[Bug 2081881] Re: nvidia driver installation modes are unclear and in conflict w/ the server guide

2024-10-04 Thread Kuba Pawlak
Regarding (1) the issue of list and list --gpgpu being the same, it has been addressed in LP: #2081970 by sorting the drivers based on priority (1a) install --gpgpu installing only a headless package is a bug that is addressed in LP: #2083709 (2) a new switch is being designed. (3) Apparently --

[Bug 2083709] [NEW] fix install --gpgpu handling.

2024-10-04 Thread Kuba Pawlak
Public bug reported: install with --gpgpu is broken and no longer installs linux-modules- nvidia, only nvidia-driver-no-dkms-. This makes the system unusable as the actual kernel moduler is not present but headless-no- dkms package will satisfy ubuntu-driver's dependency search so subsequent calls

[Bug 2083678] [NEW] obsolete 535 in Oracular

2024-10-04 Thread Kuba Pawlak
Public bug reported: Oracular will be released with 560 drivers only. Add transitionals for 535 ** Affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers-535 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 2083677] [NEW] obsolete 550 in Oracular

2024-10-04 Thread Kuba Pawlak
Public bug reported: Oracular will be released with 560 drivers only. Add transitionals for 550 ** Affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers-550 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 2081970] Re: Sort the output list of matching nvidia drivers

2024-09-27 Thread Kuba Pawlak
Tested on AWS instance with oracular image deployed and later updated to to 6.11 After that oracular-proposed was enabled and ubuntu-drivers-common at 1:0.9.7.9 installed. The result when listing drivers is: Between multiple calls the output list is stable: ubuntu@ip-172-31-10-40:~$ ubuntu-driver

[Bug 2081967] Re: NVIDIA 560 release should suggest -open variant first

2024-09-27 Thread Kuba Pawlak
Tested on AWS instance with oracular image deployed and later updated to to 6.11 After that oracular-proposed was enabled and ubuntu-drivers-common at 1:0.9.7.9 installed. The result when listing drivers is: ubuntu@ip-172-31-10-40:~$ ubuntu-drivers list nvidia-driver-560-open, (kernel modules pro

[Bug 2082044] Re: New usptream release 550.120

2024-09-26 Thread Kuba Pawlak
** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-550 (Ubuntu Oracular) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2082044 Title: New usptream release 550.120 To manage not

[Bug 2077574] Re: New upstream release 560.35.03

2024-09-25 Thread Kuba Pawlak
** Also affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers-550 (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers-550 (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-550 (Ubuntu Oracular) Status: New => Won't

[Bug 2082044] [NEW] New usptream release 550.120

2024-09-25 Thread Kuba Pawlak
Public bug reported: [Impact] These releases provide both bug fixes and new features, and we would like to make sure all of our users have access to these improvements. See the changelog entry below for a full list of changes and bugs. [Test Case] The following development and SRU process was fo

[Bug 2081974] [NEW] Mark the recommended driver package in the output

2024-09-25 Thread Kuba Pawlak
Public bug reported: The output does not mark the recommended driver in any way. [ Impact ] User has no easy way of knowing which driver to select a list as none is marked as recommended [ Steps to reproduce ] 1. Call 'ubuntu-drivers list' 2. observe the list that is returned. [ Test plan ] 1.

[Bug 2081970] [NEW] Sort the output list of matching nvidia drivers

2024-09-25 Thread Kuba Pawlak
Public bug reported: The list of matching nvidia drivers found for the system, obtained with ubuntu-drivers list, is printed in random order. It is not obvious which driver is the recommended one. The driver that is recommended can be obtained by calling ubuntu-drivers list --recommended. [ Impac

[Bug 2081967] [NEW] NVIDIA 560 release should suggest -open variant first

2024-09-25 Thread Kuba Pawlak
Public bug reported: Since 560 NVIDIA suggests using open driver for all cards that support it, ubuntu-drivers should select these as recommended. By default it sorts -open variants below all others. [ Impact ] Wrong nvidia driver is selcted for 560 series NVIDIA drivers packages [ Steps to repr

[Bug 2081964] [NEW] Open and non-open variants of NVIDIA drivers should conflict with each other

2024-09-25 Thread Kuba Pawlak
Public bug reported: It is possible to install both open and non-open versions of the LRM drivers. This results in nvidia.ko and others to be present twice under different paths: $ ls /lib/modules/6.8.0-1016-aws/kernel/nvidia-* /lib/modules/6.8.0-1016-aws/kernel/nvidia-535srv: bits nvidia-drm.ko

[Bug 2080922] Re: installation 560 error

2024-09-17 Thread Kuba Pawlak
** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-560 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Kuba Pawlak (kuba-t-pawlak) ** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-560 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, wh

[Bug 2078946] Re: package nvidia-dkms-550 550.107.02-0ubuntu0.24.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed nvidia-dkms-550 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 10

2024-09-13 Thread Kuba Pawlak
Kernel 6.10.7-061007-generic is a mainline kernel (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/MainlineBuilds) that is not supported. Please revert to the official Noble kernel. ** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-550 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix ** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-550

[Bug 2077646] Re: revert RLIMIT_NOFILE set and test

2024-09-09 Thread Kuba Pawlak
Test cases verified on Jammy ubuntu-drivers-common 1:0.9.6.2~0.22.04.7 ** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy ** Tags added: verification-done-jammy ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 2077654] Re: Race condition on builders result in 100% fail rate

2024-09-09 Thread Kuba Pawlak
Test cases verified on Jammy ubuntu-drivers-common 1:0.9.6.2~0.22.04.7 ** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy ** Tags added: verification-done-jammy ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 2077646] Re: revert RLIMIT_NOFILE set and test

2024-09-09 Thread Kuba Pawlak
Test cases verified on Noble using ubuntu-drivers-common 1:0.9.7.6ubuntu3.1 ** Tags removed: verification-needed-noble ** Tags added: verification-done-noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/

[Bug 2060287] Re: Roll UDA drivers from 545 to 550

2024-09-04 Thread Kuba Pawlak
** Description changed: [ Impact ] - * 545 series of drivers is now end of life, roll these to 550 via +  * 545 series of drivers is now end of life, roll these to 550 via transitional packages - * 550 is a new feature branch +  * 550 is a new feature branch [ Test Plan ] - *

[Bug 2078689] [NEW] New upstream release 550.90.12 ERD5

2024-09-02 Thread Kuba Pawlak
Public bug reported: [Impact] These releases provide both bug fixes and new features, and we would like to make sure all of our users have access to these improvements. See the changelog entry below for a full list of changes and bugs. [Test Case] The following development and SRU process was fo

[Bug 2077654] Re: Race condition on builders result in 100% fail rate

2024-08-28 Thread Kuba Pawlak
I disabled the test as there are some races there between different scenarios in one context. I just tested that splitting this one big test so each smaller test only checks one thing, make all of them pass. Instead of disabling it, refactor it. -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 2077654] Re: Race condition on builders result in 100% fail rate

2024-08-28 Thread Kuba Pawlak
the test origiannly was testing 6 different scenarios by injecting dependency in a separate file. I split this test into 6 scenarios, each testing one thing only. for now it seems to work. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun

[Bug 2077654] Re: Race condition on builders result in 100% fail rate

2024-08-28 Thread Kuba Pawlak
Hi Robie, the test is failing 100% on arm builder in PPA. It sometimes fails for amd64 too. This issue was already there when the previous version of this package was introduced and it was also retried until it passed somehow. I could not make it pass myself. -- You received this bug notifica

[Bug 2077654] Re: Race condition on builders result in 100% fail rate

2024-08-23 Thread Kuba Pawlak
** Description changed: [ Impact ] - ADT testing fails on builders, mostly arm ones + ADT testing fails on arm builders [ Test Plan ] - Run ADT tests + Run ADT tests in PPA or locally with: + PYTHONPATH=. python3 tests/run test_ubuntu_drivers.DetectTest.test_system_driver_packages_force_in

[Bug 2077646] Re: revert RLIMIT_NOFILE set and test

2024-08-23 Thread Kuba Pawlak
** Description changed: change to builder config in RLIMIT_NOFILE resulted in one of the tests to fail. The original value of 1024 is now changed to 65535. ADT test framework in u-d-c is intended to rise this value to 8180, but only if it was lower than that. Then it checks that the limit

[Bug 2077654] Re: Race condition on builders result in 100% fail rate

2024-08-22 Thread Kuba Pawlak
** Summary changed: - Race condition on arm builders result in 100% fail rate + Race condition on builders result in 100% fail rate ** Description changed: [ Impact ] - ADT testing fails on arm builders + ADT testing fails on builders, mostly arm ones [ Test Plan ] Run ADT tests [

[Bug 2077654] [NEW] Race condition on arm builders result in 100% fail rate

2024-08-22 Thread Kuba Pawlak
Public bug reported: [ Impact ] ADT testing fails on arm builders [ Test Plan ] Run ADT tests [ Where problems could occur ] during ADT testing on arm builders [ Other Info ] Cause unknown. It sometimes fails when locally on x86 machine but only in Jammy container. Jammy package ran in Noble c

[Bug 2077646] [NEW] revert RLIMIT_NOFILE set and test

2024-08-22 Thread Kuba Pawlak
Public bug reported: change to builder config in RLIMIT_NOFILE resulted in one of the tests to fail. The original value of 1024 is now changed to 65535. ADT test framework in u-d-c is intended to rise this value to 8180, but only if it was lower than that. Then it checks that the limit is set to

[Bug 2076245] Re: New release 0.9.7.7

2024-08-22 Thread Kuba Pawlak
** Description changed: [ Impact ] + - change repository links - not a code change, no impact + - change test dependencies from libgl1-mesa-glx to libglx-mesa0 - only affects ADT testing + - increase the timeout for test_system_driver_packages_performance - test only + - Ensure that self._ma

[Bug 2071829] Re: ubuntu-drivers-common/1:0.9.7.6ubuntu3 ADT test failure with linux/6.8.0-38.38

2024-08-22 Thread Kuba Pawlak
** Description changed: This is a scripted bug report about ADT failures while running ubuntu- drivers-common tests for linux/6.8.0-38.38 on noble. Whether this is caused by the dep8 tests of the tested source or the kernel has yet to be determined. Testing failed on: amd64: ht

[Bug 2077574] Re: New upstream release 560.35.03

2024-08-22 Thread Kuba Pawlak
** Summary changed: - New upstream release 560.31.02 + New upstream release 560.35.03 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077574 Title: New upstream release 560.35.03 To manage notifica

[Bug 2077574] [NEW] New upstream release 560.31.02

2024-08-21 Thread Kuba Pawlak
Public bug reported: [Impact] These releases provide both bug fixes and new features, and we would like to make sure all of our users have access to these improvements. See the changelog entry below for a full list of changes and bugs. [Test Case] The following development and SRU process was fo

[Bug 2076245] Re: New release 0.9.7.7

2024-08-08 Thread Kuba Pawlak
** Changed in: ubuntu-drivers-common (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Kuba Pawlak (kuba-t-pawlak) ** Changed in: ubuntu-drivers-common (Ubuntu Noble) Assignee: (unassigned) => Kuba Pawlak (kuba-t-pawlak) ** Changed in: ubuntu-drivers-common (Ubuntu Oracular) As

[Bug 2076245] [NEW] New release 0.9.7.7

2024-08-07 Thread Kuba Pawlak
Public bug reported: [ Impact ] [ Test Plan ] [ Where problems could occur ] [ Other Info ] ** Affects: ubuntu-drivers-common (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu

[Bug 2071933] [NEW] New upstream release 535.183.06 ERD10

2024-07-04 Thread Kuba Pawlak
-manager-535 (Ubuntu) Importance: High Assignee: Kuba Pawlak (kuba-t-pawlak) Status: New ** Affects: libnvidia-nscq-535 (Ubuntu) Importance: High Assignee: Kuba Pawlak (kuba-t-pawlak) Status: New ** Affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server (Ubuntu

