** Changed in: ubuntuone-client/stable-1-2
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568453
Title:
[lucid] Ubuntuone-syncdaemon using enormous amounts of r
lucid has seen the end of its life and is no longer receiving any
updates. Marking the lucid task for this ticket as "Won't Fix".
** Changed in: ubuntuone-client (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, wh
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: ubuntuone-client (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/56845
Please open a new bug if you experience this bug in Natty or newer.
Thanks in advance.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568453
Title:
[lucid] Ubuntuone-syncdaemon using enormous amounts
I hate to say this, but this is still broken in Natty, just as Reinis
and Radu state.
On my system (the same system that I opened this bug initially with
Lucid), which is running Natty with all latest updates, if I let Ubuntu
One run, eventually, the syncdaemon consumes 99% of at least one core on
I have a situations very much the same in Natty. I am on Lubuntu 64 bit.
First time installed ubuntuone. Found out that I have no way to add folders
from Ubuntu One Control Panel(!?). Was forced to install Nautilus. Marked some
.folders to backup configuration (one after previous is synced, becau
Using Ubuntu 11.04. When U1 sync kicks in it consumes up all available
ram until my laptop becomes unresponsive. This bug renders Ubuntu One
useless ..
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/56
** Also affects: ubuntuone-client
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ubuntuone-client
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: ubuntuone-client
Assignee: (unassigned) => Facundo Batista (facundo)
** Also affects: ubuntuone-client/stable-1-2
Importance: Un
Jeff, it's great to hear that this is working ok in real life for you
too! Thanks for reporting back!
Regarding the not automatic connection at startup, I really don't know
if that is desired or a bug... Beyond that, did you heard about
Magicicada?
https://edge.launchpad.net/magicicada
It wi
Facundo,
I've been running with Maverick Beta so far and memory usage has stayed
at about 520MB, give or take a few MB according to top.
The leaking has certainly been resolved.
This is as of whatever bits were in Beta and slightly beyond Beta.
One thing I've noticed, however, is that now I hav
Checked it with heappy, and now it does not leak what I found any more.
These changes are about revno 667, that I think should get into beta
anytime soon (they will be in Maverick, of course).
** Changed in: ubuntuone-client (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
[lucid] Ubuntu
** Branch linked: lp:~facundo/ubuntuone-client/aq-memory-improv-2
--
[lucid] Ubuntuone-syncdaemon using enormous amounts of ram
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568453
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailin
I'll note I'm also getting occasional .u1conflict files (even though I'm
using only a single machine), likely because the daemon has to get
killed every now and again and gets confused.
--
[lucid] Ubuntuone-syncdaemon using enormous amounts of ram
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568453
You receiv
Jeff, yes, it could be very related. Right now, the process of
SERVER_RESCAN is O(N) in function of your data. So, if you have a lot of
data, SERVER_RESCAN will take a lot, and the three details I found about
memory usage also will be impacted about that.
The good news is that SERVER_RESCAN right
Santiago: In my case, your intuition is incorrect. This happens
regardless of circumstance for me. FWIW, the standard setup for this
particular machine, when I am not traveling, is connected via copper to
my LAN with wi-fi turned off, on AC power with no suspend or
hibernation. My AC power sett
I have the intuition that it happens when the network connection is
on/off a number of times, either because the laptop "roams" from one
wifi to another, because it sleeps/wakes up several times, or because
the server it is connected to is restarted,...
--
[lucid] Ubuntuone-syncdaemon using enor
** Branch linked: lp:~facundo/ubuntuone-client/aq-memory-improvements
--
[lucid] Ubuntuone-syncdaemon using enormous amounts of ram
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568453
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs ma
Roman: The act of hashing barely uses any memory, as the file is not
read completely to hash it, it's done by chunks.
I tried to reproduce this issue, and I saw a memory increment when
making the queues bigger. However, not that much as in this case (I
created a content of 7000 and a meta queue of
** Tags added: chicharra chicharra-maverick
** Tags removed: lucid
--
[lucid] Ubuntuone-syncdaemon using enormous amounts of ram
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568453
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs maili
Facundo, from Jeff's debug log I see that the content queue is 36114,
metadata queue is 8473. While content queue is large, it was not a
memory issue earlier. Is it possible that hash queue does not free the
memory that was used to hash file contents?
--
[lucid] Ubuntuone-syncdaemon using enormou
This happens EVERY time syncdaemon runs now. It's getting hung on
something, perhaps, but either way, it's leaking like a sieve and
chewing up enormous amounts of ram... I've let it get as high as 3GB out
of 4GB total. Now I just immediately kill UbuntuOne as soon as I boot
the system.
Is there
changed to high because A: U1 is now all but unusable due to this issue
occurring every time I run ubuntuone-syncdaemon and B: it makes the
entire system all but unusable. If I catch it early enough, I can kill
off the syncdaemon process and recover my system, however, if this
happens overnight, b
** Summary changed:
- [lucid beta2] Ubuntuone-syncdaemon using enormous amounts of ram
+ [lucid] Ubuntuone-syncdaemon using enormous amounts of ram
--
[lucid] Ubuntuone-syncdaemon using enormous amounts of ram
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568453
You received this bug notification because you
23 matches
Mail list logo