[Bug 1912811] Re: Update dwarves-dfsg in focal to version 1.21 from impish

2021-09-28 Thread TuxInvader
Hello, I can confirm that with the dwarves package in proposed (1.21-0ubuntu1~20.04) I can successfully build the Ubuntu mainline kernel from source (tested version 5.13.19) using git commit from: https://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v5.13.19/ When using the version of dwarves currently

[Bug 1926938] Re: Recent mainline packages are built with Hirsuite 21.04, not Focal 20.04 LTS

2021-09-13 Thread TuxInvader
Hi @jagsdesai I think you're using the package from mainline. I publish a PPA for 20.04 LTS, and version 5.14.3 has just finished building on launchpad this morning, so any package you installed yesterday was nothing to do with me ;-) Here's my dependencies $ dpkg -I linux-headers-5.14.3-05

[Bug 1926938] Re: Recent mainline packages are built with Hirsuite 21.04, not Focal 20.04 LTS

2021-09-06 Thread TuxInvader
@nvrmndr - Works for me :-) Please open a bug on my github project if you want help debugging it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926938 Title: Recent mainline packages are built with

[Bug 1912811] Re: Update dwarves-dfsg in focal to version 1.21 from hirsute

2021-07-20 Thread TuxInvader
Couldn't this be treated like other packages for which multiple versions exist using the "alternatives system". Ie add the newer dwarves package required for new kernels as dwarves1.21 and run update-alternatives afterwards? Anyone out there who uses dwarves for anything other than the kernel would

[Bug 1926938] Re: Recent mainline packages are built with Hirsuite 21.04, not Focal 20.04 LTS

2021-07-20 Thread TuxInvader
FYI - This bug is for back-porting dwarves and libbpf to focal fixing support for newer kernels: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dwarves-dfsg/+bug/1912811 It wont make mainline releases work on focal, but it will again be possible to compile a kernel using the focal toolchain. -- You r

[Bug 1926938] Re: Recent mainline packages are built with Hirsuite 21.04, not Focal 20.04 LTS

2021-07-02 Thread TuxInvader
focal based container for building mainline here: https://github.com/TuxInvader/focal-mainline-builder The container includes the build dependencies for mainline kernels, and builds the latest dwarves and libbpf source packages from impish. -- You received this bug notification because you are a memb

[Bug 1928535] Re: No disk space, mainline 5.10.37 and 5.11.20, 5.11.21 failed to build

2021-06-30 Thread TuxInvader
This looks to be fixed in 5.10.47. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928535 Title: No disk space, mainline 5.10.3

[Bug 1928535] Re: No disk space, mainline 5.10.37 and 5.11.20, 5.11.21 failed to build

2021-06-21 Thread TuxInvader
Well that's new, those folders with the failed builds used to be mostly empty, apart from a few miscellaneous files (change logs, etc). It looks like some process has now copied that particular 5.11.20 version into them? How strange? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1926938] Re: Recent mainline packages are built with Hirsuite 21.04, not Focal 20.04 LTS

2021-06-10 Thread TuxInvader
It's a shame that mainline don't build LTS compatible kernels anymore, but what can we do about it? It would be nice if they would build for ubuntu-next *and* previous LTS, but they don't. So new kernels for any Ubuntu release relies on the HWE updates that come with the point releases. The next f

[Bug 1928535] Re: No disk space, mainline 5.10.37 and 5.11.20, 5.11.21 failed to build

2021-06-10 Thread TuxInvader
This is still broken on 5.10.43. https://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v5.10.43/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928535 Title: No disk space, mainline 5.10.37 and 5.11.20, 5

[Bug 1926938] Re: Recent mainline packages are built with Hirsuite 21.04, not Focal 20.04 LTS

2021-06-02 Thread TuxInvader
Hi all, Controversial and TL;DR version - If one of the kernel devs can update the wiki page here https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/MainlineBuilds#Mainline_kernel_build_toolchain, then as far as I'm concerned they can close this bug as resolved. The longer version. Ubuntu is great! Thank you De

[Bug 1926938] Re: Recent mainline packages are built with Hirsuite 21.04, not Focal 20.04 LTS

