Today I accepted the Ubuntu Firefox updates. Firefox became unstable, for
instance google.com doesn't resolve and gives this message:
ASSERT: *** Search: _installLocation: engine has no file!
Stack Trace:
0:ENSURE_WARN(false,_installLocation: engine has no file!,2147500037)
1:()
2:()
3:()
Further data: Entering about:plugins into Firefox gives the following error
message:
ASSERT: *** Search: _installLocation: engine has no file!
Stack Trace:
0:ENSURE_WARN(false,_installLocation: engine has no file!,2147500037)
1:()
2:()
3:()
4:epsGetAttr([object Object],alias)
5:()
Why did you comment on this bug? Your issue is in bug 338785.
Please do not comment on old bugs unless you have something to add to
the existing bug. If it's a new issue, please open a new bug report.
Thanks.
CurlySurmudgeon wrote:
Further data: Entering about:plugins into Firefox gives the
--- On Wed, 8/5/09, Micah Gersten launch...@micahscomputing.com wrote:
From: Micah Gersten launch...@micahscomputing.com
Subject: [Bug 153133] Re: update-manager seems to lose flash 9
To: alm314...@yahoo.com
Date: Wednesday, August 5, 2009, 6:19 PM
Why did you comment on this bug?
Because
--- On Wed, 8/5/09, Micah Gersten launch...@micahscomputing.com wrote:
From: Micah Gersten launch...@micahscomputing.com
Subject: [Bug 153133] Re: update-manager seems to lose flash 9
To: alm314...@yahoo.com
Date: Wednesday, August 5, 2009, 6:19 PM
Why did you comment on this bug?
Uhm, what do
its the obligation of the user to manage whatever they installed in the
profile. Ubuntu cannot anything about it. Flashplayer 9 was updated by
adobe because it had bad bugs ... as usual.
Remove things from your profile plugins/ folder and you will be fine.
In firefox 3 you will get the ability
Sorry, but not really. If I install openoffice 2.0, and then upgrade to
2.2, am I required to delete openoffice 2.0 manually? No.
The bug here, if there is one, is that Firefox's installation for Flash
9 apparently didn't remove Flash 7. For some reason, these coexisted in
the version of Firefox
from pluginreg.dat:
/home/reuben/.mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so
... so you still have a old flashplayer install in your profile.
removing the flashplayer files from /home/reuben/.mozilla/plugins will
fix this for you.
- Alexander
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete =
Yeah, but it's not my job to clean up after the app. Also, flash 9
worked on Feisty no problem, so what happened that broke things, during
the upgrade?
Thanks
--
update-manager seems to lose flash 9
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153133
You received this bug notification because you are a
Also note that both flash 7 and flash 9 lay claim to libflashplayer.so
(in my first comment). I will wipe and cleanup manually, but this is
something the app should manage.
--
update-manager seems to lose flash 9
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153133
You received this bug notification because
FYI, I searched through my installed packages, and the only thing
matching flash is flashplugin-nonfree (which I assume is providing:
/home/reuben/.mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so). Where does
/home/reuben/.mozilla/plugins/nprhapengine.so come from?
Thanks
** Attachment added: pluginreg.dat
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: update-manager = firefox
--
update-manager seems to lose flash 9
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153133
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
please post your .mozilla/pluginreg.dat
Thanks,
- Aleaxnder
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Low
Status: New = Incomplete
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Mozilla Bugs (mozilla-bugs)
--
update-manager seems to lose flash 9
13 matches
Mail list logo
