[Bug 1967842] Re: Ubuntu 22.04 Beta: linux-firmware iwlwifi-9260-th-b0-jf-b0-46.ucode - Wireless-AC 9260 not working

2022-04-29 Thread maxadamo
thanks Giacomo Tazzari. I am going to test the workaround. This is an LTS release, we hope that this bug does not stand here forever until the coming release will be out. Cheers -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https:

[Bug 1581626] Re: Switching to USB sound device stops USB mouse clicks from registering

2016-09-14 Thread maxadamo
you should be able to fix this issue, creating a file as following: $ cat /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/jabra.conf Section "InputClass" Identifier "Jabra Audio docking station" MatchDevicePath "/dev/input/event*" MatchProduct "Netcom" MatchVendor "GN_Netcom_A_S" Option "Ignore" "true" E

[Bug 1619921] Re: Password Prompt for yubikey not showing in Plymouth

2016-09-04 Thread maxadamo
I don't know if this is a problem (as I am not still not able to guess anything) but this script does exactly nothing: /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/local-top/yubikey-luks because /conf/conf.d/cryptroot does NOT exist inside initrd: # lsinitramfs /boot/initrd.img-4.4.0-37-generic | grep 'c

[Bug 1619921] [NEW] Password Prompt for yubikey not showing in Plymouth

2016-09-03 Thread maxadamo
Public bug reported: I am able to open/decrypt the partition from a terminal, either using the passphrase on slot 0, or the using the yubikey passphrase obtained with: ykchalresp -2 but from Plymouth I can only input the passphrase from slot 0. It seems that the script ykluks-keyscript is not

[Bug 1440392] Re: kernel 3.19.0-12 breaks HDMI Audio

2015-04-11 Thread maxadamo
I can confirm that 3.19.0-13-generic fixes the issue with HDMI Audio! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1440392 Title: kernel 3.19.0-12 breaks HDMI Audio To manage notifications about t

[Bug 1440392] Re: kernel 3.19.0-12 brakes HDMI Audio

2015-04-05 Thread maxadamo
I've tried 3.19.3-031903 and the problem is fixed (also added the tag as per your request). You may ask me to download all the version to check which is the first one that fix... is this something I really need to do (please no :) ) ** Tags added: kernel-fixed-upstream-3.19.3-031903 -- You re

[Bug 1440392] Re: kernel 3.19.0-12 brakes HDMI Audio

2015-04-04 Thread maxadamo
** Summary changed: - 3.19.0-12 brakes HDMI Audio + kernel 3.19.0-12 brakes HDMI Audio ** Description changed: - it's not yet clear to me what is wrong. I know that if I fail back to - the previous kernel 3.19.0-11 everything works just fine. + it's not yet clear to me what is wrong. But I know

[Bug 1440392] [NEW] 3.19.0-12 brakes HDMI Audio

2015-04-04 Thread maxadamo
Public bug reported: it's not yet clear to me what is wrong. I know that if I fail back to the previous kernel 3.19.0-11 everything works just fine. The output produced by ubuntu-bug is attached. Please let me know if you think of any relevant command that might help to troubleshoot the issue. P

[Bug 1386840] Re: failure to start a container

2014-11-10 Thread maxadamo
This the workaround: apt-get install apparmor-utils aa-complain /usr/bin/lxc-start here, I think, there should be the solution: https://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-devel/2014-October/010662.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1201092] Re: Cannot load kvm_amd module - (says disabled by bios)

2013-08-21 Thread maxadamo
Serge, if you read back the issue, I tested ALL possible kernels: v3.2 final: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.2-precise/ v3.3 final: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.3-precise/ v3.4 final: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.4-quantal/ v3.5 final: http:

[Bug 1201092] Re: Cannot load kvm_amd module - (says disabled by bios)

2013-08-09 Thread maxadamo
@Serge ... I am an experienced sysadmin, I work with Cloudstack ... therefore I work with a lot of KVM machines. I don't want to prove anything about myself, but now can you be better ensured that I am able to access a Computer BIOS and switch a feature from ON to OFF and viceversa? :) I've also

[Bug 1201092] Re: Cannot load kvm_amd module - (says disabled by bios)

2013-08-09 Thread maxadamo
All, first of all I have AMD E-350D, you have AMD E-350. I don't know what the "D" stands for, but we don't have the same identical CPU. I give you the feedback from the kernel developers and from the MainBoard vendor. I had already tried the above command (rdmsr). It says "1" ... DISABLED.

