Public bug reported:
Running Ubuntu server 12.04.4LTS. Server is attached to several disk trays
plus a boot disk. Total number of drives is 138. 25 of the drives are
multi-pathed and am running multipathd to create entries in /dev/mapper for the
drives.when updating grub, grub-probe
I have not been able to test this since the 10.04 release as I have since
pulled out all areca cards from all systems due to high-load issues.This
issue will need validation from someone else that still uses the areca cards in
a high-load environment.
--
You received this bug notification
3 years later (in this thread, and over 5 from the others) and this 'political
battle' is still going on. Please resolve these dependancies. This has
nothing to do with support, it is purely a dependancy linkage issue of the
ubuntu-minimal package. This is a major pain when trying to
I see the exact same thing here with LSI HBA's (9200-8E's/LSI2008 chipset) on
numerous external drives under 10.04.2LTS
complete strace output and udevadm attached.
** Attachment added: udevadm test strace of path_id
note, that path_id appears to be fixed with v1.71.so a back-port to 10.04
would seem to be in order.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575297
Title:
path_id is not implemented for
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: linux-image-2.6.32-29-server
Ubuntu 10.04.2LTS running two Intel X5680 cpu's on Supermicro X8DTH-6F,
kernel's coretemp package does not have support for the 32m westmere
cpu's. Need to back-port support from later kernel package.
root@loki:~# uname -a
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: linux-image-2.6.32-29-server
Ubuntu 10.04.2LTS running two Intel X5680 cpu's on Supermicro X8DTH-6F,
- kernel's coretemp package does not have support for the 32m westmere
+ kernel's coretemp package does not have support for the 32nm westmere
This is still an issue w/ 8.04.4 LTS as it does not have this version of the
driver in 2.6.24-27-server. As I have mentioned above, I have the work-around
which was to manually compile the driver from the vendor and applied it to my
system, this is opened to help others who may not be able
Public bug reported:
ARCMSR driver which is included in the linux-image-2.6.24-26-server
image (version: Driver Version 1.20.00.15 2007/08/30) aborts device
commands under heavy load (easy method to trigger would be with xfs_fsr
with a lot of drives (shows up here with large arrays of 60+
** Attachment added: sysrq system information output
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38003425/system-details.txt
--
Areca ARCMSR Driver hangs under heavy load
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508797
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
This bug appears to have been fixed, at least I have not experienced it
under 8.04.1 LTS here since I installed that version of code (fresh
install). Seems to have been germane to 7.04.
--
7.04 Desktop 64bit system freeze
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111658
You received this bug
as a data point I've used ubuntu edgy (desktop server) w/ the areca 1280ML
card here on a 20TiB array running JFS without a problem with corruption under
a C2D processor (and now a C2Q). I've run complete md5sum's against all data
every two weeks no issues. I wonder if it may not be the
I also need to agree with the requester here that even though historically the
computer industry has 'fudged' the SI units to suit it's needs, it's wrong.
And the correct current international standard is to use the MiB/GiB et al
designations for base-2 numbers. From using the MB unit
Ok, the freezes were happening way too frequently (couple times a day)
and would nearly always cause filesystem problems that needed to be
fixed (due to having to do a hard-power off each time). I couldn't risk
running 7.04 anymore went and installed 6.10 64bit version a couple days
ago and have
Thanks for that link, I stumbled across it before I made this bug
request. In yours it appears to be wireless (which I'm not using) and
you mention video drivers (I am using the stock (non restricted) drivers
that came w/ ubuntu 7.04 as I did not need/care about video acceleration
at all.
I've turned off GDM and all other services except what is required for server
type functions.(ps -ef below). Does not appear to be directly related to
transfer bandwidth but perhaps bandwidth time? Main function of the system
is as a Samba server, I've tried sending several hundred GB
Honestly, they must be mapped by the graphics card to the 1280x800 resolution.
I've tried VGA and all resolutions present under ubuntu 6.10 install zero work.
When I load up windows the only resolution I get from default is 1280x800 and
it has to be a digital dvi input signal (no analog). To
Public bug reported:
The newer 30 LCD monitors do not have built-in scalars they only
support two resolutions 2560x1600 (native) and 1280x800.If the input
signal is not one of the above then nothing is displayed. With the
desktop install versions either of these is not an option so no
18 matches
Mail list logo
