Further to discussion in #ubuntu-devel just now[1], we'll aim for a
4.7.3 release that will eliminate the need for the distro patches and
with Steve's other comments above addressed. For now then I'll reject
the current uploads from the queue.
[1]:
> Why, when this is an upstream release for which Canonical is the
upstream, are there local Debian patches included here?
Good point, we started the SRU process after 4.7.0 was released, but the
time it took us to test the PPA and then the beginning of the patch
pilot the noble released a minor
+ * New patches:
+- d/p/0002-collect-refactor-_format_version.patch
+- d/p/0003-pacemaker-Use-pep440-formatted-version-on-comparison.patch
+- d/p/0004-cirrus-Run-tests-on-latest-daily-builds-for-ubuntu.patch
+- d/p/0005-processor-handle-msr-module-loading-via-predicate.patch
Why,
It's my understanding all uploads were done, including stable releases,
where they landed in the unapproved queue. Therefore there is nothing
else to sponsor here, so I'm removing that subscription, as it's now in
the hands of the SRU team for their normal queue processing.
--
You received this
This bug was fixed in the package sosreport - 4.7.0-0ubuntu1
---
sosreport (4.7.0-0ubuntu1) oracular; urgency=medium
* New 4.7.0 upstream release. (LP: #2054395)
* For more details, full release note is available here:
- https://github.com/sosreport/sos/releases/tag/4.7.0
Autopkgtests for oracular/cockpit/s390x passed with a retry,
that should unblock the oracular-proposed migration shortly.
316-1build1 sosreport/4.7.0-0ubuntu12024-05-22
15:19:06 UTC 0h 04m 29s mfo pass
1bc3dca3-467e-430b-b336-fe8c1f19b6d5
--
You received
Be aware that, if/when those packages land, they do not fix LP: #2038648
(but that could be closed since bionic has reached EOSS anyway).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054395
Title:
Hi Arif,
sounds good. I applied the changes below and uploaded it for all series.
oracular: I removed the ':' in the changelog entry as mentioned before,
fixed the capital DEP3 header I also mentioned, and uploaded.
noble: Removed the ':' as above, fixed the version in the changelog to
Hi Athos, sounds good to me; thanks for your detailed notes
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054395
Title:
[sru] sos upstream 4.7.0
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Thanks for the changes, Arif.
I am reviewing the oracular changes only for now so we can get everyhing
right in that one and then we can proceed to checking the SRU
candidates.
- The changes still correctly match the upstream changes
- The patches introduced correctly match their upstream
Thanks for your comments, and the amendments that you have asked for.
The relevant Origin + Bugs for DEP3 have all been updated on all the
debdiffs. I have also updated mantic changelog, and focal to be
consistent.
To answer your question on the `X-Python3-Version: >= 3.6`, this is
explicitly
** Patch added: "focal-sosreport.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/2054395/+attachment/5778350/+files/focal-sosreport.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Patch added: "jammy-sosreport.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/2054395/+attachment/5778348/+files/jammy-sosreport.debdiff
** Patch removed: "focal-sosreport.debdiff"
** Patch added: "mantic-sosreport.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/2054395/+attachment/5778347/+files/mantic-sosreport.debdiff
** Patch removed: "jammy-sosreport.debdiff"
** Patch removed: "noble-sosreport.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/2054395/+attachment/5776703/+files/noble-sosreport.debdiff
** Patch added: "noble-sosreport.debdiff"
** Patch removed: "oracular-sosreport.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/2054395/+attachment/5777621/+files/oracular-sosreport.debdiff
** Patch added: "oracular-sosreport.debdiff"
Thanks, Arif.
The contents are correct as per the upstream release.
For the `X-Python3-Version: >= 3.6` entry in d/control, I kept wondering
if it is this needed in anything other than bionic and I wonder how the
SRU team will look at that. Unless we are supporting upgrade paths that
would skip
Updated debdiff as suggested
** Patch removed: "oracular-sosreport.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/2054395/+attachment/5776702/+files/oracular-sosreport.debdiff
** Patch added: "oracular-sosreport.debdiff"
I see.
So, patch debian/patches/0006-cirrus-Update-images-add-noble-to-
supported-list.patch is not needed here then, right?
And the changes in patch .cirrus.yml in patch
debian/patches/0007-cirrus-Start-testing-on-new-devel-ubuntu-daily.patch
are also not needed, right?
If my assumptions above
The new patch that was added at the end was about the msr module loading
and was also present in the CI testing we found upstream and hence added
it on.
In the original patch that is in noble it was == 24.04 and now it's
>=24.04 this will ensure it covers any series that is noble and above, I
Thanks, Arif.
Thanks for fixing the typo in the focal changelog.
For oracular, I see 2 new patches for cirrus (I see one of them is also
present for noble). Why are we patching that file at all? AFAIU, it is a
file parsed by the CI, and it is not even sipped in the package.
--
You received
** Patch added: "focal-sosreport.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/2054395/+attachment/5776707/+files/focal-sosreport.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Patch added: "jammy-sosreport.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/2054395/+attachment/5776706/+files/jammy-sosreport.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Patch added: "mantic-sosreport.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/2054395/+attachment/5776704/+files/mantic-sosreport.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054395
Title:
[sru] sos upstream 4.7.0
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-pro/+bug/2054395/+subscriptions
** Patch added: "oracular-sosreport.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/2054395/+attachment/5776702/+files/oracular-sosreport.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Patch added: "noble-sosreport.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/2054395/+attachment/5776703/+files/noble-sosreport.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Patch removed: "focal-sosreport.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/2054395/+attachment/5775312/+files/focal-sosreport.debdiff
** Patch removed: "jammy-sosreport.debdiff"
Thanks for the reply, Arif.