[Bug 1201092] Re: Cannot load kvm_amd module - (says disabled by bios)

2013-07-23 Thread maxadamo
Bad luck. Tested against all those version, and the bug is present. Added Tag: kernel-bug-reported-upstream ** Tags added: kernel-bug-reported-upstream -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1

[Bug 1201092] Re: Cannot load kvm_amd module - (says disabled by bios)

2013-07-18 Thread maxadamo
** Tags added: kernel-bug-exists-upstream ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1201092 Title: Cannot load kvm_amd modul

[Bug 1201092] Re: Cannot load kvm_amd module - (says disabled by bios)

2013-07-18 Thread maxadamo
Tested with latest upstream kernel: the problem is still there. # uname -a Linux yasna 3.11.0-031100rc1-generic #201307141935 SMP Sun Jul 14 23:36:57 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux # # kvm-ok INFO: /dev/kvm does not exist HINT: sudo modprobe kvm_amd INFO: Your CPU supports KVM extensi

[Bug 1201092] Re: Cannot load kvm_amd module - (says disabled by bios)

2013-07-15 Thread maxadamo
** Description changed: - - Firt of all I would like to mention that this bug as been also raised for Red Hat. + - Firt of all I would like to mention that this bug as been also raised for Fedora 18. Here is the link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978608 - I am running Ubunt

[Bug 1201092] Re: Cannot load kvm_amd module - (says disabled by bios)

2013-07-15 Thread maxadamo
Sorry no. I understand that it would be easier to revert a regression bug, but I bought this motherboard right now. I can tell is that on Fedora 18 (in the bug mentioned above) they guy tried the kernels 3.6.10-4.fc18.x86_64 and 3.9.6-200.fc18.x86_64 ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status

[Bug 1201092] ProcCpuinfo.txt

2013-07-15 Thread maxadamo
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1201092/+attachment/3737219/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1201092

[Bug 1201092] CurrentDmesg.txt

2013-07-15 Thread maxadamo
apport information ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1201092/+attachment/3737214/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1201092

[Bug 1201092] Lsusb.txt

2013-07-15 Thread maxadamo
apport information ** Attachment added: "Lsusb.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1201092/+attachment/3737218/+files/Lsusb.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1201092 Title: Cann

[Bug 1201092] Re: Cannot load kvm_amd module - (says disabled by bios)

2013-07-15 Thread maxadamo
apport information ** Tags added: apport-collected package-from-proposed third-party- packages ** Description changed: - Firt of all I would like to mention that this bug as been also raised for Red Hat. Here is the link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978608 - I am runnin

[Bug 1201092] UdevDb.txt

2013-07-15 Thread maxadamo
apport information ** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1201092/+attachment/3737223/+files/UdevDb.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1201092 Title: Ca

[Bug 1201092] Dependencies.txt

2013-07-15 Thread maxadamo
apport information ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1201092/+attachment/3737215/+files/Dependencies.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1201092

[Bug 1201092] Re: Cannot load kvm_amd module - (says disabled by bios)

2013-07-15 Thread maxadamo
PLEASE NOTE: AMD-V extension on Virtualbox works correctly. Therefore the extension works properly but it's not recognized by KVM. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1201092 Title: Canno

[Bug 1201092] ProcModules.txt

2013-07-15 Thread maxadamo
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1201092/+attachment/3737222/+files/ProcModules.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1201092

