fixes

that you not build NVMe FC since we do not intend to support NVMe FC on 18.04 (4.15 kernel) at this time due to all of the unmet upper layer dependencies. Laurie Barry ** Affects: open-iscsi (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1731459] Re: Black band in scanned images

Workaround is to install sane-backends-1.0.25 from the sane Project Site. This version seems to work properly with LiDE 200. I did not realise any side effects at the moment using 1.0.25. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

Re: [Bug 1730311] Re: package libnss-winbind:i386 2:4.3.11+dfsg-0ubuntu0.16.04.11 failed to install/upgrade: problèmes de dépendances - laissé non configuré

)    Active: active (exited) since mar. 2017-11-28 11:34:22 CET; 5h 33min ago Docs: man:systemd-sysv-generator(8)   Process: 1308 ExecStart=/etc/init.d/winbind start (code=exited, status=0/SUCCE nov. 28 11:34:22 barry-SATELLITE-C660 systemd[1]: Starting LSB: start Winbind da nov. 28 11:34:22 barry

[Bug 1730311] Re: package libnss-winbind:i386 2:4.3.11+dfsg-0ubuntu0.16.04.11 failed to install/upgrade: problèmes de dépendances - laissé non configuré

my log file ** Attachment added: "attachement.zip" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1730311/+attachment/5015719/+files/attachement.zip -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1730311] Re: package libnss-winbind:i386 2:4.3.11+dfsg-0ubuntu0.16.04.11 failed to install/upgrade: problèmes de dépendances - laissé non configuré

** Attachment added: "=?UTF-8?b?QXR0YWNoZW1lbnQ=?=" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1730311/+attachment/5015640/+files/%3D%3FUTF-8%3Fb%3FQXR0YWNoZW1lbnQ%3D%3F%3D -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

Re: [Bug 1730311] Re: package libnss-winbind:i386 2:4.3.11+dfsg-0ubuntu0.16.04.11 failed to install/upgrade: problèmes de dépendances - laissé non configuré

hi, BARRY Thierno M2_MIAGE Aix Marseille Université Tel:07-82-50-20-82 E_mail: thierno.aba...@yahoo.fr Le mardi 28 novembre 2017 à 12:50:40 UTC+1, Andreas Hasenack <andr...@canonical.com> a écrit : Hi, unfortunately due to launchpad bug #983766 your attachment cannot be down

[Bug 1730311] Re: package libnss-winbind:i386 2:4.3.11+dfsg-0ubuntu0.16.04.11 failed to install/upgrade: problèmes de dépendances - laissé non configuré

** Attachment added: "=?UTF-8?b?bG9nLnRhci5neg==?=" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1730311/+attachment/5015394/+files/%3D%3FUTF-8%3Fb%3FbG9nLnRhci5neg%3D%3D%3F%3D -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

Re: [Bug 1730311] Re: package libnss-winbind:i386 2:4.3.11+dfsg-0ubuntu0.16.04.11 failed to install/upgrade: problèmes de dépendances - laissé non configuré

such file or directory)    Active: inactive (dead) cordialement, BARRY Thierno M2_MIAGE Aix Marseille Université Tel:07-82-50-20-82 E_mail: thierno.aba...@yahoo.fr Le lundi 6 novembre 2017 à 15:40:59 UTC+1, Andreas Hasenack <andr...@canonical.com> a écrit : Thanks for filing th

[Bug 1733857] Re: package lxcfs 2.0.8-0ubuntu1~14.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

Stéphane, It installed correctly just now. Thanks for the quick response. Barry -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1733857 Title: package lxcfs 2.0.8-0ubuntu1~14.04.1 failed to install

[Bug 1733857] [NEW] package lxcfs 2.0.8-0ubuntu1~14.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

Public bug reported: This happened on a normal update. This was a automatic bug report. Barry ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: lxcfs 2.0.8-0ubuntu1~14.04.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-135.184-generic 3.13.11-ckt39 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-135-generic x86_64

[Bug 1730311] [NEW] package libnss-winbind:i386 2:4.3.11+dfsg-0ubuntu0.16.04.11 failed to install/upgrade: problèmes de dépendances - laissé non configuré