[Bug 2067041] Re: New upstream release 550.90.07 ERD3

2024-06-21 Thread Kuba Pawlak
** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-550-server (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067041 Title: New upstream release 550.90.07 ERD3

[Bug 2067041] Re: New upstream release 550.90.07 ERD3

2024-06-19 Thread Kuba Pawlak
** Information type changed from Private to Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067041 Title: New upstream release 550.90.07 ERD3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: htt

[Bug 2067041] [NEW] New upstream release 550.90.02 ERD3

2024-05-24 Thread Kuba Pawlak
Public bug reported: [Impact] These releases provide both bug fixes and new features, and we would like to make sure all of our users have access to these improvements. See the changelog entry below for a full list of changes and bugs. [Test Case] The following development and SRU process was fo

[Bug 2066904] [NEW] New upstream release 470.256.02 ERD12

2024-05-23 Thread Kuba Pawlak
Public bug reported: [Impact] These releases provide both bug fixes and new features, and we would like to make sure all of our users have access to these improvements. See the changelog entry below for a full list of changes and bugs. [Test Case] The following development and SRU process was fo

[Bug 2066367] [NEW] New upstream release 535.183.01 ERD9

2024-05-22 Thread Kuba Pawlak
Public bug reported: [Impact] These releases provide both bug fixes and new features, and we would like to make sure all of our users have access to these improvements. See the changelog entry below for a full list of changes and bugs. [Test Case] The following development and SRU process was fo

[Bug 2060287] [NEW] Roll UDA drivers from 545 to 550

2024-04-05 Thread Kuba Pawlak
there is no loss of functionality. ** Affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers-545 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Kuba Pawlak (kuba-t-pawlak) Status: Fix Committed ** Affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers-545 (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Kuba Pawlak

[Bug 2059115] Re: New upstream release 550.54.15 ERD2

2024-03-26 Thread Kuba Pawlak
** Changed in: fabric-manager-535 (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: fabric-manager-535 (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Kuba Pawlak (kuba-t-pawlak) ** Changed in: fabric-manager-535 (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Fix Committed ** C

[Bug 2059115] [NEW] New upstream release 550.54.15 ERD2

2024-03-26 Thread Kuba Pawlak
Public bug reported: [Impact] These releases provide both bug fixes and new features, and we would like to make sure all of our users have access to these improvements. See the changelog entry below for a full list of changes and bugs. [Test Case] The following development and SRU process was fo

[Bug 2049635] Re: Roll UDA & ERD drivers from 525 to 535

2024-03-26 Thread Kuba Pawlak
** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-525 (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-525 (Ubuntu Mantic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Kuba Pawlak (kuba-t-pawlak) ** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-525 (Ubuntu Jammy) Statu

[Bug 2055384] Re: New NVIDIA release 550.54.14

2024-03-25 Thread Kuba Pawlak
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Changed in: fabric-manager-53

[Bug 2049635] Re: Roll UDA & ERD drivers from 525 to 535

2024-03-22 Thread Kuba Pawlak
** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-525-server (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-525-server (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscr

[Bug 2049635] Re: Roll UDA & ERD drivers from 525 to 535

2024-03-22 Thread Kuba Pawlak
** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-525-server (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049635 Title: Roll UDA & ERD drivers from 525 to

[Bug 2049635] Re: Roll UDA & ERD drivers from 525 to 535

2024-03-22 Thread Kuba Pawlak
** Also affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers-525 (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers-525-server (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: fabric-manager-525 (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided

[Bug 2058740] Re: New upstream relase 535.161.08

2024-03-22 Thread Kuba Pawlak
** Summary changed: - New upstram reelase 535.161.08 + New upstream relase 535.161.08 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058740 Title: New upstream relase 535.161.08 To manage notifica

[Bug 2058740] [NEW] New upstram reelase 535.161.08

2024-03-22 Thread Kuba Pawlak
Public bug reported: [Impact] These releases provide both bug fixes and new features, and we would like to make sure all of our users have access to these improvements. See the changelog entry below for a full list of changes and bugs. [Test Case] The following development and SRU process was fo

[Bug 2055384] Re: New NVIDIA release 550.54.14

2024-03-13 Thread Kuba Pawlak
** Description changed: [Impact] These releases provide both bug fixes and new features, and we would like to make sure all of our users have access to these improvements. See the changelog entry below for a full list of changes and bugs. [Test Case] The following development and

[Bug 2055384] Re: New NVIDIA release 550.54.14

2024-03-05 Thread Kuba Pawlak
** Changed in: libnvidia-nscq-535 (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: libnvidia-nscq-535 (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: libnvidia-nscq-535 (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: libnvidia-nscq-535 (Ubuntu Foca

[Bug 2055384] Re: New NVIDIA release 550.54.14

2024-03-05 Thread Kuba Pawlak
** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress

[Bug 2055384] Re: New NVIDIA release 550.54.14

2024-03-04 Thread Kuba Pawlak
** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055384 Title: New NVIDIA release 550.54.14 To manag

[Bug 2055384] [NEW] New NVIDIA release 550.54.14

2024-02-29 Thread Kuba Pawlak
Public bug reported: [Impact] These releases provide both bug fixes and new features, and we would like to make sure all of our users have access to these improvements. See the changelog entry below for a full list of changes and bugs. [Test Case] The following development and SRU process was fo

[Bug 1918070] [NEW] package grub-efi-amd64-signed 1.155.4+2.04-1ubuntu35.4 failed to install/upgrade: installed grub-efi-amd64-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit st

2021-03-07 Thread Kuba Zembik
Public bug reported: Crashed after machine startup, just after logging-in. I'm not sure whether that's a installation fault or a software error. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.10 Package: grub-efi-amd64-signed 1.155.4+2.04-1ubuntu35.4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-44.50-generi

[Bug 1896404] [NEW] Kubuntu installer crashes when uninstalling packages

2020-09-20 Thread Kuba H
Public bug reported: The crash occurs when using a Kubuntu 20.04.1 Live USB. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: ubiquity 20.04.15.2 [modified: lib/partman/automatically_partition/question] ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-42.46-generic 5.4.44 Uname: Linux 5.4.0-42-generic x8

[Bug 1794589] Re: libssl1.0-dev conflicts libssl-dev

2020-04-08 Thread Kuba Suder
I have the same problem (bionic): - aptitude is showing 2 uninstalled updates, libmysqlclient-dev and libmysqlclient20 - I can't update them, because they require libssl-dev - if I decide to install libssl-dev, I need to uninstall libssl1.0-dev - if I do that, I would need to remove nodejs-dev wh

[Bug 1861712] Re: nodejs-dev package pinned to libssl 1.0.*

2020-04-08 Thread Kuba Suder
I have the same problem: - aptitude is showing 2 uninstalled updates, libmysqlclient-dev and libmysqlclient20 - I can't update them, because they require libssl-dev - if I decide to install libssl-dev, I need to uninstall libssl1.0-dev - if I do that, I would need to remove nodejs-dev which requi

[Bug 306017]

2019-09-02 Thread Kuba Niewiarowski
Nope nope nope nope. Don't destroy well-loved search bar usage scenario as handy quicknote area. There is no easiest and greatest solution. :x -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306017 Titl

[Bug 1815940] Re: Outdaded (and simply not working at all) version in current LTE

2019-02-14 Thread Kuba Niewiarowski
https://github.com/git-ftp/git-ftp/issues/456 https://github.com/git-ftp/git-ftp/issues/447 https://github.com/git-ftp/git-ftp/issues/439 https://github.com/git-ftp/git-ftp/issues/417 https://github.com/git-ftp/git-ftp/issues/410 All related, I think. ** Bug watch added: github.com/git-ftp/git-ft

[Bug 1815940] [NEW] Outdaded (and simply not working at all) version in current LTE

2019-02-14 Thread Kuba Niewiarowski
Public bug reported: Current LTE (18.04) and derivatives (like Mint 19.1) have outdated git- ftp package I didn't manage to get working, causing "incorrect hash" issue each time. No problems with version from PPA, there was multiple reported issues on this on Github. It's LTE, so please just updat