2021-05-29 Thread TuxInvader
This has become a security issue! So the kernels are now being built with impish, and unless people are using my PPA or building their own, then the last install-able kernel for LTS (focal) was 5.11.16. The 5.11.x series went EOL with 5.11.22, and all 5.11.x have a level 7.8 CVE: https://nvd.nist

[Bug 1928535] Re: No disk space, mainline 5.10.37 and 5.11.20, 5.11.21 failed to build

2021-05-24 Thread TuxInvader
Hi Kai-Heng, I'm sure the disk issue on the builder was resolved quickly, however the 5.10.x and 5.11.x builds have been failing ever since the disk filled. The builder is still failing to build the most recent kernels. See: https://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v5.10.39/ and https://k

[Bug 1928535] Re: No disk space, mainline 5.10.37 and 5.11.20, 5.11.21 failed to build

2021-05-24 Thread TuxInvader
Can you please check again, the builder fails to build 5.10.x and 5.11.x. Other builds 5.12, daily, etc are not affected. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to U

[Bug 1926938] Re: Recent mainline packages are built with Hirsuite 21.04, not Focal 20.04 LTS

2021-05-22 Thread tuxinvader
olicy (and continue building on Ubuntu "next"). If you use my PPA and have questions about it, then please open an issue on the github project here: https://github.com/TuxInvader/focal- mainline-builder DanglingPointer (cool handle) is correct in a lot of what he said, there is no

[Bug 1926938] Re: Recent mainline packages are built with Hirsuite 21.04, not Focal 20.04 LTS

2021-05-19 Thread tuxinvader
d.net/tuxinvader/lts-mainline/ubuntu focal main deb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/tuxinvader/lts-mainline/ubuntu focal main -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926938 Title: Recent mainline package

[Bug 1928535] Re: No disk space, mainline 5.10.37 and 5.11.20, 5.11.21 failed to build

2021-05-15 Thread tuxinvader
From: https://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v5.11.20/amd64/log ld: final link failed: No space left on device make[2]: *** [/home/kernel/COD/linux/Makefile:1183: vmlinux] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/kernel/COD/linux/debian/build/build-generic' make[1]: *** [Makefile:185: __su

[Bug 1928535] [NEW] No disk space, mainline 5.10.37 and 5.11.20, 5.11.21 failed to build

2021-05-15 Thread tuxinvader
Public bug reported: It looks like the build machine ran out of disk space while building 5.11.20 amd64 and 5.10.36 armhf. From: https://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v5.11.20/amd64/log ld: final link failed: No space left on device make[2]: *** [/home/kernel/COD/linux/Makefile:1183: vml

[Bug 1926938] Re: Recent mainline packages are built with Hirsuite 21.04, not Focal 20.04 LTS

2021-05-11 Thread tuxinvader
I'll upload the latest 5.11.x kernel to a lts-mainline-previous PPA, and longterm 5.10.x kernels to lts-mainline-longterm. 5.10.35 will be available here: https://launchpad.net/~tuxinvader/+archive/ubuntu/lts-mainline-longterm 5.11.19 will be available here: https://launchpad.net/~tuxin

[Bug 1926938] Re: Recent mainline packages are built with Hirsuite 21.04, not Focal 20.04 LTS

2021-05-10 Thread tuxinvader
I updated my container so you can pick which flavour to build (generic or lowlatency), and exclude some of the packages (udebs, cloud-tools). The PPA now has enough space to build the source package. So I've published 5.12.2 generic packages here: https://launchpad.net/~tuxinvader/+ar

[Bug 1926938] Re: Recent mainline packages are built with Hirsuite 21.04, not Focal 20.04 LTS

2021-05-08 Thread tuxinvader
s the kernels require pahole >= 1.16 (from dwarves package). The groovy version of dwarves can be installed on focal, or you can use my PPA here: https://launchpad.net/~tuxinvader/+archive/ubuntu/lts-mainline I was hoping to push my kernels to that PPA, but as I said - they're too big for l

[Bug 1926938] Re: Recent mainline packages are built with Hirsuite 21.04, not Focal 20.04 LTS

2021-05-05 Thread tuxinvader
This bug appears to be either: 1. A documentation bug. The wiki (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/MainlineBuilds) needs updating to indicate that mainline kernels are built for the current Ubuntu release only. Remove the section about using the LTS tool-chain. 2. The automated build system is wrong