Public bug reported: i dont know the problem ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: libnss-winbind:i386 2:4.3.11+dfsg-0ubuntu0.16.04.11 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-93.140-generic 3.13.11-ckt39 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-93-generic i686 ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.10

[Bug 1719210] Re: Bluetooth audio to A2DP headset no longer works following upgrade from 4.12 to 4.13 in artful

Seeing similar issues with a Logitech M337 bluetooth mouse under the new 4.13.0-11 kernel. Reverting to 4.12.0-13 solves the problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1719210 Title:

[Bug 1678064] Re: Attempting to install to a single btrfs root partition crashes the installer

Hmm, that warning may be a red herring actually. If I instead run kvm as follows, I encounter the same error, even without the "block 0" warning: $ qemu-img create -f raw target.img 10G Formatting 'target.img', fmt=raw size=10737418240 $ kvm -m 1024 -cdrom custom.iso -drive

[Bug 1678064] Re: Attempting to install to a single btrfs root partition crashes the installer

Hi, Sorry for the very late reply here, here's the log as requested: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/25331706/ On closer inspection, it's likely worth mentioning two warnings emitted by kvm cli I listed in the original report: $ qemu-img create -f raw target.img 10G Formatting 'target.img', fmt=raw

[Bug 1708526] [NEW] package docbook-xsl 1.79.1+dfsg-1 failed to install/upgrade: package docbook-xsl is not ready for configuration cannot configure (current status 'half-installed')

Public bug reported: Problem reported so developers can work on this issue to improve these operating systems for everyone. Thank you. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: docbook-xsl 1.79.1+dfsg-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-83.106-generic 4.4.70 Uname: Linux

[Bug 1704886] [NEW] package grub2-common 2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.11 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration

Public bug reported: Grub broken even after fixing. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: grub2-common 2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.11 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.8.0-58.63~16.04.1-generic 4.8.17 Uname: Linux 4.8.0-58-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.9 Architecture:

[Bug 1704805] [NEW] All titlebars are corrupt

Public bug reported: After today's artful dist-ugprade, all titlebars are corrupted. The fonts show only squares. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10 Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.11.0-10.15-generic 4.11.8 Uname: Linux 4.11.0-10-generic x86_64

[Bug 1702293] [NEW] package emacs25-nox (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

Public bug reported: I have trouble loading any package that is from emacs 25. I am using synaptics package mangaer. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.04 Package: emacs25-nox (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-26.30-generic 4.10.17 Uname: Linux 4.10.0-26-generic

[Bug 1695141] Re: Recent update broke multiheaded sleep

Has there been any updates to this in either the Zesty security channel or Artful? It's a pretty serious regression. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1695141 Title: Recent update

[Bug 1694625] Re: KVM Guest loses network connectivity under heavy load

The VM has now had the problem recur again with the monitoring showing that just before it stops functioning nothing appears to be odd/excessive with the network usage. As such, I may have mis-titled my bug as I had assumed it was heavy load causing the issue. One thing which struck me as

[Bug 1694625] Re: KVM Guest loses network connectivity under heavy load

Since I have put monitoring in place it would appear that I haven't had the issue again in 3 days. This is rather frustrating as it was happening every night. I'm going to dial back on some of the monitoring in case this was prompting it to stay alive unexpectedly (as I don't think the option of

[Bug 1694625] Re: KVM Guest loses network connectivity under heavy load

I didn't manage to force the network to drop out by simply running iperf3. Had it running most of the day doing approx 2-3gbps traffic constantly. The issue is still persisting though, so there must be something going on. I have now set some simple scripts which monitor packets per second and

[Bug 1694625] Re: KVM Guest loses network connectivity under heavy load

1) It seems to happen every night (which is when the Ceph cluster is most used). Not sure if it's at a specific time or whether anything else could be interacting with it - I'll see if I can narrow this down. I'm trying to run some tests to see whether I can force it to happen by throwing a lot of

[Bug 1695141] Re: Recent update broke multiheaded sleep

Confirmed that falling back to nvidia-graphics-drivers-375 375.39-0ubuntu5 fixes the problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1695141 Title: Recent update broke multiheaded sleep To

[Bug 1695141] Re: Recent update broke multiheaded sleep

% uname -a Linux subdivisions 4.10.0-21-generic #23-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 28 16:14:22 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux FWIW, booting 4.10.0-20 hangs on boot so that's not a viable option. Also, setting Brightness>Turn screen off when inactive for: Never does not prevent Ubuntu from

[Bug 1695141] [NEW] Recent update broke multiheaded sleep

Public bug reported: I just dist-upgraded my Zesty machine and two things broke related to sleeping the displays. I have a 34" wide panel on the left and a 20" high resolution Dell on the right. Everything works fine until the displays sleep, say after a lockscreen has started. First, the

[Bug 1694625] Re: KVM Guest loses network connectivity under heavy load

I am not experiencing this issue on my other virtualised Ceph instance. The guest of the instance is 17.04 much like the other one, but the host is 16.04.2 LTS on 4.4.0-75-generic. No idea if it is just coincidence that it's not failing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1694625] [NEW] KVM Guest loses network connectivity under heavy load

Public bug reported: Much as described in bug 1325560 I am experiencing issues with a KVM guest losing network connectivity when under load. I have a KVM host running Ubuntu 17.04 with linux- image-4.10.0-22-generic (currently in zesty-proposed) installed. On top of this I have a guest also

[Bug 1325560] Re: kvm virtio netdevs lose network connectivity under "enough" load

Getting the same here on 17.04 host with 17.04 guest. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1325560 Title: kvm virtio netdevs lose network connectivity under "enough" load To manage

[Bug 1691817] Re: ubuntu 17.04 lpfc fix.

This bug also exists and needs to be fixed in 16.04 LTS. How do we ensure this happens. OEMs like HPE and others need this fix. thank you Laurie -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1685581] [NEW] package tex-common 6.04 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

Public bug reported: upgraded from 14 to 16,04 on a dell latitude 6420? ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: tex-common 6.04 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-72.93-generic 4.4.49 Uname: Linux 4.4.0-72-generic i686 ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.5 Architecture: i386 Date:

[Bug 1685228] [NEW] dell recovery wont install

Public bug reported: cant not recover on a dell laptop with new hard drive ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: ubiquity 2.10.26 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-39.60~precise1-generic 3.5.7.17 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-39-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu17.4 Architecture:

[Bug 1641423] Re: Back up failed with message: Failed to execute child process "duplicity" (No such file or directory)

What corrected for me was Seth's post in https://bugs.launchpad.net /deja-dup/+bug/1606449 of: sudo apt install duplicity sudo apt install python-gi Immediately works, though it appeared my system only needed to install duplicity and python-pi was already at the newest version and did

[Bug 1473178] Re: package python-pkg-resources 3.3-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 1

** Changed in: python-setuptools (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Barry Warsaw (barry) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1473178 Title: package python-pkg-resources 3.3-1ubun

[Bug 1473178] Re: package python-pkg-resources 3.3-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 1

This looks like another case where pyclean (not py3clean) might be getting called by Python 3, which clearly won't work. Investigating. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1473178 Title:

[Bug 1679849] Re: vim FTBFS during a rebuild test for zesty

This builds for me locally, so I think this may have fixed itself. ** Changed in: vim (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1679849 Title: vim FTBFS

[Bug 1679842] Re: python-requests-unixsocket FTBFS during a zesty test rebuild

This bug was fixed in the package python-requests-unixsocket - 0.1.5-3 --- python-requests-unixsocket (0.1.5-3) unstable; urgency=medium * Team upload. [ Ondřej Nový ] * Bumped debhelper compat version to 10 [ Ondřej Kobližek ] * Non case sensitive url comparison in tests

[Bug 1680668] [NEW] Unexpected shutdown of Chrome Browser

Public bug reported: Unexpected shutdown of Chrome browser after last visit here regarding the same issue ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: xorg 1:7.7+13ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-72.93-generic 4.4.49 Uname: Linux 4.4.0-72-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules:

[Bug 1680665] [NEW] Attem;pted reboot with timeouts

Public bug reported: I had attempted a reboot because system was malfunctioning, at which system was not recovering from timeouts so I had to shut down manually. Same error messages as I has sent the last two times today. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: xorg 1:7.7+13ubuntu3

