[Bug 1613864] Re: Missing "juju-2"/"juju2" command.

This issue should be corrected now as of 2.1-beta5. There is a juju-2 symlink you can depend on that will point to the latest juju-2 binary on your system. ** Changed in: juju-core (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid ** Changed in: juju Status: Triaged => Invalid ** Changed in:

[Bug 1611078] Re: Support snaps inside of lxd containers

I can confirm this works on xenial after installing squashfuse. root@clean-lark:~# lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS Release:16.04 Codename: xenial root@clean-lark:~# uname -a Linux clean-lark 4.4.0-63-generic

[Bug 1630789] Re: normal users can't run snaps inside of LXD containers

Yakkety still has 1.0.43. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1630789 Title: normal users can't run snaps inside of LXD containers To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1648894] Re: [SRU] Juju 2.0.2

I have verified both xenial and yakkety functionality. In particular, I've been using this version on xenial for some time without realizing it hadn't yet been verified (I'm always running -proposed). I'll note the bash completion functionality is the same as the previous package, and doesn't

[Bug 1654116] Re: Attempts to write leadership settings when not the leader during relation-changed hooks

** Also affects: juju Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: juju Milestone: None => 2.1-rc1 ** Changed in: juju Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: juju Importance: Undecided => Critical ** Changed in: juju Assignee: (unassigned) => Menno Smits

[Bug 1269163] Re: phablet-click-test-setup should support launchpad branches

** Changed in: phablet-tools Assignee: Nicholas Skaggs (nskaggs) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1269163 Title: phablet-click-test-setup should support launch

[Bug 1091464] Re: Unable to chainload Windows 8 and 10 with Secure Boot enabled

Hello, GRUB binary doesn't have the cryptos to do the signs verification unlike shim, so the chainload process fails under Secure Boot. As Valmar said, for the OpenSUSE version of GRUB2, Michael Chang came out with a patch on 2012 that make GRUB rely on shim verification to chainload other

[Bug 1658844] Re: most recent version does not install /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources/extern and /_vendor

Has anyone figured out a way around this bug? Haven't been able to deploy since. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1658844 Title: most recent version does not install

[Bug 1360203] Re: grub-efi-amd64-signed is missing modules for GRUB_ENABLE_CRYPTODISK=y

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1565950 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1565950 All gcry modules should be included, since any user can choose a different cipher or hash and using a custom grub config file does not prevent, for example, the boot of a pendrive on a different system,

[Bug 1655730] [NEW] cannot upgrade from 14.04 to 16.04

Public bug reported: if I try to use the software updater or the terminal to upgrade, I get this message: Could not calculate the upgrade An unresolvable problem occurred while calculating the upgrade. This can be caused by: * Upgrading to a pre-release version of Ubuntu * Running the

[Bug 1496542] Re: Running processes left after disabling screen reader

I have the same problem as Travis. Never used the screen reader, then this suddenly spawned four instances and started spouting gibberish. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1496542 Title:

[Bug 1646913] Re: [SRU] Juju 1.25.8

** Description changed: - Juju 1.25.8 is a stable update containing critical bug fixes, for backup - restore, charm metrics, and mac os sierra for the 1.25 series. + Juju 1.25.8 is a stable update containing critical bug fixes including + backup restore, charm metrics, openstack security group

[Bug 1653027] [NEW] Upgrading to 12.04

Public bug reported: Upgrading from 10.04 to 12.04 using PXE boot ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: ubiquity 2.10.16 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-23.36-generic 3.2.14 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-23-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: wl ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu5

[Bug 1648894] Re: [SRU] Juju 2.0.2

** Branch linked: lp:~juju-qa/ubuntu/xenial/juju/2.0.2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648894 Title: [SRU] Juju 2.0.2 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1648894] [NEW] [SRU] Juju 2.0.2

Public bug reported: This syncs juju with the upstream releases bringing the latest bugfixes. [SRU Information] juju-core has a stable release exception, including for major version updates, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JujuUpdates. [Impact] A full list of targeted bugs can be seen against the

