You should probably take a look at gocryptfs.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277578
Title:
ecryptfs does not work properly over nfs, cifs, samba, WebDAV, or aufs
To manage notificati
@wlxing: Sorry didn't see the notification until now. But actually when
i worked on this years ago it was for a SOHO demo project with desktop
clients bound via LAN to a centralized NFS Server for keeping clients
dump and still having encryption. In the end for production we switched
to laptops wit
@KrautOS: It's been a long while since you commented, and still I do not
have any clue about what the bug status is? Is Tyler still working on
that? I'm going to work ecryptfs on samba for the personal project in
the lab...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
I just done a server with NFS(w/o Kerberos)+NIS on basis of the upcoming
Ubuntu 14.04 with server and desktop installations. eCryptfs seems to
work, as i can log into an eCryptfs protected home directory on the
graphical login screen (lightdm needs some config changes though).
At first i thought i
Hello KrautOS. Here's some of my setup info, please let me know if you
need more details. Thanks.
vmhost:
vSphere 5.5
vmmachine (nfs-server):
>uname -a
Linux xxx 3.11.0-18-generic #32-Ubuntu SMP Tue Feb 18 21:11:14 UTC 2014 x86_64
x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>lsb_release -a
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
@Johnny: You mean eCryptFS runs better on SAMBA than on NFS on your
side? Can you give us some informations about your setup?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277578
Title:
ecryptfs doe
By the way the title of this bug seems misleading as ecryptfs seems to
work fine for cifs, samba, and even sshfs. Not sure about WebDAV or
aufs .
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277578
As a work around I successfully shared my encrypted partition using CIFS
instead. I do have to share the partition with Windows boxes as well
and so far everything seems to work fine. Performance is good and
usability is seemless for both linux and windows clients. I just need to
look into securi
Hi zombi
>for me doing a bindfs mount on top of the webdav mount and then
mounting the ecryptfs on the bindfs mount worked.
does this work with "distributed editing"?
e.g
- mounting from device A
- mounting from device B
- edit on device A
are the changes properly reflected on device B ?
--
Y
for me doing a bindfs mount on top of the webdav mount and then mounting
the ecryptfs on the bindfs mount worked.
mount.davfs https://dav.box.com box
bindfs box/dav /crypt
mount -t ecryptfs /crypt /decrypt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is su
FYI it does seem to work over afp/netatalk. It isn't a workaround for
most uses (including mine unfortunately) but it might help some people.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277578
Title
On 2012-12-13 19:10:06, Don wrote:
> Will this bug be fixed, or it is already fixed?
It isn't fixed. Most of the work for NFS is done, but there's still more
to do. It is marked wishlist because no one is working on it and it
isn't considered a priority at this time.
In the future, please check t
Will this bug be fixed, or it is already fixed?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277578
Title:
ecryptfs does not work properly over nfs, cifs, samba, WebDAV, or aufs
To manage notifica
** Changed in: ecryptfs
Assignee: Tyler Hicks (tyhicks) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Tyler Hicks (tyhicks) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are
On 2012-01-16 20:47:27, Chris wrote:
> @Tyler: does this last remaining NFS issue also effect the other
> protocols like WebDAV or CIFS? If not, would it be possible to release a
> fix which supports all the other protocols except NFS?
I'm not certain as my focus was just on NFS. CIFS looks to mak
@Tyler: does this last remaining NFS issue also effect the other
protocols like WebDAV or CIFS? If not, would it be possible to release a
fix which supports all the other protocols except NFS?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub
@Tyler, thanks for your status update!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277578
Title:
ecryptfs does not work properly over nfs, cifs, samba, WebDAV, or aufs
To manage notifications abo
eCryptfs on top of NFS isn't going to happen in the short term. Nearly
all of the eCryptfs fixes are now in place, except for one last sticking
point. The NFS maintainer is requiring that eCryptfs fix up a struct
nameidata and pass it down into NFS, but that can get ugly and is
something that the V
** Changed in: ecryptfs
Status: In Progress => Triaged
** Changed in: ecryptfs
Importance: High => Wishlist
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277578
Title:
ecryptfs does not w
@Tyler, what's the status on that NFS client patch? Any progress?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277578
Title:
ecryptfs does not work properly over nfs, cifs, samba, WebDAV, or aufs
** Summary changed:
- ecryptfs does not work properly over nfs, cifs, samba, or aufs
+ ecryptfs does not work properly over nfs, cifs, samba, WebDAV, or aufs
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
On the NFSv3 client front, I have all of the needed eCryptfs patches
upstream (as of 2.6.39-rc5), but there is still an NFS client patch that
needs to be accepted upstream. The NFS client maintainer has nack'ed it,
but I plan on making a couple small changes and resubmitting it soon.
http://www.sp
FYI, Tyler is getting closer to solving this bug, with a few patches
having been pushed to Linus' kernel tree.
