[Bug 1681566] Re: nvidia-375 DKMS module not recompiled on upgrade to 17.04

2017-11-30 Thread dfg
We still have this issue for our custom drivers. What about this patch? https://github.com/dell/dkms/issues/17 I think it has not been applied to Ubunutu's version. ** Bug watch added: github.com/dell/dkms/issues #17 https://github.com/dell/dkms/issues/17 -- You received this bug notificatio

[Bug 1702528] [NEW] Warnings in generated code due to old version

2017-07-05 Thread dfg
Public bug reported: Please upgrade flex version so we don't get warnings like FlexScanner.cpp:674:18: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Wsign-compare] for ( n = 0; n < max_size && \ This has been fixed for example in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr

[Bug 1313205] [NEW] Totem crashes when seeking an mkv file - FIXED

2014-04-26 Thread dfg
Public bug reported: Please update with this! https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=727779 ** Affects: totem (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.

[Bug 735267] Re: wrong libicu library version

2012-07-05 Thread dfg
The problem is clearly that source-highlight was linked against libicudata.so.38, whereas the installed version in lucid seems to be 42. The fix shold just be to recompile and relink source-highlight with the installed library version. -- You received this bug notification because you are a memb

[Bug 735267] Re: wrong libicu library version

2012-07-05 Thread dfg
Problem is still happening. You should be able to reproduce the problem as following: echo "int x;"|source-highlight I get the reported error when doing so. ** Changed in: source-highlight (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 735267] Re: wrong libicu library version

2011-03-14 Thread dfg
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/735267 Title: wrong libicu library version -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bu

[Bug 735267] [NEW] wrong libicu library version

2011-03-14 Thread dfg
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: source-highlight When running source-highlight, the following shows up: source-highlight: error while loading shared libraries: libicudata.so.38: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory It seems that Lucid is shipped with libicu42 Pro

[Bug 600381] Re: package linux-image-2.6.32-23-generic 2.6.32-23.37 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-07-11 Thread dfg
Adding content of /var/log/installer per request ** Attachment added: "installer.tar.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51760729/installer.tar.gz -- package linux-image-2.6.32-23-generic 2.6.32-23.37 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit

[Bug 600381] Re: package linux-image-2.6.32-23-generic 2.6.32-23.37 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-06-30 Thread dfg
Note: by "some update suggested", I meant apt-get or dpkg. I didn't do anything other than do what the system suggested; no internet forum. -- package linux-image-2.6.32-23-generic 2.6.32-23.37 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

[Bug 600381] Re: package linux-image-2.6.32-23-generic 2.6.32-23.37 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-06-30 Thread dfg
Funny. I actually installed grub because apt-get suggested to. Oh, I think I remember now: I had the previous one, lilo I think, and some update suggested to install grub instead. That's why I installed this. -- package linux-image-2.6.32-23-generic 2.6.32-23.37 failed to install/upgrade: subp

[Bug 600381] Re: package linux-image-2.6.32-23-generic 2.6.32-23.37 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-06-30 Thread dfg
In that case, how come this inconsistency showed up? I think that I installed grub1 by mistake (just searched for grub, and grub showed up, didn't know it was version 1). I think that grub1 shouldn't be available for Lucid, or just make it install grub-pc. Sorry, as a user, I don't think this issu

[Bug 600381] Re: package linux-image-2.6.32-23-generic 2.6.32-23.37 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-06-30 Thread dfg
** Attachment added: "AptOrdering.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51200095/AptOrdering.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51200096/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "Df.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51200097/Df.txt ** Attachment added:

[Bug 600381] [NEW] package linux-image-2.6.32-23-generic 2.6.32-23.37 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-06-30 Thread dfg
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: grub Just regular update, failed with something like: dpkg: error processing linux-generic (sorry windows gone, is there any log file I could paste here?) ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: linux-image-2.6.32-23-generic 2.6.32-23

[Bug 192590] Re: dotty hangs

2008-09-18 Thread dfg
So? Any update? C'mon people, somebody answer psk so the fix is in!! -- dotty hangs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192590 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://