[Bug 280169] [NEW] partitioner fails to find previous instalation

2008-10-08 Thread mlindeblom
Public bug reported: Ubuntu 8.10 beta Compaq NC8430 60.0GB ATA Fujitsu MHW2060B Intel T2400 1.83GHz 1.0GB ram Partitioner tries to use entire disk in guided or manual mode. The disk has Ubuntu 7.10 and Windows XP. Installation canceled at this point. ** Affects: partitioner (Ubuntu) Import

[Bug 280478] [NEW] upgrade hangs after ldconfig deferred processing

2008-10-08 Thread mlindeblom
Public bug reported: Ubuntu 8.10 beta AMD64 5000+ R790 (HD3200) 1 GB ram Update manager states Partial Upgrade available Distrubtion Upgrade runs until cleanup stage Partial upgrade hangs after ldconfig deferred processing Shutdown machine. Restart. Again Update manager states Partial Upgrade a

[Bug 280478] Re: upgrade hangs after ldconfig deferred processing

2008-10-08 Thread mlindeblom
** Attachment added: "apt.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18352409/apt.log -- upgrade hangs after ldconfig deferred processing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/280478 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 993758] Re: hardware errors every 300s

2013-02-17 Thread mlindeblom
I replaced CPU only to find problem still existed. A BIOS upgrade fixed the problem for me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993758 Title: hardware errors every 300s To manage notifica

[Bug 993758] Re: hardware errors every 300s

2013-02-10 Thread mlindeblom
I just upgraded from 12.10 to 13.04. I now have the error messages in dmesg described here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993758 Title: hardware errors every 300s To manage notifica

[Bug 993758] Re: hardware errors every 300s

2013-02-10 Thread mlindeblom
[ 3297.587238] [Hardware Error]:MC2_ADDR: 0x0001d31aa180 [ 3297.588899] [Hardware Error]: Bus Unit Error: EV error during data copyback. [ 3297.590563] [Hardware Error]: cache level: L2, tx: GEN, mem-tx: EV -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 993758] Re: hardware errors every 300s

2013-02-10 Thread mlindeblom
I just upgraded from 12.10 to 13.04. I now get this error message in dmesg: [ 3297.587238] [Hardware Error]:MC2_ADDR: 0x0001d31aa180 [ 3297.588899] [Hardware Error]: Bus Unit Error: EV error during data copyback. [ 3297.590563] [Hardware Error]: cache level: L2, tx: GEN, mem-tx: EV --

[Bug 993758] Re: hardware errors every 300s

2013-02-10 Thread mlindeblom
I have 2 disks on the same machine with 13.04. The one that is a 1T hard drive has no problems. The one on a 12o GB SSD produces the results listed in previous comment. This drive has discard added in fstab. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 829586] [NEW] package flashplugin-installer 10.3.183.4ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-08-19 Thread mlindeblom
Public bug reported: Performing partial upgrade ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: flashplugin-installer 10.3.183.4ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-8.11-generic 3.0.1 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-8-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Aug 19 05:40:27 2011 ErrorMessa

[Bug 829586] Re: package flashplugin-installer 10.3.183.4ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-08-19 Thread mlindeblom
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829586 Title: package flashplugin-installer 10.3.183.4ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script

[Bug 829870] [NEW] package flashplugin-installer 10.3.183.4ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-08-19 Thread mlindeblom
Public bug reported: doing upgrade ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: flashplugin-installer 10.3.183.4ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-8.11-generic 3.0.1 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-8-generic x86_64 AptOrdering: flashplugin-installer: Configure Architecture: amd64 Date: Fr

[Bug 829870] Re: package flashplugin-installer 10.3.183.4ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-08-19 Thread mlindeblom
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829870 Title: package flashplugin-installer 10.3.183.4ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error

[Bug 762968] Re: package flashplugin-installer 10.2.159.1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-08-20 Thread mlindeblom
I switched to the 64 bit beta package -> works well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/762968 Title: package flashplugin-installer 10.2.159.1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subproce

[Bug 656602] [NEW] update-manager does not reports update time since install

2010-10-07 Thread mlindeblom
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager I installed a fresh rebuild 7 dates ago. Update manger even thought updated almost daily reports "The package information was updated 7 days ago" i.e. the date when I installed Ubuntu 10.10 from a daily build. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelea

[Bug 656602] Re: update-manager does not reports update time since install

2010-10-07 Thread mlindeblom
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656602/+attachment/1678095/+files/Dependencies.txt -- update-manager does not reports update time since install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656602 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 656602] Re: update-manager does not reports update time since install

2010-10-07 Thread mlindeblom
As per the attached screenshot. I have been updating daily. The package information was last updated would normally say less than one hour. I am getting time since fresh install. I expect tomorrow it will say 8 days right after I press "check" and install what ever updates that are available.

[Bug 656602] Re: update-manager does not reports update time since install

2010-10-08 Thread mlindeblom
Checked for updates, installed ia32 libs. It now states 8 days -- update-manager does not reports update time since install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656602 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing l

[Bug 656602] Re: update-manager does not reports update time since install

2010-10-08 Thread mlindeblom
Did sudo apt-get update system fetched files Did sudo apt-get upgrade system reported no upgrades available Ran update manager --- still at 8 days and annoying menu bar icon. -- update-manager does not reports update time since install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656602 You received this bu

[Bug 656602] Re: update-manager does not reports update time since install

2010-10-08 Thread mlindeblom
Sorry, forgot to add this error message: Fetched 12.7MB in 49s (257kB/s) Reading package lists... Done W: A error occurred during the signature verification. The repository is not

[Bug 656602] Re: update-manager does not reports update time since install

2010-10-09 Thread mlindeblom
Done. Problem Solved. Thank You. -- update-manager does not reports update time since install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656602 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.

[Bug 546530] [NEW] Second display is black with fglrx on Lucid

2010-03-24 Thread mlindeblom
Public bug reported: HD5750 Linux Lucid 2.6.32-17-generic #26-Ubuntu SMP Sat Mar 20 02:23:45 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux Second screen is black most of the time. All functions work on main screen. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Mar 24 19:06:04 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 DkmsS

[Bug 546530] Re: Second display is black with fglrx on Lucid

2010-03-24 Thread mlindeblom
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41890122/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41890123/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41890124/Dependencies.txt ** A

[Bug 816166] Re: sol crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_icon_set_render_icon_pixbuf()

2011-08-02 Thread mlindeblom
Dmesg between crashes on my AMD64 ubuntu 11.10 machine [113237.828772] sol[14555]: segfault at 3 ip 7f47fbac92c3 sp 7fff3fcc64c0 error 4 in libunico.so[7f47fbac+b000] [113413.950075] [Hardware Error]: MC0_STATUS[Over|CE|-|-|AddrV|CECC]: 0xd40040004136 [113413.950089] [Hardware Er

[Bug 561982] [NEW] Unusable Area on main screen in 2 screen setup

2010-04-12 Thread mlindeblom
Public bug reported: Catalyst Control Center appears to have now way of putting screen on left side. Using "xrandr --output CRT2 --left-of DFP4" on my HD5750 creates unusable area as shown in screen capture. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: fglrx 2:8.723.1-0ubuntu1 ProcVersi

[Bug 561982] Re: Unusable Area on main screen in 2 screen setup

2010-04-12 Thread mlindeblom
** Attachment added: "Screen shot of problem." http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43986988/Screenshot.png ** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43986432/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43986433/CurrentDmesg.txt

[Bug 561982] Re: Unusable Area on main screen in 2 screen setup

2010-04-13 Thread mlindeblom
Problem 1. Catalyst Control Center lists the smaller screen as being on the right side of the main screen. The screenshot.png show the second screen on the left side of the main screen. Problem 2. The dead spot is the blob in the lower right side of the main screen. As Felix pointed out it is j

[Bug 561982] Re: Unusable Area on main screen in 2 screen setup

2010-04-13 Thread mlindeblom
Blender 2.5 with 2 screen operational ** Attachment added: "Blender with 2 screens" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44096588/Screenshot-1.png -- Unusable Area on main screen in 2 screen setup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561982 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 561982] Re: Unusable Area on main screen in 2 screen setup

2010-04-13 Thread mlindeblom
Blender 2.5 with second screen disabled. Compiz is useless with second screen enabled as well. ** Attachment added: "Blender with second screen disabled" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44096684/Screenshot-2.png -- Unusable Area on main screen in 2 screen setup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs

[Bug 554023] Re: gdm fails to start

2010-04-06 Thread mlindeblom
I have an ATI HD5750. My current working system failed the first reboot after yesterdays update. The current Xorg.0.log is 0 bytes in size, thus I attached Xorg.0.log.old. Lucid 10.04 2.6.32.19 appears on grub. I was able to boot using recovery mode. Update/upgrade to not resolve issue. As

[Bug 554023] Re: gdm fails to start

2010-04-06 Thread mlindeblom
Since last update to working system was linux-kernel. Reinstalling fglrx resolved the problem to the previously working system. I do not have a second system to ssh into one of my fresh installs from daily build. The installation fails before I enter any of the install information so files are i

[Bug 554023] Re: gdm fails to start

2010-04-08 Thread mlindeblom
3 This bug was re-classified as an intel bug from a generic gdm issue. -- gdm fails to start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554023 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.

[Bug 561982] Re: Unusable Area on main screen in 2 screen setup

2010-04-14 Thread mlindeblom
Felix, all your statements are correct. "xrandr --output CRT2 --left-of DFP4" used after login to get screen on left side. I can not find place in amdcccle to do this move. The HD5750 is a PowerColor AX5750 1GBD5-S3DH s/n:PG0911022829. The main LCD is a Benq m2400hd connected by DVI cable to top

[Bug 561982] Re: Unusable Area on main screen in 2 screen setup

2010-04-15 Thread mlindeblom
Using drag and drop via amdcccle to reposition screen works. Operations moving a gnome-terminal to all areas of both screens was great. Visual Effects in Appearance Preferences is set to extra. The blender 2.5 screen was randomly garbled until I disabled second screen with amdcccle. The analog

[Bug 561982] Re: Unusable Area on main screen in 2 screen setup

2010-04-15 Thread mlindeblom
If Visual Effects in Appearance Preferences is set to none, blender 2.5 works well with second monitor enabled. Visual Effects of normal or extra cause blender to garble unless second monitor is disabled. -- Unusable Area on main screen in 2 screen setup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561982 Y

[Bug 608033] [NEW] Scrambled Login Screen

2010-07-20 Thread mlindeblom
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gdm Linux maverick 2.6.35-9-generic #14-Ubuntu SMP Sun Jul 18 15:59:30 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux Today's update after reboot could not be logged into do to unreadable gdm screen. Using alternate boot and low res screen to login. dmesg [ 11.379167] fb

[Bug 608033] Re: Scrambled Login Screen

2010-07-20 Thread mlindeblom
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52240214/Dependencies.txt -- Scrambled Login Screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/608033 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 554023] Re: gdm fails to start

2010-04-03 Thread mlindeblom
I have had problems using daily build from March 29, 31, April 1 and 2. Initial "Ubuntu" screen with 5 dots works fine then blank screen. I have an ATI HD5750. Previous daily builds from March 8, 15 and 22 worked. -- gdm fails to start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554023 You received this bu

[Bug 499707] [NEW] libwxbase2.8-dev fails to install

2009-12-22 Thread mlindeblom
Public bug reported: libwxbase2.8-dev: Depends: wx2.8-headers (=2.8.10.1-0ubuntu1) but it is not installable m...@murlin:~$ uname -a Linux murlin 2.6.31-16-generic #53-Ubuntu SMP Tue Dec 8 04:02:15 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux ** Affects: wxwidgets2.8 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Bug 377631] [NEW] putty installation via synaptic fails

2009-05-17 Thread mlindeblom
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: putty putty: Depends: libgtk1.2 (>=1.2.10-4) but it is not installable ~$ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu karmic (development branch) Release:9.10 ~$ apt-cache policy putty putty: Installed: (none) Candidate: 0.60-4 Version table:

[Bug 378922] [NEW] partitioner choice does not allow EXT4 partitions

2009-05-20 Thread mlindeblom
Public bug reported: The specific partitioner choice "use entire disk with LVM" does not allow partitions to be modified. Use entire disk without LVM works fine. ** Affects: partitioner (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- partitioner choice does not allow EXT4 partition

[Bug 374010] Re: snd_pcm_delay() returned a value that is exceptionally large:

2009-06-05 Thread mlindeblom
I am running 2.6.30-7-generic #8-Ubuntu SMP Mon May 25 13:52:54 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux After rebooting, I unmute and adjust the volume level to max and still get no audio. Issung "pkill pulseaudio; sleep 2; pulseaudio" give me a working audio for mplayer, vlc and rhythmbox. Alsa output applic

[Bug 374010] Re: snd_pcm_delay() returned a value that is exceptionally large:

2009-06-05 Thread mlindeblom
Confirmed 2.6.30-8-generic #9-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jun 3 15:38:38 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux appears to solve this bug. -- snd_pcm_delay() returned a value that is exceptionally large: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374010 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, whic

[Bug 330828] [NEW] virt-manager: Depends: python-virtinst (>=0.400.1) but 0.400.0-6ubuntu1 is to be installed

2009-02-17 Thread mlindeblom
Public bug reported: Have python-virtinst 0.400.0 is latest version in snaptic installer Jaunty Alpha 4 ** Affects: virt-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- virt-manager: Depends: python-virtinst (>=0.400.1) but 0.400.0-6ubuntu1 is to be installed https://bugs

Re: [Bug 312924] Re: HD3450 configuration fails on reboot in jaunty

2009-01-07 Thread mlindeblom
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 311748 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311748 Have switched from radeonhd to today's radeon and put memory back to 4GB. Single screen works fine. xrandr does not see alternate outputs. There is also a warning that R600 code is experimental. The HD3450

[Bug 311748] Re: [HD3470 + HD3200] Dual cards prevents X from starting / black screen

2009-01-08 Thread mlindeblom
I have success with the current radeon driver in jaunty alpha 2 provided I manually add BusID and the HPD option to xorg.conf. I am currently using 4GB memory. m...@ubuntu2:~$ xrandr -q Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 2304 x 1024, maximum 2704 x 1050 VGA-0 connected 1024x768+0+0 (normal lef

Re: [Bug 314231] Re: Two outputs are changed with --output

2009-01-08 Thread mlindeblom
After changing Option "HPD" from "off" to "swap" in xorg.conf and switching to the radeon driver has solved the problem. Pls change status to solved. m...@ubuntu2:~$ xrandr -q Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 2304 x 1024, maximum 2704 x 1050 VGA-0 connected 1024x768+0+0 (normal left inverted

[Bug 316083] [NEW] Only one hda-intel sound card configured

2009-01-11 Thread mlindeblom
Public bug reported: Motherboard integrated ATI Technologies Inc SBx00 Azalia (Intel HDA) [1002:4383] sound is not configured. m...@ubuntu2:~$ aplay -l List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices card 0: HDMI [HDA ATI HDMI], device 3: ATI HDMI [ATI HDMI] Subdevices: 1/1 Subdevice #0: subdevic

[Bug 316083] Re: Only one hda-intel sound card configured

2009-01-11 Thread mlindeblom
** Attachment added: "dmesg" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21102966/dmesg -- Only one hda-intel sound card configured https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316083 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 316083] Re: Only one hda-intel sound card configured

2009-01-13 Thread mlindeblom
alsa-info results http://www.alsa-project.org/db/?f=8516b4f44cc6dc93323d72a0479efdb92e1ee602 -- Only one hda-intel sound card configured https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316083 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bu

Re: [Bug 311748] Re: [HD3470 + HD3200] Dual cards prevents X from starting / black screen

2009-01-30 Thread mlindeblom
Using days update of Jaunty Alpha 3, I commented out Driver, BusID & Option HPD "off from /etc/X11/xorg.conf, then rebooted. Radeon driver loaded and 2nd monitor not seen m...@ubuntu2:~$ xrandr Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1152 x 864, maximum 2704 x 1050 VGA-0 connected 1152x864+0+0 (norm

[Bug 311748] Re: [HD3470 + HD3200] Dual cards prevents X from starting / black screen

2009-01-17 Thread mlindeblom
I just installed a fresh copy of Jaunty Alpha 3 using ext4. All install attempts stopped with "PANIC:early exception ... " until I removed the HD3450. After getting the system built from scratch without the HD3450, I re- installed the HD3450 and my previous xorg.conf. System works OK as before.

Re: [Bug 311748] Re: [HD3470 + HD3200] Dual cards prevents X from starting / black screen

2009-01-18 Thread mlindeblom
> mlindeblom: > Could you install the radeonhd driver and try to use that one? Does this > work, too? > Thanks! > m...@ubuntu2:~$ uname -a Linux ubuntu2 2.6.28-4-generic #11-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jan 16 21:50:52 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux m...@ubuntu2:~$ xrandr --output DVI-I_2/an

Re: [Bug 311748] Re: [HD3470 + HD3200] Dual cards prevents X from

2009-01-18 Thread mlindeblom
X from > starting / black screen > > mlindeblom: > Thanks for the testing. So radeonhd works with two cards (And the card, which should be used set manually by pci id). > I saw in your xorg.conf, that you used the option "HPD" "off". Is this necessary?

Re: [Bug 311748] Re: [HD3470 + HD3200] Dual cards prevents X from starting / black screen

2009-02-05 Thread mlindeblom
Just did fresh install using Jaunty Alpha 4 using ext4. It tried to use 1152x864 on my 1024x768 screen. I went back to live cd mode and reduced resolution. Every thing went fine from there. First boot was in 1152x864 using radeon. Edited xorg.conf to get virtual size up for second screen. m

Re: [Bug 330828] Re: virt-manager: Depends: python-virtinst (>=0.400.1) but 0.400.0-6ubuntu1 is to be installed

2009-02-18 Thread mlindeblom
Yes, I had the most recent update. I ran update again and I not get bug 330983. > > From: Andreas Olsson > Date: 2009/02/18 Wed AM 09:06:05 CST > To: linde...@mts.net > Subject: [Bug 330828] Re: virt-manager: Depends: python-virtinst (>=0.400.1) > but 0.400.0-6ubuntu1 is to be installed >

Re: [Bug 330828] Re: virt-manager: Depends: python-virtinst (>=0.400.1) but 0.400.0-6ubuntu1 is to be installed

2009-02-18 Thread mlindeblom
It took about 3 update cycles to finally clear all updates. After that I was able to use synaptic installer virt-manger without errors. Please close bug. > > From: Andreas Olsson > Date: 2009/02/18 Wed AM 09:06:05 CST > To: linde...@mts.net > Subject: [Bug 330828] Re: virt-manager: Depends: pytho

[Bug 312924] [NEW] HD3450 configuration fails on reboot in jaunty

2009-01-01 Thread mlindeblom
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xserver-xorg Installed onto fresh formatted disk using jaunty alpha 2. Updated install with sudo apt-get update. The only successful boot I can get is by manually adding driver "vesa" to device section in /etc/X11/xorg.conf ** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu)

[Bug 312924] Re: HD3450 configuration fails on reboot in jaunty

2009-01-01 Thread mlindeblom
** Attachment added: "Auto config xorg.conf" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20845023/xorg.conf.0 -- HD3450 configuration fails on reboot in jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/312924 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 312924] Re: HD3450 configuration fails on reboot in jaunty

2009-01-01 Thread mlindeblom
** Attachment added: "resent Xorg.0.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20845040/Xorg.0.log -- HD3450 configuration fails on reboot in jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/312924 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- u

[Bug 312924] Re: HD3450 configuration fails on reboot in jaunty

2009-01-01 Thread mlindeblom
** Attachment added: "lspci -vvnn results" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20845058/lspci-vvnn -- HD3450 configuration fails on reboot in jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/312924 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 312924] Re: HD3450 configuration fails on reboot in jaunty

2009-01-01 Thread mlindeblom
The Xorg.conf was indentical to one attached above. This was done with original alpha2 install. ** Attachment added: "Original Xorg.0.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20845810/Xorg.0.log.old -- HD3450 configuration fails on reboot in jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/312924 You receive

Re: [Bug 312924] Re: HD3450 configuration fails on reboot in jaunty

2009-01-01 Thread mlindeblom
> 01:05.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: ATI Technologies Inc RS690 [Radeon X1200 Series] [1002:791e] > 02:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: ATI Technologies Inc Mobility Radeon HD 3450 [1002:95c5] > Seems you have two graphic cards, maybe that confuses the driver? Testing I did with th

Re: [Bug 312924] Re: HD3450 configuration fails on reboot in jaunty

2009-01-02 Thread mlindeblom
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 311748 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311748 >What happens if you try to use the driver "radeonhd" I have two similar systems. On the one with the integrated RS690 that I can not disable --- fails with radeonhd. On the one with a RS780G which I can di

Re: [Bug 312924] Re: HD3450 configuration fails on reboot in jaunty

2009-01-03 Thread mlindeblom
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 311748 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311748 By specifying BusID I am able to turn 780G back on. Will test on my 690G motherboard soon. Still working on dual monitor setup. > > From: goto > Date: 2009/01/01 Thu PM 02:52:28 CST > To: linde...@mts.net