[Bug 1648641] [NEW] COLLATE "en_US.UTF-8" sorting takes 30x longer on newer builds

Public bug reported: (do humor my lack of full understanding of these packages). Was having issues sorting with COLLATE "en_US.UTF-8" on ubuntu 16.04, told it was related to glibc. On ubuntu 14.04 (with eglibc 2.19) I could sort a file of 2 million lines of international text (<40chars per

[Bug 1646913] Re: [SRU] Juju 1.25.8

** Branch linked: lp:~juju-qa/ubuntu/trusty/juju/juju-1.25.8 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1646913 Title: [SRU] Juju 1.25.8 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1646913] Re: [SRU] Juju 1.25.8

** Also affects: juju-core (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1646913 Title: [SRU] Juju 1.25.8 To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1646913] [NEW] [SRU] Juju 1.25.8

Public bug reported: Juju 1.25.8 is a stable update containing critical bug fixes, for backup restore, charm metrics, and mac os sierra for the 1.25 series. [SRU Information] juju-core has a stable release exception, including for major version updates, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JujuUpdates.

[Bug 1631038] Re: Need /etc/sysctl.d/10-juju.conf

** Changed in: juju-release-tools Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1631038 Title: Need /etc/sysctl.d/10-juju.conf To manage notifications

[Bug 1614969] Re: Juju packaging allows builds for unsupported architectures

Just adding a comment to note that indeed on 32-bit arches both the install and upgrade show the DEBCONF message and remove all associated binaries. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1617440] Re: [SRU] Juju 2 GA

** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: v-done-yakkety -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1617440 Title: [SRU] Juju 2 GA To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1631038] Re: Need /etc/sysctl.d/10-juju.conf

@Nicolas, /usr/lib/sysctl.d/ does override /etc/sysctl.conf. Note, these settings are already an increase from the default. These are lower values than in the wiki, but are deemed safe enough to deploy to all users. You should absolutely bump these values should you wish to run a more production

[Bug 1631038] Re: Need /etc/sysctl.d/10-juju.conf

Works properly for yakkety. juju.conf installed and values set properly. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1631038 Title: Need /etc/sysctl.d/10-juju.conf To manage notifications about

[Bug 1631038] Re: Need /etc/sysctl.d/10-juju.conf

** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: v-done-xenial v-failed-yakkety ** Tags removed: v-failed-yakkety ** Tags added: verification-needed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1617440] Re: [SRU] Juju 2 GA

** Tags removed: verification-done ** Tags added: v-done-xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1617440 Title: [SRU] Juju 2 GA To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1614969] Re: Juju packaging allows builds for unsupported architectures

Installing xenial build, I am no longer prompted on supported architectures. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1617440] Re: [SRU] Juju 2 GA

Xenial package installed and working as expected. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1617440 Title: [SRU] Juju 2 GA

[Bug 1614969] Re: Juju packaging allows builds for unsupported architectures

** Changed in: juju-core (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: juju-core (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1614969] Re: Juju packaging allows builds for unsupported architectures

** Description changed: The current juju packaging specifies all for architecture, but juju itself only officially supports 64-bit architectures. We should update - juju, conjure-up, charm, and charm-tools to specify to build on only - supported architectures for all ppa and archive versions.

