[Bug 190472] Re: nfs + fs-cache

2010-09-22 Thread Jorge O. Castro
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 440522 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/440522 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 440522 Kernel modules not compiled (Stats, NFS, AFS, etc) * You can subscribe to bug 440522 by following this link: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+s

[Bug 190472] Re: nfs + fs-cache

2010-09-08 Thread AleksanderAdamowski
Have a look at this discussion: http://markmail.org/message/kbdcma2vixgfdz4x In short, Tim Gardner has written: "We typically don't enable options that are marked experimental. fs/nfs/Kconfig:depends on EXPERIMENTAL" However, this explanation isn't entirely satisfactory, as William van de Veld

[Bug 190472] Re: nfs + fs-cache

2010-09-08 Thread AleksanderAdamowski
** Also affects: linux Importance: Undecided Status: New -- nfs + fs-cache https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190472 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https:/

[Bug 190472] Re: nfs + fs-cache

2010-07-29 Thread Johan Dahlin
I'm reopening the bug, it should be kept open until CONFIG_NFS_FSCACHE is enabled in the default kernel. ** Changed in: nfs-utils (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- nfs + fs-cache https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190472 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 190472] Re: nfs + fs-cache

2010-06-30 Thread Mikael Olofsson
And it's still not working in 10.04, the fscache module is loaded but since no filesystems actually uses fscache it is not working. r...@mon-lb-test:/boot# grep -y fscache config-2.6.32-22-server CONFIG_FSCACHE=m # CONFIG_FSCACHE_STATS is not set # CONFIG_FSCACHE_HISTOGRAM is not set # CONFIG_FSC

[Bug 190472] Re: nfs + fs-cache

2010-01-24 Thread Rich
No, it's actually not present in 9.10: # cat /boot/config-2.6.31-17-generic |grep -i fscache CONFIG_FSCACHE=m # CONFIG_FSCACHE_STATS is not set # CONFIG_FSCACHE_HISTOGRAM is not set # CONFIG_FSCACHE_DEBUG is not set # CONFIG_NFS_FSCACHE is not set # CONFIG_AFS_FSCACHE is not set In other words...f

[Bug 190472] Re: nfs + fs-cache

2009-06-12 Thread Wido den Hollander
Already present in Ubuntu 9.10 ** Changed in: nfs-utils (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- nfs + fs-cache https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190472 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-

[Bug 190472] Re: nfs + fs-cache

2009-06-12 Thread Wido den Hollander
My bad, as i see it is already present in Ubuntu 9.10 http://packages.ubuntu.com/karmic/cachefilesd This report can be closed. -- nfs + fs-cache https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190472 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 190472] Re: nfs + fs-cache

2009-06-12 Thread Wido den Hollander
I read that fs-cache was added to the 2.6.30 kernel, so i assume this will be available in Ubuntu 10.04 LTS? -- nfs + fs-cache https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190472 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 190472] Re: nfs + fs-cache

2008-02-10 Thread Murat Güneş
** Changed in: nfs-utils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist -- nfs + fs-cache https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190472 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.c

[Bug 190472] Re: nfs + fs-cache

2008-02-10 Thread Jérôme Guelfucci
** Changed in: nfs-utils (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: None => nfs-utils -- nfs + fs-cache https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190472 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.c