[Bug 336923] Re: Need LVDSout quirk for Intel 945GME 8086:27ae

2009-03-03 Thread joelkillspeople
** Attachment added: Xorg.7.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23372435/Xorg.7.log -- Need LVDSout quirk for Intel 945GME 8086:27ae https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336923 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 336923] Re: Need LVDSout quirk for Intel 945GME 8086:27ae

2009-03-03 Thread joelkillspeople
This problem is evident appears under the following Ubuntu versions: Ubuntu 8.10 x64 Ubuntu 8.10 i386 I will post the log files for each separately starting with Ubuntu 8.10 x64. ** Attachment added: lspci http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23372434/lspci -- Need LVDSout quirk for Intel 945GME

[Bug 336923] Re: Need LVDSout quirk for Intel 945GME 8086:27ae

2009-03-03 Thread joelkillspeople
** Attachment added: lshw http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23372590/lshw -- Need LVDSout quirk for Intel 945GME 8086:27ae https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336923 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 336923] Re: Need LVDSout quirk for Intel 945GME 8086:27ae

2009-03-03 Thread Geir Ove Myhr
Usually, quirks are applied using the PCI ID (major computer vendors have their own specific ID for the subsystem). In this case, both the System and Subsystem IDs are 8086:27ae, which is the generic Intel one, so disabling LVDS based on that will break all laptops with this specific ID (looks

[Bug 336923] Re: Need LVDSout quirk for Intel 945GME 8086:27ae

2009-03-03 Thread joelkillspeople
** Attachment added: Ubuntu 8.10 x64 dmidecode http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23374879/dmidecode.x64 -- Need LVDSout quirk for Intel 945GME 8086:27ae https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336923 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 336923] Re: Need LVDSout quirk for Intel 945GME 8086:27ae

2009-03-03 Thread joelkillspeople
Here's all the Ubuntu 8.10 i386 outoputs ** Attachment added: Ubuntu 8.10 i386 lspci http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23374899/lspci -- Need LVDSout quirk for Intel 945GME 8086:27ae https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336923 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 336923] Re: Need LVDSout quirk for Intel 945GME 8086:27ae

2009-03-03 Thread joelkillspeople
** Attachment added: Ubuntu 8.10 i386 Xorg.7.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23374918/Xorg.7.log -- Need LVDSout quirk for Intel 945GME 8086:27ae https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336923 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 336923] Re: Need LVDSout quirk for Intel 945GME 8086:27ae

2009-03-03 Thread joelkillspeople
it would be great if you could verify that this is still an issue there I would be happy to test. I am downloading the alpha now. -- Need LVDSout quirk for Intel 945GME 8086:27ae https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336923 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 336923] Re: Need LVDSout quirk for Intel 945GME 8086:27ae

2009-03-03 Thread joelkillspeople
** Attachment added: Ubuntu 8.10 i386 dmidecode http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23374999/dmidecode -- Need LVDSout quirk for Intel 945GME 8086:27ae https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336923 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 336923] Re: Need LVDSout quirk for Intel 945GME 8086:27ae

2009-03-03 Thread joelkillspeople
** Attachment added: Ubuntu 8.10 i386 lshw http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23375022/lshw -- Need LVDSout quirk for Intel 945GME 8086:27ae https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336923 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 336923] Re: Need LVDSout quirk for Intel 945GME 8086:27ae

2009-03-03 Thread joelkillspeople
Ok, Just finished up testing. It is, indeed, still an issue! It's the same symptoms: start the client and the screen first boots at 1024x768 open System Preferences Display Settings In there, Mirror Screens is enabled. In order to get a larger resolution on the client, I have to do the

[Bug 336923] Re: Need LVDSout quirk for Intel 945GME 8086:27ae

2009-03-03 Thread joelkillspeople
** Attachment added: Jaunty i386 Alpha-5 dmidecode http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23378694/dmidecode.jaunty.i386 -- Need LVDSout quirk for Intel 945GME 8086:27ae https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336923 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 336923] Re: Need LVDSout quirk for Intel 945GME 8086:27ae

2009-03-03 Thread joelkillspeople
** Attachment added: Jaunty i386 Alpha-5 lshw http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23378760/lshw.jaunty.i386 -- Need LVDSout quirk for Intel 945GME 8086:27ae https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336923 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 336923] Re: Need LVDSout quirk for Intel 945GME 8086:27ae

2009-03-03 Thread joelkillspeople
** Attachment added: Jaunty i386 Alpha-5 lspci http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23378961/lspci.jaunty.i386 -- Need LVDSout quirk for Intel 945GME 8086:27ae https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336923 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 336923] Re: Need LVDSout quirk for Intel 945GME 8086:27ae

2009-03-03 Thread Geir Ove Myhr
Thank you for testing and reporting back so promptly. It is evident that you have researched this well before reporting this bug, and that really helps. All the necessary information is now included and a developer can look at this bug. He/she may ask for more information if some information that

[Bug 336923] Re: Need LVDSout quirk for Intel 945GME 8086:27ae

2009-03-02 Thread Geir Ove Myhr
Thank you for reporting this bug and helping making ubuntu better. Could you please attach the output of `lspci -vvnn` as a separate attachment (we need those numeric PCI IDs from there which you didn't include in your lspci output above). And while you're at it, for completeness, we would also