[Bug 1631038] Re: Need /etc/sysctl.d/10-juju.conf

Updating to say this works properly in xenial, but not in yakkety. Yakkety is missing the sysctl file; it's not installed. This needs to be corrected in the debian/rules. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done verification-failed -- You received this bug

[Bug 1614559] Re: Juju rejects lxd 2.1

I am now able to bootstrap using LXD 2.0.5. juju bootstrap lxd lxd Creating Juju controller "lxd" on lxd/localhost Looking for packaged Juju agent version 2.0.0 for amd64 To configure your system to better support LXD containers, please see:

[Bug 1629376] Re: Juju should use bundled jujud if not matching agents found in streams

As per http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/j/juju-core, the test was skipped and the autopkgtest suite succeeded. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1614724] Re: Juju isn't protected from new versions of LXD

Diff shows LXD is added, and we can see from yakkety and zesty the tests are running on new LXD uploads. https://launchpadlibrarian.net/290947340/juju- core_2.0~beta15-0ubuntu2.16.04.1_2.0.0-0ubuntu0.16.04.1.diff.gz ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You

[Bug 1614559] Re: Juju rejects lxd 2.1

** Description changed: Juju errors with: invalid config: lxd version 2.1, juju needs at least 2.0.0 As seen here: http://reports.vapour.ws/releases/issue/57b5c506749a567eabd11a4a Full log not given here because it contains certs. See above link for full logs. + + [SRU

[Bug 1614724] Re: Juju isn't protected from new versions of LXD

** Description changed: Juju's autopkgtests don't execute when a new version of LXD is uploaded. This means a breaking change uploaded into LXD isn't caught before LXD lands. This is because juju 2.0 doesn't depend on LXD directly, but instead lists it as a recommends. The juju-1

[Bug 1631038] Re: Need /etc/sysctl.d/10-juju.conf

** Description changed: In order to increase the number of containers that can be used with the lxd provider we need an /etc/sysctl.d/10-juju.conf file setting: - fs.inotify.max_user_watches = 524288 - fs.inotify.max_user_instances = 256 + fs.inotify.max_user_watches = 524288 +

[Bug 1629376] Re: Juju should use bundled jujud if not matching agents found in streams

** Description changed: Since --upload-tools is now no longer needed, juju needs to fallback to using bundled jujud in the case where no matching agents are found in streams. For example, 6:38:07 INFO juju.environs.manual init.go:120 series: zakkety, characteristics: arch=amd64

[Bug 1614559] Re: Juju rejects lxd 2.1

** Changed in: juju-core (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Changed in: juju-core (Ubuntu Xenial) Assignee: (unassigned) => Nicholas Skaggs (nskaggs) ** Changed in: juju-core (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Nicholas Skaggs (nskaggs) -- You received

[Bug 1614724] Re: Juju isn't protected from new versions of LXD

** Changed in: juju-core (Ubuntu Yakkety) Status: In Progress => Fix Released ** Changed in: juju-core (Ubuntu Yakkety) Assignee: (unassigned) => Nicholas Skaggs (nskaggs) ** Changed in: juju-core (Ubuntu Xenial) Assignee: (unassigned) => Nicholas Skaggs (nskaggs)

[Bug 1631038] Re: Need /etc/sysctl.d/10-juju.conf

** Changed in: juju-core (Ubuntu Zesty) Assignee: (unassigned) => Nicholas Skaggs (nskaggs) ** Changed in: juju-core (Ubuntu Yakkety) Assignee: (unassigned) => Nicholas Skaggs (nskaggs) ** Changed in: juju-core (Ubuntu Xenial) Assignee: (unassigned) => Nicholas Skaggs

[Bug 1629376] Re: Juju should use bundled jujud if not matching agents found in streams

** Also affects: juju-core (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: juju-core (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: juju-core (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Nicholas Skaggs (nskaggs) -- You received this bug notification becau

[Bug 1632740] Re: Screen distorts after a period of use, may crash kernel

Well, unfortunatly, upgrading to 1.8 disables both the bluetooth module and touchscreen on my device(Asus T300 chi), leaving me with no input options. I suppose that's a separate problem, but it's rather hard to file. I'll try to find my adapter, borrow a USB keyboard from someone and file it.

