[Bug 1951832] Re: xl2tpd "Can not find tunnel" in jammy

2022-01-31 Thread gregrwm
i made the jump to manjaro.  rolling release, yay!  and ipsec/xl2tpd
just works.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951832

Title:
  xl2tpd "Can not find tunnel" in jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xl2tpd/+bug/1951832/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1946366] Re: TigerVNC fullscreen is stretched and split across both screens on kubuntu 20.04

2021-12-03 Thread gregrwm
fwiw bug does not appear in manjaro kwin(5.23.3-1)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946366

Title:
  TigerVNC fullscreen is stretched and split across both screens on
  kubuntu 20.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kwin/+bug/1946366/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1883742] Re: funky character placement when kubuntu-settings-desktop installed

2021-12-02 Thread gregrwm
The intoxicated character placement effect when kubuntu-settings is
installed is still there in jammy.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883742

Title:
  funky character placement when kubuntu-settings-desktop installed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kubuntu-settings/+bug/1883742/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1951832] Re: xl2tpd "Can not find tunnel" in jammy

2021-11-24 Thread gregrwm
** Attachment added: "er-x /var/log/messages when jammy tries to connect"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xl2tpd/+bug/1951832/+attachment/5543182/+files/jmes

** Changed in: xl2tpd (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => New

** Description changed:

  My connection works in 20.04 and fails in 22.04.  Perhaps something i've
  been using is now depricated?  Or perhaps jammy xl2tpd is...still
  working on it?
  
- see my attached syslog extracts at comments #6 and #7.  i extracted them
- thus:
+ see my attached syslog extracts at comments #6 thru #11.  i extracted
+ them thus:
  
  egrep -i "l2tp|swan|ipsec|charon|XFRM|layer 2|\/var/run/xl2tpd/l2tp-control c myvp7&&
  while i=$(ip route) j=${i#*3.i.p.}
     [[ $j = "$i" ]]
  do echo -n .;sleep .3
  done
  i="ip route add 3.i.p.0/21 via 3.i.p.${j%% *}"
  echo $i;$i
  
  er-x /etc/ipsec.conf:
  config setup
  
  conn %default
  keyexchange=ikev1
  
  conn remote-access
    authby=secret
    type=transport
    keyexchange=ikev1
    left=2.i.p.7
  
    leftprotoport=17/1701
    right=%any
    rightprotoport=17/%any
    auto=add
    dpddelay=15
    dpdtimeout=45
    dpdaction=clear
    rekey=no
    ikelifetime=3600
    keylife=3600
  
  er-x /etc/ipsec.secrets:
  2.i.p.7 %any : PSK ...
  
  er-x /etc/xl2tpd/xl2tpd.conf:
  [global]
  listen-addr = 2.i.p.7
  
  [lns default]
  ip range = 3.i.p.4-3.i.p.9
  local ip = 10.255.255.0
  refuse pap = yes
  require authentication = yes
  name = VyattaL2TPServer
  ppp debug = yes
  pppoptfile = /etc/ppp/options.xl2tpd
  length bit = yes
  
  er-x /etc/ppp/options.xl2tpd:
  name xl2tpd
  linkname l2tp
  ipcp-accept-local
  ipcp-accept-remote
  ms-dns 8.8.8.8
  ms-dns 8.8.4.4
  noccp
  auth
  nodefaultroute
  debug
  proxyarp
  connect-delay 5000
  idle 1800

** Description changed:

  My connection works in 20.04 and fails in 22.04.  Perhaps something i've
  been using is now depricated?  Or perhaps jammy xl2tpd is...still
  working on it?
  
- see my attached syslog extracts at comments #6 thru #11.  i extracted
- them thus:
+ see my attached syslog extracts at comments #6 thru #11.  the er-x
+ extracts were simple, the ubuntu extracts were thus:
  
  egrep -i "l2tp|swan|ipsec|charon|XFRM|layer 2|\/var/run/xl2tpd/l2tp-control c myvp7&&
  while i=$(ip route) j=${i#*3.i.p.}
     [[ $j = "$i" ]]
  do echo -n .;sleep .3
  done
  i="ip route add 3.i.p.0/21 via 3.i.p.${j%% *}"
  echo $i;$i
  
  er-x /etc/ipsec.conf:
  config setup
  
  conn %default
  keyexchange=ikev1
  
  conn remote-access
    authby=secret
    type=transport
    keyexchange=ikev1
    left=2.i.p.7
  
    leftprotoport=17/1701
    right=%any
    rightprotoport=17/%any
    auto=add
    dpddelay=15
    dpdtimeout=45
    dpdaction=clear
    rekey=no
    ikelifetime=3600
    keylife=3600
  
  er-x /etc/ipsec.secrets:
  2.i.p.7 %any : PSK ...
  
  er-x /etc/xl2tpd/xl2tpd.conf:
  [global]
  listen-addr = 2.i.p.7
  
  [lns default]
  ip range = 3.i.p.4-3.i.p.9
  local ip = 10.255.255.0
  refuse pap = yes
  require authentication = yes
  name = VyattaL2TPServer
  ppp debug = yes
  pppoptfile = /etc/ppp/options.xl2tpd
  length bit = yes
  
  er-x /etc/ppp/options.xl2tpd:
  name xl2tpd
  linkname l2tp
  ipcp-accept-local
  ipcp-accept-remote
  ms-dns 8.8.8.8
  ms-dns 8.8.4.4
  noccp
  auth
  nodefaultroute
  debug
  proxyarp
  connect-delay 5000
  idle 1800

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951832

Title:
  xl2tpd "Can not find tunnel" in jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xl2tpd/+bug/1951832/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1951832] Re: xl2tpd "Can not find tunnel" in jammy

2021-11-24 Thread gregrwm
** Attachment added: "er-x /var/log/charon.log when jammy tries to connect"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xl2tpd/+bug/1951832/+attachment/5543181/+files/jcha

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951832

Title:
  xl2tpd "Can not find tunnel" in jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xl2tpd/+bug/1951832/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1951832] Re: xl2tpd "Can not find tunnel" in jammy

2021-11-24 Thread gregrwm
** Attachment added: "er-x /var/log/messages when 20.04 connects"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xl2tpd/+bug/1951832/+attachment/5543180/+files/fmes

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951832

Title:
  xl2tpd "Can not find tunnel" in jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xl2tpd/+bug/1951832/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1951832] Re: xl2tpd "Can not find tunnel" in jammy

2021-11-24 Thread gregrwm
** Description changed:

  My connection works in 20.04 and fails in 22.04.  Perhaps something i've
  been using is now depricated?  Or perhaps jammy xl2tpd is...still
  working on it?
  
  see my attached syslog extracts at comments #6 and #7.  i extracted them
  thus:
  
  egrep -i "l2tp|swan|ipsec|charon|XFRM|layer 2|\/var/run/xl2tpd/l2tp-control c myvp7&&
  while i=$(ip route) j=${i#*3.i.p.}
     [[ $j = "$i" ]]
  do echo -n .;sleep .3
  done
  i="ip route add 192.168.128.0/21 via 192.168.128.${j%% *}"
  echo $i;$i
+ 
+ er-x /etc/ipsec.conf:
+ config setup
+ 
+ conn %default
+ keyexchange=ikev1
+ 
+ conn remote-access
+   authby=secret
+   type=transport
+   keyexchange=ikev1
+   left=2.i.p.7
+ 
+   leftprotoport=17/1701
+   right=%any
+   rightprotoport=17/%any
+   auto=add
+   dpddelay=15
+   dpdtimeout=45
+   dpdaction=clear
+   rekey=no
+   ikelifetime=3600
+   keylife=3600
+ 
+ er-x /etc/ipsec.secrets:
+ 2.i.p.7 %any : PSK ...
+ 
+ er-x /etc/xl2tpd/xl2tpd.conf:
+ [global]
+ listen-addr = 2.i.p.7
+ 
+ [lns default]
+ ip range = 3.i.p.4-3.i.p.9
+ local ip = 10.255.255.0
+ refuse pap = yes
+ require authentication = yes
+ name = VyattaL2TPServer
+ ppp debug = yes
+ pppoptfile = /etc/ppp/options.xl2tpd
+ length bit = yes
+ 
+ er-x /etc/ppp/options.xl2tpd:
+ name xl2tpd
+ linkname l2tp
+ ipcp-accept-local
+ ipcp-accept-remote
+ ms-dns 8.8.8.8
+ ms-dns 8.8.4.4
+ noccp
+ auth
+ nodefaultroute
+ debug
+ proxyarp
+ connect-delay 5000
+ idle 1800

** Description changed:

  My connection works in 20.04 and fails in 22.04.  Perhaps something i've
  been using is now depricated?  Or perhaps jammy xl2tpd is...still
  working on it?
  
  see my attached syslog extracts at comments #6 and #7.  i extracted them
  thus:
  
  egrep -i "l2tp|swan|ipsec|charon|XFRM|layer 2|\/var/run/xl2tpd/l2tp-control c myvp7&&
  while i=$(ip route) j=${i#*3.i.p.}
     [[ $j = "$i" ]]
  do echo -n .;sleep .3
  done
- i="ip route add 192.168.128.0/21 via 192.168.128.${j%% *}"
+ i="ip route add 3.i.p.0/21 via 3.i.p.${j%% *}"
  echo $i;$i
  
  er-x /etc/ipsec.conf:
  config setup
  
  conn %default
- keyexchange=ikev1
+ keyexchange=ikev1
  
  conn remote-access
-   authby=secret
-   type=transport
-   keyexchange=ikev1
-   left=2.i.p.7
+   authby=secret
+   type=transport
+   keyexchange=ikev1
+   left=2.i.p.7
  
-   leftprotoport=17/1701
-   right=%any
-   rightprotoport=17/%any
-   auto=add
-   dpddelay=15
-   dpdtimeout=45
-   dpdaction=clear
-   rekey=no
-   ikelifetime=3600
-   keylife=3600
+   leftprotoport=17/1701
+   right=%any
+   rightprotoport=17/%any
+   auto=add
+   dpddelay=15
+   dpdtimeout=45
+   dpdaction=clear
+   rekey=no
+   ikelifetime=3600
+   keylife=3600
  
  er-x /etc/ipsec.secrets:
  2.i.p.7 %any : PSK ...
  
  er-x /etc/xl2tpd/xl2tpd.conf:
  [global]
  listen-addr = 2.i.p.7
  
  [lns default]
  ip range = 3.i.p.4-3.i.p.9
  local ip = 10.255.255.0
  refuse pap = yes
  require authentication = yes
  name = VyattaL2TPServer
  ppp debug = yes
  pppoptfile = /etc/ppp/options.xl2tpd
  length bit = yes
  
  er-x /etc/ppp/options.xl2tpd:
  name xl2tpd
  linkname l2tp
  ipcp-accept-local
  ipcp-accept-remote
  ms-dns 8.8.8.8
  ms-dns 8.8.4.4
  noccp
  auth
  nodefaultroute
  debug
  proxyarp
  connect-delay 5000
  idle 1800

** Attachment added: "er-x charon.log when 20.04 connects"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xl2tpd/+bug/1951832/+attachment/5543179/+files/fcha

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951832

Title:
  xl2tpd "Can not find tunnel" in jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xl2tpd/+bug/1951832/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1951832] Re: xl2tpd "Can not find tunnel" in jammy

2021-11-24 Thread gregrwm
** Description changed:

  My connection works in 20.04 and fails in 22.04.  Perhaps something i've
  been using is now depricated?  Or perhaps jammy xl2tpd is...still
  working on it?
  
  see my attached syslog extracts at comments #6 and #7.  i extracted them
  thus:
  
- egrep "l2tp|swan|ipsec|charon|XFRM|layer 2|\/var/run/xl2tpd/l2tp-control c myvp7&&
  while i=$(ip route) j=${i#*3.i.p.}
     [[ $j = "$i" ]]
  do echo -n .;sleep .3
  done
  i="ip route add 192.168.128.0/21 via 192.168.128.${j%% *}"
  echo $i;$i

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951832

Title:
  xl2tpd "Can not find tunnel" in jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xl2tpd/+bug/1951832/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1951832] Re: xl2tpd "Can not find tunnel" in jammy

2021-11-24 Thread gregrwm
** Attachment added: "syslog extract from jammy"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xl2tpd/+bug/1951832/+attachment/5543174/+files/jls

** Description changed:

  My connection works in 20.04 and fails in 22.04.  Perhaps something i've
  been using is now depricated?  Or perhaps jammy xl2tpd is...still
  working on it?
  
- see my attached syslog extracts.  i extracted them thus:
+ see my attached syslog extracts at comments #6 and #7.  i extracted them
+ thus:
  
  egrep "l2tp|swan|ipsec|charon|XFRM|layer 2|\/var/run/xl2tpd/l2tp-control c myvp7&&
  while i=$(ip route) j=${i#*3.i.p.}
-[[ $j = "$i" ]]
+    [[ $j = "$i" ]]
  do echo -n .;sleep .3
  done
  i="ip route add 192.168.128.0/21 via 192.168.128.${j%% *}"
  echo $i;$i

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951832

Title:
  xl2tpd "Can not find tunnel" in jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xl2tpd/+bug/1951832/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1951832] Re: xl2tpd "Can not find tunnel" in jammy

2021-11-24 Thread gregrwm
** Description changed:

  My connection works in 20.04 and fails in 22.04.  Perhaps something i've
- been using is now depricated?  Or perhaps jammy strongswan is...still
+ been using is now depricated?  Or perhaps jammy xl2tpd is...still
  working on it?
  
- This is the output i get in 22.04:
- initiating Main Mode IKE_SA myvp7[1] to 2.i.p.7
- generating ID_PROT request 0 [ SA V V V V V ]
- sending packet: from 1.i.p.2[500] to 2.i.p.7[500] (180 bytes)
- received packet: from 2.i.p.7[500] to 1.i.p.2[500] (136 bytes)
- parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ SA V V V ]
- received XAuth vendor ID
- received DPD vendor ID
- received NAT-T (RFC 3947) vendor ID
- selected proposal: IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_2048
- generating ID_PROT request 0 [ KE No NAT-D NAT-D ]
- sending packet: from 1.i.p.2[500] to 2.i.p.7[500] (372 bytes)
- received packet: from 2.i.p.7[500] to 1.i.p.2[500] (372 bytes)
- parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ KE No NAT-D NAT-D ]
- no shared key found for '1.i.p.2'[1.i.p.2] - '2.i.p.7'[2.i.p.7]
- no shared key found for 1.i.p.2 - 2.i.p.7
- generating INFORMATIONAL_V1 request 402437601 [ N(INVAL_KE) ]
- sending packet: from 1.i.p.2[500] to 2.i.p.7[500] (56 bytes)
- establishing connection 'myvp7' failed
+ see my attached syslog extracts.  i extracted them thus:
  
- This is the output i get in 20.04:
- initiating Main Mode IKE_SA myvp7[1] to 2.i.p.7
- generating ID_PROT request 0 [ SA V V V V V ]
- sending packet: from 1.i.p.2[500] to 2.i.p.7[500] (180 bytes)
- received packet: from 2.i.p.7[500] to 1.i.p.2[500] (136 bytes)
- parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ SA V V V ]
- received XAuth vendor ID
- received DPD vendor ID
- received NAT-T (RFC 3947) vendor ID
- selected proposal: IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_2048
- generating ID_PROT request 0 [ KE No NAT-D NAT-D ]
- sending packet: from 1.i.p.2[500] to 2.i.p.7[500] (372 bytes)
- received packet: from 2.i.p.7[500] to 1.i.p.2[500] (372 bytes)
- parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ KE No NAT-D NAT-D ]
- local host is behind NAT, sending keep alives
- generating ID_PROT request 0 [ ID HASH N(INITIAL_CONTACT) ]
- sending packet: from 1.i.p.2[4500] to 2.i.p.7[4500] (108 bytes)
- received packet: from 2.i.p.7[4500] to 1.i.p.2[4500] (76 bytes)
- parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ ID HASH ]
- IKE_SA myvp7[1] established between 1.i.p.2[1.i.p.2]...2.i.p.7[2.i.p.7]
- scheduling reauthentication in 3397s
- maximum IKE_SA lifetime 3577s
- generating QUICK_MODE request 3605139670 [ HASH SA No ID ID NAT-OA NAT-OA ]
- sending packet: from 1.i.p.2[4500] to 2.i.p.7[4500] (204 bytes)
- received packet: from 2.i.p.7[4500] to 1.i.p.2[4500] (204 bytes)
- parsed QUICK_MODE response 3605139670 [ HASH SA No ID ID NAT-OA NAT-OA ]
- selected proposal: ESP:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/NO_EXT_SEQ
- CHILD_SA myvp7{1} established with SPIs ce997cf9_i ccdb93e8_o and TS 
1.i.p.2/32[udp/l2f] === 2.i.p.7/32[udp/l2f]
- connection 'myvp7' established successfully
+ egrep "l2tp|swan|ipsec|charon|XFRM|layer 2|\/var/run/xl2tpd/l2tp-control c myvp7&&
+ while i=$(ip route) j=${i#*3.i.p.}
+[[ $j = "$i" ]]
+ do echo -n .;sleep .3
+ done
+ i="ip route add 192.168.128.0/21 via 192.168.128.${j%% *}"
+ echo $i;$i

** Attachment added: "syslog extract from 20.04"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xl2tpd/+bug/1951832/+attachment/5543173/+files/fks

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951832

Title:
  xl2tpd "Can not find tunnel" in jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xl2tpd/+bug/1951832/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1951832] Re: no shared key found in 22.04

2021-11-24 Thread gregrwm
** Package changed: strongswan (Ubuntu) => xl2tpd (Ubuntu)

** Summary changed:

- no shared key found in 22.04
+ xl2tpd "Can not find tunnel" in jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951832

Title:
  xl2tpd "Can not find tunnel" in jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xl2tpd/+bug/1951832/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1952026] [NEW] jammy kubuntu ubiquity crashed, booted from thumb drive, today's iso

2021-11-23 Thread gregrwm
Public bug reported:

same as https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1952019

but using today's "current" iso

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: ubiquity 21.10.10
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-19.19-generic 5.13.14
Uname: Linux 5.13.0-19-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu73
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CasperVersion: 1.465
Date: Tue Nov 23 22:06:57 2021
InstallCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=(j)/casper/vmlinuz boot=casper 
iso-scan/filename=/boo/jk/jammy-desktop-amd64.iso panic=30 --
LiveMediaBuild: Kubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Alpha amd64 (20211123)
SourcePackage: ubiquity
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug jammy ubiquity-21.10.10

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1952026

Title:
   jammy kubuntu ubiquity crashed, booted from thumb drive, today's iso

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1952026/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1952019] [NEW] jammy kubuntu ubiquity crashed, booted from thumb drive, no toram

2021-11-23 Thread gregrwm
Public bug reported:

same as https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1952017

but this time i omitted toram

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: ubiquity 21.10.10
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-19.19-generic 5.13.14
Uname: Linux 5.13.0-19-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu73
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CasperVersion: 1.465
Date: Tue Nov 23 20:33:44 2021
InstallCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=(j)/casper/vmlinuz boot=casper 
iso-scan/filename=/boo/kubuntu/jammy-desktop-amd64.iso panic=30 --
LiveMediaBuild: Kubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Alpha amd64 (2023)
SourcePackage: ubiquity
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug jammy ubiquity-21.10.10

** Summary changed:

- ubiquity crashed, no toram this time
+ jammy kubuntu ubiquity crashed, booted from thumb drive, no toram

** Description changed:

- same as a few minutes ago, but this time i omitted toram
+ same as https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1952017
+ 
+ but this time i omitted toram
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: ubiquity 21.10.10
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-19.19-generic 5.13.14
  Uname: Linux 5.13.0-19-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu73
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CasperVersion: 1.465
  Date: Tue Nov 23 20:33:44 2021
  InstallCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=(j)/casper/vmlinuz boot=casper 
iso-scan/filename=/boo/kubuntu/jammy-desktop-amd64.iso panic=30 --
  LiveMediaBuild: Kubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Alpha amd64 (2023)
  SourcePackage: ubiquity
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1952019

Title:
  jammy kubuntu ubiquity crashed, booted from thumb drive, no toram

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1952019/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1952017] [NEW] jammy kubuntu ubiquity crashed, booted from thumb drive, with toram

2021-11-23 Thread gregrwm
Public bug reported:

Booted from thumb drive thus:
menuentry   "d07 2021-11-19 Fri 15:13:58   kubuntu/jammy-desktop-amd64.iso" 
{
 echo   "d07 2021-11-19 Fri 15:13:58   kubuntu/jammy-desktop-amd64.iso"
 #3666923520 2021-11-19 Fri 15:13:58   kubuntu/jammy-desktop-amd64.iso
i=/boo/kubuntu/jammy-desktop-amd64.iso
  search --no-floppy --set=root --fs-uuid ADDA-F0B9
  loopback j $i
linux (j)/casper/vmlinuz boot=casper iso-scan/filename="$i" panic=30 toram 
--
   initrd (j)/casper/initrd
}

Ran to completion of "copying files", tho i didn't see anything about
the bootloader, when it crashed.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: ubiquity 21.10.10
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-19.19-generic 5.13.14
Uname: Linux 5.13.0-19-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu73
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CasperVersion: 1.465
Date: Tue Nov 23 19:53:24 2021
InstallCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=(j)/casper/vmlinuz boot=casper 
iso-scan/filename=/boo/kubuntu/jammy-desktop-amd64.iso panic=30 toram --
LiveMediaBuild: Kubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Alpha amd64 (2023)
SourcePackage: ubiquity
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug jammy ubiquity-21.10.10

** Summary changed:

- ubiquity crashed, running from thumb drive, with toram, jammy kubuntu
+ jammy kubuntu ubiquity crashed, running from thumb drive, with toram

** Summary changed:

- jammy kubuntu ubiquity crashed, running from thumb drive, with toram
+ jammy kubuntu ubiquity crashed, booted from thumb drive, with toram

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1952017

Title:
  jammy kubuntu ubiquity crashed, booted from thumb drive, with toram

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1952017/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1951832] Re: no shared key found in 22.04

2021-11-23 Thread gregrwm
i've gained access to the "ER-X" which receives my connection at the
colo, if you want info from it just ask.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951832

Title:
  no shared key found in 22.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/strongswan/+bug/1951832/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1951832] Re: no shared key found in 22.04

2021-11-23 Thread gregrwm
yes.  focal on HD, vs a jammy iso, connecting to the same colo
("right").  i'm less familiar with the details at the colo, other than
the focal config i have on my end works for it.  with some difficulty i
could likely get more details about the colo config.

sorry the description above didn't show the following section in my ipsec.conf:
conn %default   

 
ikelifetime=60m 

   
keylife=20m 

   
rekeymargin=3m  

   
keyingtries=1   

   
keyexchange=ikev1   

   
authby=secret   

   
ike=...
esp=...
if you want to see any of the "..." let's find a way less public.

the extent of my configuration is ipsec.conf, ipsec.secrets,
xl2tpd.conf, options.l2tpd.client, and issuing a couple commands to open
the connection.  as it's the first stage that fails, i presume only the
ipsec.conf, ipsec.secrets, and the command "ipsec up myvp7" are
relevant.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951832

Title:
  no shared key found in 22.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/strongswan/+bug/1951832/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1951832] [NEW] no shared key found in 22.04

2021-11-22 Thread gregrwm
Public bug reported:

My connection works in 20.04 and fails in 22.04.  Perhaps something i've
been using is now depricated?  Or perhaps jammy strongswan is...still
working on it?

This is the output i get in 22.04:
initiating Main Mode IKE_SA myvp7[1] to 2.i.p.7
generating ID_PROT request 0 [ SA V V V V V ]
sending packet: from 1.i.p.2[500] to 2.i.p.7[500] (180 bytes)
received packet: from 2.i.p.7[500] to 1.i.p.2[500] (136 bytes)
parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ SA V V V ]
received XAuth vendor ID
received DPD vendor ID
received NAT-T (RFC 3947) vendor ID
selected proposal: IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_2048
generating ID_PROT request 0 [ KE No NAT-D NAT-D ]
sending packet: from 1.i.p.2[500] to 2.i.p.7[500] (372 bytes)
received packet: from 2.i.p.7[500] to 1.i.p.2[500] (372 bytes)
parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ KE No NAT-D NAT-D ]
no shared key found for '1.i.p.2'[1.i.p.2] - '2.i.p.7'[2.i.p.7]
no shared key found for 1.i.p.2 - 2.i.p.7
generating INFORMATIONAL_V1 request 402437601 [ N(INVAL_KE) ]
sending packet: from 1.i.p.2[500] to 2.i.p.7[500] (56 bytes)
establishing connection 'myvp7' failed

This is the output i get in 20.04:
initiating Main Mode IKE_SA myvp7[1] to 2.i.p.7
generating ID_PROT request 0 [ SA V V V V V ]
sending packet: from 1.i.p.2[500] to 2.i.p.7[500] (180 bytes)
received packet: from 2.i.p.7[500] to 1.i.p.2[500] (136 bytes)
parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ SA V V V ]
received XAuth vendor ID
received DPD vendor ID
received NAT-T (RFC 3947) vendor ID
selected proposal: IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_2048
generating ID_PROT request 0 [ KE No NAT-D NAT-D ]
sending packet: from 1.i.p.2[500] to 2.i.p.7[500] (372 bytes)
received packet: from 2.i.p.7[500] to 1.i.p.2[500] (372 bytes)
parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ KE No NAT-D NAT-D ]
local host is behind NAT, sending keep alives
generating ID_PROT request 0 [ ID HASH N(INITIAL_CONTACT) ]
sending packet: from 1.i.p.2[4500] to 2.i.p.7[4500] (108 bytes)
received packet: from 2.i.p.7[4500] to 1.i.p.2[4500] (76 bytes)
parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ ID HASH ]
IKE_SA myvp7[1] established between 1.i.p.2[1.i.p.2]...2.i.p.7[2.i.p.7]
scheduling reauthentication in 3397s
maximum IKE_SA lifetime 3577s
generating QUICK_MODE request 3605139670 [ HASH SA No ID ID NAT-OA NAT-OA ]
sending packet: from 1.i.p.2[4500] to 2.i.p.7[4500] (204 bytes)
received packet: from 2.i.p.7[4500] to 1.i.p.2[4500] (204 bytes)
parsed QUICK_MODE response 3605139670 [ HASH SA No ID ID NAT-OA NAT-OA ]
selected proposal: ESP:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/NO_EXT_SEQ
CHILD_SA myvp7{1} established with SPIs ce997cf9_i ccdb93e8_o and TS 
1.i.p.2/32[udp/l2f] === 2.i.p.7/32[udp/l2f]
connection 'myvp7' established successfully

my ipsec.conf:
conn myvp7
  right=2.i.p.7
  rightprotoport=17/1701
  leftprotoport=17/1701
  left=%defaultroute
  keyexchange=ikev1
  type=transport
  authby=secret
  auto=add

my ipsec.secrets:
: PSK ...

** Affects: strongswan (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951832

Title:
  no shared key found in 22.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/strongswan/+bug/1951832/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1951661] Re: Charge Limit section disappears upon changing the settings

2021-11-21 Thread gregrwm
** Summary changed:

- Battery Optimization section missing
+ Charge Limit section disappears upon changing the settings

** Description changed:

- The Battery Optimization section has gone missing ever since i changed
- the settings.
+ The Charge Limit section has gone missing ever since i changed the
+ settings.
  
  This morning i see only two sections, "Battery Levels" and "Other Settings", 
under [System Settings -> Power Management -> Advanced Power Settings], having 
just tried two recent jammy kubuntu live ISOs,
  3666923520 2021-11-19 Fri 15:13:58 kubuntu/jammy-desktop-amd64.iso and
  3667288064 2021-11-13 Sat 14:10:03 kubuntu/jammy-desktop-amd64.iso.
  
  On a recent morning i had found a third section in [Advanced Power
- Settings] called Battery Optimization or something quite like that, and
- if memory serves me correctly i set it to begin charging at 40% and stop
- charging at 60%.  But ever since, i only see the two sections in
- [Advanced Power Settings].
+ Settings] called "Charge Limit", and if memory serves me correctly i set
+ it to begin charging at 40% and stop charging at 60%.  But ever since, i
+ only see the two sections in [Advanced Power Settings].
  
  it makes sense that the panel icon is saying "Battery at 57%, not
  Charging" because that fits what i asked for, and not discharging either
  because as htop says it's "Running on A/C".  i just unplugged the lappy
  momentarily and htop tracked it as it steadily dropped from "57.1%" to
- "56.6% (Running on battery)", so apart from the missing Battery
- Optimization settings it all seems sensible.  i was a bit surprised to
- see it remembering the settings from a prior live session, but it makes
- sense if the settings were set in the firmware.
+ "56.6% (Running on battery)", so apart from the missing Charge Limit
+ settings it all seems sensible.  i was a bit surprised to see it
+ remembering the settings from a prior live session, but it makes sense
+ if the settings were set in the firmware.
  
  in addition to what's currently (nearly) implemented in jammy kubuntu
  i'm curious about optimizing battery lifetimes in general, and
  specifically for my specific devices (see sig).  Pointers to reasonably
  reliable specific information would be appreciated.  Like, what's best
  overall, a full charge occasionally, a full discharge occasionally,
  both, neither, or more specifically what?
  
  greg
  (ThinkPad e540, Pixel 3 XL (android 12), Arctis 7, Sennheiser GSP 670, Bose 
SoundLink iii, Kindle Fire HD 3rd Gen 2013 with Evervolv rom)
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: systemsettings 4:5.23.3-1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-19.19-generic 5.13.14
  Uname: Linux 5.13.0-19-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu73
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CasperVersion: 1.465
  Date: Fri Nov 19 17:25:02 2021
  LiveMediaBuild: Kubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Alpha amd64 (2029)
  SourcePackage: systemsettings
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951661

Title:
  Charge Limit section disappears upon changing the settings

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemsettings/+bug/1951661/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1951661] Re: Battery Optimization section missing

2021-11-21 Thread gregrwm
Ran the battery down all the way this morning, restored power, booted
into focal (on my HD), ran there most of the day, the battery charged up
to 100%, then booted the jammy live iso again.  The Charge Limit section
is back now, showing the default settings, stop at 100%, always charge
when plugged or something to that effect.  Fascinating.  So i clicked
around within System Settings a bunch.  Charge Limit still there.
Changed focus settings, changed monitor settings, Charge Limit section
still there.  Changed Charge Limit settings like i did before, stop at
60%, start at 40%, clicked Energy Saving, answered "Apply" to the
dialog, clicked right back to Advanced Power Settings, and the Charge
Limit section is gone again now.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951661

Title:
  Battery Optimization section missing

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemsettings/+bug/1951661/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1951661] [NEW] Battery Optimization section missing

2021-11-19 Thread gregrwm
Public bug reported:

The Battery Optimization section has gone missing ever since i changed
the settings.

This morning i see only two sections, "Battery Levels" and "Other Settings", 
under [System Settings -> Power Management -> Advanced Power Settings], having 
just tried two recent jammy kubuntu live ISOs,
3666923520 2021-11-19 Fri 15:13:58 kubuntu/jammy-desktop-amd64.iso and
3667288064 2021-11-13 Sat 14:10:03 kubuntu/jammy-desktop-amd64.iso.

On a recent morning i had found a third section in [Advanced Power
Settings] called Battery Optimization or something quite like that, and
if memory serves me correctly i set it to begin charging at 40% and stop
charging at 60%.  But ever since, i only see the two sections in
[Advanced Power Settings].

it makes sense that the panel icon is saying "Battery at 57%, not
Charging" because that fits what i asked for, and not discharging either
because as htop says it's "Running on A/C".  i just unplugged the lappy
momentarily and htop tracked it as it steadily dropped from "57.1%" to
"56.6% (Running on battery)", so apart from the missing Battery
Optimization settings it all seems sensible.  i was a bit surprised to
see it remembering the settings from a prior live session, but it makes
sense if the settings were set in the firmware.

in addition to what's currently (nearly) implemented in jammy kubuntu
i'm curious about optimizing battery lifetimes in general, and
specifically for my specific devices (see sig).  Pointers to reasonably
reliable specific information would be appreciated.  Like, what's best
overall, a full charge occasionally, a full discharge occasionally,
both, neither, or more specifically what?

greg
(ThinkPad e540, Pixel 3 XL (android 12), Arctis 7, Sennheiser GSP 670, Bose 
SoundLink iii, Kindle Fire HD 3rd Gen 2013 with Evervolv rom)

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: systemsettings 4:5.23.3-1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-19.19-generic 5.13.14
Uname: Linux 5.13.0-19-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu73
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CasperVersion: 1.465
Date: Fri Nov 19 17:25:02 2021
LiveMediaBuild: Kubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Alpha amd64 (2029)
SourcePackage: systemsettings
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: systemsettings (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951661

Title:
  Battery Optimization section missing

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemsettings/+bug/1951661/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1951655] [NEW] new windows (and popups) get focus even when "Focus new windows" is de-selected

2021-11-19 Thread gregrwm
Public bug reported:

New windows (and popups) get focus even when "Focus new windows" is de-
selected.

See these issues on github:
https://github.com/lxqt/lxqt/issues/2128#issuecomment-973339619
and
https://github.com/lxqt/obconf-qt/issues/189

Does the lubuntu team really want to base lubuntu 22.04 on a dead
product?

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: obconf-qt 0.16.0-1ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-19.19-generic 5.13.14
Uname: Linux 5.13.0-19-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu73
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CasperVersion: 1.465
Date: Fri Nov 19 15:56:55 2021
LiveMediaBuild: Lubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Alpha amd64 (20211108)
SourcePackage: obconf-qt
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: obconf-qt (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951655

Title:
  new windows (and popups) get focus even when "Focus new windows" is
  de-selected

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/obconf-qt/+bug/1951655/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1947505] Re: lxqt-panel ignores shutdown in a VT

2021-11-06 Thread gregrwm
** Description changed:

  boot up a fully updated lubuntu 20.04 system (into sddm).
  press ctl-alt-F2.
  login (on the VT).
  startx /bin/x-terminal-emulator
  move mouse into the terminal.
  startlxqt&
  (it comes up in a few seconds)
  reboot
  
  /sbin/reboot works well with an sddm session, and invoking reboot from
  the lxqt menu works well in a VT, but if i chose to login on a VT *and*
  if i choose to use /sbin/reboot, eg in a script, or if two sessions are
  open, then shutdown proceeds only part way.  apparently lxqt-panel
  ignores the shutdown, and we're left watching a message like
  
  [ *** ] a stop job is running for session 20 of lubuntu (15s / 1min 30s)
  
- workaround:  kill lxqt-panel
+ workaround:  pkill -9 lxqt-panel
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: lxqt-session 0.14.1-2ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-37.41~20.04.2-generic 5.11.22
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-37-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.20
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  Date: Sun Oct 17 10:10:18 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-09-30 (17 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210819)
  SourcePackage: lxqt-session
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947505

Title:
  lxqt-panel ignores shutdown in a VT

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxqt-panel/+bug/1947505/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1946366] Re: TigerVNC fullscreen is stretched and split across both screens on kubuntu 20.04

2021-10-21 Thread gregrwm
** Description changed:

  TigerVNC fullscreen is stretched and split across both screens on
  kubuntu 20.04.
  
  Looking thru all the "system settings" i don't see anything relevant.
  
- On lubuntu 20.04 it usually does fullscreen on just one screen.  i have
- seen it stretch across both screens on lubuntu just once, but so far
- haven't managed to reproduce that on lubuntu.
+ workaround:  kill kwin, launch openbox
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: kwin-x11 4:5.18.5-0ubuntu0.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-37.41~20.04.2-generic 5.11.22
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-37-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.20
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  Date: Thu Oct  7 08:08:00 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-08-03 (64 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 20.04.2.0 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210209.1)
  ProcEnviron:
   LC_TIME=en_DK.utf8
   TERM=screen
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   LANG=en_US.utf8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: kwin
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946366

Title:
  TigerVNC fullscreen is stretched and split across both screens on
  kubuntu 20.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kwin/+bug/1946366/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1947482] Re: can't change VT after starting X in lubuntu

2021-10-19 Thread gregrwm
** Description changed:

+ somedays this bug just doesn't show up, and other days this sequence
+ seems to reliably capture it:
+ 
  boot up a fully updated lubuntu 20.04 system (into sddm).
  press ctl-alt-F2.
  login (on the VT).
  startx /bin/x-terminal-emulator
  
  thereafter neither ctl-alt-F1 nor 'chvt 1' seem able to change back to
  sddm, tho after a rather long time, or some other change in
  circumstances, it works again.
  
  this bug shows up in a fully updated lubuntu system as long as nobody
  has yet logged in at sddm.
  
  this bug shows up on the lubuntu iso (wherein sddm has already auto-
  logged-in to 'lubuntu').
  
  this bug does not seem to show up on a regular lubuntu system if someone
  is slready logged in at sddm.
  
  this bug does not seem to show up in kubuntu regardless whether anyone
  is logged in.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: sddm 0.18.1-1ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-37.41~20.04.2-generic 5.11.22
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-37-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.20
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  Date: Sat Oct 16 21:09:14 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-09-30 (16 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210819)
  SourcePackage: sddm
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947482

Title:
  can't change VT after starting X in lubuntu

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sddm/+bug/1947482/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1947505] Re: lxqt-panel ignores shutdown in a VT

2021-10-19 Thread gregrwm
** Description changed:

  boot up a fully updated lubuntu 20.04 system (into sddm).
  press ctl-alt-F2.
  login (on the VT).
  startx /bin/x-terminal-emulator
  move mouse into the terminal.
  startlxqt&
  (it comes up in a few seconds)
  reboot
  
  /sbin/reboot works well with an sddm session, and invoking reboot from
  the lxqt menu works well in a VT, but if i chose to login on a VT *and*
- if i choose to use /sbin/reboot, eg in a script, then shutdown proceeds
- only part way.  apparently lxqt-panel ignores the shutdown, and we're
- left watching a message like
+ if i choose to use /sbin/reboot, eg in a script, or if two sessions are
+ open, then shutdown proceeds only part way.  apparently lxqt-panel
+ ignores the shutdown, and we're left watching a message like
  
  [ *** ] a stop job is running for session 20 of lubuntu (15s / 1min 30s)
  
  workaround:  kill lxqt-panel
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: lxqt-session 0.14.1-2ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-37.41~20.04.2-generic 5.11.22
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-37-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.20
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  Date: Sun Oct 17 10:10:18 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-09-30 (17 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210819)
  SourcePackage: lxqt-session
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947505

Title:
  lxqt-panel ignores shutdown in a VT

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxqt-panel/+bug/1947505/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1947482] Re: can't change VT after starting X in lubuntu

2021-10-19 Thread gregrwm
** Description changed:

  boot up a fully updated lubuntu 20.04 system (into sddm).
  press ctl-alt-F2.
  login (on the VT).
  startx /bin/x-terminal-emulator
  
- thereafter neither ctl-alt-F1 nor 'chvt 1' is able to change back to
- sddm.
+ thereafter neither ctl-alt-F1 nor 'chvt 1' seem able to change back to
+ sddm, tho after a rather long time, or some other change in
+ circumstances, it works again.
  
  this bug shows up in a fully updated lubuntu system as long as nobody
  has yet logged in at sddm.
  
  this bug shows up on the lubuntu iso (wherein sddm has already auto-
  logged-in to 'lubuntu').
  
- this bug does not show up on a regular lubuntu system if someone is
- slready logged in at sddm.
+ this bug does not seem to show up on a regular lubuntu system if someone
+ is slready logged in at sddm.
  
- this bug does not show up in kubuntu regardless whether anyone is logged
- in.
+ this bug does not seem to show up in kubuntu regardless whether anyone
+ is logged in.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: sddm 0.18.1-1ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-37.41~20.04.2-generic 5.11.22
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-37-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.20
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  Date: Sat Oct 16 21:09:14 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-09-30 (16 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210819)
  SourcePackage: sddm
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947482

Title:
  can't change VT after starting X in lubuntu

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sddm/+bug/1947482/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1946366] Re: TigerVNC fullscreen is stretched and split across both screens on kubuntu 20.04

2021-10-19 Thread gregrwm
** Description changed:

  TigerVNC fullscreen is stretched and split across both screens on
  kubuntu 20.04.
  
  Looking thru all the "system settings" i don't see anything relevant.
  
- Not a problem on lubuntu 20.04.  oops, now i've seen it happen on
- lubuntu too.  it's fine if xrandr is called before launching vnc, but
- vice versa trips this bug in lubuntu.
+ On lubuntu 20.04 it usually does fullscreen on just one screen.  i have
+ seen it stretch across both screens on lubuntu just once, but so far
+ haven't managed to reproduce that on lubuntu.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: kwin-x11 4:5.18.5-0ubuntu0.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-37.41~20.04.2-generic 5.11.22
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-37-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.20
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  Date: Thu Oct  7 08:08:00 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-08-03 (64 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 20.04.2.0 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210209.1)
  ProcEnviron:
   LC_TIME=en_DK.utf8
   TERM=screen
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   LANG=en_US.utf8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: kwin
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to kwin in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946366

Title:
  TigerVNC fullscreen is stretched and split across both screens on
  kubuntu 20.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kwin/+bug/1946366/+subscriptions


-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1947500] Re: lxqt-config-monitor crashes in VTs

2021-10-19 Thread gregrwm
** Description changed:

- install xterm in, and fully update, a lubuntu 20.04 system.
- boot it up (into sddm).
+ boot up a fully updated lubuntu 20.04 system (into sddm).
  press ctl-alt-F2.
  login (on the VT).
- startx /bin/xterm&
- move mouse into the xterm.
+ startx /bin/x-terminal-emulator
+ move mouse into the terminal.
  startlxqt&
  launch "monitor settings" from the app menu.
  
  it starts displaying its window for a split second then crashes.
  
  however if you also first login at sddm, then it works in the VT.
  
  tho meanwhile you may well run into Bug #1947504 or Bug #1947482
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: lxqt-config 0.14.1-0ubuntu3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-37.41~20.04.2-generic 5.11.22
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-37-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.20
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  Date: Sun Oct 17 08:14:34 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-09-30 (17 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210819)
  SourcePackage: lxqt-config
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947500

Title:
  lxqt-config-monitor crashes in VTs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxqt-config/+bug/1947500/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1947505] Re: lxqt-panel ignores shutdown in a VT

2021-10-19 Thread gregrwm
** Description changed:

- invoking reboot from the lxqt menu works well, but if i choose to use
- /sbin/reboot, eg in a script, shutdown proceeds only part way.
- apparently lxqt-panel ignores the shutdown, and we're left watching a
- message like
+ boot up a fully updated lubuntu 20.04 system (into sddm).
+ press ctl-alt-F2.
+ login (on the VT).
+ startx /bin/x-terminal-emulator
+ move mouse into the terminal.
+ startlxqt&
+ (it comes up in a few seconds)
+ reboot
+ 
+ /sbin/reboot works well with an sddm session, and invoking reboot from
+ the lxqt menu works well in a VT, but if i chose to login on a VT *and*
+ if i choose to use /sbin/reboot, eg in a script, then shutdown proceeds
+ only part way.  apparently lxqt-panel ignores the shutdown, and we're
+ left watching a message like
  
  [ *** ] a stop job is running for session 20 of lubuntu (15s / 1min 30s)
  
  workaround:  kill lxqt-panel
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: lxqt-session 0.14.1-2ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-37.41~20.04.2-generic 5.11.22
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-37-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.20
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  Date: Sun Oct 17 10:10:18 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-09-30 (17 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210819)
  SourcePackage: lxqt-session
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947505

Title:
  lxqt-panel ignores shutdown in a VT

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxqt-panel/+bug/1947505/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1947505] Re: lxqt-panel ignores shutdown in a VT

2021-10-19 Thread gregrwm
** Summary changed:

- lxqt-panel ignores shutdown
+ lxqt-panel ignores shutdown in a VT

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947505

Title:
  lxqt-panel ignores shutdown in a VT

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxqt-panel/+bug/1947505/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1947504] Re: second lubuntu session won't launch

2021-10-19 Thread gregrwm
** Description changed:

- install xterm in, and fully update, a lubuntu 20.04 system.
- boot it up (into sddm).
+ boot up a fully updated lubuntu 20.04 system (into sddm).
  login (at sddm).
  press ctl-alt-F2.
  login (on the VT).
- startx /bin/xterm&
- move mouse into the xterm.
+ startx /bin/x-terminal-emulator
+ move mouse into the terminal.
  startlxqt&
  
  lxqt doesn't come up.  or maybe comes up after a long wait.
  
  however if you omit logging in at sddm, then it comes up in the VT right
  away.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: lxqt-session 0.14.1-2ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-37.41~20.04.2-generic 5.11.22
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-37-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.20
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  Date: Sun Oct 17 10:04:48 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-09-30 (17 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210819)
  SourcePackage: lxqt-session
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947504

Title:
  second lubuntu session won't launch

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxqt-session/+bug/1947504/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1947482] Re: can't change VT after starting X in lubuntu

2021-10-19 Thread gregrwm
** Description changed:

- install xterm in, and fully update, a lubuntu 20.04 system.
- boot it up (into sddm).
+ boot up a fully updated lubuntu 20.04 system (into sddm).
  press ctl-alt-F2.
  login (on the VT).
- startx /bin/xterm&
+ startx /bin/x-terminal-emulator
  
  thereafter neither ctl-alt-F1 nor 'chvt 1' is able to change back to
  sddm.
  
  this bug shows up in a fully updated lubuntu system as long as nobody
  has yet logged in at sddm.
  
  this bug shows up on the lubuntu iso (wherein sddm has already auto-
  logged-in to 'lubuntu').
  
  this bug does not show up on a regular lubuntu system if someone is
  slready logged in at sddm.
  
  this bug does not show up in kubuntu regardless whether anyone is logged
  in.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: sddm 0.18.1-1ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-37.41~20.04.2-generic 5.11.22
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-37-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.20
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  Date: Sat Oct 16 21:09:14 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-09-30 (16 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210819)
  SourcePackage: sddm
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to sddm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947482

Title:
  can't change VT after starting X in lubuntu

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sddm/+bug/1947482/+subscriptions


-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1946366] Re: TigerVNC fullscreen is stretched and split across both screens on kubuntu 20.04

2021-10-18 Thread gregrwm
** Description changed:

  TigerVNC fullscreen is stretched and split across both screens on
  kubuntu 20.04.
  
  Looking thru all the "system settings" i don't see anything relevant.
  
- Not a problem on lubuntu 20.04.
+ Not a problem on lubuntu 20.04.  oops, now i've seen it happen on
+ lubuntu too.  it's fine if xrandr is called before launching vnc, but
+ vice versa trips this bug in lubuntu.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: kwin-x11 4:5.18.5-0ubuntu0.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-37.41~20.04.2-generic 5.11.22
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-37-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.20
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  Date: Thu Oct  7 08:08:00 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-08-03 (64 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 20.04.2.0 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210209.1)
  ProcEnviron:
-  LC_TIME=en_DK.utf8
-  TERM=screen
-  PATH=(custom, no user)
-  LANG=en_US.utf8
-  SHELL=/bin/bash
+  LC_TIME=en_DK.utf8
+  TERM=screen
+  PATH=(custom, no user)
+  LANG=en_US.utf8
+  SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: kwin
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946366

Title:
  TigerVNC fullscreen is stretched and split across both screens on
  kubuntu 20.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kwin/+bug/1946366/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1947505] Re: lxqt-panel ignores shutdown

2021-10-18 Thread gregrwm
** Description changed:

- run lubuntu in a VT.
- enter reboot command.
- lubuntu shuts down part way, then shows a wobbler with a message something 
like
+ invoking reboot from the lxqt menu works well, but if i choose to use
+ /sbin/reboot, eg in a script, shutdown proceeds only part way.
+ apparently lxqt-panel ignores the shutdown, and we're left watching a
+ message like
  
- [ *** ] a stop job is running for session 20 of lubuntu (NNs / 1m30s)
+ [ *** ] a stop job is running for session 20 of lubuntu (15s / 1min 30s)
+ 
+ workaround:  kill lxqt-panel
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: lxqt-session 0.14.1-2ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-37.41~20.04.2-generic 5.11.22
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-37-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.20
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  Date: Sun Oct 17 10:10:18 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-09-30 (17 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210819)
  SourcePackage: lxqt-session
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947505

Title:
  lxqt-panel ignores shutdown

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxqt-panel/+bug/1947505/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1947505] Re: in a VT lubuntu takes a long time to shutdown

2021-10-18 Thread gregrwm
** Package changed: lxqt-session (Ubuntu) => lxqt-panel (Ubuntu)

** Summary changed:

- in a VT lubuntu takes a long time to shutdown
+ lxqt-panel ignores shutdown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947505

Title:
  lxqt-panel ignores shutdown

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxqt-panel/+bug/1947505/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1947482] Re: can't change VT after starting X in lubuntu

2021-10-17 Thread gregrwm
** Description changed:

- boot up (a fully updated) lubuntu 20.04 (into sddm).
+ install xterm in, and fully update, a lubuntu 20.04 system.
+ boot it up (into sddm).
  press ctl-alt-F2.
  login (on the VT).
- install xterm if you haven't already.
  startx /bin/xterm&
  
  thereafter neither ctl-alt-F1 nor 'chvt 1' is able to change back to
  sddm.
  
  this bug shows up in a fully updated lubuntu system as long as nobody
  has yet logged in at sddm.
  
  this bug shows up on the lubuntu iso (wherein sddm has already auto-
  logged-in to 'lubuntu').
  
  this bug does not show up on a regular lubuntu system if someone is
  slready logged in at sddm.
  
  this bug does not show up in kubuntu regardless whether anyone is logged
  in.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: sddm 0.18.1-1ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-37.41~20.04.2-generic 5.11.22
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-37-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.20
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  Date: Sat Oct 16 21:09:14 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-09-30 (16 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210819)
  SourcePackage: sddm
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947482

Title:
  can't change VT after starting X in lubuntu

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sddm/+bug/1947482/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1947500] Re: lxqt-config-monitor crashes in VTs

2021-10-17 Thread gregrwm
** Description changed:

- boot up (a fully updated) lubuntu 20.04 (into sddm).
+ install xterm in, and fully update, a lubuntu 20.04 system.
+ boot it up (into sddm).
  press ctl-alt-F2.
  login (on the VT).
- install xterm if you haven't already.
  startx /bin/xterm&
- in the xterm:  startlxqt&
+ move mouse into the xterm.
+ startlxqt&
  launch "monitor settings" from the app menu.
  
  it starts displaying its window for a split second then crashes.
  
  however if you also first login at sddm, then it works in the VT.
+ 
+ tho meanwhile you may well run into Bug #1947504 or Bug #1947482
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: lxqt-config 0.14.1-0ubuntu3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-37.41~20.04.2-generic 5.11.22
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-37-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.20
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  Date: Sun Oct 17 08:14:34 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-09-30 (17 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210819)
  SourcePackage: lxqt-config
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947500

Title:
  lxqt-config-monitor crashes in VTs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxqt-config/+bug/1947500/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1947504] Re: second lubuntu session won't launch

2021-10-17 Thread gregrwm
** Description changed:

  install xterm in, and fully update, a lubuntu 20.04 system.
  boot it up (into sddm).
  login (at sddm).
  press ctl-alt-F2.
  login (on the VT).
  startx /bin/xterm&
  move mouse into the xterm.
  startlxqt&
  
- lxqt doesn't come up.
+ lxqt doesn't come up.  or maybe comes up after a long wait.
  
- however if you omit logging in at sddm, then it does come up in the VT.
+ however if you omit logging in at sddm, then it comes up in the VT right
+ away.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: lxqt-session 0.14.1-2ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-37.41~20.04.2-generic 5.11.22
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-37-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.20
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  Date: Sun Oct 17 10:04:48 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-09-30 (17 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210819)
  SourcePackage: lxqt-session
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947504

Title:
  second lubuntu session won't launch

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxqt-session/+bug/1947504/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1947504] Re: startlxqt fails in VT

2021-10-17 Thread gregrwm
** Description changed:

- in the lubuntu live iso, startlxqt fails in a VT.
+ install xterm in, and fully update, a lubuntu 20.04 system.
+ boot it up (into sddm).
+ login (at sddm).
+ press ctl-alt-F2.
+ login (on the VT).
+ startx /bin/xterm&
+ move mouse into the xterm.
+ startlxqt&
  
- but perhaps this is fixed already.  in a fully updated lubuntu system,
- it works.
+ lxqt doesn't come up.
+ 
+ however if you omit logging in at sddm, then it does come up in the VT.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: lxqt-session 0.14.1-2ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-37.41~20.04.2-generic 5.11.22
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-37-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.20
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  Date: Sun Oct 17 10:04:48 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-09-30 (17 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210819)
  SourcePackage: lxqt-session
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Summary changed:

- startlxqt fails in VT
+ multiple lubuntu sessions sometimes won't launch

** Summary changed:

- multiple lubuntu sessions sometimes won't launch
+ second lubuntu session won't launch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947504

Title:
  second lubuntu session won't launch

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxqt-session/+bug/1947504/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1947500] Re: lxqt-config-monitor crashes in VTs

2021-10-17 Thread gregrwm
** Description changed:

- when lxqt-config-monitor is invoked in a VT it starts displaying its
- window for a half second then crashes.  usually.  not always.  still
- trying to track down the circumstances.
+ boot up (a fully updated) lubuntu 20.04 (into sddm).
+ press ctl-alt-F2.
+ login (on the VT).
+ install xterm if you haven't already.
+ startx /bin/xterm&
+ in the xterm:  startlxqt&
+ launch "monitor settings" from the app menu.
+ 
+ it starts displaying its window for a split second then crashes.
+ 
+ however if you also first login at sddm, then it works in the VT.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: lxqt-config 0.14.1-0ubuntu3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-37.41~20.04.2-generic 5.11.22
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-37-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.20
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  Date: Sun Oct 17 08:14:34 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-09-30 (17 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210819)
  SourcePackage: lxqt-config
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947500

Title:
  lxqt-config-monitor crashes in VTs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxqt-config/+bug/1947500/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1947482] Re: can't change VT after starting X in lubuntu

2021-10-17 Thread gregrwm
** Description changed:

  boot up (a fully updated) lubuntu 20.04 (into sddm).
  press ctl-alt-F2.
- login.
+ login (on the VT).
  install xterm if you haven't already.
- startx /bin/xterm&  (results may vary if you launch a WM or a desktop instead 
or after just starting X with an xterm).
+ startx /bin/xterm&
  
  thereafter neither ctl-alt-F1 nor 'chvt 1' is able to change back to
  sddm.
  
  this bug shows up in a fully updated lubuntu system as long as nobody
  has yet logged in at sddm.
  
  this bug shows up on the lubuntu iso (wherein sddm has already auto-
  logged-in to 'lubuntu').
  
  this bug does not show up on a regular lubuntu system if someone is
  slready logged in at sddm.
  
  this bug does not show up in kubuntu regardless whether anyone is logged
  in.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: sddm 0.18.1-1ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-37.41~20.04.2-generic 5.11.22
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-37-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.20
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  Date: Sat Oct 16 21:09:14 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-09-30 (16 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210819)
  SourcePackage: sddm
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947482

Title:
  can't change VT after starting X in lubuntu

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sddm/+bug/1947482/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1947505] Re: in a VT lubuntu takes a long time to shutdown

2021-10-17 Thread gregrwm
** Description changed:

  run lubuntu in a VT.
  enter reboot command.
  lubuntu shuts down part way, then shows a wobbler with a message something 
like
  
- [   ***] waiting for a stop job in session 3 of lubuntu (nn seconds of
- 1min 30sec)
+ [ *** ] a stop job is running for session 20 of lubuntu (NNs / 1m30s)
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: lxqt-session 0.14.1-2ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-37.41~20.04.2-generic 5.11.22
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-37-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.20
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  Date: Sun Oct 17 10:10:18 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-09-30 (17 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210819)
  SourcePackage: lxqt-session
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947505

Title:
  in a VT lubuntu takes a long time to shutdown

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxqt-session/+bug/1947505/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1947504] Re: startlxqt fails in VT

2021-10-17 Thread gregrwm
** Description changed:

- on a plain, fully updated lubuntu system, or in the lubuntu live iso,
- startlxqt fails in a VT.
+ in the lubuntu live iso, startlxqt fails in a VT.
  
- on a system with kubuntu-desktop also installed, or in the kubuntu live
- iso after installing lubuntu-desktop, startlxqt works in a VT.
+ but perhaps this is fixed already.  in a fully updated lubuntu system,
+ it works.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: lxqt-session 0.14.1-2ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-37.41~20.04.2-generic 5.11.22
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-37-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.20
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  Date: Sun Oct 17 10:04:48 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-09-30 (17 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210819)
  SourcePackage: lxqt-session
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947504

Title:
  startlxqt fails in VT

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxqt-session/+bug/1947504/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1947482] Re: can't change VT after starting X in lubuntu

2021-10-17 Thread gregrwm
** Description changed:

- boot up (lubuntu)(into sddm).
+ boot up (a fully updated) lubuntu 20.04 (into sddm).
  press ctl-alt-F2.
  login.
- start X, eg startx /usr/bin/xterm (or any WM or desktop eg startlxqt).
+ install xterm if you haven't already.
+ startx /bin/xterm&  (results may vary if you launch a WM or a desktop instead 
or after just starting X with an xterm).
  
  thereafter neither ctl-alt-F1 nor 'chvt 1' is able to change back to
  sddm.
  
  this bug shows up in a fully updated lubuntu system as long as nobody
  has yet logged in at sddm.
  
  this bug shows up on the lubuntu iso (wherein sddm has already auto-
  logged-in to 'lubuntu').
  
  this bug does not show up on a regular lubuntu system if someone is
  slready logged in at sddm.
  
  this bug does not show up in kubuntu regardless whether anyone is logged
  in.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: sddm 0.18.1-1ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-37.41~20.04.2-generic 5.11.22
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-37-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.20
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  Date: Sat Oct 16 21:09:14 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-09-30 (16 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210819)
  SourcePackage: sddm
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947482

Title:
  can't change VT after starting X in lubuntu

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sddm/+bug/1947482/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1947505] [NEW] in a VT lubuntu takes a long time to shutdown

2021-10-17 Thread gregrwm
Public bug reported:

run lubuntu in a VT.
enter reboot command.
lubuntu shuts down part way, then shows a wobbler with a message something like

[   ***] waiting for a stop job in session 3 of lubuntu (nn seconds of
1min 30sec)

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: lxqt-session 0.14.1-2ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-37.41~20.04.2-generic 5.11.22
Uname: Linux 5.11.0-37-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.20
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
Date: Sun Oct 17 10:10:18 2021
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-09-30 (17 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20210819)
SourcePackage: lxqt-session
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: lxqt-session (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947505

Title:
  in a VT lubuntu takes a long time to shutdown

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxqt-session/+bug/1947505/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1947504] [NEW] startlxqt fails in VT

2021-10-17 Thread gregrwm
Public bug reported:

on a plain, fully updated lubuntu system, or in the lubuntu live iso,
startlxqt fails in a VT.

on a system with kubuntu-desktop also installed, or in the kubuntu live
iso after installing lubuntu-desktop, startlxqt works in a VT.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: lxqt-session 0.14.1-2ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-37.41~20.04.2-generic 5.11.22
Uname: Linux 5.11.0-37-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.20
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
Date: Sun Oct 17 10:04:48 2021
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-09-30 (17 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20210819)
SourcePackage: lxqt-session
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: lxqt-session (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947504

Title:
  startlxqt fails in VT

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxqt-session/+bug/1947504/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1947500] [NEW] lxqt-config-monitor crashes in VTs

2021-10-17 Thread gregrwm
Public bug reported:

when lxqt-config-monitor is invoked in a VT it starts displaying its
window for a half second then crashes.  usually.  not always.  still
trying to track down the circumstances.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: lxqt-config 0.14.1-0ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-37.41~20.04.2-generic 5.11.22
Uname: Linux 5.11.0-37-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.20
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
Date: Sun Oct 17 08:14:34 2021
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-09-30 (17 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20210819)
SourcePackage: lxqt-config
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: lxqt-config (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947500

Title:
  lxqt-config-monitor crashes in VTs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxqt-config/+bug/1947500/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1947482] Re: can't change VT after starting X in lubuntu

2021-10-16 Thread gregrwm
** Description changed:

  boot up (lubuntu)(into sddm).
  press ctl-alt-F2.
  login.
  start X, eg startx /usr/bin/xterm (or any WM or desktop eg startlxqt).
  
  thereafter neither ctl-alt-F1 nor 'chvt 1' is able to change back to
  sddm.
  
- not a problem in kubuntu.
+ this bug shows up in a fully updated lubuntu system as long as nobody
+ has yet logged in at sddm.
+ 
+ this bug shows up on the lubuntu iso (wherein sddm has already auto-
+ logged-in to 'lubuntu').
+ 
+ this bug does not show up on a regular lubuntu system if someone is
+ slready logged in at sddm.
+ 
+ this bug does not show up in kubuntu regardless whether anyone is logged
+ in.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: sddm 0.18.1-1ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-37.41~20.04.2-generic 5.11.22
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-37-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.20
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  Date: Sat Oct 16 21:09:14 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-09-30 (16 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210819)
  SourcePackage: sddm
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947482

Title:
  can't change VT after starting X in lubuntu

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sddm/+bug/1947482/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1947482] [NEW] can't change VT after starting X in lubuntu

2021-10-16 Thread gregrwm
Public bug reported:

boot up (lubuntu)(into sddm).
press ctl-alt-F2.
login.
start X, eg startx /usr/bin/xterm (or any WM or desktop eg startlxqt).

thereafter neither ctl-alt-F1 nor 'chvt 1' is able to change back to
sddm.

not a problem in kubuntu.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: sddm 0.18.1-1ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-37.41~20.04.2-generic 5.11.22
Uname: Linux 5.11.0-37-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.20
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
Date: Sat Oct 16 21:09:14 2021
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-09-30 (16 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20210819)
SourcePackage: sddm
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: sddm (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947482

Title:
  can't change VT after starting X in lubuntu

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sddm/+bug/1947482/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1883742] Re: funky character placement when kubuntu-settings-desktop installed

2021-10-07 Thread gregrwm
** Package changed: kubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) => kubuntu-settings (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to kubuntu-settings in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883742

Title:
  funky character placement when kubuntu-settings-desktop installed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kubuntu-settings/+bug/1883742/+subscriptions


-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1946366] [NEW] TigerVNC fullscreen is stretched and split across both screens on kubuntu 20.04

2021-10-07 Thread gregrwm
Public bug reported:

TigerVNC fullscreen is stretched and split across both screens on
kubuntu 20.04.

Looking thru all the "system settings" i don't see anything relevant.

Not a problem on lubuntu 20.04.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: kwin-x11 4:5.18.5-0ubuntu0.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-37.41~20.04.2-generic 5.11.22
Uname: Linux 5.11.0-37-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.20
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
Date: Thu Oct  7 08:08:00 2021
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-08-03 (64 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 20.04.2.0 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210209.1)
ProcEnviron:
 LC_TIME=en_DK.utf8
 TERM=screen
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: kwin
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: kwin (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946366

Title:
  TigerVNC fullscreen is stretched and split across both screens on
  kubuntu 20.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kwin/+bug/1946366/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1891785] Re: choose-w misaligned (regression)

2021-10-05 Thread gregrwm
A solution is available, with a updated copy of tmux, and a recipe, see:

http://github.com/tmux/tmux/issues/2636#issuecomment-817542083

** Bug watch added: github.com/tmux/tmux/issues #2636
   https://github.com/tmux/tmux/issues/2636

** Description changed:

  choose-window produces a sensibly aligned list
  on centos7 (tmux-1.8-4.el7.x86_64):
  (0)  0: htop  "umari"
  (1)  1: bash  "umari"
  (2)  2: bash- "umari"
  (3)  3: bash* "umari"
  
  and ubuntu xenial (tmux 2.1-3build1):
  (0)  0: [tmux]- "jocur"
  (1)  1: bash* "jocur"
  
  but more recent versions produce an annoyingly misaligned list due to the new 
session line:
  (0)  - 0: 4 windows (attached)
  (1)  ├─> 0: man- (1 panes) "e540"
  (2)  ├─> 1: bash (1 panes) "e540"
  (3)  ├─> 2: ssh* (1 panes) "e540"
  (4)  ├─> 3: bash (1 panes) "e540"
  
  so when you choose a window from the new choose-window list, you have to
  look carefully and choose "the wrong window" or you get the wrong
  window!  is there a way to fix or workaround this problem?
  
  because this shows 0 on windows other than window 2:
  $ tmux bi w choose-t -wF'#{==:#{window_index},2}'
  (0)  - 0: 1
  (1)  ├─> 0: 0
  (2)  ├─> 1: 0
  (3)  ├─> 2: 1
  (4)  ├─> 3: 0
  
  thus this eliminates windows other than window 2:
  $ tmux bi w choose-t -wf'#{==:#{window_index},2}'
  (0)  - 0: 6 windows (attached)
  (1)  └─> 2: ssh* (1 panes) "e540"
  
  so similarly since this shows 0 on the session line and 1 on each window:
  $ tmux bi w choose-t -wF'#{window_format}'
  (0)  - 0: 0
  (1)  ├─> 0: 1
  (2)  ├─> 1: 1
  (3)  ├─> 2: 1
  (4)  ├─> 3: 1
  
  you'd expect this to eliminate the session line, and restore proper alignment 
of the choose-window listing, but strangely it just doesn't:
  $ tmux bi w choose-t -wf'#{window_format}'
  (0)  - 0: 4 windows (attached)
  (1)  ├─> 0: man- (1 panes) "e540"
  (2)  ├─> 1: bash (1 panes) "e540"
  (3)  ├─> 2: ssh* (1 panes) "e540"
  (4)  ├─> 3: bash (1 panes) "e540"
  
  so a fix or workaround would be greatly appreciated!
  
+ A solution is available, see:
+ https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tmux/+bug/1891785/comments/7
+ 
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: tmux 3.0a-2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-42.46-generic 5.4.44
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-42-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.4
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  Date: Sat Aug 15 21:05:07 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-03-15 (153 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Alpha amd64 (20200314)
  ProcEnviron:
   LC_TIME=en_DK.utf8
   TERM=screen
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   LANG=en_US.utf8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: tmux
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891785

Title:
  choose-w misaligned (regression)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tmux/+bug/1891785/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1891785] Re: choose-w misaligned (regression)

2021-10-05 Thread gregrwm
** Description changed:

  choose-window produces a sensibly aligned list
  on centos7 (tmux-1.8-4.el7.x86_64):
  (0)  0: htop  "umari"
  (1)  1: bash  "umari"
  (2)  2: bash- "umari"
  (3)  3: bash* "umari"
  
  and ubuntu xenial (tmux 2.1-3build1):
  (0)  0: [tmux]- "jocur"
  (1)  1: bash* "jocur"
  
  but more recent versions produce an annoyingly misaligned list due to the new 
session line:
  (0)  - 0: 4 windows (attached)
  (1)  ├─> 0: man- (1 panes) "e540"
  (2)  ├─> 1: bash (1 panes) "e540"
  (3)  ├─> 2: ssh* (1 panes) "e540"
  (4)  ├─> 3: bash (1 panes) "e540"
  
  so when you choose a window from the new choose-window list, you have to
  look carefully and choose "the wrong window" or you get the wrong
  window!  is there a way to fix or workaround this problem?
  
  because this shows 0 on windows other than window 2:
  $ tmux bi w choose-t -wF'#{==:#{window_index},2}'
  (0)  - 0: 1
  (1)  ├─> 0: 0
  (2)  ├─> 1: 0
  (3)  ├─> 2: 1
  (4)  ├─> 3: 0
  
  thus this eliminates windows other than window 2:
  $ tmux bi w choose-t -wf'#{==:#{window_index},2}'
  (0)  - 0: 6 windows (attached)
  (1)  └─> 2: ssh* (1 panes) "e540"
  
  so similarly since this shows 0 on the session line and 1 on each window:
  $ tmux bi w choose-t -wF'#{window_format}'
  (0)  - 0: 0
  (1)  ├─> 0: 1
  (2)  ├─> 1: 1
  (3)  ├─> 2: 1
  (4)  ├─> 3: 1
  
  you'd expect this to eliminate the session line, and restore proper alignment 
of the choose-window listing, but strangely it just doesn't:
  $ tmux bi w choose-t -wf'#{window_format}'
  (0)  - 0: 4 windows (attached)
  (1)  ├─> 0: man- (1 panes) "e540"
  (2)  ├─> 1: bash (1 panes) "e540"
  (3)  ├─> 2: ssh* (1 panes) "e540"
  (4)  ├─> 3: bash (1 panes) "e540"
  
  so a fix or workaround would be greatly appreciated!
  
- A solution is available, see:
- https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tmux/+bug/1891785/comments/7
+ A solution is available, see comment #7.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: tmux 3.0a-2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-42.46-generic 5.4.44
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-42-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.4
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  Date: Sat Aug 15 21:05:07 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-03-15 (153 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Alpha amd64 (20200314)
  ProcEnviron:
   LC_TIME=en_DK.utf8
   TERM=screen
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   LANG=en_US.utf8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: tmux
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891785

Title:
  choose-w misaligned (regression)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tmux/+bug/1891785/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1883742] Re: funky character placement when kubuntu-settings-desktop installed

2021-09-29 Thread gregrwm
** Summary changed:

- funky character placement on kubuntu
+ funky character placement when kubuntu-settings-desktop installed

** Description changed:

  Funky character placement, letters often mispositioned, jammed into the
  adjacent letter on one side and/or far away from the adjacent letter on
  the other side, making one word look like two words.  And the funky
  character placement often shifts around, sometimes spuriously, and
  sometimes when interacting, for example when i tick or untick a gmail
  conversation, as in the the 2nd and 3rd screenshots.  Note how all the
  "t"'s move over in "Opportunities", "Youth", "item", and "interest".
  
  The 3 screenshots are all of the same conversation in my gmail inbox.
  One screenshot was taken on a Focal Ubuntu install, where the character
  placement is fine.  The other two screenshots were taken on a Focal
  Kubuntu install where the character placement is funky.
  
  Using Chromium (Version 83.0.4103.61 Official Build snap 64-bit), the font 
spacing on my gmail inbox is fine, thus i first reported this as
  http://github.com/webcompat/web-bugs/issues/53474
  
  They conclude it's not a firefox issue.  i still consider it an open
  question.  i have only a faint memory of having also seen the funky
  character placement in kubuntu in some context outside of firefox.
  
  The funky character placement shows up when all 3 of these factors
  converge:  using kubuntu, using either firefox or firefox nightly, and
  viewing either gmail or google voice.  Otherwise, eg using chromium on
  kubuntu, or firefox on lubuntu, or browsing other sites, character
  placement is fine.  Within gmail, the funky character placement shows up
  when viewing conversation lists or settings pages, but character
  placement seems fine when viewing a conversation/message body.  Within
  google voice, both message lists and message body show funky character
  placement.
  
  'Binary search' thru specific situations:
-good   running  lubuntu-20.04.3-desktop-amd64.iso live.
-good   install from lubuntu-20.04.3-desktop-amd64.iso live,
-   then startx startlxqt.
-   funky   running  kubuntu-20.04.2.0-desktop-amd64.iso live.
-   funky   install from kubuntu-20.04.2.0-desktop-amd64.iso,
-   then startx startplasma-x11.
-   funky   install from kubuntu-20.04.2.0-desktop-amd64.iso,
-   then apt-get install lubuntu-desktop,
-   then startx startlxqt.
-   funky   install from lubuntu-20.04.3-desktop-amd64.iso,
-   then apt-get install kubuntu-desktop,
-   then startx startplasma-x11.
+    good   running  lubuntu-20.04.3-desktop-amd64.iso live.
+    good   install from lubuntu-20.04.3-desktop-amd64.iso live,
+   then startx startlxqt.
+   funky   running  kubuntu-20.04.2.0-desktop-amd64.iso live.
+   funky   install from kubuntu-20.04.2.0-desktop-amd64.iso,
+   then startx startplasma-x11.
+   funky   install from kubuntu-20.04.2.0-desktop-amd64.iso,
+   then apt-get install lubuntu-desktop,
+   then startx startlxqt.
+   funky   install from lubuntu-20.04.3-desktop-amd64.iso,
+   then apt-get install kubuntu-desktop,
+   then startx startplasma-x11.
  
  Continuing with the most recent install above:
-good   apt-get --auto-remove purge kubuntu-desktop
+    good   apt-get --auto-remove purge kubuntu-desktop
  
-good   apt-get --auto-remove purge gpm+ htop+ xterm+ xzoom+ xl2tpd+
+    good   apt-get --auto-remove purge gpm+ htop+ xterm+ xzoom+ xl2tpd+
  strongswan-starter+ keepassxc+ libevent-dev+ tigervnc-viewer+ sddm ofono
  thunderbird xscreensaver bind9-libs samba-libs unattended-upgrades apt-
  xapian-index ubuntu-release-upgrader-core python3-update-manager cups-
  common cups-daemon cups-ipp-utils foomatic-filters openprinting-ppds
  libpaps0 libcupsimage2
  
-good   apt-get --auto-remove --purge install kate kpat krdc lame
+    good   apt-get --auto-remove --purge install kate kpat krdc lame
  cryfs elisa encfs kross kamera kmines dolphin ksudoku signond go-mtpfs
  gwenview ktorrent libraw19 baloo-kf5 kmahjongg libgeoip1 plasma-nm
  kate5-data ksystemlog kio-audiocd thunderbird ffmpegthumbs freerdp2-x11
  konversation print-manager geoip-database gstreamer-qapt session-
  migration kimageformat-plugins whoopsie-preferences kaccounts-
  integration fonts-noto-color-emoji signond signon-ui-x11 signon-ui-
  service signon-plugin-password signon-kwallet-extension
  
-   funky   apt-get --auto-remove --purge install kubuntu-web-shortcuts
+   funky   apt-get --auto-remove --purge install kubuntu-web-shortcuts
  kubuntu-settings-desktop kubuntu-wallpapers kubuntu-wallpapers-focal
  plasma-workspace-wallpapers
  
- So that's narrowed down to 5 packages.  After installing those 5
- packages, firefox character placement in gmail and google voice goes
- funky.
+   

[Bug 1883742] Re: funky character placement on kubuntu

2021-09-29 Thread gregrwm
** Summary changed:

- funky font rendering on kubuntu
+ funky character placement on kubuntu

** Description changed:

- The 3 screenshots are all of the same conversation in my gmail inbox.
- One screenshot was taken running Firefox Nightly on a Focal Ubuntu
- install, where the font rendering seems fine.  The other two screenshots
- were taken running Firefox Nightly on a Focal Kubuntu install where the
- rendering is funky.
- 
- This only happens on Kubuntu, eg running kubuntu-20.04.2.0-desktop-
- amd64.iso live.  Lubuntu-20.04.2.0-desktop-amd64.iso live is fine, no
- funky font rendering.
- 
- Even on Kubuntu, when using Chromium (Version 83.0.4103.61 Official Build 
snap 64-bit), the font spacing on my gmail inbox looks fine, thus i first 
reported this as
- http://github.com/webcompat/web-bugs/issues/53474
- But they conclude it's not a Firefox issue.
- 
- The funky font rendering only happens with the combination of Kubuntu
- (with all package updates as of 9/20) with either Firefox or Firefox
- Nightly eg version 94.0a1 (2021-09-24) (64-bit).  Letters are often
- mispositioned, jammed into the adjacent letter on one side and/or far
- away from the adjacent letter on the other side.  And the font
- placement/spacing often shifts around, sometimes spuriously, and
- sometimes when interacting, for example when i tick or untick the gmail
+ Funky character placement, letters often mispositioned, jammed into the
+ adjacent letter on one side and/or far away from the adjacent letter on
+ the other side, making one word look like two words.  And the funky
+ character placement often shifts around, sometimes spuriously, and
+ sometimes when interacting, for example when i tick or untick a gmail
  conversation, as in the the 2nd and 3rd screenshots.  Note how all the
  "t"'s move over in "Opportunities", "Youth", "item", and "interest".
+ 
+ The 3 screenshots are all of the same conversation in my gmail inbox.
+ One screenshot was taken on a Focal Ubuntu install, where the character
+ placement is fine.  The other two screenshots were taken on a Focal
+ Kubuntu install where the character placement is funky.
+ 
+ Using Chromium (Version 83.0.4103.61 Official Build snap 64-bit), the font 
spacing on my gmail inbox is fine, thus i first reported this as
+ http://github.com/webcompat/web-bugs/issues/53474
+ 
+ They conclude it's not a firefox issue.  i still consider it an open
+ question.  i have only a faint memory of having also seen the funky
+ character placement in kubuntu in some context outside of firefox.
+ 
+ The funky character placement shows up when all 3 of these factors
+ converge:  using kubuntu, using either firefox or firefox nightly, and
+ viewing either gmail or google voice.  Otherwise, eg using chromium on
+ kubuntu, or firefox on lubuntu, or browsing other sites, character
+ placement is fine.  Within gmail, the funky character placement shows up
+ when viewing conversation lists or settings pages, but character
+ placement seems fine when viewing a conversation/message body.  Within
+ google voice, both message lists and message body show funky character
+ placement.
+ 
+ 'Binary search' thru specific situations:
+good   running  lubuntu-20.04.3-desktop-amd64.iso live.
+good   install from lubuntu-20.04.3-desktop-amd64.iso live,
+   then startx startlxqt.
+   funky   running  kubuntu-20.04.2.0-desktop-amd64.iso live.
+   funky   install from kubuntu-20.04.2.0-desktop-amd64.iso,
+   then startx startplasma-x11.
+   funky   install from kubuntu-20.04.2.0-desktop-amd64.iso,
+   then apt-get install lubuntu-desktop,
+   then startx startlxqt.
+   funky   install from lubuntu-20.04.3-desktop-amd64.iso,
+   then apt-get install kubuntu-desktop,
+   then startx startplasma-x11.
+ 
+ Continuing with the most recent install above:
+good   apt-get --auto-remove purge kubuntu-desktop
+ 
+good   apt-get --auto-remove purge gpm+ htop+ xterm+ xzoom+ xl2tpd+
+ strongswan-starter+ keepassxc+ libevent-dev+ tigervnc-viewer+ sddm ofono
+ thunderbird xscreensaver bind9-libs samba-libs unattended-upgrades apt-
+ xapian-index ubuntu-release-upgrader-core python3-update-manager cups-
+ common cups-daemon cups-ipp-utils foomatic-filters openprinting-ppds
+ libpaps0 libcupsimage2
+ 
+good   apt-get --auto-remove --purge install kate kpat krdc lame
+ cryfs elisa encfs kross kamera kmines dolphin ksudoku signond go-mtpfs
+ gwenview ktorrent libraw19 baloo-kf5 kmahjongg libgeoip1 plasma-nm
+ kate5-data ksystemlog kio-audiocd thunderbird ffmpegthumbs freerdp2-x11
+ konversation print-manager geoip-database gstreamer-qapt session-
+ migration kimageformat-plugins whoopsie-preferences kaccounts-
+ integration fonts-noto-color-emoji signond signon-ui-x11 signon-ui-
+ service signon-plugin-password signon-kwallet-extension
+ 
+   funky   apt-get --auto-remove --purge install kubuntu-web-shortcuts

[Bug 1871884] Re: "EFI system partition flag not set" - false pop-up

2021-09-28 Thread gregrwm
i'm seeing this bug in lubuntu-20.04.3-desktop-amd64.iso

my disc has a prior install of kubuntu-20.04.2.0-desktop-amd64.iso:
sda1:  /boot/efi
sda2:  /

i move all prior content in / into a subdirectory (/fk) leaving only
/lost+found, /swapfile and /fk, launch "install Lubuntu 20.04 LTS",
select manual partitioning, edit "/dev/sda1", select "/boot/efi", "bios-
grub" is already ticked, i tick "boot", click "OK", edit "/dev/sda2",
select "/", click "OK", click "Next", and see

  EFI system partition flag not set

   An EFI system partition is necessary to start Lubuntu.

   A partition was configured with mount point /boot/efi
   but its esp flag is not set.
   To set the flag, go back and edit the partition.

   You can continue without setting the flag but your system
   may fail to start.

which as noted in the OP is entirely confusing and bogus.  there's no
"esp" flag available in the calamares gui.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871884

Title:
   "EFI system partition flag not set" - false pop-up

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/1871884/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1873950] Re: Calamares failed: command 'mount' returned non-zero exit status 32.

2021-09-28 Thread gregrwm
happy to find this report, i'll try without "toram", that sounds likely
to be the workaround i need.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873950

Title:
  Calamares failed: command 'mount' returned non-zero exit status 32.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/1873950/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1883742] Re: funky font rendering on kubuntu

2021-09-25 Thread gregrwm
** Description changed:

  The 3 screenshots are all of the same conversation in my gmail inbox.
  One screenshot was taken running Firefox Nightly on a Focal Ubuntu
  install, where the font rendering seems fine.  The other two screenshots
- were taken running Firefox Nightly on a Focal Kubuntu install.
+ were taken running Firefox Nightly on a Focal Kubuntu install where the
+ rendering is funky.
  
- Even on Kubuntu, the font spacing on my gmail inbox looks right on
- Chromium (Version 83.0.4103.61 Official Build snap 64-bit), but is funky
- (extra spaces within words) on Firefox Nightly, thus this was first
- reported as http://github.com/webcompat/web-bugs/issues/53474
+ This only happens on Kubuntu, eg running kubuntu-20.04.2.0-desktop-
+ amd64.iso live.  Lubuntu-20.04.2.0-desktop-amd64.iso live is fine, no
+ funky font rendering.
  
- In Firefox Nightly on Kubuntu, the font placement/spacing often shifts
- around, sometimes spuriously, and sometimes when interacting, for
- example when i tick or untick the conversation as in the the 2nd and 3rd
- screenshots.  Note how all the "t"'s move over in "Opportunities",
- "Youth", "item", and "interest".
+ Even on Kubuntu, when using Chromium (Version 83.0.4103.61 Official Build 
snap 64-bit), the font spacing on my gmail inbox looks fine, thus i first 
reported this as
+ http://github.com/webcompat/web-bugs/issues/53474
+ But they conclude it's not a Firefox issue.
+ 
+ The funky font rendering only happens with the combination of Kubuntu
+ (with all package updates as of 9/20) with either Firefox or Firefox
+ Nightly eg version 94.0a1 (2021-09-24) (64-bit).  Letters are often
+ mispositioned, jammed into the adjacent letter on one side and/or far
+ away from the adjacent letter on the other side.  And the font
+ placement/spacing often shifts around, sometimes spuriously, and
+ sometimes when interacting, for example when i tick or untick the gmail
+ conversation, as in the the 2nd and 3rd screenshots.  Note how all the
+ "t"'s move over in "Opportunities", "Youth", "item", and "interest".
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: kubuntu-desktop (not installed)
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-21.25-generic 5.4.27
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-21-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu21
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Tue Jun 16 10:33:36 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-04-05 (71 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Beta amd64 (20200331)
  ProcEnviron:
   LC_TIME=en_DK.utf8
   TERM=screen
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   LANG=en_US.utf8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: kubuntu-meta
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883742

Title:
  funky font rendering on kubuntu

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kubuntu-meta/+bug/1883742/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1944455] [NEW] kde launcher won't open with high or extreme focus stealing prevention

2021-09-21 Thread gregrwm
Public bug reported:

When "Focus stealing prevention" is set to either "High" or "Extreme",
clicking on the "Application Launcher" doesn't open it.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: systemsettings 4:5.18.4.1-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-34.36~20.04.1-generic 5.11.22
Uname: Linux 5.11.0-34-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.20
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
Date: Tue Sep 21 11:47:55 2021
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-08-03 (48 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 20.04.2.0 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210209.1)
ProcEnviron:
 LC_TIME=en_DK.utf8
 TERM=screen
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: systemsettings
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: systemsettings (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1944455

Title:
  kde launcher won't open with high or extreme focus stealing prevention

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemsettings/+bug/1944455/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1867561] Re: regression: twm won't launch in focal

2021-09-16 Thread gregrwm
** Description changed:

  regression:  the focal version of twm won't launch:
  
  twm: unable to open fontset "-adobe-helvetica-bold-r-
  normal--*-120-*-*-*-*-*-*"
  
- the bionic version of twm works fine, even if invoked in focal.
- 
- the focal version failure had surfaced in earlier ubuntu
- releases, tho sadly the solutions offered in
+ the same failure had surfaced in earlier ubuntu releases, tho sadly the
+ solutions offered in
  
  https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1596636
  
  aren't helping.
+ 
+ the bionic version of twm works fine, even if invoked in focal.  also
+ the focal versions of ctwm and vtwm work fine.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: twm 1:1.0.10-1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-14.17-generic 5.4.18
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-14-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu20
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Sun Mar 15 17:41:33 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-03-15 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Alpha amd64 (20200314)
  SourcePackage: twm
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  mtime.conffile..etc.X11.twm.system.twmrc-menu: 2018-12-13T11:37:49

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867561

Title:
  regression:  twm won't launch in focal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/twm/+bug/1867561/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1938228] UbiquitySyslog.txt

2021-07-28 Thread gregrwm
apport information

** Attachment added: "UbiquitySyslog.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938228/+attachment/5514306/+files/UbiquitySyslog.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938228

Title:
  installer says it will format when i specify not to format

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1938228/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1938228] ProcEnviron.txt

2021-07-28 Thread gregrwm
apport information

** Attachment added: "ProcEnviron.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938228/+attachment/5514305/+files/ProcEnviron.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938228

Title:
  installer says it will format when i specify not to format

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1938228/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1938228] ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt

2021-07-28 Thread gregrwm
apport information

** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938228/+attachment/5514304/+files/ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938228

Title:
  installer says it will format when i specify not to format

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1938228/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1938228] Dependencies.txt

2021-07-28 Thread gregrwm
apport information

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938228/+attachment/5514303/+files/Dependencies.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938228

Title:
  installer says it will format when i specify not to format

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1938228/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1938228] Re: installer says it will format when i specify not to format

2021-07-28 Thread gregrwm
apport information

** Tags added: apport-collected focal third-party-packages

** Description changed:

  i'm running the installer on the Kubuntu 20.04 iso downloaded today and
  dated 2021-2-9.  it's presenting me the following dialog:
  
  Write changes to disks?
  
  If you continue, the changes listed below will be written to the
  disks. Otherwise, you will be able to make further changes manually.
  
  WARNING: This will destroy all data on any partitions you have
  removed as well as on the partitions that are going to be formatted.
  
  The partition tables of the following devices are changed: SCSI1
  (0,0,0)(sda)
  
  The following partitions are going to be formatted: partition #1 of
  SCSI1 (0,0,0)(sda) as ext3
  
  i carefully chose neither to change the size of my partition, nor to
  format it, and up until the above message, the installer seemed to have
  accepted these choices.
  
  (1)  if it is actually going to honor my choice not to format, then the
  message is wrong.  Or if it's actually going to format, then it's not
  honoring my choice.
  
  (2)  if it is actually going to honor my choice not to change the size
  of the partition, nor create nor delete any partition, then it shouldn't
  need to change the partition table.  So again either the message, or the
  ensuing action, is incorrect.
  
- (3)  since i'm choosing not to format a partition, i shouldn't be
- presented with a menu of how to format it.  Presenting the menu makes
- sense once i choose to check/tick the box to format the partition.  How
- about put the checkbox to the left of the menu, and enable the menu when
- the checkbox gets checked/ticked.
+ (3)  since i'm choosing not to format a partition, i shouldn't be presented 
with a menu of how to format it.  Presenting the menu makes sense once i choose 
to check/tick the box to format the partition.  How about put the checkbox to 
the left of the menu, and enable the menu when the checkbox gets checked/ticked.
+ --- 
+ ProblemType: Bug
+ ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.16
+ Architecture: amd64
+ CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
+ CasperVersion: 1.445.1
+ DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
+ InstallCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=(j)/casper/vmlinuz boot=casper 
iso-scan/filename=/fu/home/greg/Downloads/kubuntu-20.04.2.0-desktop-amd64.iso 
panic=30 toram --
+ LiveMediaBuild: Kubuntu 20.04.2.0 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210209.1)
+ Package: ubiquity 20.04.15.10 [origin: unknown]
+ PackageArchitecture: amd64
+ ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-43.49~20.04.1-generic 5.8.18
+ Tags: third-party-packages focal
+ Uname: Linux 5.8.0-43-generic x86_64
+ UnreportableReason: This is not an official Ubuntu package. Please remove any 
third party package and try again.
+ UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
+ UserGroups: N/A
+ _MarkForUpload: True

** Attachment added: "Casper.txt"
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938228/+attachment/5514302/+files/Casper.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938228

Title:
  installer says it will format when i specify not to format

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1938228/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1938228] Re: installer says it will format when i specify not to format

2021-07-28 Thread gregrwm
i tried 'ubuntu-bug ubiquity' on the iso, it said something like
'ubiquity is not part of ubuntu'

** Package changed: partman-basicfilesystems (Ubuntu) => ubiquity
(Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938228

Title:
  installer says it will format when i specify not to format

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1938228/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1938228] [NEW] installer says it will format when i specify not to format

2021-07-27 Thread gregrwm
Public bug reported:

i'm running the installer on the Kubuntu 20.04 iso downloaded today and
dated 2021-2-9.  it's presenting me the following dialog:

Write changes to disks?

If you continue, the changes listed below will be written to the
disks. Otherwise, you will be able to make further changes manually.

WARNING: This will destroy all data on any partitions you have
removed as well as on the partitions that are going to be formatted.

The partition tables of the following devices are changed: SCSI1
(0,0,0)(sda)

The following partitions are going to be formatted: partition #1 of
SCSI1 (0,0,0)(sda) as ext3

i carefully chose neither to change the size of my partition, nor to
format it, and up until the above message, the installer seemed to have
accepted these choices.

(1)  if it is actually going to honor my choice not to format, then the
message is wrong.  Or if it's actually going to format, then it's not
honoring my choice.

(2)  if it is actually going to honor my choice not to change the size
of the partition, nor create nor delete any partition, then it shouldn't
need to change the partition table.  So again either the message, or the
ensuing action, is incorrect.

(3)  since i'm choosing not to format a partition, i shouldn't be
presented with a menu of how to format it.  Presenting the menu makes
sense once i choose to check/tick the box to format the partition.  How
about put the checkbox to the left of the menu, and enable the menu when
the checkbox gets checked/ticked.

** Affects: partman-basicfilesystems (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938228

Title:
  installer says it will format when i specify not to format

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-basicfilesystems/+bug/1938228/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1930995] Re: snapd too heavy for lubuntu

2021-06-09 Thread gregrwm
i don't even want auto updates.  i've already removed unattended-
upgrades.  i would hope there's some way to turn them off for snaps too.
perhaps stop and disable snapd would do it.  but that would of course
need to be undone to update chromium.  which is why i shouldn't need to
disable snapd and snapd ought to exit by itself.  in my opinion the
removal of unattended-upgrades should by default also avert auto updates
by snap.

fwiw i checked, and actually snapd does appear to be already installed
as part of lubuntu-desktop.  when i installed chromium-browser it didn't
need to pull in anything else along with it.  if i were to remove snapd
now, along with it that would take out libsnapd-qt1 plasma-discover-
backend-snap chromium-browser libpipewire-0.2-1 squashfs-tools xdg-
desktop-portal* xdg-desktop-portal-kde.  of those all i want is
chromium, tho i only use chromium on rare occasions when firefox doesn't
handle something properly.  i may yet try to see if removing the lot of
them would somehow cripple my system.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930995

Title:
  snapd too heavy for lubuntu

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1930995/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1930995] Re: snapd too heavy for lubuntu

2021-06-08 Thread gregrwm
seems like tunnel vision to me, no concern for getting out of the way
(exiting) when there's really nothing to be done.  chromium isn't even
running.  if it, or snap, were invoked, that would be a reasonable time
to re-launch.  if such reasonable analysis is not in the scope of the
project, i'd say the project ought not be in the scope of lubuntu.  hmm,
actually, perhaps it already isn't, perhaps i only got stuck to the
tarbaby by installing chromium.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930995

Title:
  snapd too heavy for lubuntu

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1930995/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1930995] [NEW] snapd too heavy for lubuntu

2021-06-07 Thread gregrwm
Public bug reported:

when my lubuntu focal box gets heavy into thrashing, snapd sits there
and hangs on to 20mb of resident memory.  why so heavy?  reminds me of
zfs.  wonderful features.  but way too heavy.  snapd is too heavy for
lubuntu.  lubuntu is supposed to work well with not so much ram.

why is snapd even a daemon?  i get that it installs and updates chromium
for me.  why does it need to be a daemon to do that?

it would be great if snapd gets redesigned to exit the daemon when i
don't need it.  which is almost always for me.  i could probably do what
i want by killing off snapd, and putting it back when i need to update
chromium.  but it ought to take care of all that by itself, and mostly
be out of my hair, by itself.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: snapd 2.48.3+20.04
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-60.67-generic 5.4.78
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-60-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.18
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
Date: Sat Jun  5 23:09:43 2021
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-03-15 (447 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Alpha amd64 (20200314)
ProcEnviron:
 LC_TIME=g
 TERM=screen
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: snapd
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
mtime.conffile..etc.apport.crashdb.conf: 2020-08-27T20:37:28.010487

** Affects: snapd (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930995

Title:
  snapd too heavy for lubuntu

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1930995/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1926680] [NEW] apache2 won't restart after installing nagios4

2021-04-29 Thread gregrwm
Public bug reported:

the issue is described here:  https://wiki.debian.org/Nagios4

in summary, after installing nagios4, apache2 won't restart, until:

a2enmod auth_digest
a2enmod authz_groupfile

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: nagios4 (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-42.46-generic 5.4.44
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-42-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.4
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
Date: Thu Apr 29 21:33:16 2021
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-11-30 (150 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20200731)
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=screen
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=C.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: nagios4
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: nagios4 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal uec-images

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926680

Title:
  apache2 won't restart after installing nagios4

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios4/+bug/1926680/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1621203] Re: evolution/totem/gthumb crashes when run in vnc session

2021-04-21 Thread gregrwm
been bothered by this for years with gthumb.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1621203

Title:
  evolution/totem/gthumb crashes when run in vnc session

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/1621203/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1903057] Re: vim confused by \~/

2021-03-26 Thread gregrwm
see https://github.com/vim/vim/issues/8015

** Bug watch added: github.com/vim/vim/issues #8015
   https://github.com/vim/vim/issues/8015

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903057

Title:
  vim confused by \~/

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vim/+bug/1903057/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1902643] Re: tmux drops out of copy mode (regression)

2021-02-10 Thread gregrwm
see https://github.com/tmux/tmux/issues/2538

** Bug watch added: github.com/tmux/tmux/issues #2538
   https://github.com/tmux/tmux/issues/2538

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902643

Title:
  tmux drops out of copy mode (regression)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tmux/+bug/1902643/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1912330] Re: regression: non-X VTs stopped using energy star after xenial

2021-02-01 Thread gregrwm
** Summary changed:

- non-X VTs should use energy star
+ regression:  non-X VTs stopped using energy star after xenial

** Description changed:

- it's simple.  it's easy.  let's get our servers being good energy star
- citizens shall we?
+ as of xenial, non-X VTs timed out and powered down even if nobody ever
+ logged in.  but that's no longer true in bionic and focal.
  
  if a VT is running X at all, whether that's running sddm and never
  logged in, or sddm and logged-in, or not running sddm and simply logged-
  in and running X started with startx, that VT will timeout and
- powerdown.  so far so good.
+ powerdown, even on bionic and focal.  no problem there.
  
  but a VT that's either running getty, or logged in and just running
- bash, will stay powered up and blazing away forever, whether it's ubuntu
- server 20.04, lubuntu 20.04, or centos 8.
+ bash, will stay powered up and blazing away forever, if it's ubuntu
+ 18.04 or 20.04, server or lubuntu.  or centos 8.
  
  so probably RHEL 8 too, so probably most servers, aren't being good
- energy star citizens!  boo!
+ energy star citizens anymore.  something happened since xenial.
  
  the util-linux package is used by both centos 8 and ubuntu 20.04, and
  contains both getty and setterm.
  
- thus getty seems to me to be the sensible place to call:
+ probably getty would be the place, that either used to call, or should
+ now call:
  
  setterm -term=linux -powersave=powerdown -powerdown=15
  -store>/dev/tty0https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912330

Title:
  regression:  non-X VTs stopped using energy star after xenial

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/1912330/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1912330] Re: non-X VTs should use energy star

2021-02-01 Thread gregrwm
** Description changed:

  it's simple.  it's easy.  let's get our servers being good energy star
  citizens shall we?
  
  if a VT is running X at all, whether that's running sddm and never
  logged in, or sddm and logged-in, or not running sddm and simply logged-
  in and running X started with startx, that VT will timeout and
  powerdown.  so far so good.
  
  but a VT that's either running getty, or logged in and just running
  bash, will stay powered up and blazing away forever, whether it's ubuntu
  server 20.04, lubuntu 20.04, or centos 8.
  
  so probably RHEL 8 too, so probably most servers, aren't being good
  energy star citizens!  boo!
  
  the util-linux package is used by both centos 8 and ubuntu 20.04, and
  contains both getty and setterm.
  
  thus getty seems to me to be the sensible place to call:
  
- setterm -powersave=powerdown -powerdown=15 -store
+ setterm -term=linux -powersave=powerdown -powerdown=15
+ -store>/dev/tty0https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912330

Title:
  non-X VTs should use energy star

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/1912330/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1912330] Re: non-X VTs should use energy star

2021-02-01 Thread gregrwm
** Summary changed:

- ubuntu server not a good energy star citizen apparently
+ non-X VTs should use energy star

** Description changed:

- Something like
+ it's simple.  it's easy.  let's get our servers being good energy star
+ citizens shall we?
  
- setterm -powersave=powerdown -powerdown=15 -store
+ if a VT is running X at all, whether that's running sddm and never
+ logged in, or sddm and logged-in, or not running sddm and simply logged-
+ in and running X started with startx, that VT will timeout and
+ powerdown.  so far so good.
  
- ought to do it, probably right whenever/wherever a VT is activated.
+ but a VT that's either running getty, or logged in and just running
+ bash, will stay powered up and blazing away forever, whether it's ubuntu
+ server 20.04, lubuntu 20.04, or centos 8.
  
- tho when i try that command i get
+ so probably RHEL 8 too, so probably most servers, aren't being good
+ energy star citizens!  boo!
  
- setterm: cannot (un)set powersave mode: Inappropriate ioctl for device
+ the util-linux package is used by both centos 8 and ubuntu 20.04, and
+ contains both getty and setterm.
  
- is that the problem, something lacking in a device driver or whatever?
+ thus getty seems to me to be the sensible place to call:
  
- or does the HP EliteDesk Pro 800 G1 SFF actually lack dpms energy star
- features?  seems dubious that it would.
+ setterm -powersave=powerdown -powerdown=15 -store
  
- or is it just a case of finger pointing?  ubuntu saying systemd should
- do it, systemd saying getty should do it?
- 
- whatever, i shouldn't walk up to a server terminal that's had nobody
- there for hours and hours and see it's display still burning away,
- right?
+ such that a VT running getty, or logged in and running bash, would then
+ timeout and powerdown.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: systemd 245.4-4ubuntu3.4
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-62.70-generic 5.4.78
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-62-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.14
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  Date: Tue Jan 19 05:13:35 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-12-28 (21 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20200731)
  MachineType: Hewlett-Packard HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF
  ProcEnviron:
-  TERM=screen
-  PATH=(custom, no user)
-  LANG=C.UTF-8
-  SHELL=/bin/bash
+  TERM=screen
+  PATH=(custom, no user)
+  LANG=C.UTF-8
+  SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/fs/boot/vmlinuz ro 
root=UUID=a671d866-a05f-4b83-8714-0b448b1eeac4 subroot=/fs 
init=/fs/etc/g/subroot
  SourcePackage: systemd
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 07/15/2014
  dmi.bios.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
  dmi.bios.version: L01 v02.33
  dmi.board.name: 1998
  dmi.board.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
  dmi.chassis.type: 4
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnHewlett-Packard:bvrL01v02.33:bd07/15/2014:svnHewlett-Packard:pnHPEliteDesk800G1SFF:pvr:rvnHewlett-Packard:rn1998:rvr:cvnHewlett-Packard:ct4:cvr:
  dmi.product.family: 103C_53307F G=D
  dmi.product.name: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF
  dmi.product.sku: J6D79UT#ABA
  dmi.sys.vendor: Hewlett-Packard

** Package changed: systemd (Ubuntu) => util-linux (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912330

Title:
  non-X VTs should use energy star

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/1912330/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1912330] Re: ubuntu server not a good energy star citizen apparently

2021-01-19 Thread gregrwm
** Summary changed:

- ubuntu server not a good energy star citizen?  really?
+ ubuntu server not a good energy star citizen apparently

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912330

Title:
  ubuntu server not a good energy star citizen apparently

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1912330/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1912330] Re: ubuntu server not a good energy star citizen? really?

2021-01-19 Thread gregrwm
no, i say it's a bug.  We shouldn't have to "figure out how to use"
energy star features!  they should just work out of the box.  Especially
on a server console that hasn't even been logged into!

** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
   Status: Invalid => New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912330

Title:
  ubuntu server not a good energy star citizen apparently

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1912330/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1912330] [NEW] ubuntu server not a good energy star citizen? really?

2021-01-19 Thread gregrwm
Public bug reported:

Something like

setterm -powersave=powerdown -powerdown=15 -store

ought to do it, probably right whenever/wherever a VT is activated.

tho when i try that command i get

setterm: cannot (un)set powersave mode: Inappropriate ioctl for device

is that the problem, something lacking in a device driver or whatever?

or does the HP EliteDesk Pro 800 G1 SFF actually lack dpms energy star
features?  seems dubious that it would.

or is it just a case of finger pointing?  ubuntu saying systemd should
do it, systemd saying getty should do it?

whatever, i shouldn't walk up to a server terminal that's had nobody
there for hours and hours and see it's display still burning away,
right?

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: systemd 245.4-4ubuntu3.4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-62.70-generic 5.4.78
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-62-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.14
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
Date: Tue Jan 19 05:13:35 2021
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-12-28 (21 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20200731)
MachineType: Hewlett-Packard HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=screen
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=C.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/fs/boot/vmlinuz ro 
root=UUID=a671d866-a05f-4b83-8714-0b448b1eeac4 subroot=/fs 
init=/fs/etc/g/subroot
SourcePackage: systemd
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 07/15/2014
dmi.bios.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
dmi.bios.version: L01 v02.33
dmi.board.name: 1998
dmi.board.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
dmi.chassis.type: 4
dmi.chassis.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnHewlett-Packard:bvrL01v02.33:bd07/15/2014:svnHewlett-Packard:pnHPEliteDesk800G1SFF:pvr:rvnHewlett-Packard:rn1998:rvr:cvnHewlett-Packard:ct4:cvr:
dmi.product.family: 103C_53307F G=D
dmi.product.name: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF
dmi.product.sku: J6D79UT#ABA
dmi.sys.vendor: Hewlett-Packard

** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912330

Title:
  ubuntu server not a good energy star citizen?  really?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1912330/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1902643] Re: tmux drops out of copy mode (regression)

2021-01-17 Thread gregrwm
i just saw this happen on tmux-3.1b-x86_64.AppImage (from
https://github.com/tmux/tmux/wiki/Installing at "Prebuilt AppImage
packages") so i'll report it there.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902643

Title:
  tmux drops out of copy mode (regression)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tmux/+bug/1902643/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909480] Re: ubuntu installer wont probe block devices if invoked via ssh

2020-12-28 Thread gregrwm
** Description changed:

- While groping for a workaround to bug #1909478 i tried logging into the
- ubiquity installer via ssh.  This looks like a very nice feature, but
- unfortunately, when logged in thusly via ssh, the installer says "Guided
- storage configuration...Block probing did not discover any disks.
- Unfortunately this means that installation will not be possible."
+ While groping for a workaround to bug #1909478 i tried setting the
+ password on the 'installer' account and logging in via ssh, whereupon
+ the installer works via ssh.  This looks to be a very nice feature, but,
+ sadly, when logged in thusly via ssh, the installer oddly fails to probe
+ the discs, saying "Guided storage configuration...Block probing did not
+ discover any disks. Unfortunately this means that installation will not
+ be possible."
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: ubiquity (not installed)
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-42.46-generic 5.4.44
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-42-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.4
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CasperVersion: 1.445.1
  Date: Mon Dec 28 06:35:11 2020
  InstallCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=(i)/casper/vmlinuz 
iso-scan/filename=/home/greg/ubuntu-20.04.1-live-server-amd64.iso boot=casper 
panic=30 toram --
  LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu-Server 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20200731)
  ProcEnviron:
-  TERM=screen
-  PATH=(custom, no user)
-  LANG=C.UTF-8
-  SHELL=/bin/bash
+  TERM=screen
+  PATH=(custom, no user)
+  LANG=C.UTF-8
+  SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: ubiquity
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909480

Title:
  ubuntu installer wont probe block devices if invoked via ssh

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1909480/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909478] [NEW] ubuntu installer Create LVM volume group Devices are invisible

2020-12-28 Thread gregrwm
Public bug reported:

Booted ubuntu installer live iso, got as far as "Create LVM volume
group", which presents a list of Devices which are invisible.  The tab
key clearly steps through the invisible devices, but as they are
invisible i cant see which to choose.  As a sometimes workaround, by
hitting the spacebar on each invisible choice, the size is shown, and i
can sometimes deduce from that which device it is, tho if several
devices are the same size even that doesn't help.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: ubiquity (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-42.46-generic 5.4.44
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-42-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.4
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CasperVersion: 1.445.1
Date: Mon Dec 28 06:44:19 2020
InstallCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=(i)/casper/vmlinuz 
iso-scan/filename=/home/greg/ubuntu-20.04.1-live-server-amd64.iso boot=casper 
panic=30 toram --
LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu-Server 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20200731)
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=screen
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=C.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: ubiquity
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal uec-images

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909478

Title:
  ubuntu installer Create LVM volume group Devices are invisible

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1909478/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909480] [NEW] ubuntu installer wont probe block devices if invoked via ssh

2020-12-28 Thread gregrwm
Public bug reported:

While groping for a workaround to bug #1909478 i tried logging into the
ubiquity installer via ssh.  This looks like a very nice feature, but
unfortunately, when logged in thusly via ssh, the installer says "Guided
storage configuration...Block probing did not discover any disks.
Unfortunately this means that installation will not be possible."

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: ubiquity (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-42.46-generic 5.4.44
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-42-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.4
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CasperVersion: 1.445.1
Date: Mon Dec 28 06:35:11 2020
InstallCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=(i)/casper/vmlinuz 
iso-scan/filename=/home/greg/ubuntu-20.04.1-live-server-amd64.iso boot=casper 
panic=30 toram --
LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu-Server 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20200731)
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=screen
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=C.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: ubiquity
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal uec-images

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909480

Title:
  ubuntu installer wont probe block devices if invoked via ssh

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1909480/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1903057] [NEW] vim confused by \~/

2020-11-05 Thread gregrwm
Public bug reported:

 $ cd
 $ mkdir \~
 $ echo content a>\~/a
 $ echo content b>b
 $ less \~/a b
:n
:e#
:q
 $ vim \~/a b
:n
:e#

less is not confused, but vim has forgotten where the first file was.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: vim 2:8.0.1453-1ubuntu1.3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.3.0-51.44~18.04.2-generic 5.3.18
Uname: Linux 5.3.0-51-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.14
Architecture: amd64
Date: Thu Nov  5 08:50:54 2020
InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-11-16 (354 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04.2 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20190210)
ProcEnviron:
 LC_TIME=en_DK.utf8
 TERM=screen
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: vim
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: vim (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903057

Title:
  vim confused by \~/

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vim/+bug/1903057/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1902643] Re: tmux drops out of copy mode (regression)

2020-11-04 Thread gregrwm
Caught centos8 tmux (2.7-1.el8.x86_64) a couple times dropping out of
copy mode apparently in response to window size changes while showing a
different tmux window, tho now when i repeat what i thought was the
trigger sequence i can't repeat it again.  Of course i was hoping to
catch focal tmux in the act of dropping out of copy mode, but not yet
today.

Meanwhile i do observe focal tmux (3.0a-2ubuntu0.1) oddly changing the
window size by one line and changing it right back again in response to
window size changes while showing a different tmux window.  to wit:

 $ alias ws='c=;while ((c==COLUMNS&==LINES))||{ c=$COLUMNS l=$LINES;echo 
$(date +%F%a%T) ${l}x$c;};do sleep .05;done'  #track window size changes
 $ ws
2020-11-04Wed15:43:52 57x226
2020-11-04Wed15:44:00 24x80
2020-11-04Wed15:44:01 57x226
2020-11-04Wed15:44:15 56x226
2020-11-04Wed15:44:15 57x226

'24x80' was when i unmaximized the xterm, and '57x226' when i
remaximized it a second later, without changing the tmux window
meanwhile.  However then i switched to show a different tmux window,
unmaximized, remaximized, and then when i switched the tmux window back,
you see the odd little dance where tmux changes by one line to '56x226'
and immediately back to '57x226'.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902643

Title:
  tmux drops out of copy mode (regression)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tmux/+bug/1902643/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1902643] Re: tmux drops out of copy mode (regression)

2020-11-04 Thread gregrwm
Yes indeed copy mode as per the manpage, which i use frequently not for
copy paste but simply for review.  And yes i typically run tmux in an
xterm.

i haven't tweaked or created any config files for either xterm or tmux.
For xterm i use the following variables and aliases, occasionally the xt
alias for starting an additional xterm, but more typically just the x
alias to start X with a single xterm (from which i launch a window
manager according to preference or need, usually twm, occasionally
openbox).

  xk='xterm -bg black -fg white -xrm 
"*"'charClass:33:48,37-38:48,43:48,45-47:48,58:48,63-64:48,92:48,94:48,126:48  
#doubleclick group ! %& + -./ : ?@ \ ^ ~
  xt=$xk\ -rightbar 
#xk knoppix rxvt no -rightbar
alias xt="$xt&" 
alias xk="$xk&"
alias  x='startx /usr/bin/$xt'

For tmux i just use the following aliases, all 5 are identical except
for setting the escape char to one of ^a ^q ^b ^x ^e, which i use for
stacking sessions (eg my phone on the first level, ssh to my laptop on
the next level, ssh to a server on the next level, ssh to other servers
on the next level, etc).

alias ta='tmux h 2>/dev/null||tmux new -d;tmux bi w choose-w 2>/dev/null||tmux 
bi w choose-t -w;tmux set status off\; set visual-b on\; set display-t \; 
set prefix ^A\; bi ^A last\; bi a send-p\; bi k killp\; bi . detac\; bi _ sp\; 
bi \| sp -h\; bi \" set status\; bi Tab selectp -t :.+\; a -d'
alias tq='tmux h 2>/dev/null||tmux new -d;tmux bi w choose-w 2>/dev/null||tmux 
bi w choose-t -w;tmux set status off\; set visual-b on\; set display-t \; 
set prefix ^Q\; bi ^Q last\; bi q send-p\; bi k killp\; bi . detac\; bi _ sp\; 
bi \| sp -h\; bi \" set status\; bi Tab selectp -t :.+\; a -d'
alias tb='tmux h 2>/dev/null||tmux new -d;tmux bi w choose-w 2>/dev/null||tmux 
bi w choose-t -w;tmux set status off\; set visual-b on\; set display-t \; 
set prefix ^B\; bi ^B last\; bi b send-p\; bi k killp\; bi . detac\; bi _ sp\; 
bi \| sp -h\; bi \" set status\; bi Tab selectp -t :.+\; a -d'
alias tx='tmux h 2>/dev/null||tmux new -d;tmux bi w choose-w 2>/dev/null||tmux 
bi w choose-t -w;tmux set status off\; set visual-b on\; set display-t \; 
set prefix ^X\; bi ^X last\; bi x send-p\; bi k killp\; bi . detac\; bi _ sp\; 
bi \| sp -h\; bi \" set status\; bi Tab selectp -t :.+\; a -d'
alias te='tmux h 2>/dev/null||tmux new -d;tmux bi w choose-w 2>/dev/null||tmux 
bi w choose-t -w;tmux set status off\; set visual-b on\; set display-t \; 
set prefix ^E\; bi ^E last\; bi e send-p\; bi k killp\; bi . detac\; bi _ sp\; 
bi \| sp -h\; bi \" set status\; bi Tab selectp -t :.+\; a -d'

One prospect is the bug might be related to window size change (it's one
of the reasons i prefer tmux, screen will immediately drop copy mode in
response to a window size change, thankfully tmux doesn't).  i recall
several occurrences happening very soon after returning to a window from
another.  in the meantime i might have changed the xterm size, or
reattached from my phone, or rotated the phone...  But i think i've also
seen it happen without any window size change, can't promise tho, i'll
watch for further occurrences.

Let me know if there's more i can clarify or share with you.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902643

Title:
  tmux drops out of copy mode (regression)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tmux/+bug/1902643/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1902595] Re: Unit strongswan.service could not be found. (regression)

2020-11-03 Thread gregrwm
yes that works (systemctl status strongswan-starter) thank you

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902595

Title:
  Unit strongswan.service could not be found. (regression)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/strongswan/+bug/1902595/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1902643] [NEW] tmux drops out of copy mode (regression)

2020-11-02 Thread gregrwm
Public bug reported:

After what might be about a minute, or other times many minutes, tmux
drops out of copy mode.  if the elapsed time were consistent i'd presume
it's an intentional feature, and if it were an intentional feature i'd
be asking for a way to opt out of that behavior, but as the timing is
random i presume it's a bug, and a regression.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: tmux 3.0a-2ubuntu0.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-48.52-generic 5.4.60
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-48-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.9
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
Date: Mon Nov  2 22:17:39 2020
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-03-15 (232 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Alpha amd64 (20200314)
ProcEnviron:
 LC_TIME=en_DK.utf8
 TERM=screen
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: tmux
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
mtime.conffile..etc.apport.crashdb.conf: 2020-08-27T20:37:28.010487

** Affects: tmux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902643

Title:
  tmux drops out of copy mode (regression)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tmux/+bug/1902643/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1902595] Re: Unit strongswan.service could not be found. (regression)

2020-11-02 Thread gregrwm
** Description changed:

-   #  systemctl status strongswan
+ #  systemctl status strongswan
  Unit strongswan.service could not be found.
    $  dpkg-query -W strongswan
  strongswan  5.8.2-1ubuntu3.1
    $  cat /etc/lsb-release
  DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
  DISTRIB_RELEASE=20.04
  DISTRIB_CODENAME=focal
  DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS"
    $
  
- no such problem in bionic.
+ No such problem in bionic.  Or if this is an intentional new design,
+ please advise new instructions to follow superseding "service strongswan
+ restart" and related instructions at http://github.com/hwdsl2/setup-
+ ipsec-vpn/blob/master/docs/clients.md#configure-linux-vpn-clients-using-
+ the-command-line
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: strongswan 5.8.2-1ubuntu3.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-48.52-generic 5.4.60
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-48-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.9
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  Date: Mon Nov  2 17:36:49 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-03-15 (232 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Alpha amd64 (20200314)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  ProcEnviron:
   LC_TIME=en_DK.utf8
   TERM=screen
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   LANG=en_US.utf8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: strongswan
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  mtime.conffile..etc.apport.crashdb.conf: 2020-08-27T20:37:28.010487

** Description changed:

- #  systemctl status strongswan
+   #  systemctl status strongswan
  Unit strongswan.service could not be found.
    $  dpkg-query -W strongswan
  strongswan  5.8.2-1ubuntu3.1
    $  cat /etc/lsb-release
  DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
  DISTRIB_RELEASE=20.04
  DISTRIB_CODENAME=focal
  DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS"
    $
  
  No such problem in bionic.  Or if this is an intentional new design,
  please advise new instructions to follow superseding "service strongswan
  restart" and related instructions at http://github.com/hwdsl2/setup-
  ipsec-vpn/blob/master/docs/clients.md#configure-linux-vpn-clients-using-
  the-command-line
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: strongswan 5.8.2-1ubuntu3.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-48.52-generic 5.4.60
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-48-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.9
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  Date: Mon Nov  2 17:36:49 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-03-15 (232 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Alpha amd64 (20200314)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  ProcEnviron:
   LC_TIME=en_DK.utf8
   TERM=screen
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   LANG=en_US.utf8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: strongswan
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  mtime.conffile..etc.apport.crashdb.conf: 2020-08-27T20:37:28.010487

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902595

Title:
  Unit strongswan.service could not be found. (regression)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/strongswan/+bug/1902595/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1902595] Re: Unit strongswan.service could not be found. (regression)

2020-11-02 Thread gregrwm
** Summary changed:

- Unit strongswan.service could not be found.
+ Unit strongswan.service could not be found. (regression)

** Description changed:

-   #  status strongswan
+ #  systemctl status strongswan
  Unit strongswan.service could not be found.
-   $  dpkg-query -W strongswan
+   $  dpkg-query -W strongswan
  strongswan  5.8.2-1ubuntu3.1
-   $  cat /etc/lsb-release 
+   $  cat /etc/lsb-release
  DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
  DISTRIB_RELEASE=20.04
  DISTRIB_CODENAME=focal
  DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS"
-   $
+   $
  
  no such problem in bionic.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: strongswan 5.8.2-1ubuntu3.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-48.52-generic 5.4.60
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-48-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.9
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  Date: Mon Nov  2 17:36:49 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-03-15 (232 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Alpha amd64 (20200314)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  ProcEnviron:
-  LC_TIME=en_DK.utf8
-  TERM=screen
-  PATH=(custom, no user)
-  LANG=en_US.utf8
-  SHELL=/bin/bash
+  LC_TIME=en_DK.utf8
+  TERM=screen
+  PATH=(custom, no user)
+  LANG=en_US.utf8
+  SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: strongswan
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  mtime.conffile..etc.apport.crashdb.conf: 2020-08-27T20:37:28.010487

** Description changed:

- #  systemctl status strongswan
+   #  systemctl status strongswan
  Unit strongswan.service could not be found.
    $  dpkg-query -W strongswan
  strongswan  5.8.2-1ubuntu3.1
    $  cat /etc/lsb-release
  DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
  DISTRIB_RELEASE=20.04
  DISTRIB_CODENAME=focal
  DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS"
    $
  
  no such problem in bionic.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: strongswan 5.8.2-1ubuntu3.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-48.52-generic 5.4.60
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-48-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.9
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  Date: Mon Nov  2 17:36:49 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-03-15 (232 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Alpha amd64 (20200314)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  ProcEnviron:
   LC_TIME=en_DK.utf8
   TERM=screen
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   LANG=en_US.utf8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: strongswan
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  mtime.conffile..etc.apport.crashdb.conf: 2020-08-27T20:37:28.010487

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902595

Title:
  Unit strongswan.service could not be found. (regression)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/strongswan/+bug/1902595/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1902595] [NEW] Unit strongswan.service could not be found. (regression)

2020-11-02 Thread gregrwm
Public bug reported:

  #  systemctl status strongswan
Unit strongswan.service could not be found.
  $  dpkg-query -W strongswan
strongswan  5.8.2-1ubuntu3.1
  $  cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=20.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=focal
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS"
  $

no such problem in bionic.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: strongswan 5.8.2-1ubuntu3.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-48.52-generic 5.4.60
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-48-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.9
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
Date: Mon Nov  2 17:36:49 2020
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-03-15 (232 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Alpha amd64 (20200314)
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 LC_TIME=en_DK.utf8
 TERM=screen
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: strongswan
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
mtime.conffile..etc.apport.crashdb.conf: 2020-08-27T20:37:28.010487

** Affects: strongswan (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal regression-release

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902595

Title:
  Unit strongswan.service could not be found. (regression)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/strongswan/+bug/1902595/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1460362] Re: "a week ago last thu" wrong

2020-10-27 Thread gregrwm
** Tags added: bionic focal xenial

** Tags added: amd64

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1460362

Title:
  "a week ago last thu" wrong

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/coreutils/+bug/1460362/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1883742] Re: funky font rendering on kubuntu

2020-10-17 Thread gregrwm
** Summary changed:

- funky font rendering on kubuntu and lubuntu
+ funky font rendering on kubuntu

** Description changed:

  The 3 screenshots are all of the same conversation in my gmail inbox.
  One screenshot was taken running Firefox Nightly on a Focal Ubuntu
  install, where the font rendering seems fine.  The other two screenshots
  were taken running Firefox Nightly on a Focal Kubuntu install.
  
  Even on Kubuntu, the font spacing on my gmail inbox looks right on
  Chromium (Version 83.0.4103.61 Official Build snap 64-bit), but is funky
  (extra spaces within words) on Firefox Nightly, thus this was first
  reported as http://github.com/webcompat/web-bugs/issues/53474
  
- In Firefox Nightly on Kubuntu or Lubuntu, the font placement/spacing
- often shifts around, sometimes spuriously, and sometimes when
- interacting, for example when i tick or untick the conversation as in
- the the 2nd and 3rd screenshots.  Note how all the "t"'s move over in
- "Opportunities", "Youth", "item", and "interest".
+ In Firefox Nightly on Kubuntu, the font placement/spacing often shifts
+ around, sometimes spuriously, and sometimes when interacting, for
+ example when i tick or untick the conversation as in the the 2nd and 3rd
+ screenshots.  Note how all the "t"'s move over in "Opportunities",
+ "Youth", "item", and "interest".
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: kubuntu-desktop (not installed)
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-21.25-generic 5.4.27
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-21-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu21
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Tue Jun 16 10:33:36 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-04-05 (71 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Beta amd64 (20200331)
  ProcEnviron:
-  LC_TIME=en_DK.utf8
-  TERM=screen
-  PATH=(custom, no user)
-  LANG=en_US.utf8
-  SHELL=/bin/bash
+  LC_TIME=en_DK.utf8
+  TERM=screen
+  PATH=(custom, no user)
+  LANG=en_US.utf8
+  SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: kubuntu-meta
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883742

Title:
  funky font rendering on kubuntu

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kubuntu-meta/+bug/1883742/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894400] Re: Establishing connection to PulseAudio. Please wait...

2020-09-28 Thread gregrwm
Attaching as requested.  fyi i was rather busy yesterday and was able to
overlook the fact that pavucontrol said "Establishing connection to
PulseAudio. Please wait..." all day because even so sound was working
and the volume was tolerable.  i didn't even shut the box off last
night.  i finally got around to launching the additional pulseaudio
process this morning whereupon i observe that this manifestation differs
from prior manifestations in that pavucontrol only then displayed the
built-in audio with no mention of my arctis 7 headset which meanwhile
was working!  so i killed both pulseaudio processes owned by me (tho not
the third one owned by sddm, i didn't login via sddm) and launched
another.  whereupon pulseaudio showed all the devices, but the youtube
player was stuck as if it was paused but wasn't.  so i killed my
pulseaudio processes again, whereupon the youtube player proceeded as if
it was no longer paused, but i could no longer hear the audio!  so i
paused the youtube player, this time killed All the pulseaudio
processes, unpaused the youtube player, i could then hear audio again
and another pulseaudio process had somehow spawned, but pavucontrol was
still stuck saying "Establishing connection to PulseAudio. Please
wait..." so i launched another pulseaudio process which made pavucontrol
happy again but the youtube player again stayed stuck as if paused
again.  so again i killed all pulseaudio processes, the youtube player
plays, i can hear it, but pavucontrol says "Establishing connection to
PulseAudio. Please wait...".  so i killed pulseaudio again, and now i
can hear the youtube but there's no pulseaudio process!  after a tad
longer of listening another pulseaudio process appeared, and again
pavucontrol-qt is stuck saying "Establishing...".  i launched
pavucontrol (no -qt) at this point, they're both stuck saying
"Establishing...".  i then launched another pulseaudio process,
whereupon both pavucontrols immediately showed the controls but the
youtube player is stuck again.  so i'll finally give up and reboot,
after attaching the journalctl report, which should span from yesterday
morning through this morning...

** Attachment added: "see my 9/28 comment"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1894400/+attachment/5415004/+files/journal.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894400

Title:
  Establishing connection to PulseAudio. Please wait...

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1894400/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894400] Re: Establishing connection to PulseAudio. Please wait...

2020-09-07 Thread gregrwm
upon the next manifestation i certainly will attach journalctl -b0 for
you.  meanwhile i'm curious what difference you find between that and
CurrentDmesg.  To me they both appear to be a readout of messages from
the most recent boot up until the present.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894400

Title:
  Establishing connection to PulseAudio. Please wait...

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1894400/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894400] Re: Establishing connection to PulseAudio. Please wait...

2020-09-07 Thread gregrwm
** Changed in: pulseaudio (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894400

Title:
  Establishing connection to PulseAudio. Please wait...

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1894400/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894400] Re: Establishing connection to PulseAudio. Please wait...

2020-09-07 Thread gregrwm
>On the affected machine, please:
>1. Check for any crashes in /var/crash/

None.

>2. Reproduce the problem again and verify there is a pulseaudio process
running while the problem is occuring.

Yes there was.

>3. Reboot, reproduce the problem again and while it is happening run:
>journalctl -b0 > journal.txt
>and attach the resulting text file here.

i believe what you are asking for is already in comment #3, in the
attachment, immediately following "CurrentDmesg:".

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894400

Title:
  Establishing connection to PulseAudio. Please wait...

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1894400/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894400] Re: Establishing connection to PulseAudio. Please wait...

2020-09-05 Thread gregrwm
** Attachment added: "ubuntu-bug report from the proper computer"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1894400/+attachment/5407983/+files/apport.pulseaudio.hg6b4xhv.apport

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894400

Title:
  Establishing connection to PulseAudio. Please wait...

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1894400/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894400] Re: Establishing connection to PulseAudio. Please wait...

2020-09-05 Thread gregrwm
Sorry i launched ubuntu-bug on the wrong box.  And upon running it on the 
proper box just now, it said '*** It seems you have modified the contents of 
"/etc/apport/crashdb.conf".  Would you like to add the contents of it to your 
bug report?
What would you like to do? Your options are:
  Y: Yes
  N: No
  C: Cancel
Please choose (Y/N/C):'.  i answered 'y'.  But, no, i didn't modify that file!  
But whatever, tho bizarre, hopefully that's irrelevant.

Anyway, see the attachment for the report from the proper box.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894400

Title:
  Establishing connection to PulseAudio. Please wait...

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1894400/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

  1   2   3   4   5   >