$ change-override -s impish-proposed -c main -t fence-agents
Override component to main
fence-agents 4.7.1-1ubuntu7 in impish: universe/admin -> main
1 publication overridden.
$ change-override -s impish-proposed -c main fence-agents-base
fence-agents-common
Override component to main
fence-agent
Override component to main
fence-agents 4.7.1-1ubuntu6 in impish amd64: universe/admin/optional/100% ->
main
fence-agents 4.7.1-1ubuntu6 in impish arm64: universe/admin/optional/100% ->
main
fence-agents 4.7.1-1ubuntu6 in impish armhf: universe/admin/optional/100% ->
main
fence-agents 4.7.1-1ubu
** Changed in: fence-agents (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Andy Whitcroft (apw)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927004
Title:
[MIR] fence-agents
To manage notifications abou
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/4.7.1-1ubuntu7
resolved the last missing bit and is built in imposh-proposed.
It shows in
https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.html
so it is ready.
Setting Fix Committed.
Asking the Archive-Admins to please
I reviewed fence-agents 4.7.1-1ubuntu6 as checked into impish. This shouldn't
be
considered a full audit but rather a quick gauge of maintainability.
fence-agents provides per-hardware or cloud details on how to forcibly
remove a machine from a high-availability setup, whether it's by yanking
po
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: fence-agents (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927004
Title:
Yep this is just waiting on security team review.
Also just for easy clarification for the archive admin reading this
later, the packages to promote to main are:
- fence-agents-common
- fence-agents-base
The packages to leave in universe are:
- fence-agents (transitional package)
- fence-agents
The description of this bug was updated after the renaming of the binary
packages happened. Now we have src:fence-agents providing the following
binary packages in Impish:
- fence-agents (transitional package)
- fence-agents-common
- fence-agents-base
- fence-agents-extra
If I got everything righ
I think you might be too focused on this particular package, as I'm not seeing
any 'myriad' of use cases; the breakdown is:
1) a 'common' binary deb that provides something that other binary debs use
2) a 'maintained' or 'stable' binary deb that provides stuff that is
'maintained' and/or 'works m
"Also note that while 'base' and 'extra' might have been used before,
you might not have seen Seth's comment 7 that indicated it didn't turn
out very well for apparmor, so maybe 'base' and 'extra' aren't the best
names, even if they've been used before."
Thanks, I did see that and we discussed it.
Thanks Rick.
> There's some prior art to this in the archive
I think it would really be good for the server team to follow up on this
naming convention and get some agreement across the distro (not only for
server team maintained packages), as we don't want different
teams/people coming up with d
Thanks for the feedback folks. We spent some time thinking through this
and the goals of the split and have come up with using -base and
-extras. There's some prior art to this in the archive and we don't want
to go with any naming convention that would indicate a "value" judgment
on the two differ
I agree -supported is a bad term to use, it indeed is far too ambiguous;
the meaning of 'supported' varies wildly depending on who you ask. I
think even between us three discussing this the meaning probably is
different ;-)
I don't have particularly strong feelings on the specific naming of each
p
On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 03:21:26PM -, Dan Streetman wrote:
> Lucas, thanks! The naming sounds good to me, using -core and -extra does
> seem better than supported/unsupported. No more concerns from me, so
I know it's cliche to bikeshed on names, but:
- "core" is already an overloaded word wit
Lucas, thanks! The naming sounds good to me, using -core and -extra does
seem better than supported/unsupported. No more concerns from me, so
this only needs security team review (and server team subscription to
the package)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
And of course please do update this bug description with the adjusted
binary package names to promote to main, once the packaging is updated
with the new names.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
Lucas - thanks for the heads up, I have marked this CVE-2019-10153 as
not-affected for focal+ in the Ubuntu CVE Tracker -
https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu-cve-
tracker/commit/?id=2b90bcddc25956d0c037e6119460f2778ee64c0a
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
Thanks for the review Dan! Some comments below:
- I'll make sure the Server team is subscribed to this package.
- Regarding the CVE-2019-10153 fix, it is mentioned in the changelog:
$ cat debian/changelog | grep -B2 -A4 CVE-2019-10153
fence-agents (4.3.3-2) unstable; urgency=high
* fence_rhev
[Summary]
There are only some minor concerns listed below, which shouldn't block
this, so this is ACK from MIR team. Please see Notes and TODOs below.
This does need a security review (though I considered skipping it,
but want to err on the side of safety), so I'll assign ubuntu-security
List of
FWIW I submitted a pacemaker merge proposal which add changes to
recommend fence-agents-supported. Since pacemaker is already in main the
fence-agents-supported package will need to be pulled in.
https://code.launchpad.net/~lucaskanashiro/ubuntu/+source/pacemaker/+git/pacemaker/+merge/402284
--
** Changed in: fence-agents (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Streetman (ddstreet)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927004
Title:
[MIR] fence-agents
To manage notifications
21 matches
Mail list logo