[Bug 1926938] Re: Recent mainline packages are built with Hirsuite 21.04, not Focal 20.04 LTS

2021-05-03 Thread tuxinvader
This is not a bug report, but a question on the build policy of the mainline kernels? Should mainline kernels work on the previous LTS or not? ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, whi

[Bug 1926938] [NEW] Recent mainline packages are built with Hirsuite 21.04, not Focal 20.04 LTS

2021-05-03 Thread tuxinvader
Public bug reported: Hi all, The Mainline wiki states that the mainline kernels are built with the previous LTS toolchain, but the recent 5.12.x and 5.11.x releases are being built with Hirsuite 21.04, and before that Groovy? If this is intentional, then the wiki should be updated to reflect the

[Bug 1670959] Re: systemd-resolved using 100% CPU

2018-09-28 Thread tuxinvader
I have this on Ubuntu 18.04. In my case I use dnsmasq with a custom configuration providing DHCP and DNS to multiple bridges (Virtual Machines and containers). So I need them both (in so far as I need dnsmasq and am being forced to use systemd). The problem is a DNS loop between systemd and dnsmas

[Bug 1660416] Re: zfs-dkms 0.6.5.6-0ubuntu14: zfs kernel module failed to build

2017-02-23 Thread tuxinvader
I have this error too, but it seems that you no longer need the zfs- linux dkms packages on 16.04. Ubuntu ships the ZOL module with the main kernel package. So the fact it wont build is irrelevant. Unless you specifically need to build it out of tree??? The version currently included is: 0.6.5.6-0

[Bug 1602409] [NEW] Ubuntu 16.04 Should package zfs-auto-snapshot

2016-07-12 Thread tuxinvader
Public bug reported: ZFS on Linux provide a handy script for automatically creating hourly, weekly, and monthly snapshots of ZFS pools. I can't think of a good reason for it not being packaged with the official Ubuntu ZFS support. The ZoL PPA includes the script and crontabs, so why isn't in the o

Re: [Bug 527890] Re: ALPS touchpad in HP Mini 311 not configurable/recognized as a touchpad

2011-07-26 Thread tuxinvader
Hi all, I was asked to be help some one get vertical scroll working on their HP, so I've just blown the dust of mine and installed Natty. Vertical Scroll still broken by default :-( The problem with scrolling is Ubuntu specific. Kernel.org kernels should just work. Ubuntu patches add support

[Bug 566441] Re: pycompile defaults to python 2.5, should use python 2.6 in Lucid

2010-09-21 Thread tuxinvader
Hmmm Odd. /usr/bin/pycompile on my systems has the following configuration: SUPPORTED_VERSIONS = [(2, 5), (2, 6), (3, 1)] DEFAULT_VERSION = (2, 5) Obviously if I change the default version 2.6 I can compile without needing to specify the version on the command line. Package: python-minimal Esse

[Bug 543506] Re: Upstart not starting jobs on boot

2010-05-11 Thread tuxinvader
It look as though upstart couldn't figure out what the previous runlevel was (or maybe it was trying to use 6?). My last log says the system crashed, but I don't think it did, maybe upstart/reboot failed to write to utmp properly? My last log. runlevel (to lvl 2) 2.6.32-22-generi Tue May 11

[Bug 543506] Re: Upstart not starting jobs on boot

2010-05-11 Thread tuxinvader
running: telinit 2 and then rebooting seems to have resolved the problem. -- Upstart not starting jobs on boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543506 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bug

[Bug 543506] Re: Upstart not starting jobs on boot

2010-05-11 Thread tuxinvader
Me too. Upstart is not starting all processes. My box has been running since last night without a firewall! runlevel returns "unknown", and it seems to have forgotten a lot of scripts even exist r...@swift:/etc/rc2.d# initctl list | grep postfix r...@swift:/etc/rc2.d# initctl list | grep cyru

[Bug 544522] Re: [lucid] latest version of Date::Manip breaks tv_grab_uk_rt

2010-04-24 Thread tuxinvader
As the fix is now in Debian what are the chances of this making it into Lucid? I can confirm that ChrisBs patch works with the current mythtv packages in Lucid. -- [lucid] latest version of Date::Manip breaks tv_grab_uk_rt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/544522 You received this bug notific

[Bug 550625] Re: Alps touchpad is recognized but neither gsynaptics nor mouse preferences work

2010-04-20 Thread tuxinvader
I'm going out in a bit, but I have run a few traces official.bz2 == Current Lucid kernel (finger run across pad) my-mod.bz2 == My reverted driver (finger run across pad) official-scroll.bz2 == Current Lucid kernel (finger run up/down scroll section) my-mod-scroll.bz2 == My reverted driver (fin

[Bug 550625] Re: Alps touchpad is recognized but neither gsynaptics nor mouse preferences work

2010-04-20 Thread tuxinvader
trace attached ** Attachment added: "trace.bz2" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44908180/trace.bz2 -- Alps touchpad is recognized but neither gsynaptics nor mouse preferences work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/550625 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu B

[Bug 550625] Re: Alps touchpad is recognized but neither gsynaptics nor mouse preferences work

2010-04-20 Thread tuxinvader
I was not aware of that, but, granted my touchpad option has disappeared... but I'd rather have a working touchpad that I can't configure, than a broken one which I can ;-) -- Alps touchpad is recognized but neither gsynaptics nor mouse preferences work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/550625 You

[Bug 550625] Re: Alps touchpad is recognized but neither gsynaptics nor mouse preferences work

2010-04-20 Thread tuxinvader
You can try my module if you wish The only other way would be for you to compile your own kernel Download the psmouse.ko file attached, and then in a console (from the directory containing my module) run: $ sudo rmmode psmouse $ sudo insmod psmouse.ko I should warn you about the dangers

[Bug 527890] Re: ALPS touchpad in HP Mini 311 not configurable/recognized as a touchpad

2010-04-20 Thread tuxinvader
Cross Post sorry. There's a ubuntu specific patch which adds the following line to the alps kernel driver alps.c: { { 0x73, 0x02, 0x64 }, 0xf8, 0xf8, 0 }, /* HP Pavilion dm3 */ Commenting out this new device fixes the ALPs on the HP mini 311c ;-) -- ALPS touchpad in HP Mini 311 not configur

[Bug 550625] Re: Alps touchpad is recognized but neither gsynaptics nor mouse preferences work

2010-04-20 Thread tuxinvader
Fixed it. There's a ubuntu specific patch which adds the following line to the alps kernel driver alps.c: { { 0x73, 0x02, 0x64 }, 0xf8, 0xf8, 0 }, /* HP Pavilion dm3 */ Commenting out this new device fixes the ALPs on the HP mini 311c ;-) -- Alps touchpad is recognized b

[Bug 550625] Re: Alps touchpad is recognized but neither gsynaptics nor mouse preferences work

2010-04-19 Thread tuxinvader
I wasn't, I was logged on via ssh. I have just tested it again on the console (/dev/tty1), and I get exactly the same output. Nothing on the ALPS device, everything on the PS2 mouse device. -- Alps touchpad is recognized but neither gsynaptics nor mouse preferences work https://bugs.launchpad.ne

[Bug 550625] Re: Alps touchpad is recognized but neither gsynaptics nor mouse preferences work

2010-04-19 Thread tuxinvader
done this My alps has no output (event8), but I also have a ps2 mouse on event7, all data appears on this input. See attached: events.tgz ** Attachment added: "events logs" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44845199/events.tgz -- Alps touchpad is recognized but neither gsynaptics nor mouse p

[Bug 566441] [NEW] pycompile defaults to python 2.5, should use python 2.6 in Lucid

2010-04-19 Thread tuxinvader
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: python-minimal A fresh install of Lucid installs python2.6, but the python compiler still defaults to using python2.5. Unless I manually specify the python version on the command line (eg "pycompile -V 2.6 foo.py"), then I get the error: /bin/sh: p

[Bug 565277] [NEW] Subscriptions Manager should allow imap subscription to other users inbox

2010-04-17 Thread tuxinvader
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution Evolution should allow me to subscribe to another users Inbox for imap accounts. In my case i have a default mailbox called junk, which catches any email not addressed to any other account. My imap user has full access to the other mailbox, but