Regarding the new upstream version: I understand it is not practical to
go for 4.7.1 now given your explanation. Let's go with 4.7.0 then.
As for the bogus debdiffs, please, fix them and make them apply cleanly
with debdiff-apply. This will at least slightly reduce
@athos-ribeiro @eeickmeyer
I created the debdiff by comparing the 2 .dsc files, and indeed it
include the file, as well it's symbolic linked file to be changed. I
have re-ran the debdiff locally again this morning, and I can see the
same thing. I can remove the offending section, and have been
@athos-ribeiro
A debdiff should most certainly not be trying to patch a symlink. I'd
recommend trying it with `patch -p1 < {debdiff}` and build the source
package to see if it works. If it complains about changes to the source
that aren't reflected, then yes, there's a problem with the debdiff,
Oh, there is one additional issue:
debdiff-apply failis with
File man/en/sosreport.1 is not a regular file -- refusing to patch
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/debdiff-apply", line 382, in
sys.exit(main(sys.argv[1:]))
Thanks, Arif, the changes LGTM. I have a couple of questions:
- The maintainer field in d/control was reset. Was this on purpose?
- Version 4.7.1 is out since 2024-04-08; I understand this was first prepared
prior that date. Still, I should ask: would you rather prepare 4.7.1 here to
avoid
** Patch added: "jammy-sosreport.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/2054395/+attachment/5775311/+files/jammy-sosreport.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Patch added: "noble-sosreport.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/2054395/+attachment/5775309/+files/noble-sosreport.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Patch added: "focal-sosreport.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/2054395/+attachment/5775312/+files/focal-sosreport.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Patch added: "mantic-sosreport.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/2054395/+attachment/5775310/+files/mantic-sosreport.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Patch removed: "oracular-sosreport.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/2054395/+attachment/5773527/+files/oracular-sosreport.debdiff
** Patch removed: "noble-sosreport.debdiff"
Sounds good to me, I'll revert the copyright change and upload new
debdiffs for all. We can tackle the copyright file in a later SRU.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054395
Title:
Looking at [1], it states:
Similarly, plain text files which include their own copyright information and
are installed into
the binary package unmodified need not have that copyright information copied
into
/usr/share/doc/PACKAGE/copyright
So in principle it's ok to drop the specific
Hi Andreas,
This was discussed in the PR [1], let me see if I can answer your
questions
* All the files that need a copyright have the copyright at the top of the
files, and hence not therefore require here. If we started to add all the
copyright stuff, then this file would be considerably
I pushed the oracular debdiff to a git repo at
https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+git/sosreport/+ref/oracular-patch-pilot-sosreport-update-2054395
I'm slightly concerned with the d/copyright changes. We seem to be removing
attributions from others:
diff -Nru
** Patch added: "oracular-sosreport.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/oracular/+source/sosreport/+bug/2054395/+attachment/5773527/+files/oracular-sosreport.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
new debdiff with new oracular being the version, and building on top of
the 2 versions that were not there previously
** Patch removed: "noble-sosreport.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/oracular/+source/sosreport/+bug/2054395/+attachment/5772881/+files/noble-sosreport.debdiff
**
** Also affects: sosreport (Ubuntu Oracular)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Arif Ali (arif-ali)
Status: In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054395
Title:
[sru]
Updated noble debdiff with a couple of fixes for py3.12 and `msr` module
load on noble
** Patch removed: "noble-sosreport.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/+source/sosreport/+bug/2054395/+attachment/5757528/+files/noble-sosreport.debdiff
** Patch added:
** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu Mantic)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided =>
@Lucas, it is ready.
We were planning to resolve that bug as part of the whole SRU of 4.7.0.
When n/m/j/f are done, we'll get the bionic one done too, and that will
be 4.7.0 as well, I hope that makes sense.
Or, would you prefer us to fix the current version there first, and then
do the SRU for
@Arif are the attached debdiffs ready to be uploaded? I do not know if I
get it right, but the bug you mentioned is not yet fixed:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/2038648
If this is ready for ~ubuntu-sponsors, please state so. If not, please
unsubscribe ~ubuntu-sponsors
The attachment "noble-sosreport.debdiff" seems to be a debdiff. The
ubuntu-sponsors team has been subscribed to the bug report so that they
can review and hopefully sponsor the debdiff. If the attachment isn't a
patch, please remove the "patch" flag from the attachment, remove the
"patch" tag,
The above debdiffs have been added, and ready for verification
We are waiting for the 4.4 main patch for bionic in #2038648 to be
uploaded before we crack on with the Pro update for bionic for 4.7.0
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Patch added: "focal-sosreport.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/2054395/+attachment/5757531/+files/focal-sosreport.debdiff
** Tags added: sts-sru-needed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
** Patch added: "noble-sosreport.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/2054395/+attachment/5757528/+files/noble-sosreport.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Patch added: "jammy-sosreport.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/2054395/+attachment/5757530/+files/jammy-sosreport.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Patch added: "mantic-sosreport.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/2054395/+attachment/5757529/+files/mantic-sosreport.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Description changed:
- [IMPACT]
+ [ Impact ]
- The sos team is pleased to announce the release of sos-4.7.0 This
- release focused on expanding support in policies for more and multiple
- package managers.
+ * A new sosreport version is available upstream, and following the
+
** Description changed:
[IMPACT]
The sos team is pleased to announce the release of sos-4.7.0 This
release focused on expanding support in policies for more and multiple
package managers.
[TEST PLAN]
Documentation for Special Cases:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SosreportUpdates
57 matches
Mail list logo
