[Bug 641647] Re: package vsftpd (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-09-22 Thread Kirill
This bug is reproducible with any existing username which contains letters ftp, not only for the ftp user himself: $ getent passwd | grep ftp ftpsecure:x:1001:1001:,,,:/var/ftp:/bin/false ftpuser:x:1002:1002:,,,:/home/ftpuser:/bin/bash $ sudo dpkg --configure -a Настраивается пакет vsftpd

[Bug 644156] Re: package clamav-base 0.96.1+df sg-0ubuntu0.10.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: Unt erprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den F ehlerwert 10 zurück

2010-09-22 Thread Ralf-Peter Raedel
Installation failed with error: Installed subprocess post installation script returned error 10 -- package clamav-base 0.96.1+dfsg-0ubuntu0.10.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 10 zurück https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/644156

[Bug 641001] Re: cacrl should be use instead of hostcrl when generating apache2 passenger configuration

2010-09-22 Thread Martin Pitt
Mathias, can you please check this source package very carefully? It replaces debian/patches/debian-changes-2.6.1-0ubuntu1 withdebian/patches /debian-changes-2.6.1-0ubuntu2, and this patch looks like it would be the delta betwen 2.6.1rc4 and 2.6.1 final. This looks strange, as if something went

[Bug 641001] Re: cacrl should be use instead of hostcrl when generating apache2 passenger configuration

2010-09-22 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package puppet - 2.6.1-0ubuntu2 --- puppet (2.6.1-0ubuntu2) maverick; urgency=low * debian/puppetmaster-passenger.postinst: Use cacrl instead of hostcrl to set the location of the CRL in apache2 configuration. Fix apache2 configuration on upgrade

[Bug 644961] [NEW] qemu crash in rootstock second step during Setting up console-setup (1.34ubuntu15) (log reported in bootstrap.log)

2010-09-22 Thread Matteo Mattei
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: qemu-kvm Looking at bootstrap.log after rootstock (bzr revision 126) I see this crash in qemu when it try to setup the console-setup package: Setting up console-setup (1.34ubuntu15) ... qemu: Unsupported syscall: 250 plymouth: ply-event-loop.c:466:

[Bug 644961] Re: qemu crash in rootstock second step during Setting up console-setup (1.34ubuntu15) (log reported in bootstrap.log)

2010-09-22 Thread Matteo Mattei
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/644961/+attachment/1621358/+files/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/644961/+attachment/1621359/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt

[Bug 644489] Re: constantly changes /dev/disk/by-id/{scsi, wwn}-* LUN symlinks with multipathing

2010-09-22 Thread Thierry Carrez
** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- constantly changes /dev/disk/by-id/{scsi,wwn}-* LUN symlinks with multipathing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/644489 You received this bug

[Bug 644538] Re: package postfix 2.7.0-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 75

2010-09-22 Thread Thierry Carrez
Error is: newaliases: fatal: /etc/mailname/: cannot open file: No such file or directory You replaced /etc/aliases by the package maintainer version, overriding local changes. You might want to edit that file again to reflect your configuration. That said, if, like mentioned in bug 644534, there

[Bug 644549] Re: package dovecot-postfix 1:1.2.9-1ubuntu6.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 2

2010-09-22 Thread Thierry Carrez
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 644538 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/644538 Error is: /etc/init.d/postfix: 165: cannot open /etc/mailname/: No such file This is not a bug, but a broken configuration. Marking as duplicate of first bug. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug

[Bug 644910] Re: Hardy: apache2-mpm-itk cannot be installed due to dependency

2010-09-22 Thread Dave Walker
Requires a no-change rebuild of apache2-mpm-itk. ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Dave Walker (davewalker) ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High -- Hardy: apache2-mpm-itk cannot

[Bug 644798] Re: package apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.2 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1

2010-09-22 Thread Thierry Carrez
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 644853 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/644853 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 644853 apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.2 failed to install/upgrade: Module reqtimeout does not exist! * You can subscribe to bug 644853 by following this

[Bug 644799] Re: package apache2.2-common 2.2 .14-5ubuntu8.2 failed to install/upgrade: Unterproze ss installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwe rt 1 zurück

2010-09-22 Thread Thierry Carrez
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 644853 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/644853 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 644853 apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.2 failed to install/upgrade: Module reqtimeout does not exist! * You can subscribe to bug 644853 by following this

[Bug 644853] Re: apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.2 failed to install/upgrade: Module reqtimeout does not exist!