[Bug 141436] Re: iptables is missing the statistic and other modules

2009-12-03 Thread tuxinvader
This appears to be fixed in the Karmic 9.10 kernel. Not sure when it was fixed, but I can load the statistic and connection tracking modules. Please close this bug. -- iptables is missing the statistic and other modules https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141436 You received this bug notification be

[Bug 324233] Re: Network Manager 0.7 doesn't use resolvconf to remove nameserver info if it didn't use resolvconf for adding its nameserver info - wipes /etc/resolv.conf link

2009-05-27 Thread tuxinvader
Patch -> If /etc/resolv.conf is a SYMLINK, then overwrite the target file, not the SYMLINK. Possibly fixes another bug: NM checks if tmp_resolv_conf is a SYMLINK, and if so writes to the file pointed to by the symlink. However, when it replaces resolv.conf, it will do so with the symlink, so /etc/

[Bug 324233] Re: Network Manager 0.7 doesn't use resolvconf to remove nameserver info if it didn't use resolvconf for adding its nameserver info - wipes /etc/resolv.conf link

2009-05-27 Thread tuxinvader
Patch -> If resolvconf update fails, and /etc/resolv.conf is a SYMLINK then do nothing. If we find /sbin/resolvconf, but the execution of it fails, then check if /etc/resolv.conf is a SYMLINK. If it is, then report success, and do not overwrite resolv.conf. ** Attachment added: "Ignore resolv.co

[Bug 324233] Re: Network Manager 0.7 doesn't use resolvconf to remove nameserver info if it didn't use resolvconf for adding its nameserver info - wipes /etc/resolv.conf link

2009-05-27 Thread tuxinvader
I believe I have found the cause of this bug within nm-named-manager.c. Should Network Manager fail to update the resolver via the resolvconf script, then it will fall through to the default behaviour (ie write details to a temp file and then overwrites /etc/resolv.conf). The code treats /sbin/res

[Bug 112611] Re: ipt_connmark is broken

2007-09-21 Thread tuxinvader
Still broken in the latest ubuntu kernel, release 2.6.22-11-generic. As the Beta freeze is now on, and this bug is marked as wishlist, I guess this is not going to be fixed in Gutsy? Looks like I'll have to use Debian Etch for any server deployments that require any clever firewalling or advanced

[Bug 141436] Re: iptables is missing the statistic and other modules

2007-09-21 Thread tuxinvader
Perhaps I should raise this as a separate bug, but It would appear that CONNMARK is not included in the ubuntu kernel either. This makes it a lot more difficult to mark all related packets in a connection, which makes advanced routing with fwmarks more complicated if not impossible :( -- iptab

[Bug 116257] Re: Any chance for iptables random module?

2007-09-21 Thread tuxinvader
Hi Pat, The RANDOM, nth, and some other module which escapes me right now, were all merged into the Statistic module. This module is included in the base NetFilter package. It is in Debian Etch, but not Ubuntu :( See my bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptables/+bug/141436 Cheers

[Bug 141436] iptables is missing the statistic and other modules

2007-09-21 Thread tuxinvader
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: iptables The version of iptables in Ubuntu (up to and including 7.10) seems to be missing some modules and extensions. I specifically require the statistic module, which is included in Debian Etch (1.3.6.0debian1-5), but not in Gutsy (1.3.6.0debian1-5ubu

[Bug 96103] Re: NetworkManager does not allow more than one active NIC

2007-04-14 Thread tuxinvader
I think there's a misunderstanding about this bug. The issue I had was that network manager took control of all interfaces regardless of the way they were configured in /etc/network/interfaces. So using that file was not a work around at the time I reported this bug. If that now works then this is

[Bug 96103] Re: NetworkManager does not allow more than one active NIC

2007-04-05 Thread tuxinvader
Perhaps the easiest solution would be to have the NetworkManager processes launched under D-Bus check /etc/defaults files to see if they should run or not? Have: /etc/dbus-1/event.d/25NetworkManager /etc/dbus-1/event.d/26NetworkManagerDispatcher Check: /etc/default/NetworkManager /etc/default/Ne

[Bug 96103] NetworkManager does not allow more than one active NIC

2007-03-25 Thread tuxinvader
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: network-manager I have two NICs and I want them both active at the same time. All network management in Feisty appears to be controlled by network manager, which will only allow one NIC to be active at a time. This behaviour is ludicrous, please fix it AS