[Bug 1201092] BootDmesg.txt

2013-07-15 Thread maxadamo
apport information ** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1201092/+attachment/3737213/+files/BootDmesg.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1201092 Titl

[Bug 1201092] IwConfig.txt

2013-07-15 Thread maxadamo
apport information ** Attachment added: "IwConfig.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1201092/+attachment/3737216/+files/IwConfig.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1201092 Title:

[Bug 1201092] ProcInterrupts.txt

2013-07-15 Thread maxadamo
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1201092/+attachment/3737221/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120

[Bug 1201092] ProcEnviron.txt

2013-07-15 Thread maxadamo
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcEnviron.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1201092/+attachment/3737220/+files/ProcEnviron.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1201092

[Bug 1201092] Lspci.txt

2013-07-15 Thread maxadamo
apport information ** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1201092/+attachment/3737217/+files/Lspci.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1201092 Title: Cann

[Bug 1201092] UdevLog.txt

2013-07-15 Thread maxadamo
apport information ** Attachment added: "UdevLog.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1201092/+attachment/3737224/+files/UdevLog.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1201092 Title:

[Bug 945027] Re: ubi-partman failed with exit code 141

2013-07-02 Thread maxadamo
it doesn't matter if you have two OS installed. I have a brand new disk and fails as well. In my case, it happens when I select BTRFS instead of EXT4. Crapware. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.

[Bug 1104476] Re: Network manager cannot connect to WPA2/PEAP/MSCHAPv2 network without CA_Certificate

2013-05-16 Thread maxadamo
Just OT. Yes, the workaround fixes the issue. OT: Troubles came from the day when Network Manager was invented. It has never been reliable and - as we can see in every day experience - it has never been tested properly. My favorite method for network configuration is the one used in Red Hat 5

[Bug 645625] Re: lxc container can power-off host machine

2012-03-23 Thread maxadamo
It's correct what you wrote. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645625 Title: lxc container can power-off host machine To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.

[Bug 645625] Re: lxc container can power-off host machine

2012-03-22 Thread maxadamo
don't want to argue, but may I ask why you decided to tag the urgency of this issue as "low"? One can stop 30 containers and the host machine and the host machine, by issuing a simple command on one of the containers and you say urgency is just "low"? Wasn't it at least "medium", if not "high"?

[Bug 387308] Re: HTTPS Proxy Support for file sync

2012-02-20 Thread maxadamo
Rodney, I would say that part of "Ubuntu One" service is on sale, while its development it's clearly not completed yet. I would never pay the extra storage space for something that it's missing such a basic functionality, whereas the competitor (dropbox) started working perfectly from the very b

[Bug 710219] Re: yelp throws a segfault error and it doesn't start

2011-05-25 Thread maxadamo
After six months this is the first answer that I receive. By the way, I don't have maverick anymore, and you can do whatever you wish with this bug who cares, but those people who still uses maverick still have this issue, and you shouldn't have to close this bug, but you had to ask somebody

[Bug 734563] Re: [gnome3] Upgrading to Gnome3 PPA breaks Ubuntu theme defaults

2011-04-03 Thread maxadamo
did any of you find a workaround? I have seen that Gnome 3 works properly in Fedora and I think we're missing some package in Ubuntu. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/734563 Title: [g

[Bug 423252] Re: NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2 suexec, and atd

2011-03-05 Thread maxadamo
bug still present in Maverick 10.10 this is the output with debug option enabled: $ sudo -u news /usr/sbin/fetchnews LDAP Config Summary === uri ldap://127.0.0.1/ ldap_version 3 sudoers_base ou=sudoers,dc=homelinux,dc=doma binddn (anonymous) bindpw

[Bug 729795] Re: sudo-ldap: required version higher than 1.75

2011-03-05 Thread maxadamo
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/729795 Title: sudo-ldap: required version higher than 1.75 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/li

[Bug 729795] [NEW] sudo-ldap: required version higher than 1.75

2011-03-05 Thread maxadamo
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: sudo-ldap sudo-ldap, in order to work correctly must have the ability to use the parameter "sudoOrder" which is only available from versions higher than 1.75 >From the author website it's possible to download the latest deb for Ubuntu >Lucid and the lat

[Bug 729735] Re: sudo-ldap attempts removal of other metapackages

2011-03-05 Thread maxadamo
** Changed in: sudo (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/729735 Title: sudo-ldap attempts removal of other metapackages -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 729735] [NEW] sudo-ldap attempts removal of other metapackages

2011-03-05 Thread maxadamo
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: sudo-ldap sorry. I was only getting warnings. There isn't any bug. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: sudo-ldap 1.7.2p7-1ubuntu2.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-5.32~lucid1-generic 2.6.38-rc6 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-5-generic i68

[Bug 710219] Re: yelp throws a segfault error and it doesn't start

2011-01-30 Thread maxadamo
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/710219 Title: yelp throws a segfault error and it doesn't start -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mai

[Bug 710219] [NEW] yelp throws a segfault error and it doesn't start

2011-01-30 Thread maxadamo
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: yelp I am getting the following error when trying to start yelp: $ yelp (yelp:6427): Gtk-CRITICAL **: IA__gtk_tool_button_new: assertion `icon_widget == NULL || GTK_IS_MISC (icon_widget)' failed (yelp:6427): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: invalid (NULL) point

[Bug 678203] Re: evolution 2.30 is an out of date version

2010-12-23 Thread maxadamo
I disagree, for a simple reason. At the time that we were using Evolution 2.28 in Ubuntu Lucid, an identical issue was raised and you were saying absolutely the same: 2.30 is still buggy and so on I have been using evolution 2.30 taken from a PPA, and I didn't have any issue so far. The same

[Bug 677929] Re: users-admin: create new user with dot/period fails

2010-11-21 Thread maxadamo
Milan, first of all, as I can see the "adduser" command has a switch "--force-badname" that can be used in this case. But, if you use this option every kind of strange character will be used. In other words, if you want to use the dot, you need to pass this option only when dot(s) appear in the

[Bug 677929] Re: users-admin: create new user with dot/period fails

2010-11-21 Thread maxadamo
Milan, I don't know if the urgency of this issue is low. Ubuntu installer is affected as well, and I've read on forums about some novice user not being able to perform the installation as of this issue. Anyway, as I wrote in my bug report, perhaps the dot should be removed because it's used by t

[Bug 678203] [NEW] evolution 2.30 is an out of date version

2010-11-21 Thread maxadamo
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution Evolution 2.30 in Ubuntu Maverick is outdated. As Novell suggests Evolution 2.32 is the latest stable and, most important, Fedora 14 is using Evolution 2.32 You can check it here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=205101 We

[Bug 678230] Re: users-admin has problem when username contains a dot

2010-11-21 Thread maxadamo
-- users-admin has problem when username contains a dot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/678230 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/li

[Bug 678230] [NEW] users-admin has problem when username contains a dot

2010-11-21 Thread maxadamo
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-system-tools on Ubuntu Maverick, when trying to create a user, I get a windows which says that I can use special characters, such as: '.' '-' '_' In other words, the tools says that I am allowed to use the dot, but this is slightly wrong. The dot

[Bug 678203] Re: evolution 2.30 is an out of date version

2010-11-21 Thread maxadamo
-- evolution 2.30 is an out of date version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/678203 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubunt

[Bug 672243] Re: cannot convert videos to MPG

2010-11-07 Thread maxadamo
-- cannot convert videos to MPG https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/672243 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 672243] [NEW] cannot convert videos to MPG

