** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/ubuntu-font-family-sources
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791076
Title:
Emacs: choosing normal monospace font in Emacs but gives bold-italic
To manage no
2011-09-22 (Paul Sladen) Ubuntu Font Family version 0.80
[Vincent Connare/Dalton Maag]
* Wish for addition of a monospaced member to the family (LP: #640382)
* Mono: No hinting yet - Ubuntu Beta Mono font looks jagged in
Netbeans and terrible with ClearType (LP: #820493)
* Emacs: choos
0.80~rc tested, the previous workaround is not needed any more (deleting
the UbuntuBetaMono-BI.ttf).
I am an happy camper, thanks !
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791076
Title:
Emacs
Fix committed by Malcolm Wooden/Vincent Connare in 0.80~rc.
** Changed in: ubuntu-font-family
Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791076
Title:
** Changed in: ubuntu-font-family
Milestone: None => 0.80
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791076
Title:
Emacs: choosing normal monospace font in Emacs but gives bold-italic
To ma
jml: I believe it is fixed in the build that Dalton Maag have internally
(and has been for several months), but has not been made available for
testing yet.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Paul Sladen wrote:
> jml: the mono haven't been updated. codeman38's script can be found on
> bug #788757:
Will you update the bug when it is updated? Am very keen to have
Ubuntu Mono in Emacs. (Also, probably because I don't know the
internal process, I thought
Just for the record, I am using a pure Debian sid system (updated twice
per day) and the font package version
0.71.2-0ubuntu7+phasedbeta7+mono+condensed.
I get this problem of an italic bold with plain xterm (having just
installed the font package). OTOH, rxvt-unicode doesn't have this
problem, bu
I ran the script over all the .ttf files in /usr/share/fonts/truetype
/ubuntu-font-family, and replaced them all with the 'fixed' versions.
Most of the on-screen fonts looked horrible (this included the greeter
fonts, menus, and various dialogs). However, it did kind of fix the
Emacs bug.
Then I
jml: the mono haven't been updated. codeman38's script can be found on
bug #788757:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-font-
family/+bug/788757/+attachment/2151526/+files/fixboxdraw-ft.py
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun
Just tried with latest version
(0.71.2-0ubuntu7+phasedbeta7+mono+condensed+arabic). Still see the same
behaviour. Can't find codeman38's script at all.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791
On Sep 06, 2011, at 07:05 PM, Paul Sladen wrote:
>jml: this should be fixed by an update from Dalton Maag. codeman38's
>script does fix; need to diff the result and confirm that the same
>changes are carried over in the fixed version from DM.
Yay! I'm happy to test it.
--
You received this b
jml: this should be fixed by an update from Dalton Maag. codeman38's
script does fix; need to diff the result and confirm that the same
changes are carried over in the fixed version from DM.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub
I'm out of the office until 1st August.
On 17 Jun 2011, at 07:44, Vincent Ladeuil <791...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:
> @paul: Ok, after reading bug #727733 I realised I've been out of the
> loop.
>
> My preference was for Ubuntu Mono Beta 21 but I understand why this
> wasn't the chosen one.
>
I'm out of the office until 1st August.
On 14 Jun 2011, at 23:10, Barry Warsaw <791...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:
> @Paul, thanks for the explanation. I'm sure I can adjust to the
> sizing
> changes, especially since Unity already breaks geometry hints, so I
> have
> to move windows around
I'm out of the office until 1st August.
On 16 Jun 2011, at 11:33, Vincent Ladeuil <791...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:
> Bah, more info:
>
> 86 lines with "-adobe-courier-medium-r-*-*-12-*-*-*-m-*-iso8859-1"
> 79 lines with "-unknown-Ubuntu Beta Mono 21-normal-normal-*-14-*-*-*-
> *-0-iso10646-1
I'm out of the office until 1st August.
On 16 Jun 2011, at 10:17, Vincent Ladeuil <791...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:
> I encounter the same issue on natty.
>
> I use a slightly different way to select the font (in case it
> matters).
> I use
>
> (setq my-default-font "-unknown-UbuntuBeta Mon
I'm out of the office until 1st August.
On 16 Jun 2011, at 11:30, Vincent Ladeuil <791...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:
> Hmm it looks like I missed a detail there: it seems the switch from
> 'Ubuntu Beta Mono 21' to 'UbuntuBeta Mono' also means I went from 79
> to
> 74 lines on a 24" display (a
I'm out of the office until 1st August.
On 16 Jun 2011, at 13:40, Triwanto Simanjuntak <791...@bugs.launchpad.net
> wrote:
> The workaround works for me as well. Finally I can enjoy using the
> lovely Ubuntu Monospace font in my favorite Editor.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification bec
I'm out of the office until 1st August.
On 17 Jun 2011, at 13:39, Barry Warsaw <791...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:
> On Jun 17, 2011, at 06:44 AM, Vincent Ladeuil wrote:
>
> @paul: Ok, after reading bug #727733 I realised I've been out of the
> loop.
>
> My preference was for Ubuntu Mono Beta 21
I'm out of the office until 1st August.
On 25 Jun 2011, at 18:47, Dmitrijs Ledkovs <791...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:
> running the sscript from bug 788757 against BI is better, cause then
> you
> get monospace regular but still have bold+italic in Emacs when needed.
>
> --
> You received th
Is there a reason this bug is marked Incomplete? Does something need to
be reproduced or confirmed that I could with?
It would be great to go back to using Ubuntu monospace for my daily
work, and as such I'd like to do what I can to help resolve this issue.
--
You received this bug notification
running the sscript from bug 788757 against BI is better, cause then you
get monospace regular but still have bold+italic in Emacs when needed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791076
Tit
On Jun 17, 2011, at 06:44 AM, Vincent Ladeuil wrote:
>@paul: Ok, after reading bug #727733 I realised I've been out of the
>loop.
>
>My preference was for Ubuntu Mono Beta 21 but I understand why this
>wasn't the chosen one.
>
>I'm currently trying:
> 79 lines with "-unknown-UbuntuBeta
> Mono-nor
@paul: Ok, after reading bug #727733 I realised I've been out of the
loop.
My preference was for Ubuntu Mono Beta 21 but I understand why this
wasn't the chosen one.
I'm currently trying:
79 lines with "-unknown-UbuntuBeta
Mono-normal-normal-*-13-*-*-*-*-0-iso10646-1"
It's a bit small and less
Vincent: Regarding line-counts and scaling, are the answers in comment
#13 (above), and bug #727733 ("Technical: Mono: discern level of scaling
to fit in terminal cell") sufficient? I can explain in more detail if
required.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
The workaround works for me as well. Finally I can enjoy using the
lovely Ubuntu Monospace font in my favorite Editor.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791076
Title:
Emacs: choosing no
Bah, more info:
86 lines with "-adobe-courier-medium-r-*-*-12-*-*-*-m-*-iso8859-1"
79 lines with "-unknown-Ubuntu Beta Mono
21-normal-normal-*-14-*-*-*-*-0-iso10646-1"
74 lines with "-unknown-UbuntuBeta Mono-normal-normal-*-14-*-*-*-*-0-iso10646-1"
I hope there is a way to invert the trend ;)
-
Hmm it looks like I missed a detail there: it seems the switch from
'Ubuntu Beta Mono 21' to 'UbuntuBeta Mono' also means I went from 79 to
74 lines on a 24" display (aka 1920x1200, taking into account that I
leave some empty space at the bottom of the screen).
Is this caused by a change in the fo
** Description changed:
- I just installed the beta Ubuntu Mono space font and when i tried in
- Emacs by: "Options--> Set Default Font -->UbuntuBeta Mono, regular", the
- bolded italic was displayed instead (see the attachment). Any clue why
- this happened and how to fix it?
+ Problem: Graphic
I encounter the same issue on natty.
I use a slightly different way to select the font (in case it matters).
I use
(setq my-default-font "-unknown-UbuntuBeta Mono-normal-
normal-*-14-*-*-*-*-0-iso10646-1")
which ultimately ends up in default-frame-alist
Note that I previously used:
(setq m
Paul: I've found that the problem is resolved by just deleting the bold-
italic font from /usr/share/fonts/truetype/ubuntu-font-family.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791076
Title:
Em
Interesting, whole looking into bug #797471, I noticed the following:
$ for f in /usr/share/fonts/truetype/ubuntu-font-family/UbuntuBetaMono-*.ttf
; do basename $f | tr \\n \\t ; showttf $f | awk '/avgWidth/{print$1}' ; done |
sort -t= -nk2
UbuntuBetaMono-BI.ttf avgWidth=499
UbuntuBetaMono
@Paul, thanks for the explanation. I'm sure I can adjust to the sizing
changes, especially since Unity already breaks geometry hints, so I have
to move windows around manually anyway :). It *was* great to see that
vertical line counts weren't sacrificed, so I think it's a pretty good
trade-off.
** Summary changed:
- Emacs: choosing normal monospace font in Emacs but gives bolded italic
+ Emacs: choosing normal monospace font in Emacs but gives bold-italic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
35 matches
Mail list logo
