natty has seen the end of its life and is no longer receiving any
updates. Marking the natty task for this ticket as Won't Fix.
** Changed in: linux-linaro-omap (Ubuntu Natty)
Status: New = Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
oneiric has seen the end of its life and is no longer receiving any
updates. Marking the oneiric task for this ticket as Won't Fix.
** Changed in: linux-linaro-omap (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: New = Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Migrated to bugzilla: https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=569
** Bug watch added: Linaro Bug Tracking System #569
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=569
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: u-boot-linaro (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
** Changed in: u-boot-linaro (Ubuntu Natty)
Status: New = Fix Released
** Changed in: u-boot-linaro (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 2.6.38-10.46
---
linux (2.6.38-10.46) natty-proposed; urgency=low
[ Steve Conklin ]
* Release Tracking Bug
- LP: #802464
[ Upstream Kernel Changes ]
* Revert put stricter guards on queue dead checks
* Revert fix oops in
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/lucid-proposed/linux-lts-backport-natty
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/770679
Title:
Missing proper support for Beagle XM rev B and C
To manage
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel in -proposed solves
the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the
results. If the problem is solved, change the tag
'verification-needed-natty' to 'verification-done-natty'.
If verification is not done by one week from today,
Guys,
I won't be able to verify this in time, as another developer has the C
board at another location.. By now, more users on irc should have the
C board..
Regards,
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Normally, as the QA guy, I would test this and report back asap.
Unfortunately, I cannot test this properly as I do not have one of the
affected boards. I will reach out to the community on IRC and see if I
can drum up volunteers.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
I have a rev C board and am willing to test it if someone can walk me
through it and help me recover if it goes badly :)
I hang out in the #ubuntu-arm IRC channel ( Matt_O )
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Tobin Davis
770...@bugs.launchpad.netwrote:
Normally, as the QA guy, I would test this
** Changed in: u-boot-linaro (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Importance: Undecided = Low
** Changed in: u-boot-linaro (Ubuntu Natty)
Importance: Undecided = Low
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I just tested the kernel and it seems to be working fine for me.
Here is my dmesg dump: http://paste.ubuntu.com/621469/
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Matt Ownby matt.ow...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a rev C board and am willing to test it if someone can walk me
through it and help me recover if
From Matt's log:
[0.00] Linux version 2.6.38-10-omap (buildd@crabapple) (gcc version
4.5.2 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.5.2-8ubuntu4) ) #44-Ubuntu Fri Jun 3 06:51:06 UTC 2011
(Ubuntu 2.6.38-10.44-omap 2.6.38.7)
...
[0.150482] OMAP3 Beagle Rev: xM C
So it's working fine on a Rev C.
Thanks for
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 2.6.39-3.10
---
linux (2.6.39-3.10) oneiric; urgency=low
[ Colin Ian King ]
* SAUCE: S3 early resume debug via keyboard LEDs
[ Ingo Molnar ]
* ubuntu: nx-emu - i386: NX emulation
* ubuntu: nx-emu - i386: mmap randomization for
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Natty)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/770679
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Committed
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Natty)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: linux-linaro-omap (Ubuntu Natty)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: u-boot-linaro (Ubuntu Natty)
Hi Ricardo,
The kernel looks good on the xM C..
ubuntu@omap:~$ lsusb
Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0424:ec00 Standard Microsystems Corp.
Bus 001 Device 002: ID 0424:9514 Standard Microsystems Corp.
Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
ubuntu@omap:~$ dmesg | grep Beagle
[
u-boot notes: (with natty headless image):
Texas Instruments X-Loader 1.5.0 (Apr 11 2011 - 09:47:05)
Beagle xM
Reading boot sector
Loading u-boot.bin from mmc
U-Boot 2011.03 (Apr 20 2011 - 07:19:53)
OMAP3630/3730-GP ES2.1, CPU-OPP2, L3-165MHz, Max CPU Clock 1 Ghz
OMAP3 Beagle board + LPDDR/NAND
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Robert Nelson robertcnel...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ricardo,
The kernel looks good on the xM C..
ubuntu@omap:~$ lsusb
Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0424:ec00 Standard Microsystems Corp.
Bus 001 Device 002: ID 0424:9514 Standard Microsystems Corp.
Bus 001 Device 001:
I also noticed that mine was unidentified. When I say I have a rev C, I am
going off what the box says that my beagleboard came in. I know of no other
way to ID it.
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Ricardo Salveti
rsalv...@rsalveti.netwrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Robert Nelson
Pull request: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-
team/2011-May/015591.html
SRU Justification:
Impact: Owners of Beagle xM rev C (newer ones) can't boot with current
Natty's kernel.
Fix: Detect the rev C revision and proper initialize it (like older xM).
Testcase: Boot the kernel with a
Matt,
Your ID of (011) doesn't make a lot of sense, since that would be the
next logical xM C++ aka xM D revision would be.. ;)
Maybe Koen knows something we don't, when he implemented the omap3:
beagle: if rev unknown, assume xM revision C part of the xM C
changeset...
Regards,
--
You
@Matt: interested that you said you had a rev C but the GPIO reported something
else, as you can see from the logs:
[0.143920] OMAP3 Beagle Rev: unknown 3, assuming xM C or newer
So it could be the case that the GPIO is not set as 010 for xM C. As I
can't find the proper hardware manuals now
I tested the patched kernel with my xM rev C and it works. Also GLES2
works too (which was previously broken for me).
My dmesg output is at:
http://paste.ubuntu.com/604270/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I have added the three kernel patches to the packaged kernel. What
about the u-boot patches? Do we need them?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/770679
Title:
Missing proper support
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 6:33 PM, John Rigby 770...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
I have added the three kernel patches to the packaged kernel. What
about the u-boot patches? Do we need them?
It seems that the only important part of the u-boot patches is where
it sets the default case to behave
Hi Ricardo,
Sure i'll give it a test. I have an xM B at my desk now (it actually
comes up as xM A, last i talked to Gerald, none of the xM B's are
actually xM B's as far as the gpio identification..) But the xM C
left yesterday with another developer, should have it back tomorrow..
Regards,
The kernel packages can be located at
http://people.canonical.com/~rsalveti/770679/
Robert, can you help testing this package for us? I believe you're one
of the few who have a Beagle xM C (and probably also B).
Tested with my xM A and worked as expected:
ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ dmesg | grep xM
[
Robert is working to include the proper support at the kernel with
upstream, and he'll probably forward the first 5 patches at
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~beagleboard-
kernel/+junk/2.6-stable/files/head:/patches/wip_to_be_pushed/
I removed the cosmetic changes and applied just what's need to
For u-boot it seems we need 2 patches:
* http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/85303/
* http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/92334/
They were sent upstream, but not yet applied.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
30 matches
Mail list logo
