Joe - interesting. Though what you're doing is solving the problem by
downloading ALL attachments. The bug here is that attachments should not
be downloaded unless requested (and then only once!).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
More info:
I set up an entirely empty IMAP account in thunderbird and moved the 1MB
and 6MB files to it. I set this up for offline mode and ran the
'Download Now' to force the offline sync.
THIS WORKED!
The 6MB file is now loaded instantly and available when offline. I can
save the attachment
I can confirm this bug is still present in the latest Thunderbird 5.0
relese to date.
1. First open a new email with 6MB attachment -
2. Notice long download, no message body until complete. (either blank or
previously selected message body often still visible).
3. Right click attachment - save
I can confirm that further to my report in Comment 142 this particular
folder *IS* set to offline mode with Select this folder for offline
use ticked.
Interesting development:
1. Created new TEST subfolder (also marked for offline use)
2. Move EmailA (1MB attachment)
3. Run above test on EmailA
rsx11m - ah a 4MB limit! Well that explains my behaviour but my findings
suggest this limit is NOT removed in TB 5.0.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275471
Title:
mozilla attachments
That is not a helpful comment; it does not solve the problem
--
Incomplete Internationalisation makes Openoffice Difficult to use
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173740
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
Apparently this will be committed to the gutsy repository in the next security
release?
When is that?
--
FF2 without default mozilla-five-home
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/157126
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
though - how does one really market an office suite with
incomplete menus. Before it gets said, the excuse that it's free so
deal with it is a cop out, it's also enterprise ready so shouldn't
your supported locale be complete?
Regards,
Danson Joseph
** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu)
Importance
and java.
So, this isn't a major ask, please provide a 32bit firefox build packaged for a
64 bit environment, just until sun-java6-plugin OR ia32-sun-java6-plugin
is around.
Regards,
Danson Joseph
--
[wontfix] firefox should be 32bit even on 64bit enabled OS
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/90947
You
for Flash and Java plugins, whichever is easier
for developers.
Regards,
Danson Joseph
--
firefox32 for amd64 = support 32-bit plugins on amd64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/28479
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber
It's pointless providing an incomplete system. Systems like LTSP
servers with more than 4GB ram can't run 32bit ubuntu. So they cannot
be crippled by not having a FULLY functional web browser in an
environment that does support 4+GB ram. It's also not realistic to ask
people to open a shell and
Public bug reported:
the php modules for cups and kadm kerberos have gone missing?
Really important corporate packages like GoSA require cups and kadm5 php
modules.
The pecl build of kadm5 fails because the -dev file for kadm is not available
in ubuntu.
How can we make ubuntu a corporate
not be expected to by developers. I am an END USER - Imagine
your grandmother trying to get a knitting program to run but she can't
because you installed a 64 bit system and she can only get a 32 bit deb
file - try tell her (The real type of end users) to install a chroot
environment!
Regards,
Danson
Does anybody have any idea when these issues will be solved? As of
February 9th, none of the last three Ubuntu releases are working with my
Asus P5B. Since there have been consistent problems for almost half a
year now, it amazes me that I still can't get Ubuntu to work on my
computer.
6.06 =
Public bug reported:
[CODE]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:dpkg --configure -a
dpkg: ../../src/packages.c:191: process_queue: Assertion 'dependtry =4' failed.
Aborted
[/CODE]
Happens every time i run the dpkg --configure -a command and I'm always
told to run that command before running dpkg or synaptic.
Not that I've seen
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 19:23 +, Jonathan Carter wrote:
Does this bug still occur on Ubuntu 6.06 LTS?
--
QCAD selection of snap-to operation kills qCAD
https://launchpad.net/bugs/5187
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
16 matches
Mail list logo
