Actually I haven't seen this "error: sparse file not allowed. Press any
key to continue ..." in a long time and I am on 24.04. And all my
machines have /boot on btrfs.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launch
Ubuntu 25.04.
any updates? how to solve it ?
I read about moving /boot partition to a different file system (ext4) ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Title:
environment block not
Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu.
Ubuntu 11.04 (natty) reached end-of-life on October 28, 2012.
See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases
We appreciate that this bug may be old and you might not be interested
in discussing it any more. B
Is anyone can explain why /etc/grub.d/00_header generate
/boot/grub/grub.cfg like this by default for btrfs partitions? I have at
least one laptop where it cause GRUB2 menu appear on every boot with 30
seconds counter:
function recordfail {
set recordfail=1
# GRUB lacks write support for btrfs
SUSE has fixed this patching grub to use reserved area in BTRFS:
https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/openSUSE:Factory/grub2/grub2-grubenv-in-btrfs-header.patch?expand=1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://b
This has been the advice since day 1. It's obviously not what many want.
I'd expect that someone at Canonical might have a better chance at spurring
communication between GRUB and BTRFS than a mere end-user.
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 7:25 AM, Lars Stockmann <736...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:
> Note
Note however the disadvantage of this: if you create a snapshot of your
btrfs system, the stuff in boot will not be included.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Title:
environment
Just create a small ext4 partition and have it mounted as boot. The rest
can stay btrfs. I have done this and it works as expected.
This problem will never be fixed as long as everyone frames the others
for this. You would have to get the grub people talk to the btrfs
people.
Regarding Ubuntu, it
I've given up on BTRFS and gone back to ext4 because of this issue. No one
is interested in fixing this.
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 11:08 PM, Robert Hardy <736...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:
> This same issue bit me using 18.04. I think this should really be
> reclassified as an installer bug.
> Ubun
This same issue bit me using 18.04. I think this should really be reclassified
as an installer bug.
Ubuntu has known for many releases that a single btrfs root partition does not
work properly.
The installer should warn people when they use a single partition that is btrfs
that grub cannot writ
Oh and this is not a complete solution in any way as there are those
grub environment tools that you can use on runing system that would need
a fix too. So final solution could be a setting on /etc/default/grub
that controls between the default location and ESP location.
--
You received this bug
OK so I actually found out how to do the above thing.
So apply the provided patch for /etc/grub.d/00_header.
Original used for patching is from Ubuntu 17.10 (GRUB 2.02~beta3-4ubuntu7.3).
Move or create your grub env block file to efi partition:
ubuntu original location: /boot/grub/grubenv
patch lo
I would like to see a fix that would allow the Grub environment block to
be relocated inside the EFI System Partition (VFAT file system so
writing and reading should just work).
I tried to find how I could do that on my own, but that is anything but
trivial.
--
You received this bug notification
what is preventing the patch from #63 to be implemented? I am no grub
wizard by a long shot, but the patch looks sane.
And I have to correct myself. When I spoke in #79, I had /boot on a
separate ext4 partition so it would not be surprising that I did not run
into this. I've now made a fresh bi
Because it basically can't be fixed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Title:
environment block not implemented on btrfs
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bug
this is hilarious!! How could this bug still present on Ubuntu 17.10
with btrfs!!!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Title:
environment block not implemented on btrfs
To manage n
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Title:
environment block not implemented on btrfs
To manage notifications abo
Not really. The issue is still present on trusty.
If your /boot is a btrfs, grub2 does not know how to save its env.
In order to reproduce:
While on grub menu, press c
Type: save_env xxx
Disabling GRUB_SAVEDEFAULT just disables the feature that needs
save_env. It is not a fix.
--
You received
This is still an issue with grub 2.02.beta2-15 (on Manjaro OpenRC) - the
fix mentioned above from Gentoo still works:
set GRUB_SAVEDEFAULT=false in /etc/default/grub & run update-grub
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
ht
Rolf, please show the partition table of the trusty system that you
tested.
On Thu, May 26, 2016, 23:45 Rolf Leggewie <736...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:
> I do not experience this in trusty. Is this still an issue?
>
> ** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
>Status: Triaged => Incomplete
>
> --
>
I do not experience this in trusty. Is this still an issue?
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Title:
environmen
* grub does not write to btrfs because of its checksum/cow stuff.
* btrfs is aware but doesn't seems to care as it says on its FAQ: "grub needs
btrfs to support a reserved area" (and not "btrfs needs to implement reserved
area")
* ubuntu is hit by this problem for years but it is something for ei
Maybe I'm missing something(ubuntu specific?), but I can't believe no
one mentioned this simple obvious workaround yet (tested to work on
Gentoo with btrfs /boot on separate partition):
GRUB_SAVEDEFAULT=false
in your /etc/default/grub
(must rerun Grub after this change, depending on your OS (I'm
bug still not fixed in 14.04
:-(
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Title:
environment block not implemented on btrfs
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.l
** Tags added: raring
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Title:
environment block not implemented on btrfs
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net
Error is also available in 13:10 (save file not allowed)
Perhaps eliminate mel?
After so many years, this can not be true.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Title:
environment blo
Sorry, (spare file not allowed)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Title:
environment block not implemented on btrfs
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.lau
13.04 amd64
First HAPPY BIRTHDAY for this bug!!!
Found a cool technical upgrade, cannot press the key due usb keyboard to
override the message. So i have to wait the full timeout.
Will this ever be fixed?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is s
On 13-04-06 06:05 AM, Harald Glatt wrote:
> Also the fact that this bug is two years old means the time span for
> patience has long been left standing in the dust...
Patience for this bug to be fixed or patience with Ubuntu in general?
I know which one it is for me.
--
You received this bug no
Also the fact that this bug is two years old means the time span for
patience has long been left standing in the dust...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Title:
environment block
Aki Rossi, is reiserfs considered experimental? If you've read the
previous comments, you are aware this affects more than just btrfs.
That alone should bump the priority up a notch or two.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun
I can't speak for Ubuntu maintainers, but this _is_ a wishlist-priority
bug concerning a file system that's still considered experimental, and a
patch was recognised just under a month ago. I've been annoyed by this
bug as well, but I doubt a little patience will kill anyone at this
point.
--
You
+1
I'm suffering from this as well, and I'm very often under the impression
that Ubuntu's bug reporting system is there for getting users complains
and le it be, not for solving them.
Over years I filled hundreds of bug reports here, almost all of them
never got any solution nor fix, until the up
On 13-02-21 03:10 AM, ill wrote:
> It's been a bug for two years now. It has a known, easy to implement
> fix. If the ubuntu devs wanted to fix it they would have done it a long
> time ago.
Indeed. It's this apathy for the real problems real users have that is
driving me away from Ubuntu. All ne
It's been a bug for two years now. It has a known, easy to implement
fix. If the ubuntu devs wanted to fix it they would have done it a long
time ago.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/7367
I just rebuilt my system using Kubuntu 12.10. I thought I would try
BTRFS. Now I get this same error message while booting. I hope this bug
gets squashed soon.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
The attachment "Proof-of-concept patch against /etc/grub.d/00_header" of
this bug report has been identified as being a patch. The ubuntu-
reviewers team has been subscribed to the bug report so that they can
review the patch. In the event that this is in fact not a patch you can
resolve this sit
Short of implementing btrfs environment-block support for GRUB, we need
a better workaround that doesn't involve manually hacking config files.
The scripts in /etc/grub.d/ can determine the type of the root
filesystem---we see this in /etc/grub.d/10_linux, assigning to GRUBFS---
so there's no reas
With a btrfs install, I started getting the grub screen with the error
message:
'sparse file not allowed.
press any key to continue'
I tried the temporary "fix" by Colin on comment #10 which temporarily
fixed the problem. After a few successfull boots without any error
messages, I then began to
On comment 60 : Works for me MINT 14
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Title:
environment block not implemented on btrfs
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bug
Comment 59:
The workaround did work for me on 12.10, but I only commented the first part
(the lines from cat << EOF to EOF).
The second part wasn't needed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
Just upgraded to Kubuntu 12.10 - again the bug. However commenting out
the lines in 00_header does not work anymore?
I have commented out these lines:
#cat << EOF
#if [ -s \$prefix/grubenv ]; then
# set have_grubenv=true
# load_env
#fi
#EOF
and_
# if [ -n "\${have_grubenv}" ]; then if [ -z "\
Try works: http://seeseekey.net/blog/5259
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Title:
environment block not implemented on btrfs
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https:
Still exist in kubuntu 12.10.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Title:
environment block not implemented on btrfs
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launc
Confirmed that this still exists in released Quantal.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Title:
environment block not implemented on btrfs
To manage notifications about this bug g
+1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Title:
environment block not implemented on btrfs
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/grub/+bug/736743/+
I don't like to comment when I don't have nothing to add, but I just did
a 12.10 install with btrfs, and I would not consider "do not show an
erroneous scary message to users that stalls boot every time" as
wishlist/new feature.
The only wish here is "I wish this worked properly"...
--
You recei
Reading the documentation [1] it leads to believe that load_env is
excluded from certain type of systems. Yet reading the code I did not
find those guards (maybe they are not explicit). In any case, until
blocklists are implemented for btrfs, load_env should not stall the
boot. Showing warnings is
** No longer affects: grub2 (Ubuntu Oneiric)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Title:
environment block not implemented on btrfs
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
htt
Well, it's not a patch. It's a workaround for those who have btrfs
installed. The rest non-btrfs based systems still want those 4 lines.
Please note that cjwatson is maintainer of grub2 and he proposed this as
a dirty workaround not a solution that we can apply and upload into the
archive.
--
You
1.5 years to apply 4-line long patch...
confirmed in 12.04.1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Title:
environment block not implemented on btrfs
To manage notifications about thi
Quantal alpha 3 also affected...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Title:
environment block not implemented on btrfs
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.la
** Tags added: quantal
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Title:
environment block not implemented on btrfs
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
Same problem with Xubuntu 12.04 (Precise Pangolin):
$ sudo fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sda: 120.0 GB, 120034123776 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 14593 cylinders, total 234441648 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optim
"me too" comments are not helpful. If you wish to make it known that
you are affected by this, please check the "affects me" box at the top
of the bug. This bug is well understood and needs no further input.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Ubuntu 12.04 LTS 32-bit Final Version, using the btrfs format option during
Installation.
but still encounter the o.g. Error Message. After a few second (or pressing any
key) the system is booting with no further problems
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Confirmed in Ubuntu 12.04 LTS 64-bit (final release) using the native
btrfs option in Ubiquity.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Title:
environment block not implemented on btrfs
Gah, wrong defect, ignore.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Title:
environment block not implemented on btrfs
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpa
Breakthrough!
Messing around with netdown in /etc/init.d/halt is a waste of time.
Shutting down like this:
ifconfig eth0 down; shutdown -h now
WORKS!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
Colin Watson's fixed seems to work for me ... after commenting out the
lines suggested in 00_header and running update-grub it seems to have
cleared it ...
GPT partition table
1) non-fs (bios_grub)
2) swap
3) btrfs (root mount)
kubuntu 12.04 3.2.0-23-generic on a AMD64 cpu
--
You received this
again "sparse file not allowed"
but my system is *not* booting.
Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Beta 2 - 64 bits
(Linux ubuntu 3.2.0-20-generic #33-Ubuntu SMP Tue Mar 27 16:42:26 UTC 2012
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux)
on fresh SSD with one btrfs partition in the root (and not in a subvolume, what
was in
** Tags added: precise
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Title:
environment block not implemented on btrfs
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
Same problem.
Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Beta 1 - 64 bits
Fresh install on btrfs formatted from Ubiquity
$ mount
/dev/sda1 on / type btrfs (rw,subvol=@)
Linux maria 3.2.0-23-lowlatency #31-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Wed Apr 11 02:24:03 UTC
2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
--
You received this bug notificat
Just installed Precise Pangolin 64bit as a fresh install from USB using
btrfs as filesystem for / and /home and have encountered the same issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Ti
i don't know if its allready in there but btrfs should definately be
marked as experimental in the final LTS if the problem persists until
release
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
It affect Precise Pangolin too with btrfs. Very annoying.
** Also affects: btrfs-grub2
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** No longer affects: btrfs-grub2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
same problem on 32bit 12.04 Beta using btrfs. Installed from USB Stick.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Title:
environment block not implemented on btrfs
To manage notification
Same problem.
Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Beta 1 - 64 bits
Fresh install on btrfs formatted from Ubiquity
$ mount
/dev/sda1 on / type btrfs (rw,subvol=@)
...
/dev/sda1 on /home type btrfs (rw,subvol=@home)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed t
There are some other problems, not sure what they are.
I installed Oneiric on an BTRF partition and it has trouble booting, after
pressing the key it goes back to the BIOS quite often.
On the exact same machine, reinstalling to an EXT4 filesystem and it boots
every time.
I realize that this is not
Well, seems it boots even without pressing a key. But it boots too
long...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Title:
environment block not implemented on btrfs
To manage notificat
Every time I boot Ubuntu 11.10 on btrfs, I have to "press any key to
continue". It is very annoying!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Title:
environment block not implemented on
I have the same problem with Precise Pangolin 12.04 Alpha 1 and a btrfs
partition : immediately after the BIOS screen, I see a message "error:
sparse file not allowed". After a few seconds, the Linux boots starts
successfully.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
I justclean installed 11.10 in / using btrfs and got same error
Disk /dev/sda: 160.0 GB, 160041885696 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 19457 cylinders, total 312581808 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal):
** Tags added: oneiric
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Title:
environment block not implemented on btrfs
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
Same problem in Ubuntu 11.10 32bit
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Title:
environment block not implemented on btrfs
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.
This affects me (oneiric ocelot, amd64).
Can anybody test it on ubuntu precise(pre-alpha)?
If this error is still present in precise, it could be fixed before precise
final will be released.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu
Is there a way to get grub2 to ignore this error?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Title:
environment block not implemented on btrfs
To manage notifications about this bug go to
Same problem in Ubuntu 11.10 32bit
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Title:
environment block not implemented on btrfs
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs
Same problem in final version of Oneiric.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Title:
environment block not implemented on btrfs
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https:
First time trying btrfs and I got the same error right after grub menu:
"error: sparse file not allowed. Press any key to continue ..."
same problem
after a few seconds the system boots but it is a bit sinister . . to
have this message greeting users
--
You received this bug notification becau
Sorry for the "me too" comment, but I can confirm the bug for Oneiric beta 2.
Just so you know, because Oneiric wasn't mentioned yet.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Title:
envi
First time trying btrfs and I got the same error right after grub menu:
"error: sparse file not allowed. Press any key to continue ..."
I had another problem with the package apt-xapian-index refusing to
configure on upgrade so I removed it and now the system merely hangs on
the error above for a
Correctly booting an operating system is a wish list :)
Is this effecting boot times?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Title:
environment block not implemented on btrfs
To manag
In my tests this did not actually impede automatic booting even though
it claims to require input.
In any case, new feature = wishlist. You should not take that to mean
that I consider it low priority.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
I think it's a bit strange you consider this bug 'wishlist'. In server
environment, where remote reboot is a must, it's quiet a showstopper.
You might say no one using btrfs on servers. Maybe, but many servers
using reiser (which is also affected).
Not booting after upgrade, well... I think its a
** Also affects: grub
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Title:
environment block not implemented on btrfs
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
As Colin pointed out in #8, there's no need to add any more
confirmations and "me too"s - the bug is known and being attended too.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Title:
environ
I have a multi-boot system. Ubuntu Natty is on an ext4 partition. Boots
with no error. Xubuntu 11.04 is on a btrfs partition and upon boot I get
the same the error message:
'sparse file not allowed.
press any key to continue'
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
Yet again confirmed - I added a new btrfs at the end of my disk - going
to try again in ext4. Shame!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Title:
environment block not implemented on
Nevermind, on closer inspection, my disk has exactly 1 MB free at the
beginning, as it's been partitioned with ubiquity and therefore follows
the best-practice of 4k properly aligned sectors.
So to answer my own question: No, this does not change this particular
issue - these two things are not re
With the risk of sound like another "me too, waa waa", I just want to
ask a question based on the piece of info in #5 ("and so we could use
1KB of it for an environment block") compared to the piece of info on
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/btrfs ("take care to keep about 1 Mib
space free at the
See comment 8, and please don't post further confirmation messages to
this bug report.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Title:
environment block not implemented on btrfs
--
ubu
Confirmed in natty final (64bit) too.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Title:
environment block not implemented on btrfs
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.co
Confirmed here in natty final version.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Title:
environment block not implemented on btrfs
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.c
Thanks for the tip, Colin. However, I think simply removing my GPU had
the same effect. It reboots unattended now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Title:
environment block not i
I think you can probably make it unattended for the time being by
editing /etc/grub.d/00_header, commenting out the following lines with a
leading # sign on each line, and then running update-grub:
cat << EOF
if [ -s \$prefix/grubenv ]; then
set have_grubenv=true
load_env
fi
EOF
T
I've also run into this bug. However, it's on a machine (server) with no
GPU and no keyboard. It's a bit of an annoyance because it means that
I'd need manual intervention to reboot the machine (e.g. after power
failure, where it would usually come back up on its own).
Not to nag or anything... bu
Thanks, but there's no need to post further reproduction information to
this bug. This is a missing feature and we know about it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Title:
environ
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu Natty (development branch)
Release:11.04
Codename: natty
grub2:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 1.99~rc1-13ubuntu1
Version table:
1.99~rc1-13ubuntu1 0
500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ n
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Importance: High => Wishlist
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743
Title:
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