[Bug 314231] [NEW] Two outputs are changed with --output

2009-01-05 Thread mlindeblom
Public bug reported: When I set the output to modes listed it may not work or set two outputs instead of one. radeonhd 1.24, jaunty alpha2 updated, Sapphire PI-AM2RS690MHD, 2GB, HD3450 m...@ubuntu2:~$ xrandr -q Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 2048 x 768, maximum 2704 x 1050 VGA_1 connected

[Bug 314231] Re: Two outputs are changed with --output

2009-01-05 Thread mlindeblom
** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20933044/Xorg.0.log -- Two outputs are changed with --output https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314231 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs maili

Re: [Bug 280478] Re: upgrade hangs after ldconfig deferred processing

2008-11-01 Thread mlindeblom
I have not experienced this bug sine about two days after I reported it. I assume one of the numerous upgrades fixed this problem. Thanks looking into this bug - Murray > > From: Marlon Cisternas Milla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2008/11/01 Sat AM 11:39:49 CDT > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject:

[Bug 521824] [NEW] xorg-driver-fglrx fails to install due to dependancies

2010-02-14 Thread mlindeblom
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xorg System is fresh install from lucid amd64 daily build 2010/02/14. synaptic install error message: Depends: xserver-xorg-core but is not going to be installed. Recommends: fglrx-amd-amdcccle but is not going to be installed. ProblemType: Bug Architec

[Bug 521824] Re: xorg-driver-fglrx fails to install due to dependancies

2010-02-14 Thread mlindeblom
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39191972/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39191974/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39191975/Dependencies.txt ** A

[Bug 415660] Re: clive 1.0.2 no longer works on youtube urls

2009-09-02 Thread mlindeblom
This problem was tested on Jaunty 2.6.28-15-generic #49-Ubuntu SMP Tue Aug 18 19:25:34 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux -- clive 1.0.2 no longer works on youtube urls https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415660 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 415660] Re: clive 1.0.2 no longer works on youtube urls

2009-09-02 Thread mlindeblom
Tested backport. It solved the problem. -- clive 1.0.2 no longer works on youtube urls https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415660 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https

[Bug 424511] Re: [karmic] gnome-panel and window manager do not start on login

2009-09-04 Thread mlindeblom
running gnome-session sends me back to gdm for another login. running gnome-panel in terminal session (i.e. no &) gives me limits functionality. ** Attachment added: "dump" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31331229/dump -- [karmic] gnome-panel and window manager do not start on login https://bu

[Bug 424511] Re: gnome-panel and window manager do not start on login

2009-09-13 Thread mlindeblom
I have done a number of rebuilds from scratch and end up with the same results --- sent back to login screen if GNOME selected. Get limited use with gnome-panel. gnome-session sends me back to login screen. compiz also sends me back to the login screen. I am using an AMD 3800+ with a HD3450 vi

[Bug 424511] Re: gnome-panel and window manager do not start on login

2009-09-13 Thread mlindeblom
Did a rebuild using Alpha5. Installed xorg.conf file with Option "DRI" "off". Updated to current code. Success! All works now. -- gnome-panel and window manager do not start on login https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424511 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bug

[Bug 421245] Re: bzflag triggers a bug in Radeon graphics driver

2009-09-26 Thread mlindeblom
m...@karmic:~$ glxgears drmRadeonCmdBuffer: -22. Kernel failed to parse or rejected command stream. See dmesg for more info. m...@karmic:~$ sh b.sh (script to run blender 2.49b) Compiled with Python version 2.6.2. Checking for installed Python... got it! drmRadeonCmdBuffer: -22. Kernel failed to p

[Bug 421245] Re: bzflag triggers a bug in Radeon graphics driver

2009-09-26 Thread mlindeblom
apport-collect 421245 was run successfully -- bzflag triggers a bug in Radeon graphics driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/421245 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.co

Re: [Bug 394371] Re: boot failure after 2.6.31 kernel upgrade

2009-07-15 Thread mlindeblom
Yes, I have an ati graphics card. This problem was solved by a later daily build of karmic. > > From: Andy Whitcroft > Date: 2009/07/15 Wed AM 05:46:53 CDT > To: linde...@mts.net > Subject: [Bug 394371] Re: boot failure after 2.6.31 kernel upgrade > > I note that you have an ATI graphics contr

Re: Re: [Bug 394371] Re: boot failure after 2.6.31 kernel upgrade

2009-07-07 Thread mlindeblom
Using daily build 7-July-2009 to rebuild from scratch solves the problem. > > From: mlindeblom > Date: 2009/07/07 Tue AM 06:27:13 CDT > To: linde...@mts.net > Subject: Re: [Bug 394371] Re: boot failure after 2.6.31 kernel upgrade > > The next few updates resulted in a to

[Bug 398479] [NEW] unable to burn cdrom

2009-07-12 Thread mlindeblom
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 397906 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397906 Public bug reported: When I insert a blank disk in response to brasero disk burner request "Please insert a recordable CD or DVD.", the request is not responded to. The desktop image Blank CD-R Disc appears

[Bug 398484] Re: package classpath-common (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man1/gappletviewer.1.gz', which is also in package gcj-jdk

2009-07-12 Thread mlindeblom
** Attachment added: "AptOrdering.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28939661/AptOrdering.txt ** Attachment added: "Dmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28939662/Dmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "DpkgTerminalLog.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28939663/DpkgTerminalLog.txt -- pack

[Bug 398484] [NEW] package classpath-common (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man1/gappletviewer.1.gz', which is also in package gcj-jdk

2009-07-12 Thread mlindeblom
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: classpath I was in the process of installing jikes & jikes-classpath ProblemType: Package Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Jul 12 12:19:55 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ErrorMessage: trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man1/gappletviewer.1.gz', which is

Re: [Bug 397906] Re: blank cd-r not detected [Karmic]

2009-07-13 Thread mlindeblom
The new kernel allows disk write; however: this error log results: Checking session consistency (brasero_burn_check_session_consistency brasero-burn.c:1932) BraseroBurnURI called brasero_job_get_action BraseroBurnURI called brasero_job_get_action BraseroBurnURI called brasero_job_set_output_size_

[Bug 405902] Re: NetworkManager fails to connect at login; needs restart

2009-08-04 Thread mlindeblom
I had the same problem as described in bug 408773 today. sudo /etc/init.d/apparmor stop sudo dhclient eth0 fixed the problem. -- NetworkManager fails to connect at login; needs restart https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405902 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu B

[Bug 394371] Re: boot failure after 2.6.31 kernel upgrade

2009-07-01 Thread mlindeblom
** Attachment added: "GDM log for 2.6.31 boot failure" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28601660/%3A0.log.2 -- boot failure after 2.6.31 kernel upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/394371 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu

[Bug 394371] [NEW] boot failure after 2.6.31 kernel upgrade

2009-07-01 Thread mlindeblom
Public bug reported: Boot hangs at GDM banner after 2.6.31 kernel upgrade. Using 2.6.30.10 works fine. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Jul 1 11:11:02 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=16c70311-167c-4253-a795-ae663b08816c MachineType: Unknow Unknow Pack

[Bug 394371] Re: boot failure after 2.6.31 kernel upgrade

2009-07-01 Thread mlindeblom
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28601609/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28601610/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28601611/Dependencies.txt ** A

Re: [Bug 394371] Re: boot failure after 2.6.31 kernel upgrade

2009-07-07 Thread mlindeblom
The next few updates resulted in a totally unusable system. I tried using the daily build from 3-Jul-09 to rebuild from scratch; however: it resulted in a blank screen. I will try the next few daily builds. I am using an ATI HD3450 graphic card and a AMD 3800+ cpu. > > From: Andy Whitcroft > D

[Bug 399995] Re: [karmic] Gedit crashes when saving over sftp

2009-07-21 Thread mlindeblom
Linux karmic 2.6.31-3-generic #19-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jul 14 16:07:02 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux When I copy a file to a new name, I can edit the copy. When I try to edit the original, gedit screen comes up and then exits immediately. -- [karmic] Gedit crashes when saving over sftp https://bugs.launc

[Bug 405902] Re: NetworkManager fails to connect at login; needs restart

2009-07-29 Thread mlindeblom
Haven't tried restarting networkmanager; however: find rebooting system works. syslog messages: Jul 29 19:25:52 karmic NetworkManager: starting... Jul 29 19:25:52 karmic NetworkManager: (eth0): new Ethernet device (driver: 'r8169') Jul 29 19:25:52 karmic NetworkManager: (eth0): exported as