[Bug 1549762] Re: Source package autodock-vina does not build in Ubuntu 15.10

2016-02-25 Thread mirix
Sorry, this was a problem with my particular setup and not a general bug. I had installed an older version of Boost. Removing that version fixes the problem. ** Changed in: autodock-vina (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1549762] [NEW] Source package autodock-vina does not build in Ubuntu 15.10

2016-02-25 Thread mirix
Public bug reported: In Ubuntu 14.04 one could build the source package autodock-vina by following these instructions: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UpdatingADeb In Ubuntu 15.10 he compilation fails with the following errors: $ debuild -us -uc -i -I  dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -D -us -uc

[Bug 576808] Re: Blank screen at start of LiveCD install Mint 9 RC

2010-06-02 Thread mirix
I have been unable to install Linux Mint 9 64-bit (final release) from either de LiveCD or the LiveDVD edition. First, I had the problem with the monitor being put to sleep. Replacing the boot option splash with nomodeset prevents the monitor from sleeping and I can see several error messages. It

[Bug 576808] Re: Blank screen at start of LiveCD install Mint 9 RC

2010-06-02 Thread mirix
UPDATE: After waiting for a very long while (maybe half an hour) just with the nomodeset option instead of splash, the monitor started to display weird things. Then, after a few minutes of showing weird stuff, finally the desktop came up and installation was possible. After installation, the

[Bug 576808] Re: Blank screen at start of LiveCD install Mint 9 RC

2010-06-02 Thread mirix
OK, left shift works to access to the GRUB menu. I think everything is working now. Yet, this is not what I would call user-friendly installation. -- Blank screen at start of LiveCD install Mint 9 RC https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576808 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 576808] Re: Blank screen at start of LiveCD install Mint 9 RC

2010-06-02 Thread mirix
UPDATE2: No, the system hangs again during booting. I will try Ubuntu. -- Blank screen at start of LiveCD install Mint 9 RC https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576808 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 534047] Re: Flickering when wathcing videos with Nvidia drivers in Lucid

2010-03-09 Thread mirix
I have just installed Debian testing (2.6.32-trunk-amd64 SMP) with XFCE4 and all the issues are fixed: 1) No more video or audio flickering. 2) nvidia-settings reports the correct power source, either battery or AC power. 3) Performance levels are adjusted as required, from 0 to 3, by

[Bug 534047] Re: Flickering when wathcing videos with Nvidia drivers in Lucid

2010-03-08 Thread mirix
I guess this is not related, but, just in case, I would like to add that nvidia settings always reports the laptop as being on battery even if on AC power and even if the battery is absent. -- Flickering when wathcing videos with Nvidia drivers in Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/534047 You

[Bug 534047] Re: Flickering when wathcing videos with Nvidia drivers in Lucid

2010-03-08 Thread mirix
Reverting to the nv driver worsens the problem. -- Flickering when wathcing videos with Nvidia drivers in Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/534047 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 534047] Re: Flickering when wathcing videos with Nvidia drivers in Lucid

2010-03-08 Thread mirix
This appears to be a 64-bit specific issue. -- Flickering when wathcing videos with Nvidia drivers in Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/534047 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 534047] [NEW] Flickering when wathcing videos with Nvidia drivers in Lucid

2010-03-07 Thread mirix
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xorg I am testing Lucid alpha 3. Fully upgraded. Since I installed the Nvidia proprietary drivers I observe a slight flickering when watching videos. The flickering occurs at irregular intervals (from a few seconds to several minutes) and only last one

[Bug 534047] Re: Flickering when wathcing videos with Nvidia drivers in Lucid

2010-03-07 Thread mirix
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40448954/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40448955/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40448956/Dependencies.txt **

[Bug 519123] Re: Cannot boot 64-bit Karmic Live CDs

2010-03-01 Thread mirix
This also affects my laptop. The bug also happens installing from a USB pen-drive. The workaround is removing the splash -- boot option and maybe adding the vga mode vga=xxx which corresponds to your monitor (see Linux video mode numbers in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VESA_BIOS_Extensions).

[Bug 519123] Re: Cannot boot 64-bit Karmic Live CDs

2010-03-01 Thread mirix
I tried Kubuntu 10.04 Alpha 3 and it works for me replacing splash -- with vga=789. I have a black screen for some minutes but finally the KDE splash screen shows up. I am sorry that this does not work for you, but it can be useful for others. Your problem appears to be more serious because you

[Bug 430759] [NEW] Karmic Alternate CD amd64 fails to install asking to change CD

2009-09-16 Thread mirix
Public bug reported: This bug affects Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala AMD64 Alternate CD Alpha 4, Alpha 5 and daily builds 16/09/2009. After completing more than 70 % of the installation of the base system, the installer requests the insertion of the installation CD. However, the same installation CD

[Bug 346691] Re: 2.6.28-11 causes massive data corruption on 64 bit installations

2009-08-17 Thread mirix
The bug is fixed in Karmic Koala alpha 4 (kernel 2.26.31 RC5) and the 2.6.30 familiy is also bug-free to this respect. Paradoxically, Koala seems faster and less bloated than Jackalope ;-) -- 2.6.28-11 causes massive data corruption on 64 bit installations https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346691

[Bug 346691] Re: 2.6.28-11 causes massive data corruption on 64 bit installations

2009-06-20 Thread mirix
A new kernel, 2.26.28-13 is available from the update repositories. Now I guess that when someone installs Ubuntu from the CD image, the kernel will be updated from 2.26.28-9 (which is known to be free from this bug) to 2.26.28-13 (which I hope will be bug-free as well). So, practically speaking,

[Bug 346691] Re: 2.6.28-11 causes massive data corruption on 64 bit installations

2009-06-14 Thread mirix
I cannot believe this bug is still open. To all the people doing hardware diagnostics: This is not a hardware issue. As far as I can tell, it affects exclusively to the Unbuntu kernel 2.6.28-11. Any other kernel/distro I have tried (older or newer) works perfectly. I am running 2.6.30 from

[Bug 346691] Re: jaunty kernel 2.6.28-11 kernel update renders the system un-usable.

2009-04-28 Thread mirix
I agree that it is not acceptable to release a so called stable version being aware of such a serious bug. Fuchur: I have compiled kernel 2.6.29.1 (2.6.29.2 is already available but I have not tested it) a few weeks ago and I have not had any issues since then. You can download precompiled

[Bug 346691] Re: jaunty kernel 2.6.28-11 kernel update renders the system un-usable.

2009-04-07 Thread mirix
@god-mok: when you install a beta version you take some risks. as far as I know, the problem only happens when you upgrade the kernel. so if you stick to the kernel provided by the installation CD (2.6.28-9) until the problem is solved, you should be safe. I guess this is a problem specific to

[Bug 346691] Re: jaunty kernel 2.6.28-11 kernel update renders the system un-usable.

2009-04-06 Thread mirix
Installing 9.04 beta (AMD) via the Live CD and then compiling the kernel to 2.6.29.1 (before doing any other update via Aptitude/Synaptic) renders a very stable and performant system. -- jaunty kernel 2.6.28-11 kernel update renders the system un-usable. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346691

[Bug 350593] Re: ext3 and ext4 : file system corrupted and system unbootable

2009-03-29 Thread mirix
Hi Jon, Thanks for your quick answer. The minor problems were bugs previously reported (application crashes, true or false, etc.). The problem is reproduced also with ext3. I have updated the description. No I have never had media issues with this laptop. I was running Ubuntu Studio 8.10 until

[Bug 350593] [NEW] ext4 : file system corrupted and system unbootable

2009-03-28 Thread mirix
Public bug reported: I have installed the first beta version of Ubuntu 9.04 codenamed Jaunty Jackalope (AMD64). First I tried ext4 with a customized partition scheme. When installing packages from Synaptic, the system starts to behave erratically. The last thing I have the time to read, before

[Bug 350593] Re: ext4 : file system corrupted and system unbootable

2009-03-28 Thread mirix
** Attachment added: lshw.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24465481/lshw.log -- ext4 : file system corrupted and system unbootable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350593 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 322490] [NEW] package pulseaudio 0.9.10-2ubuntu9.3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2009-01-28 Thread mirix
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: pulseaudio during an automatic update of Ubuntu 8.10 64 bits I have received this error message: package pulseaudio 0.9.10-2ubuntu9.3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 this is all I know

[Bug 322490] Re: package pulseaudio 0.9.10-2ubuntu9.3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2009-01-28 Thread mirix
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21729448/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21729449/DpkgTerminalLog.gz -- package pulseaudio 0.9.10-2ubuntu9.3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation

Re: [Bug 160084] Re: Installing RESTRICTED DRIVERS (bcm43xx-fwcutter) makes my system instable

2008-11-12 Thread mirix
No, I think the problem is solved with the 2.6.27 kernel. In any case, I think that bcm43xx-fwcutter is an outdated package. On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:36 AM, Daniel T Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is this symptom still reproducible in 8.10? ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename:

[Bug 202921] [NEW] Broadcim Wireless card BCM4318 crashes with restricted drivers

2008-03-16 Thread mirix
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-restricted-modules I have an HP Pavilion dv5000 and a ASUS A6Tc. Both have the same wireless card: Broadcom Corporation BCM4318 [AirForce One 54g] 802.11g Wireless LAN Controller (rev 02) Using restricted drivers in Unbuntu, Debian and other

[Bug 160084] Installing RESTRICTED DRIVERS (bcm43xx-fwcutter) makes my system instable

2007-11-04 Thread mirix
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: bcm43xx-fwcutter The newer versions of UBUNTU and DEBIAN allow to automatically download and install firmware for several wireless cards using the (unmantained?) package bcm43xx-fwcutter (instead of nsdiswrapper). Unsing this firmware causes my laptop