Oh, so the ratings do not fold into the "scores" which weight how often
songs are played? If that is the case then please disregard this bug.
But, in any case, if I were to redo the tooltips for the stars, perhaps:
1 - tolerable
2 - okay
3 - good
4 - great
5 - favorite
(which, again, assumes tha
I think the scores do come into play in some of the smart playlists or
dynamic playlists, but I'm not sure how. I do think I've heard that
manual ratings are given more priority than the score that's calculated
based on how often you play it.
So is your idea then, that the impact of star ratings
It's actually more minor than that.
My point is just that if the ratings are used as part of an algorithm to
determine scores (1 == less likely ; 5 == more likely), and if also 1 is
unlikely to be chosen due to "awful" songs probably not being kept in
the owner's collection, then the algorithm is
Now I can see where you're coming from.
Since the specific words chosen are hard to quantify well since they're
subjective, you're going to need to provide exactly what you're
expecting. And since there are descriptions of the half star values
too, you'll need to let me know what you want for tho
As member of the upstream team I can tell you, that we had reasons to do
the one star = awful thing. Most important is: also single users might
not delete bad files as they might want to have complete albums for
statistics etc. Also user's preference for certain music might change
after some time,
As member of the upstream team I can tell you, that we had reasons to do
the one star = awful thing. Most important is: also single users might
not delete bad files as they might want to have complete albums for
statistics etc. Also user's preference for certain music might change
after some time,
Oh, so the ratings do not fold into the "scores" which weight how often
songs are played? If that is the case then please disregard this bug.
But, in any case, if I were to redo the tooltips for the stars, perhaps:
1 - tolerable
2 - okay
3 - good
4 - great
5 - favorite
(which, again, assumes tha
I think the scores do come into play in some of the smart playlists or
dynamic playlists, but I'm not sure how. I do think I've heard that
manual ratings are given more priority than the score that's calculated
based on how often you play it.
So is your idea then, that the impact of star ratings
It's actually more minor than that.
My point is just that if the ratings are used as part of an algorithm to
determine scores (1 == less likely ; 5 == more likely), and if also 1 is
unlikely to be chosen due to "awful" songs probably not being kept in
the owner's collection, then the algorithm is
Now I can see where you're coming from.
Since the specific words chosen are hard to quantify well since they're
subjective, you're going to need to provide exactly what you're
expecting. And since there are descriptions of the half star values
too, you'll need to let me know what you want for tho
Oh, so the ratings do not fold into the "scores" which weight how often
songs are played? If that is the case then please disregard this bug.
But, in any case, if I were to redo the tooltips for the stars, perhaps:
1 - tolerable
2 - okay
3 - good
4 - great
5 - favorite
(which, again, assumes tha
I think the scores do come into play in some of the smart playlists or
dynamic playlists, but I'm not sure how. I do think I've heard that
manual ratings are given more priority than the score that's calculated
based on how often you play it.
So is your idea then, that the impact of star ratings
It's actually more minor than that.
My point is just that if the ratings are used as part of an algorithm to
determine scores (1 == less likely ; 5 == more likely), and if also 1 is
unlikely to be chosen due to "awful" songs probably not being kept in
the owner's collection, then the algorithm is
Now I can see where you're coming from.
Since the specific words chosen are hard to quantify well since they're
subjective, you're going to need to provide exactly what you're
expecting. And since there are descriptions of the half star values
too, you'll need to let me know what you want for tho
As member of the upstream team I can tell you, that we had reasons to do
the one star = awful thing. Most important is: also single users might
not delete bad files as they might want to have complete albums for
statistics etc. Also user's preference for certain music might change
after some time,
As member of the upstream team I can tell you, that we had reasons to do
the one star = awful thing. Most important is: also single users might
not delete bad files as they might want to have complete albums for
statistics etc. Also user's preference for certain music might change
after some time,
Oh, so the ratings do not fold into the "scores" which weight how often
songs are played? If that is the case then please disregard this bug.
But, in any case, if I were to redo the tooltips for the stars, perhaps:
1 - tolerable
2 - okay
3 - good
4 - great
5 - favorite
(which, again, assumes tha
I think the scores do come into play in some of the smart playlists or
dynamic playlists, but I'm not sure how. I do think I've heard that
manual ratings are given more priority than the score that's calculated
based on how often you play it.
So is your idea then, that the impact of star ratings
It's actually more minor than that.
My point is just that if the ratings are used as part of an algorithm to
determine scores (1 == less likely ; 5 == more likely), and if also 1 is
unlikely to be chosen due to "awful" songs probably not being kept in
the owner's collection, then the algorithm is
Now I can see where you're coming from.
Since the specific words chosen are hard to quantify well since they're
subjective, you're going to need to provide exactly what you're
expecting. And since there are descriptions of the half star values
too, you'll need to let me know what you want for tho
As member of the upstream team I can tell you, that we had reasons to do
the one star = awful thing. Most important is: also single users might
not delete bad files as they might want to have complete albums for
statistics etc. Also user's preference for certain music might change
after some time,
Oh, so the ratings do not fold into the "scores" which weight how often
songs are played? If that is the case then please disregard this bug.
But, in any case, if I were to redo the tooltips for the stars, perhaps:
1 - tolerable
2 - okay
3 - good
4 - great
5 - favorite
(which, again, assumes tha
I think the scores do come into play in some of the smart playlists or
dynamic playlists, but I'm not sure how. I do think I've heard that
manual ratings are given more priority than the score that's calculated
based on how often you play it.
So is your idea then, that the impact of star ratings
It's actually more minor than that.
My point is just that if the ratings are used as part of an algorithm to
determine scores (1 == less likely ; 5 == more likely), and if also 1 is
unlikely to be chosen due to "awful" songs probably not being kept in
the owner's collection, then the algorithm is
Now I can see where you're coming from.
Since the specific words chosen are hard to quantify well since they're
subjective, you're going to need to provide exactly what you're
expecting. And since there are descriptions of the half star values
too, you'll need to let me know what you want for tho
As member of the upstream team I can tell you, that we had reasons to do
the one star = awful thing. Most important is: also single users might
not delete bad files as they might want to have complete albums for
statistics etc. Also user's preference for certain music might change
after some time,
Oh, so the ratings do not fold into the "scores" which weight how often
songs are played? If that is the case then please disregard this bug.
But, in any case, if I were to redo the tooltips for the stars, perhaps:
1 - tolerable
2 - okay
3 - good
4 - great
5 - favorite
(which, again, assumes tha
I think the scores do come into play in some of the smart playlists or
dynamic playlists, but I'm not sure how. I do think I've heard that
manual ratings are given more priority than the score that's calculated
based on how often you play it.
So is your idea then, that the impact of star ratings
It's actually more minor than that.
My point is just that if the ratings are used as part of an algorithm to
determine scores (1 == less likely ; 5 == more likely), and if also 1 is
unlikely to be chosen due to "awful" songs probably not being kept in
the owner's collection, then the algorithm is
Now I can see where you're coming from.
Since the specific words chosen are hard to quantify well since they're
subjective, you're going to need to provide exactly what you're
expecting. And since there are descriptions of the half star values
too, you'll need to let me know what you want for tho
30 matches
Mail list logo
