Daniel have you got enough information about this bug?
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124895
Title:
coreutils and
On 24 May 2013 15:31, Thomas Hotz 124...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
Daniel have you got enough information about this bug?
Nothing that is not already in the report, which is sufficient to
identify a real issue.
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
Again, why?
On 24 May 2013 15:51, Daniel Hartwig mand...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 May 2013 15:31, Thomas Hotz 124...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
Daniel have you got enough information about this bug?
Nothing that is not already in the report, which is sufficient to
identify a real issue.
So for the time
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124895
Title:
coreutils and debianutils dependency cycle on reinstall command
To manage
On 23 May 2013 23:05, piotr zimoch ebyt...@gmail.com wrote:
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = New
Why?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124895
Title:
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Triaged
--
coreutils and debianutils dependency cycle on reinstall command
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124895
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Can you confirm if this is still a problem in Jaunty please? Thank you.
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
coreutils and debianutils dependency cycle on reinstall command
On my jaunty system findutils pre-depends on libc6 and libc6 has a
dependency on findutils. So yes, for me the issue still exists, but
this may not affect typical use of the package. I have worked around it
for my purposes by writing a function that modifies the findutils binary
package before
Thank you for updating us. I am marking this as Triaged as there should
be enough information here for a developer to begin working on this.
Thank you for reporting this.
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
coreutils and debianutils dependency cycle on
Rodolfos way works for me, thank you very much. Little howto:
cd /var/cache/apt/archives
sudo rm *
sudo apt-get install libc
# it'll fetch the debs and then exit with the error message
sudo dpkg --force-depends --install libc6_2.8\~20080505-0ubuntu9_i386.deb
findutils_4.4.0-2ubuntu3_i386.deb
sudo
Rodolfo,
I don't know how you manage to get a clean cache (with the debs you needed)
I tried the following but got the following results :(
[Tue Feb 03 19:40:57 shir...@shirish-desktop:/var/cache/apt/archives ] $ ll
libc6*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4364500 2009-01-09 20:35
Right tried again, this time get a different bug
$ sudo dpkg --force-depends --install libc6_2.8~20080505-0ubuntu8_i386.deb
findutils_4.4.0-2ubuntu3_i386.deb
[sudo] password for shirish:
dpkg: failed to open package info file `/var/lib/dpkg/available' for reading:
Stale NFS file handle
--
Well, it seems you're having some problems with the file system. Are you
using NFS? Reading from network?
Cheers,
--
coreutils and debianutils dependency cycle on reinstall command
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124895
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Reply in-line :-
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 21:01, Rodolfo rgama...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, it seems you're having some problems with the file system. Are you
using NFS? Reading from network?
Hi Rodolfo,
Nope, just on the plain hdd. No NFS, no nothing :(
Cheers,
--
Regards,
Hi Shirish,
Let's see. What I meat was that:
1) Just erased by command line all what was copied in the cache directory (or
moved all that stuff somewhere else).
2) Retried the command that was causing me troubles.
3) After failing, nevertheless, I saw that on the caché directory there were
I believe I've solved it.
After cleaning apt-get's cache, I tried one more time without good
results; but with that I generated a clean cache (ie only with the
debs I was needing).
Then did
cd /var/cache/apt/archives
and then
sudo dpkg --force-depends --install
Hi, I'm having the same problem:
E: Couldn't configure pre-depend libc6 for findutils, probably a
dependency cycle.
Is there any way to bypass the problem? So as to install'em separately?
It prompted when I tried to upgrade from CMake 2.4 to 2.6. In
particular, I'm using Gutsy; and that newer
findutils has always had a pre-depends on libc6. However, until
Intrepid libc6 did not have a dependency on findutils. Now that it
does, it is not possible to use apt-get to go from the state of neither
libc6 nor findutils being installed to the state where either or both is
installed.
Oh, drat, I put this into the wrong bug.
--
coreutils and debianutils dependency cycle on reinstall command
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124895
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = New
--
coreutils and debianutils dependency cycle on reinstall command
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124895
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been
any activity in it recently. We were wondering is this still an issue
for you? Can you try with the latest Ubuntu release? Thanks in advance.
** Changed in:
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 4:23 AM, Hew McLachlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been
any activity in it recently. We were wondering is this still an issue
for you? Can
This issue is mentioned by some Debian folks...
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00144.html
And the apparent realization of the issue, with no solution given...
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00147.html
--
coreutils and debianutils dependency cycle on reinstall
23 matches
Mail list logo