Tyler, could you perhaps give us a brief update on where we are now?
--
:-Dustin
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Confirming the problem as reported by Dan (#10), Corni (#11) and Pallavi (#13):
Mounting over NFS: First "ls" after the mount works, subsequent "ls" return an
empty directory.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bu
Hello,
I tried running "ls" on a directory mounted over NFS. This works fine for the
first time but for subsequent attempts "ls" does not show any output.
However, when I repeat the same operation over a mount over local filesystems,
ls works fine.
Is this a known problem?
The ecryptfs RE
Hey Tyler,
What's the current state of your eCryptfs-on-NFS work-in-progress?
Dustin
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277578
Title:
ecryptfs does not work properly over nfs, cifs, sam
I see the exact same behavior as Dan above me. In any folder the first ls (or
any other command which requires file system data) works fine where the second
and all subsequent calls fail. Nothing in any log file nor in dmesg as far as I
can tell.
Reading through the comments I'm also not sure if
Not sure if this is the same bug or a different one, but I find ecryptfs
generally works smoothly over NFS, except that the second and subsequent
"ls" in any folder doesn't return any files. I don't see anything in
dmesg to suggest a problem.
This sounds like the bug reported two years ago here: h
I'm not sure if this is related, but I tried ecryptfs with .private on a
Rackspace cloud storage filesystem (cloudfuse) and it would crash the
file system every time (http://github.com/redbo/cloudfuse/issues#issue/4
). I'm sure this is a problem on the file system side (which shouldn't
just crash),
** Summary changed:
- ecryptfs does not work properly over nfs, cifs, or samba
+ ecryptfs does not work properly over nfs, cifs, samba, or aufs
--
ecryptfs does not work properly over nfs, cifs, samba, or aufs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277578
You received this bug notification because you
I have found a workaround (at least for the last 5 minutes):
1) Uninstall ecryptfs-utils in the client machine and install sshfs
2) Mount Private using sshfs.
It works for me up to now.
--
ecryptfs does not work properly over nfs, cifs, or samba
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277578
You receiv
Don't know if this helps, but I hit a different BUG (in inode.c) every
time I try to use rsync/SSH to back up data to an ecryptfs directory.
Trace is attached.
** Attachment added: "BUG trace"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39434423/ecryptfs_BUG
--
ecryptfs does not work properly over nfs, cif
Setting to in-progress.
Tyler has some working prototypes for this now.
** Changed in: ecryptfs
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
ecryptfs does not work properly over nfs, cifs, or samba
https://bugs.launch
** Tags added: kernel
--
ecryptfs does not work properly over nfs, cifs, or samba
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277578
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://li
** Changed in: ecryptfs
Status: Triaged => Confirmed
** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Confirmed
--
ecryptfs does not work properly over nfs, cifs, or samba
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277578
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Tyler Hicks (tyhicks)
** Changed in: ecryptfs
Assignee: (unassigned) => Tyler Hicks (tyhicks)
** Changed in: ecryptfs
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed =>
Unfortunately, I haven't gotten to work on this bug much in the last
month. I do not yet have a working patch set, but things were getting
close for NFS support. I will try to devote some time this week to more
work on NFS support.
--
ecryptfs does not work properly over nfs, cifs, or samba
htt
Tyler-
What's the status of this bug in the upstream kernel code?
I seem to remember you saying that you had a handle on the fixes. Have
those been merged upstream? If so, can you point to the git commits, in
case others want to try and backport them to their kernels?
:-Dustin
--
ecryptfs do
** Summary changed:
- ecryptfs does not work properly over nfs
+ ecryptfs does not work properly over nfs, cifs, or samba
--
ecryptfs does not work properly over nfs, cifs, or samba
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277578
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
Status: New => Confirmed
--
ecryptfs does not work properly over nfs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277578
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Date: 2007-01-19 14:49
Sender: mhalcrowProject Admin
Logged In: YES
user_id=729064
Originator: NO
This is an explicit call to BUG by NFS; while trying to do a radix insert
of an encrypted page, it looks like the page already exists in the NFS
inode page map when it shouldn't. If NFS were to just
41 matches
Mail list logo