2010-09-22 Thread Thierry Carrez
Error is: Setting up apache2.2-common (2.2.14-5ubuntu8.2) ... ERROR: Module reqtimeout does not exist! dpkg: error processing apache2.2-common (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 ** Summary changed: - package apache2.2-common

[Bug 645009] Re: spamd segfaults a message

2010-09-22 Thread Marcin Owsiany
** Attachment added: The message which causes a segfault when piped into spamc https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645009/+attachment/1621515/+files/spamd-crash.txt -- spamd segfaults a message https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645009 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 645009] Re: spamd segfaults a message

2010-09-22 Thread Marcin Owsiany
And the version of perl-base is 5.10.1-8ubuntu2 -- spamd segfaults a message https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645009 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to spamassassin in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list

[Bug 645009] [NEW] spamd segfaults a message

2010-09-22 Thread Marcin Owsiany
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: spamassassin Description:Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS Release:10.04 spamassassin 3.3.1-1 I find the following in syslog after piping the attached message into spamc. Sep 22 09:40:31 beczulka spamd[25056]: spamd: connection from beczulka

[Bug 645015] [NEW] package apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-09-22 Thread r0g
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apache2 No further info, the box containing the error details allows text to be selected but I can't copy from it. I would do a screengrab instead but the window also can't be resized and as there are several pages of info it's not practical, at least

[Bug 645015] Re: package apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-09-22 Thread r0g
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645015/+attachment/1621547/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Df.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645015/+attachment/1621548/+files/Df.txt ** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt

[Bug 644910] Re: Hardy: apache2-mpm-itk cannot be installed due to dependency

2010-09-22 Thread Dave Walker
Apologies, apache2-mpm-itk is now part of the Apache source package. I'm currently wondering if this issues will solve itself following a sudo apt-get update. Please can you try, and report back. Thanks :) ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Incomplete -- Hardy:

[Bug 644910] Re: Hardy: apache2-mpm-itk cannot be installed due to dependency

2010-09-22 Thread Kurt Huwig
According to this page: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+source/apache2 The apache2-mpm-itk is not part of apache2 in Hardy. Updating was my first try. Just tried again, but no change: r...@storage:~# apt-get update Hit http://de.archive.ubuntu.com hardy Release.gpg Ign

[Bug 644853] Re: apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.2 failed to install/upgrade: Module reqtimeout does not exist!

2010-09-22 Thread Thierry Carrez
Looks like you manually removed (or moved) the /etc/apache2/mods- available/reqtimeout.load file. This is supposed to be handled through a2enmod. Recreating that file (or purging and reinstalling apache2) should work around this error. We should guard for that case by adding a || true and/or a

[Bug 350936] Re: Should shut down domains on system shutdown

2010-09-22 Thread Valentijn Sessink
While there's many solutions now to shutdown VM's, here's my 2 cents. Instead of a libvirt-bin.conf script, I made a separate script (/usr/local/sbin/shutdown-libvirt-hosts.sh). This script waits 120 seconds for all VM's to shut down. Then I'm running this script from two places; in

[Bug 644910] Re: Hardy: apache2-mpm-itk cannot be installed due to dependency

2010-09-22 Thread Kurt Huwig
The correct package for Hardy is apache2-mpm-itk, not apache2?! ** Package changed: apache2 (Ubuntu) = apache2-mpm-itk (Ubuntu) -- Hardy: apache2-mpm-itk cannot be installed due to dependency https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/644910 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 645061] [NEW] apparmor blocks freshclam process info after latest update

2010-09-22 Thread Micah Gersten
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: clamav Sep 22 05:00:56 defiant kernel: [ 3685.854925] type=1400 audit(1285149656.699:8211): apparmor=DENIED operation=open parent=1 profile=/usr/bin/freshclam name=/proc/1435/status pid=1435 comm=freshclam requested_mask=r denied_mask=r fsuid=119

[Bug 645061] Re: apparmor blocks freshclam process info after latest update

2010-09-22 Thread Micah Gersten
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/645061/+attachment/1621864/+files/Dependencies.txt -- apparmor blocks freshclam process info after latest update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645061 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 645082] [NEW] bacula misses requirement of gawk

2010-09-22 Thread Fred Baumgarten
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: bacula-director-mysql the awk script /etc/bacula/scripts/make_catalog_backup_awk fails due to the missing gensub function if gawk is not installed and used. thanks for processing Fred ** Affects: bacula (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Bug 644156] Re: package clamav-base 0.96.1+df sg-0ubuntu0.10.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: Unt erprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den F ehlerwert 10 zurück

2010-09-22 Thread Imre Gergely
If you look in DpkgTerminalLog.txt there are a lot of other things gone wrong as far as I can tell, a lot of other packages gave errors. Could you try editing /var/lib/dpkg/info/clamav-base.postinst file, adding the following line before the set -e line: set -x then runnning apt-get -f install

[Bug 645061] Re: apparmor blocks freshclam process info after latest update

2010-09-22 Thread Imre Gergely
Hi Does this affect freshclam in any way, is it not working, does it give any other errors besides this log entry? -- apparmor blocks freshclam process info after latest update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645061 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server

[Bug 645126] [NEW] package apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-09-22 Thread Areski
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apache2 This issue happens after an automatic update. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-24.43-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-24-generic x86_64

[Bug 645126] Re: package apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-09-22 Thread Areski
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645126/+attachment/1622219/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Df.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645126/+attachment/160/+files/Df.txt ** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt

[Bug 645061] Re: apparmor blocks freshclam process info after latest update

2010-09-22 Thread Micah Gersten
Updater seemed to work fine: Received signal: wake up ClamAV update process started at Wed Sep 22 05:00:55 2010 main.cld is up to date (version: 52, sigs: 704727, f-level: 44, builder: sven) Downloading daily-11996.cdiff [100%] daily.cld updated (version: 11996, sigs: 130710, f-level: 53, builder:

[Bug 645126] Re: package apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-09-22 Thread Thierry Carrez
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 644853 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/644853 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 644853 apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.2 failed to install/upgrade: Module reqtimeout does not exist! * You can subscribe to bug 644853 by following this

[Bug 645061] Re: apparmor blocks freshclam process info after latest update

2010-09-22 Thread Imre Gergely
Confirmed on Lucid with (not yet) backported clamav 0.96.3 from clamav- ppa. Seems like this is some new feature in 0.96.3 where freshclam (and indeed clamav-daemon too) does some checking in /proc/self and also /proc/filesystems. Attached some syslog entries which appear exactly after freshclam

[Bug 645015] Re: package apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-09-22 Thread Thierry Carrez
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 644853 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/644853 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 644853 apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.2 failed to install/upgrade: Module reqtimeout does not exist! * You can subscribe to bug 644853 by following this

[Bug 645061] Re: apparmor blocks freshclam process info after latest update

2010-09-22 Thread Thierry Carrez
** Changed in: clamav (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: clamav (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- apparmor blocks freshclam process info after latest update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645061 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 645009] Re: spamd segfaults a message

2010-09-22 Thread Thierry Carrez
@Marcin: I can't reproduce that: $ spamc -r spamd-crash.txt 0/0 Can you reproduce it steadily ? ** Changed in: spamassassin (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: spamassassin (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- spamd segfaults a message

Re: [Bug 350936] Re: Should shut down domains on system shutdown

2010-09-22 Thread John Morrissey
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 09:47:47AM -, Valentijn Sessink wrote: - if the shutdown script searches for the word running (like mine does, - but John Morrissey's script is affected, too), it must set LANG=C at the - top, otherwise virsh will run in the local language. Good catch. I've updated

[Bug 627973] Re: Assertion failed at socket.c:629

2010-09-22 Thread Thierry Carrez
The IPv6 patch has a case where it would hit that ASSERT if ! (host addr) -- while the upstream code would just pass without triggering any error. I'll prepare a package for you to test in a few, maybe it's just that corner case. ** Changed in: openvpn (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = In

[Bug 627973] Re: Assertion failed at socket.c:629

2010-09-22 Thread Jarrett Miller
Ok I would be happy to test. Not sure if its an issue but that system is now running Maverick and no longer runs Lucid. So any test won't be apples to apples. -- Assertion failed at socket.c:629 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/627973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

Re: [Bug 645009] Re: spamd segfaults a message

2010-09-22 Thread Marcin Owsiany
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:22:54PM -, Thierry Carrez wrote: @Marcin: I can't reproduce that: $ spamc -r spamd-crash.txt 0/0 Can you reproduce it steadily ? Yes. Note, that it's not spamc that segfaults, so it looks the same on the command line for me: mowsi...@beczulka:~$ spamc -r

[Bug 628055] Re: Instances don't start correctly: Security Labeling error running aa_change_profile()

2010-09-22 Thread Jamie Strandboge
Ok, I know what is failing, but I don't know why. On amd64 things are ok: $ cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep model model : 37 model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU L 640 @ 2.13GHz ... repeated 4 times ... $ dpkg --print-architecture amd64 $ uname -m x86_64 $ cat ./628055.xml |

[Bug 645288] [NEW] dovecot fails to find mailbox of new users

2010-09-22 Thread yaztromo
Public bug reported: Fully updated Lucid as of Sept 22 2010 dovecot-common: Installed: 1:1.2.9-1ubuntu6.1 New users mailboxes aren't autodetected properly and dovecot closes connection to clients, older users aren't affected. Sep 22 15:28:51 Shula dovecot: pop3-login: Login: user=xx,

[Bug 627973] Re: Assertion failed at socket.c:629

2010-09-22 Thread Thierry Carrez
I suppose you reproduce the issue in maverick, so I'll build packages for Maverick. Package will build @ https://launchpad.net/~ttx/+archive/ppa -- Assertion failed at socket.c:629 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/627973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 627973] Re: Assertion failed at socket.c:629

2010-09-22 Thread Thierry Carrez
Arh, this needs a bit more work -- more tomorrow :) -- Assertion failed at socket.c:629 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/627973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openvpn in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list

[Bug 562370] Re: Upgrade from 2.2.14-5ubuntu6 to 2.2.14-5ubuntu7 results in syntax error, missing module

2010-09-22 Thread Chris Carey
I ran into this bug *today* 2010-09-22 when updating to latest: subl...@sublime:~$ sudo apt-get -f install Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. 3 not fully installed or

[Bug 645367] [NEW] package drbd8-source 2:8.3.7-1ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: drbd8 kernel module failed to build

2010-09-22 Thread Blue Print
Public bug reported: done an update, seemed all successful, tried to activate ati driver then got error report ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: drbd8-source 2:8.3.7-1ubuntu2.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.33-generic 2.6.35.4 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic

[Bug 645367] Re: package drbd8-source 2:8.3.7-1ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: drbd8 kernel module failed to build

2010-09-22 Thread Blue Print
** Attachment added: DKMSBuildLog.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645367/+attachment/1623330/+files/DKMSBuildLog.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645367/+attachment/1623331/+files/Dependencies.txt -- package drbd8-source 2:8.3.7-1ubuntu2.1

[Bug 645367] Re: package drbd8-source 2:8.3.7-1ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: drbd8 kernel module failed to build

2010-09-22 Thread Andres Rodriguez
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 644562 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/644562 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 644562 package drbd8-source 2:8.3.7-1ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: drbd8 kernel module failed to build * You can subscribe to bug 644562 by following

[Bug 627973] Re: Assertion failed at socket.c:629

2010-09-22 Thread Jarrett Miller
No worries. I cobbled together a Lucid system to test this so no need to worry about Maverick anymore. I just wanted to thank you for the prompt attention you have shown this bug. Are you a Canonical employee? If so is there anyway I can provide feedback to let your employer know how pleased I

[Bug 645061] Re: apparmor blocks freshclam process info after latest update

2010-09-22 Thread Scott Kitterman
According to upstream, this is for selinux and pax detection. This permission problem doesn't affect anything, except for apparmor logs since we have neither and they wouldn't co-exist with apparmor if a user had switched to them. The detection process opens /proc/pid/status and if it can't be

[Bug 621509] Re: mysqld randomly causes system to not respond to commands

2010-09-22 Thread Clint Byrum
Luke, thanks for keeping us up to date! While your configuration is a little bit weird, it still sounds like there may be a legitimate bug in mysql, as it should not be able to cause such a huge problem for the system. That said, I would suspect that cacti needs to *not* run two of its

[Bug 645396] [NEW] package winbind 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-09-22 Thread Helpdesk
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba I was trying to install Tradera Pro Lister using whine. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: winbind 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-24.43-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-24-generic

[Bug 645396] Re: package winbind 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-09-22 Thread Helpdesk
** Attachment added: AptOrdering.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645396/+attachment/1623493/+files/AptOrdering.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645396/+attachment/1623494/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Df.txt

[Bug 645396] Ticket created: [NEW] package winbind 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 (ticket #39041)

2010-09-22 Thread Helpdesk
-- package winbind 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645396 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to

[Bug 645396] Ticket created: Re: package winbind 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 (ticket #39042)

2010-09-22 Thread Helpdesk
-- package winbind 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645396 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to

[Bug 645061] Re: apparmor blocks freshclam process info after latest update

2010-09-22 Thread Imre Gergely
[09/22-194642] jdstrand owner @{PROC}/[0-9]*/status r, [09/22-195205] jdstrand cemc: /proc/filesystems r, is fine Added these two lines to /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.freshclam and /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.clamd , and after reloading apparmor and restarting clamav-freshclam and clamav-daemon the

[Bug 645061] Re: apparmor blocks freshclam process info after latest update

2010-09-22 Thread Jamie Strandboge
** Changed in: clamav (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand) -- apparmor blocks freshclam process info after latest update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645061 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to

[Bug 643477] Re: package nmap 5.00-3 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting a removal.

2010-09-22 Thread Thomas
Thanks for the quick reply, I found out that it was some kind of hard drive issue: while installing nmap there was a rsync job copying over 200 GB from one drive to another. It somehow froze the apt-get install nmap command at the point of unpacking. Strange this is that I could use the computer

[Bug 645061] Re: apparmor blocks freshclam process info after latest update

2010-09-22 Thread Jamie Strandboge
** Changed in: clamav (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed -- apparmor blocks freshclam process info after latest update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645061 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to clamav in ubuntu.

[Bug 645061] Re: apparmor blocks freshclam process info after latest update

2010-09-22 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package clamav - 0.96.3+dfsg-1ubuntu2 --- clamav (0.96.3+dfsg-1ubuntu2) maverick; urgency=low * debian/usr.bin.freshclam: updated to give read access to @{PROC}/[0-9]*/status and @{PROC}/filesystems. The latter is covered by the base abstraction,

[Bug 644632] Re: nssldap-update-ignoreusers needs to be configurable to ignore users

2010-09-22 Thread Joshua Kugler
OK, so rolling around some ideas on how to handle this. One simple way, one somewhat complex, but kind of neat, way. Method 1: Use a config file for nssldap-update-ignoreusers. Probably /etc/default/nssldap-update-ignoreusers. Have a single line something like:

Re: [Bug 641647] Re: package vsftpd (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-09-22 Thread shankar vignesh
Hey Guys, Thanks a lot deleting the ftp* user resolved this issue. The users are added as a part of pureadmin gui installation, I guess. I am not sure whether this thread will help in address another issue I have related to DVD burn on Lucid. Is there a common tool that can grab all the relevant

[Bug 641647] Re: package vsftpd (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-09-22 Thread Clint Byrum
Shankar, I'm glad there is an easy workaround for you. This isn't the best place to seek guidance for an unrelated question. I'd suggest IRC, the Ubuntu Forums, or a relevant mailing list: IRC: #ubuntu - irc.freenode.net Forums: http://ubuntuforums.org/ Mailing Lists: https://lists.ubuntu.com/

[Bug 644156] Re: package clamav-base 0.96.1+df sg-0ubuntu0.10.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: Unt erprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den F ehlerwert 10 zurück

2010-09-22 Thread Ralf-Peter Raedel
it was not clamav it was an version missmatch. Thanks. -- package clamav-base 0.96.1+dfsg-0ubuntu0.10.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 10 zurück https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/644156 You received this bug notification

[Bug 628055] Re: Instances don't start correctly: Security Labeling error running aa_change_profile()

2010-09-22 Thread Jamie Strandboge
Ok, I am able to reproduce this on a pure i386 machine using the disk as setup by eucalyptus. My tests before were not identical. Here are the results: == amd64 == $ ./628055.sh $ cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep model model : 37 model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU L 640 @

[Bug 644156] Re: package clamav-base 0.96.1+df sg-0ubuntu0.10.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: Unt erprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den F ehlerwert 10 zurück

2010-09-22 Thread Imre Gergely
** Changed in: clamav (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- package clamav-base 0.96.1+dfsg-0ubuntu0.10.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 10 zurück https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/644156 You received this bug

[Bug 599342] Re: Temporary failure in name resolution

2010-09-22 Thread Kate Stewart
Robert, Serge - was this ever confirmed? Do we have chance of getting it in for 10.10 or is it likely to be a candidate for update? -- Temporary failure in name resolution https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599342 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team,

[Bug 628055] Re: Instances don't start correctly: Security Labeling error running aa_change_profile()

2010-09-22 Thread Jamie Strandboge
Here is the problem: stat() is returning with error in virFileExists() on 32 bit when we use it on the disk image. Ie: $ ls -l /home/jamie/tmp/628055/disk -rw-r--r-- 1 jamie jamie 2179989504 2010-09-22 08:57 /home/jamie/tmp/628055/disk == amd64 == $ a.out /home/jamie/tmp/628055/disk

[Bug 645532] [NEW] package apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-09-22 Thread SuperCyborg
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apache2 I got here after an automated message report by Ubuntu. In this case, the update just reported failing and the bug reporting process took me here. Synaptic reports apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.2 as latest AND installed, so it seems like it

[Bug 645532] Re: package apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-09-22 Thread SuperCyborg
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645532/+attachment/1624238/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Df.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645532/+attachment/1624239/+files/Df.txt ** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt

[Bug 644632] Re: nssldap-update-ignoreusers needs to be configurable to ignore users

2010-09-22 Thread Joshua Kugler
So, here is the patch. You add a line in /etc/ldap.conf of the form: nss_initgroups_okusers user1,user2 Thanks to pgas on #awk for help with the awk syntax and best practices. Comments/critique welcome. ** Patch added: Patch to add OK users functionality.

[Bug 382832] Re: Need comment for line added to /etc/ldap.conf by nssldap-update-ignoreusers(8)

2010-09-22 Thread Joshua Kugler
Something like this? ** Patch added: Adds an explanatory comment https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libnss-ldap/+bug/382832/+attachment/1624319/+files/nssldap-update-ignoreusers.382832.diff -- Need comment for line added to /etc/ldap.conf by nssldap-update-ignoreusers(8)

[Bug 628055] Re: Instances don't start correctly: Security Labeling error running aa_change_profile()

2010-09-22 Thread Jamie Strandboge
Turns out this was a missing #include in virt-aa-helper.c. In previous releases we did not need '#include sys/stat.h', but in libvirt 0.8.3 (presumably because of its embedded gnulib, which has functions for stat()) and the toolchain in maverick, we do. Specifically, virt-aa-helper.c has in its

[Bug 645009] Re: spamd segfaults a message

2010-09-22 Thread Marcin Owsiany
I had a look at the history of segfaults in my syslog and found the following things: There were the following two kernel messages, with slightly different frequencies: 29 times: segfault at 108 ip 7f6269838a81 sp 7fffb3255900 error 4 in libperl.so.5.10.1[7f6269795000+162000] 40

[Bug 628055] Re: Instances don't start correctly on 32bit systems with large disk files

2010-09-22 Thread Jamie Strandboge
** Summary changed: - Instances don't start correctly: Security Labeling error running aa_change_profile() + Instances don't start correctly on 32bit systems with large disk files -- Instances don't start correctly on 32bit systems with large disk files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/628055

[Bug 645009] Re: spamd segfaults a message

2010-09-22 Thread Marcin Owsiany
another thing: removing ~/.spamassassin does not help -- spamd segfaults a message https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645009 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to spamassassin in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list

[Bug 645082] Re: bacula misses requirement of gawk

2010-09-22 Thread Serge Hallyn
** Changed in: bacula (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: bacula (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High -- bacula misses requirement of gawk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645082 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is

[Bug 645082] Re: bacula misses requirement of gawk

2010-09-22 Thread Serge Hallyn
Thanks for reporting this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Sure looks like you're right, I'll propose a trivial patch. ** Changed in: bacula (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Serge Hallyn (serge-hallyn) -- bacula misses requirement of gawk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645082 You

[Bug 628055] Re: Instances don't start correctly on 32bit systems with large disk files

2010-09-22 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/libvirt -- Instances don't start correctly on 32bit systems with large disk files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/628055 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu. --

[Bug 628055] Re: Instances don't start correctly on 32bit systems with large disk files

2010-09-22 Thread Jamie Strandboge
The attached debdiff is what I uploaded to fix this issue. It is confirmed to fix the issue using the reproducer locally. ** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu Maverick) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed ** Patch added: libvirt_0.8.3-1ubuntu13.debdiff

[Bug 645082] Re: bacula misses requirement of gawk

2010-09-22 Thread Serge Hallyn
Pushed branch https://code.launchpad.net/~serge- hallyn/ubuntu/maverick/bacula/depend-on-gawk/. Need to test and propose for merge. -- bacula misses requirement of gawk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645082 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team,

[Bug 645009] Re: spamd segfaults a message

2010-09-22 Thread Marcin Owsiany
After installing perl-debug and attaching to a spamd child I managed to obtain the following backtrace: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x7f6269838a86 in S_share_hek_flags (my_perl=0x165e010, str=0x4652010 OpenVZ, len=6, hash=2293735283, flags=0) at hv.c:2460 2460

[Bug 628055] Re: Instances don't start correctly on 32bit systems with large disk files

2010-09-22 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package libvirt - 0.8.3-1ubuntu13 --- libvirt (0.8.3-1ubuntu13) maverick; urgency=low * debian/patch/9028-lp628055.patch: include sys/stat.h to fix compiler warning and stat() failure on 32bit architectures when calling stat() on large files. This

[Bug 644961] Re: qemu crash in rootstock second step during Setting up console-setup (1.34ubuntu15) (log reported in bootstrap.log)

2010-09-22 Thread Serge Hallyn
Thanks for reporting this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Could you tell us the precise rootstock command you used, how you subsequently started up the image (full kvm commandline), and attach the bootstrap.log? ** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- qemu

[Bug 643100] Re: Recent update broke dhcp

2010-09-22 Thread Till Klampaeckel
This is my complete /etc/apt/sources.list: # deb http://download.openvz.org/debian-systs lenny openvz deb http://ubuntu.intergenia.de/ubuntu/ lucid main restricted deb-src http://ubuntu.intergenia.de/ubuntu/ lucid restricted main multiverse universe #Added by software-properties ## Major bug

[Bug 645532] Re: package apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-09-22 Thread Serge Hallyn
Hi, I could be wrong, but it looks like apache-common refused to complete configuration due to some complaints. Please see DpkgTerminalLog.txt attached and address those issues, and see if you can then complete the upgrade. In particular, there are critical configuration files like