2010-11-07 Thread maxadamo
450]: DEBUG Loaded device Computer (4 presets) arista.queue [185]: DEBUG Found item in queue! Queue is Transcode queue: [Queue entry /home/maxadamo/Scrivania/aa/b/test.wmv -> PAL DVD ffmux_dvd -> /home/maxadamo/Scrivania/aa/b/test.mpg] arista.discoverer [230]: DEBUG Discovering /home/maxadamo/

[Bug 664160] Re: Multiple /dev/pts instances vs. lxc-start

2010-10-30 Thread maxadamo
Hi. This is not a bug in my opinion. This is happening because LXC does not support udev, it has some extra trouble with upstart, and I suspect you didn't disable udev on your container. For the moment just try to disable these upstart jobs located in /etc/init/: udev.conf udev-finish.conf udevm

[Bug 450336] Re: audio surround 5.1 stopped working after updating

2010-10-10 Thread maxadamo
well: perhaps karmic is still affected and I don't have karmic anymore. I'll leave the issue as is -- audio surround 5.1 stopped working after updating https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/450336 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu

[Bug 450336] Re: audio surround 5.1 stopped working after updating

2010-10-10 Thread maxadamo
Hi Macarena, This is issue is solved, and I am changing its status to "fix-released". Anyway, in the file /etc/modprobe.d/alsa-base.conf I have the following statement: options snd-hda-intel power_save=10 power_save_controller=N model=3stack-6ch I think "power save" options where not inserted by

[Bug 657409] Re: PPA Search Engine is DOWN

2010-10-09 Thread maxadamo
Hi there. in the list of "notified" people I can see "launchpad bug Contacts" (if you see my same page, just have a look on the right) Is this the recipient for this kind of issues? In this case I suspect that we can re-open the bug. Otherwise, is anybody able to provide any link to file this issu

[Bug 657409] Re: PPA Search Engine is DOWN

2010-10-09 Thread maxadamo
** Description changed: Hi. - sorry for opening this bug here, but I don't where to report it, but the website is down since two days. + sorry for opening this bug here, but I don't where to report it, and the website is down since two days. The website https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+ppas is

[Bug 657409] [NEW] PPA Search Engine is DOWN

2010-10-09 Thread maxadamo
Public bug reported: Hi. sorry for opening this bug here, but I don't where to report it, and the website is down since two days. The website https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+ppas is accessible but it's not possible to run any query. The result for a query that you try to run is the following erro

[Bug 645625] Re: lxc container can power-off host machine

2010-10-01 Thread maxadamo
** Description changed: Binary package hint: lxc Bug related information: # lsb_release -rd Description: Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS Release: 10.04 # apt-cache policy lxc lxc:   Installed: 0.7.2-1~10.04~csz1   Candidate: 0.7.2-1~10.04~csz1   Version table:  *** 0.7.2-1~10.04~

[Bug 653323] Re: hp-toolbox segmentation fault

2010-10-01 Thread maxadamo
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653323/+attachment/1664921/+files/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "CupsErrorLog.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653323/+attachment/1664922/+files/CupsErrorLog.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" http

[Bug 653323] [NEW] hp-toolbox segmentation fault

2010-10-01 Thread maxadamo
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: hplip When I run hp-toolbox I get the following message: $ hp-toolbox HP Linux Imaging and Printing System (ver. 3.10.2) HP Device Manager ver. 15.0 Copyright (c) 2001-9 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, LP This software comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WAR

[Bug 651039] Re: move ppp script to upstart

2010-09-29 Thread maxadamo
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/651039/+attachment/1652939/+files/Dependencies.txt -- move ppp script to upstart https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/651039 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to U

[Bug 651039] [NEW] move ppp script to upstart

2010-09-29 Thread maxadamo
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ppp Hi. I created the following ppp-dns.conf for upstart: # Restore /etc/resolv.conf if the system crashed before the ppp link # was shut down. # description "Restore /etc/resolv.conf if system crashed" start on (local-filesystems and gdm