[Bug 1680659] [NEW] Problem shutting down

Public bug reported: Hello I had a problem shutting down kept timing out had to manually shut down. Still getting error messages RE: main: daemon not run main: ping failed. Everything else is in the report sent. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: xorg 1:7.7+13ubuntu3

[Bug 1569719] Re: package python3 3.5.1-3 failed to install/upgrade: pre-dependency problem - not installing python3

Setting up python3.5-minimal (3.5.1-10) ... Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python3.5/py_compile.py", line 6, in import importlib._bootstrap_external File "/usr/lib/python3.5/importlib/__init__.py", line 93 raise ValueError('{}.__loader__ is not set'.format(name))

[Bug 1680548] [NEW] Problems with Ubuntu Nome persist

Public bug reported: I have Ubuntu Nome 16.04.2 64-bit and the same problems persist there is a report that was sent to you regarding this problem. I keep seeing this error message in my boot information: main: daemon not run main: ping failed ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04

[Bug 1679835] Re: pygobject-2 FTBFS on most arches during zesty test rebuild

% reverse-depends src:pygobject-2 Reverse-Recommends == * python-gtk2-doc (for python-gobject-2) * winswitch (for python-gobject-2) Reverse-Depends === * coccinelle(for python-gobject-2) * comitup

[Bug 1679842] Re: python-requests-unixsocket FTBFS during a zesty test rebuild

This is another case where a syncpackage of the unstable version discarding Ubuntu deltas should just fix things. I'll do that now. ** Changed in: python-requests-unixsocket (Ubuntu) Assignee: Chuck Short (zulcss) => Barry Warsaw (barry) -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1679837] Re: python-eventlet FTBFS on amd64 during zesty archive test rebuild

This bug was fixed in the package python-eventlet - 0.19.0-6 --- python-eventlet (0.19.0-6) unstable; urgency=medium * Removed non-deterministic test leading to FTBFS (Closes: #857893). -- Thomas Goirand Thu, 16 Mar 2017 10:21:30 +0100 python-eventlet

[Bug 1679893] [NEW] bug report sent to you in report

Public bug reported: I stall have bugs and I sent you a report that signifies the problem. Thank you for your help., ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: xorg 1:7.7+13ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-72.93-generic 4.4.49 Uname: Linux 4.4.0-72-generic x86_64

[Bug 1679837] Re: python-eventlet FTBFS on amd64 during zesty archive test rebuild

** Changed in: python-eventlet (Ubuntu) Assignee: Corey Bryant (corey.bryant) => Barry Warsaw (barry) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1679837 Title: python-eventlet FT

[Bug 1679837] Re: python-eventlet FTBFS on amd64 during zesty archive test rebuild

We should just sync python-eventlet from unstable. I know it's late in the cycle, but I believe 0.19.0-6 builds just fine (I tested the unstable's autopkgtests+build in a Zesty chroot). The differences ought to be benign, although the debhelper bump is not ideal (but I think probably not worth

[Bug 1679837] Re: python-eventlet FTBFS on amd64 during zesty archive test rebuild

Note that the 0.19.0-2ubuntu1 change from yakkety shows up in 0.19.0-3, so it appears to still be necessary (and no Ubuntu delta still needed). There's a new upstream which is obviously too late to consider, but that would be the time to see if the test skips are still worth it. -- You received

[Bug 1660216] Re: Package is obsolete and should be removed

IIRC, the a-x-i dependency on xapian1.3-bindings was because at the time only 1.3 support Python 3. I'll do some simple testing to see if we can just use python3-xapian. I suspect that will work just fine. ** Changed in: apt-xapian-index (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You

[Bug 1678653] [NEW] bug report sent to you in report

Public bug reported: I have switched from Ubuntu Mate to Ubuntu Nome and I wish to help you discover and fix any bugs or problems that may be evidenced within the Nome Operating System, but also seems to affect Ubuntu Mate. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: xorg

Re: [Bug 1678604] [NEW] package python3 3.5.1-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed pre-removal script returned error exit status 127

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1605657 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1605657 On Apr 02, 2017, at 12:25 PM, virendra singh wrote: >afer removing python2.7 and installing python3 and making >/usr/bin/python soft link from /usr/bin/python3 i am receiving this >error. Please suggest

[Bug 1678064] [NEW] Attempting to install to a single btrfs root partition crashes the installer

Public bug reported: If I create a single partition, type btrfs mounted as /, the installer takes me briefly to the next screen to input user details, but crashes as I enter my name. The error detail box is empty. Partition details: http://people.canonical.com/~barryprice/subi1.png Error

[Bug 1656474] Re: FTBFS on arm64: make[4]: *** [../../lisp/cedet/semantic/bovine/c-by.el] Segmentation fault (core dumped)

It also doesn't fail on bare metal. We have an arm64 porter box available to us and I did a test build w/dpkg-buildpackage in a chroot. No failure. I just also tried Debian unstable's Emacs 25.1 in my PPA and it fails in exactly the same way, so we can rule out any Ubuntu deltas, as expected.

[Bug 1658844] Re: most recent version does not install /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources/extern and /_vendor

Something from the description is confusing me: """ This is new install of lubuntu 14.04, installing python-pip Most recent python-pip version, installed 23 Jan 2017, does not install /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources/extern and

[Bug 1633331] Re: /usr/bin/pyclean fails with python3

Oh I missed this bit: "I'd assume this only triggers when the system is tweaked to run /usr/bin/python as python3? Does that match your case?" Yeah, don't do that! :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1633331] Re: /usr/bin/pyclean fails with python3

It doesn't really make to be running /usr/bin/pyclean with Python 3. That's why we have /usr/bin/py3clean which is part of python3-minimal. samba isn't even ported to Python 3, so why is it trying to run pyclean as Python 3? (samba is really the last thing keeping Python 2 on desktop, and it's

[Bug 1633331] Re: /usr/bin/pyclean fails with python3

*doesn't really make sense to be running -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/161 Title: /usr/bin/pyclean fails with python3 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1656474] Re: FTBFS on arm64: make[4]: *** [../../lisp/cedet/semantic/bovine/c-by.el] Segmentation fault (core dumped)

Building in my PPA with -O0 for arm64 fixes the problem, and I've uploaded 25.1+1-3ubuntu4 with this change, so hopefully that will clear it once it's approved. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1656474] Re: FTBFS on arm64: make[4]: *** [../../lisp/cedet/semantic/bovine/c-by.el] Segmentation fault (core dumped)

** Changed in: emacs25 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Barry Warsaw (barry) ** Changed in: emacs25 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchp

[Bug 1671572] Re: chrome-gnome-shell error popup when log in to non-GNOME

@jbicha: Sorry I didn't respond to this earlier. I've only seen this on Zesty. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1671572 Title: chrome-gnome-shell error popup when log in to non-GNOME

[Bug 1672755] Re: SRU 1.0 tracking bug

The manual tests are described in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuImageUpdates With u-i 1.0 we have an autopkgtest test that performs an amd64 boot test. This is essentially equivalent (and therefore redundant) with the manual boot tests for SRU. Still, it's important to continue to manually boot

[Bug 1672755] Re: SRU 1.0 tracking bug

** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done-xenial verification-done-yakkety -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1672755 Title: SRU 1.0 tracking bug To manage

[Bug 1671572] Re: chrome-gnome-shell error popup when log in to non-GNOME

I've started seeing this too on the machine which I have U-G installed (and enabled by default). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1671572 Title: chrome-gnome-shell error popup when log

[Bug 1673258] Re: Remove aptdaemon and drop or port its reverse-dependencies

Bugtasks added for revdep source packages. Hopefully I got them all. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673258 Title: Remove aptdaemon and drop or port its reverse-dependencies To

[Bug 1673258] Re: Remove aptdaemon and drop or port its reverse-dependencies

Here are a few more relevant comments from IRC and email: barry: software-properties was already ported from aptdaemon to pk in Debian, we didn't push it into zesty since I don't think anyone checked if the driver code worked [16:51] https://anonscm.debian.org/git

[Bug 1623856] Re: Scrolled Windows in update-manager are too small to read

Unfortunately this won't get fixed in aptdaemon. That package is unmaintained and does not build in Zesty any more because it uses obsolete APIs. This bug isn't worth fixing aptdaemon for and really, aptdaemon should eventually get removed from Ubuntu (it's already dropped in Debian). **

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >