** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Triaged => Invalid
** Changed in: raring-backports
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
Title:
[needs-packaging]
Yeah, probably safe to close. As janc correctly states, Celtx turned
into a SaaS a couple of years ago, and the previous open source app is
no longer developed. It was also based on XUL which is also no longer a
thing.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: Bernhard Reiter (ockham-razor) =>
** No longer affects: ubuntustudio
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
Title:
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production
suite
To manage notifications
Went ahead and closed in Ubuntu Studio.
** Changed in: ubuntustudio
Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix
** Changed in: ubuntustudio
Importance: Wishlist => Low
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Looks to me like Celtx has become an online service at celtx.com that is
no longer open source?
If nobody corrects me on that, you can probably just close this.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Is this even still a thing? Last comment on this bug was over 7 years
ago.
** Changed in: ubuntustudio
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
Title:
** Also affects: raring-backports
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
Title:
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media
I've just packaged version 2.9.1 for natty and uploaded it to my PPA,
https://launchpad.net/~ockham-razor/+archive/ppa/
Please test! You might notice that it's not based on the previous effort found
in this bug report; I wanted to use current packaging techniques like debhelper
7 and source
** Changed in: ubuntustudio
Assignee: Alessio Treglia (quadrispro) = (unassigned)
** Changed in: ubuntustudio
Status: In Progress = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
** Also affects: baltix
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production suite
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
** Changed in: ubuntustudio
Assignee: (unassigned) = Alessio Treglia (quadrispro)
** Changed in: ubuntustudio
Status: New = In Progress
--
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production suite
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
You received this bug
I'm using celtx_2.7+dfsg1-0inniyah1_amd64.deb from
http://alioth.debian.org/~miriam/celtx/ on maverick. It works, but I get
a
LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library
/home/bernie/.mozilla/plugins/gxineplugin.so
[/home/bernie/.mozilla/plugins/gxineplugin.so: wrong ELF class:
ELFCLASS32]
I've also noticed that I don't get any menu entry, and there is no
celtx.desktop in /usr/share/applications. Perhaps the menu file is
broken?
--
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production suite
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
You received this bug notification
Does this work on Jaunty ? Thanks
--
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production suite
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I have prepared celtx 2.5.1 packages for Debian, temporarily available
at http://alioth.debian.org/~miriam/celtx/
I still have to finish them properly, though, but I guess they are in
quite good condition to be usable, in case someone wants to adapt them
to Ubuntu.
--
[needs-packaging] celtx -
** Changed in: gutsy-backports
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
** Changed in: feisty-backports
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
--
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production suite
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
You received this bug notification because
I've not had time to fix the items in the review, and I kinda doubt that
I'll get it done tonight. It's probably too late, anyway. I promise I'll
have it done for Lucid, though, and I'll certainly have a PPA for
Karmic.
--
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production suite
It's uploaded to REVU. There are a few warnings it generated. I'm going
to try to address these tonight.
http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/celtx
--
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production suite
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
You received this bug notification
OK, folks. Celtx 2.0.1 has been built for both Jaunty and Karmic in the
associated PPA. Please install it and check it out. I want to propose it
for Karmic as early as Monday night if it's running fine.
--
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production suite
I tested your build on a 32Bit Jaunty and it is working great so far.
Thanks,
2009/8/24 Colin Dean c...@cad.cx
OK, folks. Celtx 2.0.1 has been built for both Jaunty and Karmic in the
associated PPA. Please install it and check it out. I want to propose it
for Karmic as early as Monday night
Edit: 32bit Karmic has issues with splash screen, boxes aren't drawn
right.
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Thom Hastings
tghasti...@gmail.comwrote:
Ditto for 64bit Jaunty + 32bit Karmic
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:13 PM, George Wright ex...@agendi.com wrote:
I tested your build on a
Aaaand again, it may just be my resolution, but many boxes seem to be drawn
too large.
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Thom Hastings
tghasti...@gmail.comwrote:
Edit: 32bit Karmic has issues with splash screen, boxes aren't drawn right.
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Thom Hastings
Ditto for 64bit Jaunty + 32bit Karmic
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:13 PM, George Wright ex...@agendi.com
wrote:
I tested your build on a 32Bit Jaunty and it is working great so far.
Thanks,
2009/8/24 Colin Dean c...@cad.cx
OK, folks. Celtx 2.0.1 has been built for both Jaunty and Karmic in
I saw those when I tried it out, but I chalked it up to oddities with
the theme I was using.
Is the scrollbar present when you open one of the test documents? I
notice that it's missing.
I guess I'll take a look at the differences in the dependencies and see
if there the Jaunty version of gtk+
I can confirm that on 32bit Karmic boxes aren't drawn right. It got a
little better when I turned compiz off, but not by much. However, I
don't honestly believe this minor bug should prevent the package from
entering Karmic. Get the package uploaded to REVU as soon as possible
(feature freeze
The package is available!
https://launchpad.net/~colindean/+archive/ppa
Right now, I just have a jaunty version up. I'm working on setting up a
Karmic VM so I can do a cleaner build and know better what dependencies
are needed.
--
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media
I've run into some problems compiling for Karmic. I guess gcc is a
little more militant about #elif in Karmic:
c++ -o nsNativeAppSupportUnix.o -c -I../../dist/include/system_wrappers
-include
/home/colin/Source/celtx/karmic/celtx-2.0.1/mozilla/config/gcc_hidden.h
-DGF_CELTX -DIMPL_XREAPI
I had a successful build just now during lunch. However, I seem to have
accidentally deleted the .orig.tar.gz file, so I'm gonna redo some of it
and and see what else I can refine. Ideally, it'll be in my PPA before
midnight.
--
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production
I'm almost there. I've got celtx building and I'm just having some
stupid errors like typos in my rules file and such. I'll have the
package up by the end of the weekend, or tonight if it succeeds in the
next hour or so.
--
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production
On 08/12/2009 11:31 PM, Colin Dean wrote:
Here's my first attempt at making a package from source. The newest
version of the source available is 2.0.1. I've put in request that the
source for 2.0.2 be released (they're more than a month late posting
it).
This is a BINARY package compiled
Thom, thanks.
John, that's pretty much the plan. I need to take a look at the Firefox
source package and see how it is configured. Celtx and it use the same
build process with one extra configure included from the celtx
directory.
--
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media
Here's my first attempt at making a package from source. The newest
version of the source available is 2.0.1. I've put in request that the
source for 2.0.2 be released (they're more than a month late posting
it).
This is a BINARY package compiled for amd64.
I'll have a i386 version when I finish
Whoops, forgot to attach it.
** Attachment added: celtx 2.0.1 amd64, compiled against ubuntu jaunty
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30261477/celtx-2.0.1_amd64.deb
--
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production suite
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
You received
Installation and running it worked fine for me, 64bit Jaunty.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Colin Dean c...@cad.cx wrote:
Whoops, forgot to attach it.
** Attachment added: celtx 2.0.1 amd64, compiled against ubuntu jaunty
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30261477/celtx-2.0.1_amd64.deb
Downloading it now, will test on Ubuntu!
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Colin Dean c...@cad.cx wrote:
I've completed an initial attempt at the package.
Please note that this version of the package was NOT compiled on Ubuntu!
It's the stock English package from Celtx's web site with
Installed .deb worked perfectly Ubuntu 9.04 amd64 worked perfectly!
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Thom Hastings tghasti...@gmail.com
wrote:
Downloading it now, will test on Ubuntu!
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Colin Dean c...@cad.cx wrote:
I've completed an initial attempt at the
Colin,
Thank you for your effort. However, we upload Debian source packages in
Ubuntu, and not the final installable Debian package as you have
attached to the bug report (which isn't even compiled and linked against
Ubuntu libraries).
For help with packaging, please have a look at the packaging
Thanks for trying out, Thom. Now that I know that the little build
system I set up works (I couldn't get dh_make to work acceptably with
their package), I can proceed trying to build the source package I
planned on building.
Chris, thanks for a reminder of the policy. I am aware of the need for a
I've completed an initial attempt at the package.
Please note that this version of the package was NOT compiled on Ubuntu!
It's the stock English package from Celtx's web site with sufficient
structure and files to make a Debian package.
I may try to recompile it myself at a later date, but
** Changed in: ubuntustudio
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
--
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production suite
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Colin, you mentioned that you'd certainly have this package done for
Karmic, and Karmic's feature freeze is on it's way around the bend.
What's the status of your packaging effort? Need a hand?
--
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production suite
According to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KarmicReleaseSchedule, Feature
Freeze is 27 August.
I'll make every effort to get the package made this week.
IIRC, when I first tried, I couldn't get it to compile (it's been ~two
years since I tried before running into life). I may end up packaging
the
Celtx 2.0 is out!
http://celtx.com/
It would be great to have in ubuntustudio!
** Also affects: ubuntustudio
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production suite
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
You received this bug
I agree, this is long overdue.
-Original Message-
Date: Monday, March 02, 2009 10:55:31 am
To: tghasti...@gmail.com
From: sputnik sputniksh...@gmail.com
Subject: [Bug 99965] Re: [needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media
pre-production suite
Celtx 2.0 is out!
http://celtx.com
I'm back to using Celtx regularly, so I'm going to spend some time at some
point trying to get this packaged. I don't know if I'll finish it before
the Jaunty package freeze, but it will certainly be done before Karmic.
--
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production
Don't expect it to get packaged anytime soon. The package freeze is
already in, and the application uses their own home-made license:
http://www.celtx.com/CePL/
Which would require speaking with the FSF or something to figure out the
exact implication.
--
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 20:04:44 -, Vadim Peretokin vpereto...@gmail.com
wrote:
Don't expect it to get packaged anytime soon. The package freeze is
already in, and the application uses their own home-made license:
http://www.celtx.com/CePL/
Which would require speaking with the FSF or
For inclusion in Debian, it would need to be re-trademarked. However,
even without re-trademarking it should be suitable for inclusion in
Universe. Barring that, there should be no question that it's acceptable
in Multiverse. We've definitely got a place for Celtx if you package it!
--
*If* it were to hit Multiverse, it would not be included *in* Ubuntu
Studio but we could promote it.
--
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production suite
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Would love to see this program included in the repos. Let's get this
things moving!
--
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production suite
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
** Also affects: gutsy-backports
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: feisty-backports
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production suite
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
You received this bug
** Changed in: feisty-backports
Status: New = Incomplete
** Changed in: gutsy-backports
Status: New = Incomplete
--
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production suite
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
You received this bug notification because you are a
I had word from another maker of a library system, and they advised not
to separate xulrunner from their package.
I think that if a programmer specs their program with (not for) and
included program, then unless you know more than the programmer on the
issue, then it would probably be wise to
** Summary changed:
- [needs-packaging] celtx
+ [needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production suite
** Description changed:
Celtx is a film/tv production tool that includes basic scriptwriting
software. It's based on the mozilla codebase, and I believe is mostly written
See also
Celtx 1.0 needs packaging
https://bugs.launchpad.net/getdeb.net/+bug/255078
--
[needs-packaging] celtx
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I would still really like to see this, as Celtx just recently hit 1.0.
I don't know if it would be a good idea to separate Celtx from
xulrunner, since Hardy now uses Firefox 3 and I'm pretty sure it's
version of xulrunner would only cause problems with Celtx...
--
[needs-packaging] celtx
I moved and was without Internet access for a while. I'm still swamped
with work, so if someone else wants to undertake this, go for it.
Otherwise, I'm probably going to end up simply packaging up Celtx's
binaries. I've been having a hell of a time compiling it--the
dependencies are crazy (of
Just curious on your progress, Colin-- It's been a couple of months now
and I'd be more than happy to help, though I probably have less
experience building packages than you do.
--
[needs-packaging] celtx
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
You received this bug notification because you are a
I kinda stalled on it--got busy. If you've built one package, you have
more experience than I do. I was still working on getting the debian/
directory set up. If you want, I can send you what I have, which really
isn't much. I might have some time this week, though.
--
[needs-packaging] celtx
Colin: thanks for the work! I think at the least we could get this put
up on PPA, and then go on from there...
Version .9.9.7 is a really good release, and I hope to be seeing this in
the Ubuntu repos eventually...
--
[needs-packaging] celtx
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
You received
I'm working on a package as I type. I've not tried to separate the celtx
parts from the xulrunner parts--I want to get the package together in a
basic form before I try anything more time-consuming. I'll post it when
it's finished--I'm getting dpkg-buildpackage errors (this is my first
package).
So I looked at the src download, which looks like it includes mozilla.
While I would be grateful for any package of celtx, I wonder if it'd be
possible to just package celtx itself, and use xulrunner for the rest.
--
[needs-packaging] celtx
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
You received this
Due to a policy change (https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-
motu/2007-November/002684.html) I set the status to 'Triaged'. Set it
back to 'In Progress' once you have a source package up for review.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: In Progress = Triaged
--
[needs-packaging] celtx
I'll take a stab at it if someone with stronger licensing-fu can
determine by the CePL if such a package is legal.
http://www.celtx.com/CePL/
I've not make a package before, but I've been wanting to take a stab at
it--might as well do it with a decent project.
--
[needs-packaging] celtx
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
[needs-packaging] celtx
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I am looking at packageing this for hardy. Hoepfully will have a PPA for
people to play with some time soon.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: MOTU = Andrew Hunter
--
[needs-packaging] celtx
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
I would love to see this in the repos so I can run it under 64-bit
Ubuntu
--
[needs-packaging] celtx
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Changed in: Debian
Status: Unknown = Unconfirmed
--
[needs-packaging] celtx
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #409048
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=409048
** Also affects: Debian via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=409048
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
[needs-packaging] celtx
** Changed in: Ubuntu
Assignee: (unassigned) = MOTU
Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed
** Summary changed:
- [needs packaging] celtx
+ [needs-packaging] celtx
--
[needs-packaging] celtx
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
You received this bug notification because you are a member
** Changed in: Ubuntu
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
--
[needs packaging] celtx
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
71 matches
Mail list logo
