That Ruby2.0 depends on Ruby1.9.1 isn't as much the problem as the fact
that when Ruby2.0 is installed, it is not the default ruby; ruby1.9 is.
That, to me, is completely baffling.
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 12:10 AM, Daniel Muller
1310...@bugs.launchpad.netwrote:
The problem seems to be in the
Sorry, could you dumb this down a notch for me?
I get that when I request ruby2.0 you have $REASONS for also
installing 1.9.fuckingancientwhocares
What I fail to understand is how not making THE THING I REQUESTED the
default.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Public bug reported:
When I install ruby2.0, ruby1.9 is installed and made default.
This is unexpected and undesired behaviour.
If ruby1.9 needs to be installed for some reason, then fine, but ruby2.0
(the thing requested) should be default.
** Affects: ruby2.0 (Ubuntu)
Importance:
Expected behavior is not delivered.
If I ran 'apt-get install apache2' and found that apache1.x was
installed instead, I'd be upset.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1310292
Title:
Truth is spoken here. If I install Ruby2.0, that's what I expect to have
readily available.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1310292
Title:
installing `ruby2.0` results in ruby
Public bug reported:
upgraded lubuntu 11.10 to 12.04 via gui tool, and next login experienced
this error.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: desktop-file-utils 0.20-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.39-generic 3.2.16
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic x86_64
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011374
Title:
package desktop-file-utils 0.20-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script