[Bug 1469163] Re: Missing charachters on slide text/title

2018-11-16 Thread Martin Kuba
I have the same problem on Linux Mint MATE 18.3 Sylvia (Ubuntu 16.04) with LibreOffice 1:6.1.3~rc2-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 from PPA. $ LC_ALL=C apt-cache policy libreoffice-impress libreoffice-impress: Installed: 1:6.1.3~rc2-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 Candidate: 1:6.1.3~rc2-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 Version table:

[Bug 1594344] Re: lshw crashes with 'std::bad_alloc' and core dump if not run as root

2017-08-22 Thread Kuba Niewiarowski
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1593233 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1593233 ** Also affects: lshw (Arch Linux) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.lau

[Bug 1531369] Re: lshw locks up system

2017-08-22 Thread Kuba Niewiarowski
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #848791 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=848791 ** Also affects: lshw (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=848791 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because yo

[Bug 1593233] Re: lshw crashes on the 16.04 release

2017-08-22 Thread Kuba Niewiarowski
** No longer affects: lshw (Debian) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1593233 Title: lshw crashes on the 16.04 release To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchp

[Bug 1593233] Re: lshw crashes on the 16.04 release

2017-08-22 Thread Kuba Niewiarowski
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #848791 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=848791 ** Also affects: lshw (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=848791 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because yo

[Bug 1590799] Re: nfs-kernel-server does not start because of dependency failure

2017-07-15 Thread Kuba
Similar situation as reported above. This time however dmesg shows that there is a ordering cycle on nfs-server.service (depends on nfs- mountd.service) kuba@kubadesktop:~$ systemctl status nfs-kernel-server.service ● nfs-server.service - NFS server and services Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd

[Bug 1590799] Re: nfs-kernel-server does not start because of dependency failure

2017-07-05 Thread Kuba
Hi Rafael, Below requested output, seems both services are dead and there are no log indication on what happened: kuba@kubadesktop:~$ systemctl status nfs-kernel-server.service ● nfs-server.service - NFS server and services Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/nfs-server.service; enabled

[Bug 1590799] Re: nfs-kernel-server does not start because of dependency failure

2017-05-29 Thread Kuba
I'm still seeing this issue while the package is installed. ~$ apt-cache policy nfs-kernel-server nfs-kernel-server: Installed: 1:1.2.8-9ubuntu12.1 Candidate: 1:1.2.8-9ubuntu12.1 Version table: *** 1:1.2.8-9ubuntu12.1 500 500 http://nl3.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates/main

[Bug 1598519] Re: regression: page scrolling jumps to top of page spontaneously

2016-07-07 Thread Kuba
I have an X220 and the same issue - and I'm on Arch. It only happens when I scroll using the Touchpad (edge scroll), not when I use a mousewheel. Tried disabling smooth scrolling (Re: that Chromium bug report) - still there, even if the jump sometimes seems less high. Weird. -- You received thi

[Bug 1510624] Re: double menu bar

2015-12-14 Thread Kuba
I've just installed vlc 3.0.0 and now I have double menu bar all the time. Just right after I start some video from nautilus. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1510624 Title: double menu

[Bug 1496585] Re: local menu appear after stop

2015-12-14 Thread Kuba
I've just installed vlc 3.0.0 and now I have double menu bar all the time. Just right after I start some video from nautilus. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1496585 Title: local menu

[Bug 1496585] Re: local menu appear after stop

2015-12-01 Thread Kuba
same problem here https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc/+bug/1510624 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1496585 Title: local menu appear after stop To manage notifications about

[Bug 1510624] Re: double menu bar

2015-11-13 Thread Kuba
I've got same problem. When I start VLC (from dash, from console, from video file, from sound indicator etc.) everything looks OK (OK means that I've got only global menu bar), but... when I switch to full screen and than return I've got two menu bars (global and local). It drives me mad. I'm usin

[Bug 649809] Re: the session settings manager can try starting before the login screen one exits

2015-02-02 Thread Kuba Mędrek
** Also affects: unity-settings-daemon (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: unity-settings-daemon (Ubuntu Natty) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/649

[Bug 1244969] Re: freezy all the time

2013-11-03 Thread Kuba Mędrek
** Changed in: simple-scan Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: simple-scan Assignee: (unassigned) => Simple Scan Development Team (simple-scan-team) ** Project changed: simple-scan => ubuntu ** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: Simple Scan Development Team (simple-scan-team) => (

[Bug 1071301] Re: Can't change the desktop environment in lightdm when more than one desktop is installed and the ok button is outside the visible screen.

2012-12-26 Thread Kuba Mędrek
It's related, but not duplicate of #1047140 ** Attachment added: "Example screenshot" https://bugs.launchpad.net/lightdm/+bug/1071301/+attachment/3468366/+files/lightdm-bug.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https

[Bug 1078620] [NEW] package quagga 0.99.20.1-0ubuntu0.12.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 1

2012-11-14 Thread Kuba Wroniecki
Public bug reported: The package upgrade fails. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: quagga 0.99.20.1-0ubuntu0.12.04.2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-32.51-generic 3.2.30 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-32-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu14 Arch

[Bug 1059523] Re: [Acer Aspire One 722] Broken support of Intel HDA in 3.5.0-16 kernel

2012-10-03 Thread Kuba Iwanicki
Thanx Joseph! That patched kernel for 32bit restore sound in my Acer Aspire One 722. I removed kernel linux-headers-3.5.0-16 and install Yours. Really good work! Regards, Kuba -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https

[Bug 1060908] Re: [HDA-Intel - HD-Audio Generic, playback] No sound at all after Ubuntu 12.10 update

2012-10-03 Thread Kuba Iwanicki
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1060908 Title: [HDA-Intel - HD-Audio Generic, playback] No sound at all after Ubuntu 12.10 update To manage notifications about this bug go to: https:

[Bug 1060908] [NEW] [HDA-Intel - HD-Audio Generic, playback] No sound at all after Ubuntu 12.10 update

2012-10-03 Thread Kuba Iwanicki
-0ubuntu1 Architecture: i386 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: kuba 1572 F pulseaudio Date: Wed Oct 3 13:47:07 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 "Quantal Quetzal" - Alpha i386 (20120903.4) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: alsa-driv

[Bug 1023812] Re: package proftpd-basic 1.3.4a-1 failed to install/upgrade: podproces zainstalowany skrypt pre-removal zwrócił kod błędu 100

2012-07-12 Thread Kuba Mędrek
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1023812 Title: package proftpd-basic 1.3.4a-1 failed to install/upgrade: podproces zainstalowany skrypt pre-removal zwrócił kod błędu 100 To manage no

[Bug 1023812] [NEW] package proftpd-basic 1.3.4a-1 failed to install/upgrade: podproces zainstalowany skrypt pre-removal zwrócił kod błędu 100

2012-07-12 Thread Kuba Mędrek
Public bug reported: I try to purge or remove this using dpkg. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: proftpd-basic 1.3.4a-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-26.41-generic 3.2.19 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-26-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu8 AptOrdering: gadmin-proftpd:

[Bug 945749] Re: Mouse pointer jerky on login screen

2012-04-27 Thread Kuba Mędrek
The same in my, Desktop, Dell Inspirion 580, Intel i3, 64bit, Graphics Gallium 0.4 on AMD CEDAR -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/945749 Title: Mouse pointer jerky on login screen To ma

[Bug 884933] Re: eds keeps prompting me for calendar passwords

2011-12-05 Thread Kuba Wroniecki
One the password dialog for google-calendats pops up, the IMAP access to gmail seems to get blocked and must be unblocked via the google "captcha" page. ( https://mail.google.com/accounts/DisplayUnlockCaptcha ) ** Description changed: EDS keeps popping up dialogs asking me for passwords for my

[Bug 727783] Re: Installing packages from CD repository fails due to changed CD-ROM default mount point

2011-07-12 Thread Jan Kuba
Hi guys, I've probably bumped to this bug as well, I've downloaded it yesterday (don't know what build it is thought). Checked the CD for errors - none found. Tried the workaround when I had the message popping up I've switched to tty 2, the CDROM was mounted /cdrom/ and i could see the files, howe

[Bug 802263] [NEW] curl packages 7.21.3-1ubuntu1.2 missing changelog

2011-06-26 Thread Kuba
Public bug reported: libcurl3 and libcurl-gnutls version 7.21.3-1ubuntu1.2 are missing their *ubuntu* (not upstream) changelog. Previous package builds have a ubuntu changelog. Steps to reproduce: 1) http://packages.ubuntu.com/natty/libcurl3 2) click "Ubuntu Changelog" -> gives 404 missing file

[Bug 801912] Re: When i go to applications menu, the panel disappears.

2011-06-25 Thread Kuba Chrobot
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/801912 Title: When i go to applications menu, the panel disappears. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+sou

[Bug 801912] [NEW] When i go to applications menu, the panel disappears.

2011-06-25 Thread Kuba Chrobot
Public bug reported: In gnome-shell, when i go to applications menu, the panel disappears. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: gnome-shell 3.0.2-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0-1.2-generic 3.0.0-rc3 Uname: Linux 3.0-1-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: wl Architecture: i386 D

[Bug 790538] Re: pam update causes cron to stop working with "Module is unknown" error

2011-05-31 Thread Kuba
I can confirm the bug. I can confirm that restarting cron works. I can confirm that after applying the newest pam related packages updated 19 minutes ago cron is working as expected. Not the best confirmation since I restarted cron prior to applying the fix, but there you go. Thank you everyone

[Bug 742806] Re: package open-vm-dkms 2010.06.16-268169-3ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: open-vm-tools kernel module failed to build

2011-03-25 Thread Kuba Galus
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742806 Title: package open-vm-dkms 2010.06.16-268169-3ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: open-vm-tools kernel module failed to build -- ubuntu-bugs m

[Bug 742806] [NEW] package open-vm-dkms 2010.06.16-268169-3ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: open-vm-tools kernel module failed to build

2011-03-25 Thread Kuba Galus
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: open-vm-tools The messag is shown during a bootup of natty alpha ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: open-vm-dkms 2010.06.16-268169-3ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-7.38-generic 2.6.38 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-7-generic i686

[Bug 524281] Re: Tens of wakes per second in "[kernel scheduler] Load balancing tick" on Core 2 Duo even with only 1 core enabled

2010-11-12 Thread kuba
** Attachment added: "powertopLenovoR61Core2DuoT7100.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/524281/+attachment/1731649/+files/powertopLenovoR61Core2DuoT7100.txt -- Tens of wakes per second in "[kernel scheduler] Load balancing tick" on Core 2 Duo even with only 1 core ena

[Bug 613325] Re: package gdebi 0.5.9 failed to install/upgrade:

2010-08-03 Thread kuba
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53031159/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53031160/VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz" http://launchpadlibra

[Bug 613325] [NEW] package gdebi 0.5.9 failed to install/upgrade:

2010-08-03 Thread kuba
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gdebi It crashed during distribution upgade from Ubuntu 9.04 to 9.10 ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Aug 4 08:09:31 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: pakiet gdebi jest już zainstalowany i skonfigurowany Nonfr

[Bug 613326] Re: package gdebi-kde 0.5.9 failed to install/upgrade:

2010-08-03 Thread kuba
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53031241/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53031242/VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz" http://launchpadlibra

[Bug 613326] [NEW] package gdebi-kde 0.5.9 failed to install/upgrade:

2010-08-03 Thread kuba
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gdebi It crashed during distribution upgade from Ubuntu 9.04 to 9.10 ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Aug 4 08:09:30 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: pakiet gdebi-kde jest już zainstalowany i skonfigurowany N

[Bug 613327] Re: package libgraphviz4 2.20.2-3ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade:

2010-08-03 Thread kuba
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53031269/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53031270/VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz" http://launchpadlibra

[Bug 613327] [NEW] package libgraphviz4 2.20.2-3ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade:

2010-08-03 Thread kuba
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: graphviz It crashed during distribution upgade from Ubuntu 9.04 to 9.10 ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Aug 4 08:06:00 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: pakiet libgraphviz4 jest już zainstalowany i skonfiguro

  1   2   >