[Bug 645396] Re: package winbind 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-09-22 Thread Serge Hallyn
This looks like a transient error trying to open /etc/group and failing to get a lock. If you try again, does it persist? ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- package winbind 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation

[Bug 645396] Ticket created: Re: package winbind 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 (ticket #39179)

2010-09-22 Thread Helpdesk
-- package winbind 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645396 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to

[Bug 423252] Re: NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su and sudo

2010-09-22 Thread greenmoss
My bug 509734 was marked as a duplicate of this one. This was a special case using the atd job scheduler. At jobs launched by ldap users worked, but at jobs launched by root did *not* work. atd was doing a group lookup, and nss was dropping privileges, thus breaking root-launched at jobs. To work

[Bug 642866] Re: openssh client logs into server without specifying the correct key file.

2010-09-22 Thread Canoblus
same with ssh -vvv -i linux_test_server -l username 192.168.1.222 I can log in without any problems, but this is expected because there I specified the key file. The weird behavior shows up, if I do not specify any key file and can still log into the server. myself is the standard ubuntu

[Bug 643100] Re: Recent update broke dhcp

2010-09-22 Thread C de-Avillez
Yes, I think your network-manager is a left-over from your Karmic days -- you installed it from an external repository (probably a PPA), but... * it has a greater version than current Lucid * it is most probably not compatible with Lucid This goes with the territory, when using non-official

[Bug 645630] [NEW] Unable to connect to CIFS host

2010-09-22 Thread mrandrzejak
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba 1) Description:Ubuntu maverick (development branch) Release:10.10 2) smbclient: Installed: 2:3.5.4~dfsg-1ubuntu7 Candidate: 2:3.5.4~dfsg-1ubuntu7 Version table: *** 2:3.5.4~dfsg-1ubuntu7 0 500

[Bug 645630] Re: Unable to connect to CIFS host

2010-09-22 Thread mrandrzejak
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645630/+attachment/1624822/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: SambaInstalledVersions.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645630/+attachment/1624823/+files/SambaInstalledVersions.txt -- Unable to connect to

[Bug 641647] Re: post-install script fails if any users exist with word 'ftp' in their name (was: package vsftpd (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation scrip

2010-09-22 Thread Clint Byrum
** Summary changed: - package vsftpd (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 + post-install script fails if any users exist with word 'ftp' in their name (was: package vsftpd (not installed) failed to install/upgrade:

[Bug 645654] [NEW] package apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-09-22 Thread LeBurt
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apache2 Problem occurred while performing a standard update on 22 Sep 2010. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-24.43-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5 Uname: Linux

[Bug 645654] Re: package apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-09-22 Thread LeBurt
** Attachment added: AptOrdering.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645654/+attachment/1624992/+files/AptOrdering.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645654/+attachment/1624993/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Df.txt

[Bug 632202] [NEW] whois 5.0.7 tries to overwrite mkpasswd

2010-09-22 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
You have been subscribed to a public bug: whois 5.0.7 and mkpasswd 5.0.6 appear to have the same file in them: /usr/bin/mkpasswd ** Affects: whois (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Fix Released -- whois 5.0.7 tries to overwrite mkpasswd

Re: [Bug 644538] Re: package postfix 2.7.0-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 75

2010-09-22 Thread progone
How do I reinstall my system without loosing all my html work I've done in the past and my 1 tb of photos? On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 4:39 AM, Thierry Carrez thierry.car...@ubuntu.comwrote: Error is: newaliases: fatal: /etc/mailname/: cannot open file: No such file or directory You replaced

[Bug 632202] Re: whois 5.0.7 tries to overwrite mkpasswd

2010-09-22 Thread Luke Faraone
Fixed in whois 5.0.7ubuntu1. ** Package changed: ubuntu = whois (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: whois (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- whois 5.0.7 tries to overwrite mkpasswd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632202 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 644538] Re: package postfix 2.7.0-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 75

2010-09-22 Thread progone
Please delete #3, personal data from email reply is on here. -- package postfix 2.7.0-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 75 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/644538 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >