** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.20 (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117314
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
I have one of the chipsets on the "endangered list", 27df 82801G (ICH7
Family) IDE Controller (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-
source-2.6.20/+bug/116996/comments/79 thanks sitsofe), and I have now
upgraded from 2.6.20-15.14 to 2.6.20-16.29.
I am happy to say that everything works
I checked for the status as you asked.
Turns out for some reason linux-generic was not installed. To fix it, I did an
apt-get update, installed it via your command line above and then did an
apt-get upgrade just to be sure I had everything as current as possible.
While X11 starts ok now - the
I'm sorry that people have been continuing to have problems with the
-16.29 kernel update. We have not yet been able to reproduce these
issues. e.g. a machine local to me using the nvidia binary driver loads
without problems. Can you check that your linux-restricted-modules was
upgraded along wi
Same problem as dschneller: The kernel update fixed the fixed the boot problem,
but now the nvidia module fails to load.
And, hell, NO, I won't file ANOTHER bug.
I know I'm being unprofessional now, and I never thought I would. But
this is the 7th system-breaking bug in 3 months for me, and my ha
Hello,
After upgrading to the latest kernel I aslo hade problems booting on my
SATA drive. (Current setup, 2 SATA drives and 1 IDE). I used UUID ref in
both fstab and menu.lst before the upgrade. After some investigation I
managed to get my mashine to boot, the solution for me was to update the
UU
It seems the page was moved without a redirect left in its place. I
have fixed this now, and the page should work again.
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117314
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, wh
hk47:
I have a feeling it might have been created in the wrong place and has now been
moved to https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UsingUUID . It would be wise for
someone to update http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-470-1
dschneller:
Spin off a new bug report and post a link to it here Can you al
I installed the new update because I suffered from the hard disk
renaming (Intel PERL865 mainboard). Now I can boot again, however X11
does not start, because it claims it cannot load the nvidia kernel
module (FATAL: Could not run the install command for nvidia). After some
fiddling I could load it
The mentioned wiki page regarding usage of UUID
(https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UsingUUID) doesn't exist:
"This page does not exist yet. You can create a new empty page, or use
one of the page templates. Before creating the page, please check if a
similar page already exists."
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-1
2.6.20-16.29 is better, but hangs on booting if I enable the IT8212
(GigaRAID) controller on my Gigabyte GA-8KNXP.
Edgy's 2.6.17.1-10.34 works just fine.
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117314
You received this bug notification because yo
thanks to all people for the help
now with the latest
2.6.20-16.29
everything is ok
edoardo
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117314
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for
A new kernel (2.6.20-16.29) reverting the piix changes was released:
http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-470-1 on 08 June 2007. Additionally a new
wiki page describing how references to partitions should be UUIDs/labels
has recently appeared: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UsingUUID .
While not every query men
Sorry for my english but i'm french.
It seems that the message
hdg: dma_timer_expiry: dma_status == 0x24
hdg: DMA interrupt recovery
hdg: lost interrupt
du to the change /dev/sd by /dev/hd
may be corrected with with Asus p4p800 Deluxe motherboard by entering :
"Compatibilty Mode" in the IDE c
I haven't found any problem with this kernel:
$ uname -r
2.6.20-16-generic
I have a AMD64-like motherboard (Sempron 64 bits) and working fine.
Everything's mounting just like usual.
This is my fstab:
# /etc/fstab: static file system information.
#
#
proc/proc
0) All 5 of my systems have nvidia chipsets (some AM2, some socket 939)
1) on all of my systems, the PS-2 mouse doesn't work.
2) nvidia-glx drivers are not working
3) all my hard drives are sata (4 raid installs) and all work fine
4) the cdrom drives, which used to be /dev/hda are all not available
AllanEising:
Try and remove all instances of /dev/s??? from your /etc/fstab ,
/boot/grub/menu.lst and /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/resume files and replace
them with UUIDs. The
blkid
command will list the UUIDs for all partitions. Do this in 2.6.20-15 so you can
see the "old" /dev/s??? syntax and
I also experience the exact same behavior regarding my SATA drive
changing from /dev/sdc to /dev/hde and not being able to boot
afterwards. Is there any preliminary solution to this yet?
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117314
You received
A little addendum. Booting normally works sometimes without irqpoll, and
as far as I can see with irqpoll it works always.
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117314
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, w
I also had problems with 2.6.20-16.28, the same "Loading hardware
drivers" message.
When I saw some people were experimenting with irqpoll, I immediately
thought about PNP. I disabled "Plug & Play OS" in my BIOS, and poof,
2.6.20-16 boots fine. If you still have problems, please try this and
repor
Hi, Sitsofe Wheeler [2007-06-01 16:44 -]:
> Martin: Since it looks like we are headed for another change I think
> the word has to be put out to those who have gone and relabelled
> their /etc/fstab with the /dev/h??? syntax that we are now going
> back the other way. The folks over in bugs lik
Don't know if this is relevant.
I was one of those that could not use the 2.6.20-16 version when I did
the recommended update. Because of other reasons I had to reinstall
Feisty over the weekend and voila - the 2.6.20-16 now works alongside
the 15 version perfectly!
(I did change my configuration
Martin:
Since it looks like we are headed for another change I think the word has to be
put out to those who have gone and relabelled their /etc/fstab with the
/dev/h??? syntax that we are now going back the other way. The folks over in
bugs like Bug #94119 need to be warned that their CD drives
Philip,
> Unhappily, the bad behaviour that other people are experiencing with
> the reversion wasn't intended. A wholesale re-reversion of the libata
> isn't an option because this will cause devices to change again for
>everyone, and everyone will be quite understandably upset.
Sorry, but that'
I'd like to share my experience with this issue in my laptop with PATA
disk: as some of you have commented above, I was using /dev/sdXX syntax
in menu.lst and fstab since first Feisty alphas. After upgrading to
2.6.20-16.28 the laptop just couldn't mount root partition at boot time.
Previous kernel
i also have boot-problems after upgrading the kernel.
at start, i get the error-message that apt is not installed and i should
do "apt-get install aptitude" which is kind of funny ;-)
but, if i start with the old kernel again, i don't get this error. this
is strange
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.2
Lars:
Somehow I knew you were going to say that : )
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117314
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubunt
Phillip: Thanks very much for taking this on. I do find the "wholesale"
changeover in an otherwise "routine" kernel update mid-release slightly
discomforting though...
Sitsofe: Yes, I can ease up on the cross-posting. I know it's not normally good
form. However, in this case it's had the desired
Sitsofe:
Done - UUID can change on swap breaking swap mount and Hibernation- bug
118199
I've logged it against the kernel though its really Ubuntu policy in my opinion.
please excuse my plagiarization of your comments.
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems
https://bugs.laun
Lars:
Your comment links and forum checking are invaluable but can you ease up on the
bug comment cross-posting? Rather than posting in three different bugs
simultaneously confine the comment to this bug initially because if there is
something people disagree with in your comment they wind up ha
Phillip Lougher
I can see your between a rock and a hard place ,
ICH6 appears to function correctly under either libata or PATA, Hence
the lack of bug reports (besides me) for this chipset.
I don't think it matters which way you go with this for this chipset as
I appear to be the only ICH6 pers
** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.20 (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => In Progress
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117314
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
On 5/31/07, LarsBjerregaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is FIXED in Debian! I'm sorry, but I have to say that I find it
> disheartening, that bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-
> source-2.6.20/+bug/116996 is still unconfirmed+undecided, bug
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubun
I think klmonz in the appended bug-description at the top of bug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-
source-2.6.20/+bug/116996, hits the nail on the head.
Reading through the extensive thread in
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=456662, it seems obvious, that
Debian bug http://
Same here.
Stops loading at the hardware drivers.
There is nothing I can add to the above posts other than I have removed
2.6.20-16
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117314
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
The backports modules are also missing for the latest kernel
2.6.20-16.28. The linux-backports-modules-generic package is available
for update but the linux-backports-modules-2.6.20-16-generic which itr
depends on isnt available at all...
Regards
André
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update give
BatteryKing:
i would think that would give you .16 back again; could you check that?
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117314
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
I figured out a way to get things working. I completely de-installed
the -16 kernel and modules and such and re-installed from the command
prompt `apt-get install kernel-generic`
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117314
You received this bu
I recently ran the update from 6.10 to 7.04 and on first boot I had options
between kernel 2.6.20-16-generic and 2.6.20-15-386.
Kernel 2.6.20-15-386 works fine.
Kernel 2.6.20-16-generic does not boot at all. By default on the splash screen
I get a thin sliver on the progress bar and after leavin
Some threads have been merged, and the survey is going on in
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=456662 starting from
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=456662&page=25 post#244
(http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=2744328&postcount=244).
Related bugs seem to be:
https://bugs.launchp
Think thats probably the way to get rid of it.
or correct it to the right setting, but doesn't appear needed.
Could be left over from a previous upgrade.
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117314
You received this bug notification because yo
Andrew...
same with me, although mine was /dev/scd0
I have commented it out in /etc/fstab... i don't know if this a correct
procedure or not.
other than that, things seem to be okey.
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117314
You received
Also of note with this new kernel.
I have a new ghost CD-ROM01 in Gnome its at /dev/hdc and doesn't exist
the real device is at /dev/hdb
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117314
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
Ok I can't prove this as I went round the houses fixing up my system.
But I reckon if you have the message about resume file (after pressing
ctrl alt F1)
then simply press enter to continue boot.
once in x start a terminal window
and issue
sudo update-initramfs -u
and
sudu dpkg-reconfigure usw
The unofficial survey going on here:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=456662&page=20 starting
post#195 might yeld some clues, and it would seem there's a lot of folks
with Intel ICH4 and ICH5 there.
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
Andrew Waldram
Yes the TIFM fixes are in this kernel. The changelog should have
mentioned an update to the tifm 0.8d driver.
Phillip
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117314
You received this bug notification because you are a member of U
@Sitsofe Wheeler
You are right, my problem is discussed in detail in bug#116996, this discussion
should concentrate on the X server and AGP related versions of the problem.
I'm off to #116996.
Good luck!
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
@Sitsofe Wheeler
I hope I did it right. That was my first bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.20/+bug/117621
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117314
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
Upgraded kernel seems to recognise my SATA HDD as hde and gives an error
message "hde lost interrupt" during kernel boot.
No boot is conclude din a reasonable amount of time.
It should be sdx.
2-6-20-15 works just fine.
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems
https://bugs.lau
a friend of mine have had the same problem as erik, in the new menu.lst
root was set to (1,0) instead of (0,0), maybe grub does not like to be
installed in a slave hard drive. In addition the section in menu.lst
that booted windows disappeared completely
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update give
Phillip,
I take it back even though you didn't mention it in the change log the
TIFM fixes are in this kernel, If not then strangely my SD works.
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117314
You received this bug notification because you are a
Ok pinned the last bit of the puzzle down my suspend
I'm using uswsusp so in /etc/uswsusp.conf I had /dev/sda1 (as that was the
correct swap drive)
so when the new kernel installed the and the devices no longer matched
the initrd image no longer had uswsusp in it.
Therefore correcting uswsus
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-
source-2.6.20/+bug/116996/comments/13
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-
source-2.6.20/+bug/116996/comments/14
more info about my problem...
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
Phillip, please check into this.
** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.20 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
Assignee: (unassigned) => Phillip Lougher
Status: Confirmed => Unconfirmed
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117314
Yo
If you wish I can deliberatly bust my 2.6.20.-16.28 kernel to how it
was.
then try noresume, Though I'm not sure that'll fix it as it depends on
whether the noresume option is before the 'does image exist code'
I believe the initramfs kernel is functioning correctly
1 check if image exists
2 err
Sitsofe My system is now booting perfectly with 2.6.20-16.28 so I don't
think adding no-resume will affect it.
It was definatly the '/dev/sda1' in /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/resume.
causing the 'hang with flashing cursor' which isnt really a hang its the
system waiting for acknoledgment behind th
Gorgonzola:
It looks like the issue you described is also reported in Bug #116996 ...