[Bug 1617440] Re: [SRU] Juju 2 GA

** Summary changed: - [SRU] Juju 2-rc3 for Xenial + [SRU] Juju 2 GA ** Description changed: - Juju 2.0 is not quite final, as per the risks and timeline outlined in - the FFe for Xenial, bug 1545913. As such, we intend to release SRU's - post-xenial release. This updates juju to an upgradeable

[Bug 1633355] [NEW] package libheimbase1-heimdal:amd64 1.7~git20160703+dfsg-1 failed to install/upgrade: package libheimbase1-heimdal:amd64 1.7~git20160703+dfsg-1 cannot be configured because libheimb

Public bug reported: On startup ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.10 Package: libheimbase1-heimdal:amd64 1.7~git20160703+dfsg-1 Uname: Linux 4.8.1-040801-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.3-0ubuntu8 AptOrdering: libheimbase1-heimdal:amd64: Install NULL: ConfigurePending NULL:

Re: [Bug 1632593] Re: Xorg does not utilize the 3D graphics acceleration capabilities of my device

% apt-cache policy libgbm1-lts-vivid N: Unable to locate package libgbm1-lts-vivid 2016-10-12 23:51 GMT+02:00 Timo Aaltonen : > apt-cache policy > libgbm1-lts-vivid > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1632593] Re: Xorg does not utilize the 3D graphics acceleration capabilities of my device

Well, it's certainly a problem which appeared after I did the upgrade. There were no issues before this point. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1632593 Title: Xorg does not utilize the

[Bug 1617440] Re: [SRU] Juju 2-rc3 for Xenial

** Description changed: Juju 2.0 is not quite final, as per the risks and timeline outlined in the FFe for Xenial, bug 1545913. As such, we intend to release SRU's - post-xenial release. This updates juju to the lastest 2.0 milestone - version. + post-xenial release. This updates juju to an

[Bug 1617440] Re: [SRU] Juju 2-rc3 for Xenial

** Summary changed: - [SRU] Juju 2 beta 17 for Xenial + [SRU] Juju 2-rc3 for Xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1617440 Title: [SRU] Juju 2-rc3 for Xenial To manage

[Bug 1632593] Re: Xorg does not utilize the 3D graphics acceleration capabilities of my device

Can someone please change this to be about the package containing the do-release-upgrade command? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1632593 Title: Xorg does not utilize the 3D graphics

[Bug 1632740] [NEW] Screen distorts after a period of use, may crash kernel

Public bug reported: After using my system for a period of time, usually less than an hour, the screen starts to corrupt. It will vary in intensity, until the system either crashes, or everything goes back to normal for a while. When the system does crash, not even the sysrq-key works.

[Bug 1632740] Re: Screen distorts after a period of use, may crash kernel

** Attachment added: "Fotos.zip" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1632740/+attachment/4759954/+files/Fotos.zip -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1632740 Title:

[Bug 1632593] Re: Xorg does not utilize the 3D graphics acceleration capabilities of my device

I reinstalled the package, no dice. I then looked around for it, and found that it had been renamed to old.libgbm1.so, along with the file it linked to. I renamed both, removing the "old.", and now 3D works. It's definitely still a bug though. -- You received this bug notification because you

Re: [Bug 1632593] Re: Xorg does not utilize the 3D graphics acceleration capabilities of my device

The package is installed, but the file is not there. On 12 Oct 2016 13:50, "Timo Aaltonen" wrote: > your logfile disagrees > > [ 8.117] (EE) Failed to load /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libglamoregl.so: > libgbm.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory >

[Bug 1632593] Re: Xorg does not utilize the 3D graphics acceleration capabilities of my device

No, I have not. Libgbm1 is installed, as well as all other packages included in the ubuntu-desktop meta-package. ** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1632593] [NEW] Xorg does not utilize the 3D graphics acceleration capabilities of my device

Public bug reported: Everything worked fine in 16.04. I then upgraded to 16.10 a bit early to see if I could find any bugs, and immediately noticed that Unity was running in low-graphics mode, and YouTube chugs noticably. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.10 Package: xorg 1:7.7+13ubuntu4

[Bug 1613845] Re: Juju snap can no longer interact with LXD in devmode

1.0.41 was backported which has the fix. This should be released. ** Changed in: snap-confine (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1627408] Re: Severe graphics regression with mainline kernel v4.7.5 on Broadwell 5500U

Yes, this problem most definitely occurs with the Yakkety proposed kernel, I tried using the most recent build of 16.10 that comes with 4.8, and the graphical problems persist. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1627408] Re: Severe graphics regression with mainline kernel v4.7.5 on Broadwell 5500U

All kernels after 4.7.4 have this exact same issue with Broadwell integrated graphics, including the official 4.8 release and the previous rc builds. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1614724] Re: Juju isn't protected from new versions of LXD

** Changed in: juju-release-tools Status: In Progress => Fix Released ** Changed in: juju-core (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1629412] [NEW] Please merge debian version of golang-golang-x-crypto-dev

Public bug reported: The current ubuntu (xenial / yakkety) packages are missing needed updates. Specifically, juju needs golang.org/x/crypto/acme/autocert. I can note that sid contains these updated packages, but yakkety is still missing them. See https://packages.debian.org/sid/all/golang-

[Bug 1617433] Re: [FFe] juju 2.0

** Description changed: The juju team is requesting an FFE for juju. Juju-2 represents API changes and new features and bugfixes for juju. This FFE is intended to cover the acceptance of the updated juju package. Timeline - We have released 16 betas of juju-2 so far over the

[Bug 1612116] Re: please remove juju-core-1 and juju-mongodb packages from yakkety

Given juju2 is now RC and has promises of being upgradeable, I think this is safe to move forward on. For folks who have to have it, it will be in the stable juju ppa. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1450557] Re: 15.04: Broadwell HD 5500: screen corruption after logout

Since my last comment, I have been trying the modesetting driver periodically and it seems that a fairly recent update has fixed the screen wrapping I was seeing on my Lemur. My operating system is still Xubuntu 16.04. I have been using the modesetting driver since last night and I have seen no

[Bug 1627408] Re: Severe graphics regression with mainline kernel v4.7.5 on Broadwell 5500U

** Description changed: I would like to report a severe graphics regression, involving frequent rainbow-glitching and flickering on a x64 computer with Intel Broadwell 5500U processor w/ integrated graphics. This issue was not present on kernel v4.7.4, which I will continue to use. Due to

[Bug 1627408] Re: Severe graphics regression with mainline kernel v4.7.5 on Broadwell 5500U

I was unable to use apport-collect but I believe the information I have provided is sufficient. I am running Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS with kernel v4.7.5-generic on a x64 HP Spectre x360 with Broadwell GT2 5500 integrated graphics. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed --

[Bug 1627408] [NEW] Severe graphics regression with mainline kernel v4.7.5 on Broadwell 5500U

Public bug reported: I would like to report a severe graphics regression, involving frequent rainbow-glitching and flickering on a x64 computer with Intel Broadwell 5500U processor w/ integrated graphics. This issue was not present on kernel v4.7.4, which I will continue to use. Due to

[Bug 1578550] Re: ftbfs on yakkety

** Changed in: juju-core (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1578550 Title: ftbfs on yakkety To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1605976] Re: [2.0] bump mongod to 3.2.9

@mwhudson, I utilized the tool locally and everything seemed fine. For now, bug 1564500 prevents a full CI run until it lands in xenial proper. I think we should discuss a set of autopkgtests to help bridge the gap in the interim. That said, given 3.2.9 is in yakkety we've not seen any issues in

[Bug 1605976] Re: [2.0] bump mongod to 3.2.9

Looks good. /usr/lib/juju/mongo3.2/bin/mongo MongoDB shell version: 3.2.9 ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1605976

[Bug 1484132] Re: [FFe] juju-core 1.25

** Changed in: juju-core (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1484132 Title: [FFe] juju-core 1.25 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1614969] Re: Juju packaging allows builds for unsupported architectures

** No longer affects: charm-tools (Ubuntu) ** No longer affects: charm (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1614969 Title: Juju packaging allows builds for unsupported

[Bug 1614559] Re: Juju rejects lxd 2.1

Martin, the edge channel in the snap store has replaced the daily ppa. This ppa is where we release betas: https://launchpad.net/~juju/+archive/ubuntu/devel Now as to landing this fix, we've pushed packages to proposed as you've seen, but encountered various failures with beta16 and now beta17.

[Bug 1516451] Re: check_disk plugin broken after upgrade to 15.10

Rather than excluding tmpfs, just exclude /run/lxcfs/controllers. This is the check_all_disks command I'm now using in my /etc/nagios- plugins/config/disk.cfg: # 'check_all_disks' command definition define command{ command_namecheck_all_disks command_line

[Bug 1617440] Re: [SRU] Juju 2 beta 17 for Xenial

** Summary changed: - [SRU] Juju 2 beta 16 for Xenial + [SRU] Juju 2 beta 17 for Xenial ** Description changed: Juju 2.0 is not quite final, as per the risks and timeline outlined in the FFe for Xenial, bug 1545913. As such, we intend to release SRU's post-xenial release. This updates

[Bug 1618286] [NEW] Critical security flaw: Missing crl-verify openvpn option

*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** Public security bug reported: Many VPN providers will give a Certificate Revocation List crl.pem file in their OpenVPN packages. The CRL list is becoming increasingly important after the Heartbleed bug was exposed, leaving many servers vulnerable to

[Bug 1617440] [NEW] [SRU] Juju 2 beta 16 for Xenial

Public bug reported: Juju 2.0 is not quite final, as per the risks and timeline outlined in the FFe for Xenial, bug 1545913. As such, we intend to release SRU's post-xenial release. This updates juju to the lastest 2.0 milestone version. [SRU Information] juju-core has a stable release

[Bug 1614724] Re: Juju isn't protected from new versions of LXD

** Changed in: juju-release-tools Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Changed in: juju-core (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: juju-release-tools Assignee: (unassigned) => Nicholas Skaggs (nskaggs) ** Changed in: juju-core (Ubuntu) Assignee: (u

[Bug 1617433] [NEW] [FFe] juju 2.0

Public bug reported: The juju team is requesting an FFE for juju. Juju-2 represents API changes and new features and bugfixes for juju. This FFE is intended to cover the acceptance of the updated juju package. Timeline We have released 16 betas of juju-2 so far over the xenial and now

[Bug 1605976] Re: [2.0] bump mongod to 3.2.8

@mwhudson, once mongo3.2.8 is in the proposed queue for xenial, we can ensure a CI test run or two before landing. Let us know. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1605976 Title: [2.0]

[Bug 1596095] Re: [needs packaging] 3.2.4-0ubuntu4 available in xenial or trusty

** Changed in: juju-mongodb3.2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1596095 Title: [needs packaging] 3.2.4-0ubuntu4 available in xenial or

[Bug 1612713] Re: Please merge debian version of golang-juju-loggo-dev

** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1612713 Title: Please merge debian version of golang-juju-loggo-dev To manage

[Bug 1613718] Re: [SRU] Juju 2.0-beta15 for Xenial

Tested 2.0~beta15-0ubuntu2.16.04.1. Works as expected. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1613718 Title: [SRU] Juju

[Bug 1614969] Re: Juju packaging allows builds for unsupported architectures

** Changed in: juju-release-tools Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: juju-release-tools Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1614969 Title: Juju

[Bug 1614724] Re: Juju isn't protected from new versions of LXD

** Changed in: juju-release-tools Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: juju-release-tools Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1614724 Title: Juju

[Bug 1614959] Re: /usr/bin/juju is missing after upgrade to 1.25.6

I cannot reproduce this myself, on our CI servers, nor could lazypower who I asked to try on his machine. See an upgrade: http://paste.ubuntu.com/23070808/. My only thought is perhaps you manually mucked with /usr/bin/juju and somehow that's causing you issues now. ** Changed in:

[Bug 1614969] Re: Juju packaging allows builds for unsupported architectures

** Also affects: conjure-up Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: charm-tools Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: charm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: conjure-up ** No longer affects: charm-tools **

[Bug 1614724] Re: Juju isn't protected from new versions of LXD

** Also affects: juju-core-1 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: juju-core-1 (Ubuntu) ** Also affects: juju-core (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: juju-core -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1614959] Re: /usr/bin/juju is missing after upgrade to 1.25.6

$ dpkg-divert --list | grep juju diversion of /usr/bin/juju to /usr/bin/juju.default by juju-1-default ** Attachment added: "dpkg-divert --list | grep juju" https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-release-tools/+bug/1614959/+attachment/4724019/+files/divert -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1614959] Re: /usr/bin/juju is missing after upgrade to 1.25.6

Expected output should look something like this: $ ls -al /usr/bin/juju* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Aug 16 16:04 /usr/bin/juju -> juju-1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Aug 16 16:04 /usr/bin/juju-1 -> juju-1.25 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 68 Aug 16 16:04 /usr/bin/juju-1.25 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 67 Jul 28

[Bug 1614959] Re: /usr/bin/juju is missing after upgrade to 1.25.6

** Attachment added: "ls -al /usr/bin/juju*" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/juju-core-1/+bug/1614959/+attachment/4723996/+files/ls%20usr%20binjuju -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1614959] Re: /usr/bin/juju is missing after upgrade to 1.25.6

** Attachment added: "juju-xenial-upgrade-log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/juju-core-1/+bug/1614959/+attachment/4723998/+files/juju-xenial-upgrade-log ** Also affects: juju-release-tools Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1614959] [NEW] /usr/bin/juju is missing after upgrade to 1.25.6

Public bug reported: After upgrading from 1.25.5 on xenial to 1.25.6-0ubuntu1.16.04.1, /usr/bin/juju has disappeared. Attached are the upgrade logs, as well as an ls of /usr/bin/juju* after the upgrade showing the diversion, but missing /usr/bin/juju. ** Affects: juju-release-tools

[Bug 1611855] Re: [SRU] Juju 1.25.6

** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1611855 Title: [SRU] Juju 1.25.6 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1611855] Re: [SRU] Juju 1.25.6

Tested on xenial. Deploys, tearsdown, installs and removes cleanly, and works with juju-1-default as expected. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1611855 Title: [SRU] Juju 1.25.6 To

[Bug 1612713] Re: Please merge debian version of golang-juju-loggo-dev

** Description changed: The current package in ubuntu is old and the maintainer is no longer able to maintain the package. I'd like to request we replace this package with the debian version which is newer and has a maintainer. + + NOTE: juju-core in xenial would like to depend on this

[Bug 1611855] Re: [SRU] Juju 1.25.6

** Changed in: juju-core-1 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed ** Changed in: juju-core (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1612116] Re: please remove juju-core-1 and juju-mongodb packages from yakkety

@mwhudson, a new version of juju-core-1, 1.25.6, is being uploaded into yakkety. I agree with the package removal, but given the extended timeline for juju 2.0, it's possible yakkety retains juju-core-1. Let's revisit this before FF. I definitely agree with not including it in Z. -- You received

[Bug 1613718] [NEW] [SRU] Juju 2.0-beta15 for Xenial

Public bug reported: Juju 2.0 is not quite final, as per the risks and timeline outlined in the FFe for Xenial, bug 1545913. As such, we intend to release SRU's post-xenial release. This updates juju to the lastest 2.0 milestone version. [SRU Information] juju-core has a stable release

[Bug 1611855] Re: [SRU] Juju 1.25.6

I've restored the debhelper script to version 7 as released. The juju-1-default.links file was present in my version, heh, but not added and thus not in the repository. This too has been corrected. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >