[Bug 212617] Re: [needs-packaging] octave3.0-forge

2012-07-01 Thread Jeremy Bicha
I'm going to close this since it looks like most of Octave Forge is packaged in Debian and Ubuntu. Also, the #octave IRC topic doesn't recommend installing all of Octave Forge any more. If you need a metapackage for octave-forge, please file a bug in Debian's bug tracker as these packages are

[Bug 212617] Re: [needs-packaging] octave3.0-forge

2008-12-04 Thread pavon
I would agree that this is now essentially fixed in 8.10 since the packages are available individually. However, creating a octave-forge meta package wouldn't be a bad idea, since people moving over from matlab expect certain libraries to just be there without having to install anything else. This

[Bug 212617] Re: [needs-packaging] octave3.0-forge

2008-12-03 Thread Rebecca Palmer
Ubuntu 8.10 has most of the individual Octave-Forge main packages (as octave-[name]), plus octave-ad, octave-nan, and octave-tsa from Octave- Forge extra. The missing ones from Octave-Forge main are ANN, benchmark, database, nnet, special-matrix and video; ANN is a binding for a library itself

[Bug 212617] Re: [needs-packaging] octave3.0-forge

2008-06-06 Thread pavon
I would like to second this. Octave is pretty much useless without the standard libraries provided in octave-forge. Everyone I know that uses octave on Ubuntu have downgraded back to 2.1 because of this, which is a shame considering that the 2.9/3.0 series is leaps and bounds better. Is there an

[Bug 212617] Re: [needs-packaging] octave3.0-forge

2008-05-08 Thread Iulian Udrea
** Changed in: octave3.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist -- [needs-packaging] octave3.0-forge https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212617 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list