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117314
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
I'm running Feisty on a Dell Latitude D505 and everything has been
working great until I updated the kernel through update manager this
morning.
I've moved /home to it's own partition some time ago using
[URL="http://ubuntu.wordpress.com/2006/01/29/move-home-to-its-own-
partition/"]these instructi
Andrew:
Interesting theory with suspend... Can you try booting with the noresume kernel
parameter in grub and reporting your results back?
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117314
You received this bug notification because you are a member
OK heres the hack to fix once you've established it is the resume issue
(see above)
all 3 locations must exist and be either UUID= or hd= (for ide) (I use
the physical (hda1) as UUID moves on swaps for me so example is for
/dev/hda1)
menu.lst
fstab
and /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/resume
ensure /
Vajra:
Can you file a new bug report and include the output of
lspci
/etc/X11/xorg.conf
and
/var/log/Xorg.0.log
in it? Can you also indicate whether you can here the log in sound and whether
caps lock works even though the screen is black? If you are running binary
drivers could you switch to bin
PROBLEM:
On my system, X is unable to load the NVIDIA binary driver after the kernel
update. Not the famous "kernel module and X driver version mismatch", the X log
just says it encountered an error loading the NVIDIA driver module. The package
versions are:
nvidia-kernel-common 20051028+1ubunt
Gorgonzola:
Your problem seems very clearly defined. Is there any chance you file a new bug
report and post a link to the new bug back here so it doesn't get lost? Please
also include the output of lspci and lsmod in the new bug report. Thanks!
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot p
I also have a problem with 16. after reboot it just display black screen with a
cursor. this is my first time to report a problem. what shall i send?
chris ian fiel
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117314
You received this bug notificati
Hi All,
If you are getting the hangs early in boot symptom, I think this is
related to a problem with resume.
On my system the boot process is attempting to resume a non existent
image and stops when it fails???.
You can check this for yourselves.
when system has stopped press ctrl alt F1 and r
@Vajra
Yes, it should have been handled correctly, but there's no indication in your
problem reports that it is caused by a bug in the kernel itself.
i'm not saying that these are not important issues, i was just pointing
out that the original problem reported is related to a rather specific
and
@Gorgonzola
"Besides that particular problem, there are people reporting issues with third
party drivers, X server not loading and wireless cards failing to work. Please
bear in mind that these issues are all related to modified kernel modules, and
DO NOT apply to the kernel itself."
My system
There are various problems reported here.
One of them is related to the relabeling of storage devices form sd** to
hd**, wich produces a IRQ problem, and then an error message about DMA
interrupt and DMA interrupt recovery. This is all related to disks not
been found or not been properly identifie
I respect that these kind of things happy from time to time, when when a
update like this looks like it might pose a problem for a great number
of users, It would be really nice if Ubuntu or an Ubuntu dev. could make
some sort of a statement acknowledging that they recognize that their is
a problem
** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.20 (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117314
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
OK just a quick message because it looks like this bug is going to be
popular. If you are using 3rd party binary drivers not provided by
Ubuntu (or installed using a 3rd party tool) then bugs.launchpad.net is
not the right place to seek support. Please use one of the support
methods described on ht
As I said before, in my case, kernel hangs during boot with a X cursor frozen
in a black screen.
2.6.20-15 works fine.
This post is to attach my syslog.
** Attachment added: "syslog"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7860514/syslog
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems
https
OK pined my problem down to my resume settings
cant use uuid for swap as it changes from time to time
It worked fine on -15 using /dev/sda1 in menu.lst and fstab
With -16 it doesn't matter whether I use /dev/hda1 or the UUID the boot
mesage complains that it cant resume the image (even though it
Update...
I posted earlier that after upgrading, my grub menu.list file was not
correct. Apparently, the "groot" option in the file was not set
correctly (maybe on install?). After setting it to "(hd0,1)", update-
grub seems to correctly set the "root" lines for my grub entries.
--
latest kernel
same here: sd* -> hd*, so system is unbootable.
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117314
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bu
Here is the content of the startup screens:
Starting up...
Loading, please wait...
kinit: name_to_dev_t( /dev/disk/by uuid/440adce5-08d1-48d5-8f6b-946ed16c9d82) =
hda2 (3,2)
kinit: trying to resume from /dev/disk/by
uuid/440adce5-08d1-48d5-8f6b-946ed16c9d82
kinit: No resume image, doing normal b
OK, further reviewing has narrowed this down to the rebadging of storage
devices from sda to hda. Other users have arrived at the same
conclusion and I now concur; in 2.6.20-15 my laptop hard disk is sda1,
in 2.6.20-16 it is hda1.
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems
https:/
OK it gets stranger. When attempting to boot 2.6.20-16 the process
stops just after system starting message and sits there. Entered ctrl-
alt-f1 and saw message relating to what appears to be fstab commands.
Last line says press enter to continue; pressed enter and successfully
booted to the kern
My Fstab has always had uuid since edgy.
yet still my system stops dead with a flashing text cursor in the top
left
no error messages
going back to 2.6.20-15 all OK.
excerpt from my fstab.
# /dev/hda2 -- converted during upgrade to edgy
UUID=e9533fb2-8c39-4ea6-b14a-da0a3475a503 / ext3 defa
This update incorrectly changed Grub on my system (as others have
experienced), and left me unbootable.
After reading the above, I changed the incorrect root entry in grub from
(4,1) to (0,1) which fixed it.
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
In my case, kernel hangs during boot with a X cursor frozen in a black screen.
Uninstalling nvidia-glx and falling back to the 'nv' driver did not solve the
problem.
2.6.20-15 works fine.
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117314
You receive
Solution for me was to address volumes in fstab by their UUID.
When I first saw 7.04's new UUID convention I didn't like it, didn't at
all appreciate the automatic edits to my fstab, and didn't like how a
portion of my hard-won (though limited) understanding of volume mounting
had been broken with
Forgot to mention, the system I upgraded in my previous post had no SATA
drives, all drives are PATA in that box. I have not yet upgraded my
machine that has a mix of SATA and PATA drives.
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117314
You receive
After I upgraded, the grub menu.list file was incorrect. The entry for
2.6.20-15 looked like this BEFORE:
title Ubuntu, kernel 2.6.20-15-generic
root(hd0,1)
kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.20-15-generic
root=UUID=6430bdad-99af-4e51-8552-4f50510924c1 ro quiet splash
initrd
Hello.
I'm getting "hde lost interrupt" during kernel boot and then it freezes.
I'm able to boot normally with the old kernel (2-6-20-15).
Specs:
Ubuntu 7.04 32-bit.
Pentium 4 2.8GHz
Abit IC7
2x IDE & 1x SATA HDD
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
I have a problem with 2.6.20-16 too, even if not so serious as the posts
above. My mouse wheel is not working anymore after rebooting.
This is xorg.conf input section:
Section "InputDevice"
Identifier "Configured Mouse"
Driver "mouse"
Option "CorePoi
2.6.20-16 will not boot on my centrino laptop, nor will 16 generic. The
recovery modes will boot. System fails on screen after grub, the hard
disk activity light flickers then nothing.
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117314
You received
similar problems. ubuntu no longer auto-mounts my two windows
partitions. I use the automatix read/write NTFS utility...
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117314
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whi
Similar problems, 2.6.20-16 does not seem to find my root file system
even though it is specified with a root=UUID in the menu.lst
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117314
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Same problem here. It say that it lost interrupt with my hd ' s (the
sata ones propably) and it doesnt boot. If i press ctrl-alt-delete it
reaches the phase when Xserver loads but it brokes down (normaly)
because i have used the official nvidia drivers and the kernel module
need to rebuild. But whe
Same here, 2.6.20-15 gave all my IDE devices sdx names as well on an IBM
Thinkpad R50.
Now with 2.6.20-16 my drives are named hdx again and thus several partitions
dont get mounted correctly, HIGHLY annoying.
Please revert to 2.6.20-15 behaviour.
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot
** Summary changed:
- latest kernel(2.6.20-16) update gives boot problems
+ latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems
--
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117314
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
92 matches
Mail list logo
