[Bug 1376443] Re: Default ACL not inherited as Access ACL on copy and move

2014-10-23 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: coreutils (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1376443 Title:

[Bug 1376443] Re: Default ACL not inherited as Access ACL on copy and move

2014-10-20 Thread Seth Arnold
Bib, I'm not saying that this bug is incorrect. I'm saying that these patches are insecure and should not be used: http://michael.orlitzky.com/code/releases/tar-1.27.1-gpcc.patch http://michael.orlitzky.com/code/releases/coreutils-8.22-gpcc.patch Do not use those patches. They are unsafe.

[Bug 1376443] Re: Default ACL not inherited as Access ACL on copy and move

2014-10-18 Thread Bib
Please Seth could you be more clear? I can't see the difference when an admin sets a default+access acl to some directory to grant write to a group, he knows what he does. Furthermore, imagine the admin is been under so heavy load so that he didn't got time enough to regrant the group write

[Bug 1376443] Re: Default ACL not inherited as Access ACL on copy and move

2014-10-16 Thread Seth Arnold
Stay away from the patches provided in the linked email; I suspect the person who put it together does not regularly receive files named foo ; rm -rf ~ from his friends. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1376443] Re: Default ACL not inherited as Access ACL on copy and move

2014-10-14 Thread Bib
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/acl-devel/2014-10/msg2.html ** Package changed: acl (Ubuntu) = coreutils (Ubuntu) ** Tags removed: coreutils ** Tags added: acl -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1376443] Re: Default ACL not inherited as Access ACL on copy and move

2014-10-11 Thread Bib
More info: as umask is the ootb default (0002), it doesn't seem to be the thing that a default cp would ignore, because actually cp ignores it when an acl is involved. Instead, the culprit seems to be cp when cp ignores an acl when present and uses its usual mode bits when it would adopt the acl's

[Bug 1376443] Re: Default ACL not inherited as Access ACL on copy and move

2014-10-09 Thread Bib
http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=8527 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1376443 Title: Default ACL not inherited as Access ACL on copy and move To manage notifications

[Bug 1376443] Re: Default ACL not inherited as Access ACL on copy and move

2014-10-06 Thread Bib
** Summary changed: - Default ACL not inherited as Access ACL on copy + Default ACL not inherited as Access ACL on copy and move -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1376443 Title: