** Changed in: ecryptfs
Importance: Medium = Wishlist
** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium = Wishlist
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257901
Title:
** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Debian)
Status: Unknown = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257901
Title:
Suggestion: GUI frontend(s) for ecryptfs-utils
To manage
Looking at the attachments in this bug report, I noticed that an
attachment was not flagged as a patch. A patch contains changes to an
Ubuntu package that will resolve a bug and this attachment is one!
Subsequently, I've checked the patch flag for it. In the future when
submitting patches please
If I am at UDS-L I could probably pretty easily work with either of you
two to integrate the branches and add any desired features; if you think
that would be useful, put in a good word for my sponsorship ;)
--
Suggestion: GUI frontend(s) for ecryptfs-utils
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257901
I put desktop-karmic-ecryptfs-desktop-ui on my list of desktop things to
have for Lucid.
--
Suggestion: GUI frontend(s) for ecryptfs-utils
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257901
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Awesome! Thanks, Martin.
:-Dustin
--
Suggestion: GUI frontend(s) for ecryptfs-utils
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257901
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
If you need any help, let me know. The nautilus integration branch is
at lp:~mrooney/ecryptfs/nautilus-integration which depends on the API
branch. Dustin, I saw you merged that branch but is the API actually
being installed anywhere?
--
Suggestion: GUI frontend(s) for ecryptfs-utils
Another release and I still haven't found any time to work on this.
CC'ing Martin Pitt, desktop team lead. Martin, too late for Karmic, but
do you think you or someone on your team might be able to throw a little
bit of effort into merging the UI work that Michael has done, and ensure
that we
** Changed in: ecryptfs
Status: In Progress = Triaged
** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress = Triaged
--
Suggestion: GUI frontend(s) for ecryptfs-utils
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257901
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Thanks for the merge Dustin. Are the necessary changes in for the
packaging to actually ship the API correctly? If so I can merge that
into my nautilus branch and propose a merge for that which should help
provide a basic API.
--
Suggestion: GUI frontend(s) for ecryptfs-utils
Sorry, that should be help provide a basic GUI.
--
Suggestion: GUI frontend(s) for ecryptfs-utils
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257901
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Also affects: ecryptfs
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Suggestion: GUI frontend(s) for ecryptfs-utils
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257901
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #505008
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=505008
** Also affects: ecryptfs-utils (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=505008
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
Suggestion: GUI frontend(s) for
** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu)
Target: intrepid-alpha-5 = None
--
Suggestion: GUI frontend(s) for ecryptfs-utils
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257901
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
I certainly prefer the larger icons, but I question whether or not the
big icon should be on the button. An icon on a button should usually
indicate what the button will do, not what the current state is.
I would suggest having the icon grouped with the string Your Private
folder is currently...,
I think the vault should be locked/unlocked in situ, i.e., right inside
the folder view. This may be possible in Nautilus with a ribbon on top
similar to the Trash view.
I’m a fan of this:
http://www.iclarified.com/images/tutorials/177/698/698.png
I'll attach a mockup of how I feel it would work
(icons from Epiphany.)
** Attachment added: better-ui.png
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17406196/better-ui.png
--
Suggestion: GUI frontend(s) for ecryptfs-utils
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257901
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Thanks Tobias. Did you actually code that or is it just a graphical
mockup? If there is code a patch would be appreciated. Thanks!
--
Suggestion: GUI frontend(s) for ecryptfs-utils
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257901
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Well, the patch is so trivial, that I found it not worth posting.
What I'm really wondering is, where and how will this UI be presented?
Did you think this through, yet?
My initial impression is that this will sidestep the established desktop
mechanisms. Shouldn't this be intregrated with
Okay, I tested it on Intrepid and it works! By the way, the small
project now lives at https://launchpad.net/ecryptfs-gui.
Dustin, any feedback on my previous comment? I am not sure exactly where
to go from here.
--
Suggestion: GUI frontend(s) for ecryptfs-utils
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 4:08 PM, Mike Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, I tested it on Intrepid and it works! By the way, the small
project now lives at https://launchpad.net/ecryptfs-gui.
Dustin, any feedback on my previous comment? I am not sure exactly where
to go from here.
I think
Those terms would be more true to form, of what's actually being done.
But perhaps too technical for the target audience? Thoughts?
I agree about the use of mounting and unmounting being too technical
for this application. With a layperson it might also lead to confusion
with the need to
I agree about the use of mounting and unmounting being too technical
for this application.
Yes, I must admit I too feel this way. Though we don't want to be
inaccurate in a way that confuses more knowledgable users, although I
am not convinced the current terminology of encrypt/decrypt does, so
Actually, strike this
I have talked to the upstream ecryptfs-utils maintainers and they are
quite willing an interested to integrate GUI into the main
ecryptfs-utils project.
Hmm, well that is good in ways, but doesn't that change the scope of
this then? My idea was to have a simple GUI
Hi Dustin! I am going to install Intrepid-A4 and wanted to ping you to
make sure the instructions I should use to test this are the ones under
Testing from the Wiki page. I noticed it says it is up to date as of
8/4, and wanted to make sure it was still up to date.
By the way, is this GUI
And shaggy, I think this feature is still useful for users with
encrypted ~/. That is because I assume in general you have to have your
Home decrypted pretty much always when logged in for things to work
properly. However with ~/Private, this is not typically going to be the
case. As such it will
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Mike Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- It currently can't detect the mount state, so it assumes it is mounted
when run. Change this on line 89 if yours isn't mounted, or just mount it
before running. Can anyone give me a Python line[s] that will detect this?
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Mark Crutch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Based on Dustin's comments it appears that checking the automount option
should simply create ~/.ecryptfs/auto-mount whilst unchecking it should
remove that file. The initial state of the checkbox should be reflect
the
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 10:29 AM, Mike Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where should I go from here? Will mounting or unmounting require a
gksudo (or will the UI itself be run with gksudo), and what should the
autorun option do, code-wise?
No gksudo should be required.
mount.ecryptfs_private
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 9:13 AM, Mike Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Dustin! I am going to install Intrepid-A4 and wanted to ping you to
make sure the instructions I should use to test this are the ones under
Testing from the Wiki page. I noticed it says it is up to date as of
8/4, and
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Mark Crutch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally I still favour decrypt - not least because it's a real
word, whereas unencrypt isn't (at least as far as dictionary.com and
wiktionary.org is concerned).
I tend to agree... decrypt sounds better than unencrypt.
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Dustin Kirkland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can make an Ecryptfs-GUI project on Launchpad if
Agreed. I suggest you call it ecryptfs-gui. We'll need the
packaging, and such done too. At which point, we can provide binary
installables in a PPA.
Actually,
Alrighty then, I'll bite :)
** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
Assignee: (unassigned) = Mike Rooney (michael)
Status: New = In Progress
Target: None = intrepid-alpha-5
--
Suggestion: GUI frontend(s) for ecryptfs-utils
Okay, here is a quick initial version in pygtk. Currently there is no
underlying functionality, but who cares about that ;)
Where should I go from here? Will mounting or unmounting require a
gksudo (or will the UI itself be run with gksudo), and what should the
autorun option do, code-wise?
**
Based on Dustin's comments it appears that checking the automount option
should simply create ~/.ecryptfs/auto-mount whilst unchecking it should
remove that file. The initial state of the checkbox should be reflect
the existence, or otherwise, of that file.
I notice that Dustin also mentions an
Thanks for the feedback Mark, I agree that the wording can be improved,
and like your suggestions. I shall await Dustin's feedback.
For now, here is the initial version of the script. I don't have an
Intrepid box running but theoretically the mounting and unmounting
*should* work, so give it a
Okay, here's version 0.2, with functional toggling of the auto-mount
option. Note that it still has the second caveat of the first version,
so someone feel free to implement getMounted at line 70 :)
I took out the business logic or whatever you might call it from the
GUI and made an
I have an Intrepid installation on a virtual machine at work, but I'm
off until next week so won't get a chance to try the app until at least
then.
I did mean preceded: with the text change you end up with a complete
sentence, so putting the icon in the middle of the string per the
original
If i dont need and want the ~/Private thing, because i allready set up
encryption for entire /home/. Will there be something to turn the
feature on/off per user/per system?
--
Suggestion: GUI frontend(s) for ecryptfs-utils
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257901
You received this bug notification
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 6:09 PM, shaggy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If i dont need and want the ~/Private thing, because i allready set up
encryption for entire /home/. Will there be something to turn the
feature on/off per user/per system?
Quite simply, don't run the 'ecryptfs-setup-private'
40 matches
Mail list logo