[Bug 649478] [NEW] move sudo script to upstart

2010-09-27 Thread maxadamo
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: sudo I think the lines below can be used in /etc/init/sudo.conf in order to replace the old sysv script: # ensure sudo privileges don't persist across reboots # description "ensure sudo privileges don't persist across reboots" start on local-filesy

[Bug 649478] Re: move sudo script to upstart

2010-09-27 Thread maxadamo
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/649478/+attachment/1646842/+files/Dependencies.txt -- move sudo script to upstart https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/649478 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 646405] Re: power-manager fails to detect battery and perform poweroff

2010-09-23 Thread maxadamo
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646405/+attachment/1629057/+files/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646405/+attachment/1629058/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http

[Bug 646405] [NEW] power-manager fails to detect battery status and performs poweroff

2010-09-23 Thread maxadamo
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-power-manager $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu maverick (development branch) Release:10.10 $ apt-cache policy gnome-power-manager gnome-power-manager: Installed: 2.31.92-0ubunntu1 Candidate: 2.31.92-0ubunntu1 Version table: *

[Bug 645625] Re: lxc container can power-off host machine

2010-09-23 Thread maxadamo
** Summary changed: - lxc container can power-off the host machine + lxc container can power-off host machine ** Description changed: Binary package hint: lxc Bug related information: # lsb_release -rd Description: Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS Release: 10.04 # apt-cache policy lxc l

[Bug 619148] Re: no lxc-priority tool

2010-09-23 Thread maxadamo
These tools are not included even in 0.7.2.1 (from PPA) and I suspect they are not included in 0.7.2.1 from Maverick as well. -- no lxc-priority tool https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619148 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 645625] [NEW] lxc container can power-off the host machine

2010-09-22 Thread maxadamo
*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** Public security bug reported: Binary package hint: lxc Bug related information: # lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS Release:10.04 # apt-cache policy lxc lxc: Installed: 0.7.2-1~10.04~csz1 Candidate: 0.7.2-1~10.04~csz1 Ve

[Bug 451267] Re: screen keeps blinking on X server

2010-08-23 Thread maxadamo
Hi all. This bug report is duplicated (I can't remember which one is the original), and it's also fixed. gnome-power-manager was broken with this hardware and we have been using an alternate power-manager. Now it works without problems. cheers ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Incomplete =>

Re: [Bug 451267] Re: screen keeps blinking on X server

2010-08-23 Thread maxadamo
Ciao. Dovrebbe essere risolto da un bel po' di tempo. Era un problema con il power-manager di gnome, che con questo hardware interagiva in maniera non corretta. Adesso funziona perfettamente Ciao Massimiliano 2010/8/23 Fabio Marconi > Hello maxdamo > is this problem present with the latest upd

[Bug 568295] Re: Evolution 2.30 is considered by Novell the last stable one

2010-04-22 Thread maxadamo
You should change debian tree... otherwise there is no reason to use ubuntu instead of debian (only for synaptic?) I may be wrong, but I don't believe you have tried evolution 2.30 you just take the tree from debian "as is": what they put is ok, what they don't is not ok . and you get softwar

[Bug 568295] [NEW] Evolution 2.30 is considered by Novell the last stable one

2010-04-22 Thread maxadamo
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution You can see here that the develoipers of Evolution consider 2.30 the stable release: http://projects.gnome.org/evolution/download.shtml We are currently using 2.28, either in Lucid and in Karmic, which is an old stable, but which is NOT a goo

[Bug 568291] [NEW] mysql-proxy 0.7.2 is alpha release: upgrade to 0.8

2010-04-22 Thread maxadamo
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mysql-proxy MySQL Proxy 0.7.2 is considered alpha software from their developers, and users are warned to not use in any case such software in a production environment. Now the version 0.8 seems to be the stable one, but you are including in Ubuntu Karmic

[Bug 565810] Re: packages.medibuntu.org not available

2010-04-21 Thread maxadamo
Well, now let's crash the database of this bugtrack system, because of too many answers: yes it works. Thanks everybody. -- packages.medibuntu.org not available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565810 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 565810] Re: packages.medibuntu.org not available

2010-04-21 Thread maxadamo
... and, please, don't tell: click there, go on "contact us"; than connect to IRC channel, and ask for the secret code to the x-men; than you use this code to open the page, where you'll find the secret token to decrypt the message that you can find by opening the 4th link that you'll find on a

[Bug 565810] Re: packages.medibuntu.org not available

2010-04-21 Thread maxadamo
@Paul: stop the fighting. Right now we can't understand each other. Perhaps my fault ... doesn't matter, nevermind. I point out only one thing: YOU SHOULD SPREAD THIS INFORMATIION. I am very sorry, but it looks like you're trying to hide the info. After the first ton of complains we got some ackno

[Bug 565810] Re: packages.medibuntu.org not available

2010-04-21 Thread maxadamo
@Paul: you miss the point. I am also ready and happy to contribute to the community, in any way. And I know that we get everything for free, I know that commmunity is based on volunteers effort... and so far and so on. What I disliked, is the lack of transparency and professionality. Even if you

[Bug 565810] Re: packages.medibuntu.org not available

2010-04-21 Thread maxadamo
@Lionel: I think you have given now an official explanation: server owner is away, and server can't be brought online for such reason. Too bad to hear, after many days, "contribute or stop using it". -- packages.medibuntu.org not available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565810 You received this

[Bug 565810] Re: packages.medibuntu.org not available

2010-04-21 Thread maxadamo
the best I can hear from you is "as far as I know", but nobody really knows, nobody is able to explain, and when asking for details people tend to become almost rude. If I am not wrong, it doesn't make any sense to use a mirror. because packages I suppose are dispatched from the main node. If the

[Bug 563374] Re: IP alias assigned with network-manager is not viewable with ifconfig or ip

2010-04-15 Thread maxadamo
(changing status as: invalid) The slution is to run: ip addr ** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- IP alias assigned with network-manager is not viewable with ifconfig or ip https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563374 You received this bug notification because yo

[Bug 563374] Re: IP alias assigned with network-manager is not viewable with ifconfig or ip

2010-04-14 Thread maxadamo
** Description changed: Binary package hint: network-manager Hi. I have the following problem on Ubuntu Lucid (beta), X86: I am using gnome-network-manager to assing an IP alias to my eth0 device. - As I can see, the IP address is assigned to the interface: in answers to ping, an

[Bug 563374] [NEW] IP alias assigned with network-manager is not viewable with ifconfig or ip

2010-04-14 Thread maxadamo
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: network-manager Hi. I have the following problem on Ubuntu Lucid (beta), X86: I am using gnome-network-manager to assing an IP alias to my eth0 device. As I can see, the IP address is assigned to the interface: in answers to ping, and I can run sockets

[Bug 562855] [NEW] audacious-plugins-extra cannot be installed

2010-04-14 Thread maxadamo
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: audacious-plugins-extra On Ubuntu Lucid (Beta), x86 version: The version of audacious-plugins-extra doesn't match the version of all other components, and it's not installable. Attempting to install I get the following error message: r...@zurvan:~# apt

[Bug 321528] Re: Include ext4 defrag / defragment tool

2010-04-10 Thread maxadamo
@bmhm: I am not pretty sure if you're right. First, I would state that this linux is not a kind of thing where everything is magic, and so fa and so on, and file self-manage fragmentation and filesystem never fragment. Veritas and XFS, have a defrag tool from a long time. As far fragmentation is

[Bug 415023] Re: brightness is broken on MSI WIND U100

2010-03-19 Thread maxadamo
Thanks a lot Andre!! @ all: don't even try to change the BIOS (at least: don't do it to fix this issue). I have the very last version of the BIOS and the screen was flickering. That's why I was asking the other to refrain tu put confusing information. -- brightness is broken on MSI WIND U100 http

[Bug 415023] Re: brightness is broken on MSI WIND U100

2010-02-27 Thread maxadamo
Please, refrain putting comments and comments. It's really confusing now. This is not yet fixed. If you use Gnome, the easiest workaround is to install guidance-power-manager (from KDE) and than create a symlink: $ cd /usr/bin $ mv gnome-power-manager gnome-power-manager.save $ ln -sf /usr/share/k

[Bug 223542] Re: Release upgrade procedure "sucks" (from Gutsy to Hardy)

2010-02-16 Thread maxadamo
I agree the closure of this but (also because I don't like that I wrote the word "sucks" in the subject). Anyway the problem is still there: the update-manager shouldn't have any bind to libraries that will be updated during the update process. If - for any reason (*) - the update hangs, you won'

[Bug 321528] Re: ext4 defrag / defragment tool in Jaunty - include

2010-02-14 Thread maxadamo
do it please :-) This issue is still there from one year and I would like to migrate my XFS filesystem. This feature was added to Veritas filesystem, during the pleistocene epoch, and a little bit later, after the the firt glaciation, was seen first time in XFS. -- ext4 defrag / defragment

[Bug 495694] Re: kacpid uses 100% of CPU. Kernel is 2.6.31-17

2010-01-04 Thread maxadamo
Final Workaround: I disabled in the BIOS "fan controlled from operating system". My BIOS allows to set a fixed speed (from 50% up to 100%) or speed controlled by operating system. Now I have put the speed fixed to 50% and this is fixed fixed fixed. Please let me know if you need further informat

[Bug 495694] Re: kacpid uses 100% of CPU. Kernel is 2.6.31-17

2009-12-20 Thread maxadamo
I suspect the priority cannot be medium if you have to reboot a server. kacpid cannot be killed and right now I didn't find a workaround. -- kacpid uses 100% of CPU. Kernel is 2.6.31-17 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/495694 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bu

[Bug 495694] Re: kacpid uses 100% of CPU. Kernel is 2.6.31-17

2009-12-20 Thread maxadamo
sometime, rarely, it still happens, and I have to reboot the machine. -- kacpid uses 100% of CPU. Kernel is 2.6.31-17 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/495694 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubu

[Bug 495694] Re: kacpid uses 100% of CPU. Kernel is 2.6.31-17

2009-12-11 Thread maxadamo
I have just removed the service "acpi-support" and now it seems to be fixed. --> update-rc.d -f acpi-support remove I suppose the bug is on such script, because on my laptop works properly, but on the desktop causes this problem. -- kacpid uses 100% of CPU. Kernel is 2.6.31-17 https://bugs.launc

[Bug 495694] Re: kacpid uses 100% of CPU. Kernel is 2.6.31-17

2009-12-11 Thread maxadamo
Of course, booting with acpi=off fix this problem. But it creates many other problems: cannot run compiz, console framebuffer doesn't work, X server becomes pretty slow. -- kacpid uses 100% of CPU. Kernel is 2.6.31-17 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/495694 You received this bug notification beca

[Bug 495694] Re: kacpid uses 100% of CPU. Kernel is 2.6.31-17

2009-12-11 Thread maxadamo
** Attachment added: "version.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36705167/version.log -- kacpid uses 100% of CPU. Kernel is 2.6.31-17 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/495694 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-b

[Bug 495694] Re: kacpid uses 100% of CPU. Kernel is 2.6.31-17

2009-12-11 Thread maxadamo
** Attachment added: "lspci-vnvn.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36705162/lspci-vnvn.log -- kacpid uses 100% of CPU. Kernel is 2.6.31-17 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/495694 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ub

[Bug 495694] Re: kacpid uses 100% of CPU. Kernel is 2.6.31-17

2009-12-11 Thread maxadamo
** Attachment added: "uname-a.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36705175/uname-a.log -- kacpid uses 100% of CPU. Kernel is 2.6.31-17 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/495694 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-b

  1   2   >