--- Comment From jan...@us.ibm.com 2024-05-09 17:13 EDT---
Was able to successfully validate the bootstrapped dotnet8 package .
Here are a few of the tests that were run:
$ uname -a
Linux ltcden12-lp22 6.8.0-31-generic #31-Ubuntu SMP Sat Apr 20 00:05:55 UTC
2024 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le
--- Comment From jan...@us.ibm.com 2024-05-07 13:41 EDT---
Thanks for the quick turnaround. We will test it and report the results.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064530
** Tags added: architecture-ppc64le bugnameltc-206197 severity-medium
targetmilestone-inin---
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061913
Title:
PMDK FTBFS on ppc64el
--- Comment From kowshik.j...@in.ibm.com 2024-05-06 14:39 EDT---
Frank has confirmed in his previous comment that the fix will be part kernel
6.8.0-31.31.
I also verified the bug on the same level of kernel and updated my
comments above that the fix is working as expected.
Since it is a
--- Comment From kowshik.j...@in.ibm.com 2024-05-06 06:50 EDT---
I have verified this bug on the latest available Ubuntu 24.04 host. The issue
has been fixed and is not getting reproduced anymore!
kernel: 6.8.0-31-generic #31-Ubuntu
Before guest creation:
HugePages_Total: 0
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin---
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2404
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2052696
Title:
[UBUNTU 24.04] Haskell LLVM Backend: Objects of data
Public bug reported:
== Comment: #0 - JAMIE L. DOLAN - 2024-05-01
12:19:47 ==
This is a bug to track adding the feature of .NET 8 to Ubuntu 24.04
- This has already been added for s390x
- Customer survey showed strong interest in .NET on Linux on Power, having .NET
on Ubuntu on Power will
Public bug reported:
Covering the userspace portion (secvarctl)
Feature:
This feature comprises PowerVM LPAR guest OS kernel verification to
extend the chain of trust from partition firmware to the OS kernel and
includes key management. GRUB and the host OS kernel are signed with 2
separate
Public bug reported:
Covering the kernel portion
Feature:
This feature comprises PowerVM LPAR guest OS kernel verification using
static keys to extend the chain of trust from partition firmware to the
OS kernel. GRUB and the host OS kernel are signed with 2 separate
public key pairs.
Public bug reported:
Covering the GRUB2 portion:
Feature:
This feature comprises PowerVM LPAR guest OS kernel verification using
static keys to extend the chain of trust from partition firmware to the
OS kernel. GRUB and the host OS kernel are signed with 2 separate
public key pairs.
--- Comment From wint...@de.ibm.com 2024-04-29 05:15 EDT---
I got the reply from Phoenyx:
Hi Sandy,
We?ve made the suggested changes to arp_ignore and arp_announce, but
this does not seem to have had any effect on the issue unfortunately ?
There has been no reduction in the number of
--- Comment From hbath...@in.ibm.com 2024-04-24 12:23 EDT---
Posted the patches to reduce memory consumption for KFENCE upstream:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240424110926.184077-1-hbath...@linux.ibm.com/
("[PATCH 1/2] radix/kfence: map __kfence_pool at page granularity")
--- Comment From david_pa...@uk.ibm.com 2024-04-24 02:47 EDT---
Hi,
We have had a reply from the AIX support team (see below) explaining the RENEW
requests. Do you have any further questions for the AIX support team or can we
supply any further diagnostic information to progress this
--- Comment From jldo...@us.ibm.com 2024-04-19 13:51 EDT---
It was decided internally that the Novalink team will be taking a patched socat
.deb and placing it within their own repo to provide the correct behavior in
their customer environments.
Thank you to everyone that spent time on
Public bug reported:
---Problem Description---
Hugepages memory is not getting released even after destroying the guest
Machine Type = P10 Denali LPAR
---uname output---
Linux ubuntu2404lp3 6.8.0-22-generic #22-Ubuntu SMP Thu Apr 4 22:47:57 UTC
2024 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux
--- Comment From kowshik.j...@in.ibm.com 2024-04-18 11:45 EDT---
I have verified this bug on latest Ubuntu24.04 Host and the issue is not
getting reproduced anymore!
root@ubuntu2404lp2:~# qemu-system-ppc64 -accel tcg -smp 10,maxcpus=9000
qemu-system-ppc64: Invalid SMP CPUs 9000. The max
--- Comment From david_pa...@uk.ibm.com 2024-04-18 11:00 EDT---
Hi,
Thanks for looking at the logs. I agree that both syslogs (AIX 7.2 and 7.3)
contain multiple "TCP recvfrom got EAGAIN" entries.
To clarify the information in the attachments, I have updated the
comment for the
** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-206054 severity-high
targetmilestone-inin---
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062118
Title:
autopkgtests fail on s390x (segfault)
To
--- Comment From david_pa...@uk.ibm.com 2024-04-17 13:11 EDT---
Here are the details of the IP addresses for the tcpdump files
AIX 7.3
9.20.120.112name = amaliada.v6.hursley.ibm.com -- Primary
9.20.120.153 name = adamsongrunter.v6.hursley.ibm.com ? Partner
AIX 7.2
--- Comment (attachment only) From david_pa...@uk.ibm.com 2024-04-17 06:19
EDT---
** Attachment added: "tcpdump for aix 7.2 testing part 4 of 4"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2042363/+attachment/5766767/+files/tcpdump17_04_2024_09H_10M3.zip
--
You received this bug notification
--- Comment (attachment only) From david_pa...@uk.ibm.com 2024-04-17 06:18
EDT---
** Attachment added: "tcpdump for aix 7.2 testing part 3 of 4"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2042363/+attachment/5766766/+files/tcpdump17_04_2024_09H_10M2.zip
--
You received this bug notification
--- Comment (attachment only) From david_pa...@uk.ibm.com 2024-04-17 06:16
EDT---
** Attachment added: "tcpdump for aix 7.3 testing part 5 of 5"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2042363/+attachment/5766763/+files/tcpdump16_04_2024_14H_03M4.zip
--
You received this bug notification
--- Comment (attachment only) From david_pa...@uk.ibm.com 2024-04-17 06:18
EDT---
** Attachment added: "tcpdump for aix 7.2 testing part 2 of 4"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2042363/+attachment/5766765/+files/tcpdump17_04_2024_09H_10M1.zip
--
You received this bug notification
--- Comment (attachment only) From david_pa...@uk.ibm.com 2024-04-17 06:17
EDT---
** Attachment added: "tcpdump for aix 7.2 testing part 1 of 4"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2042363/+attachment/5766764/+files/tcpdump17_04_2024_09H_10M.zip
--
You received this bug notification
--- Comment (attachment only) From david_pa...@uk.ibm.com 2024-04-17 06:16
EDT---
** Attachment added: "tcpdump for aix 7.3 testing part 4 of 5"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2042363/+attachment/5766762/+files/tcpdump16_04_2024_14H_03M3.zip
--
You received this bug notification
--- Comment (attachment only) From david_pa...@uk.ibm.com 2024-04-17 06:15
EDT---
** Attachment added: "tcpdump for aix 7.3 testing part 3 of 5"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2042363/+attachment/5766761/+files/tcpdump16_04_2024_14H_03M2.zip
--
You received this bug notification
--- Comment (attachment only) From david_pa...@uk.ibm.com 2024-04-17 06:15
EDT---
** Attachment added: "tcpdump for aix 7.3 testing part 2 of 5"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2042363/+attachment/5766760/+files/tcpdump16_04_2024_14H_03M1.zip
--
You received this bug notification
--- Comment (attachment only) From david_pa...@uk.ibm.com 2024-04-17 06:14
EDT---
** Attachment added: "tcpdump for aix 7.3 testing part 1 of 5"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2042363/+attachment/5766759/+files/tcpdump16_04_2024_14H_03M.zip
--
You received this bug notification
--- Comment (attachment only) From david_pa...@uk.ibm.com 2024-04-17 06:12
EDT---
** Attachment added: "Syslog for AIX 7.2 primary and partner"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2042363/+attachment/5766758/+files/syslog_17042024_adia_primary_amberjack_partner_both_aix72.zip
--
You
--- Comment (attachment only) From david_pa...@uk.ibm.com 2024-04-17 06:11
EDT---
** Attachment added: "Syslog and tcpdump file covering a working AIX 7.2 and
non-working AIX 7.3 pair of machines using the same NFSv4 server"
--- Comment (attachment only) From david_pa...@uk.ibm.com 2024-04-17 06:10
EDT---
** Attachment added: "Syslog and tcpdump file covering a working AIX 7.2 and
non-working AIX 7.3 pair of machines using the same NFSv4 server"
--- Comment From david_pa...@uk.ibm.com 2024-04-17 05:37 EDT---
Hi,
I have run the same MQ HA test on a working(AIX 7.2) and non working(AIX 7.3)
pair of machines with the same Linux NVSv4 Ubuntu 20.04 (kernel updated to
5.4.0-176-generic). I used the same RPC debug trace options as
--- Comment From steffen.ei...@ibm.com 2024-04-17 04:28 EDT---
Thanks Frank and Marc.
Verified for focal with the focal-package in PPA at
http://ppa.launchpad.net/fheimes/lp2059303/ubuntu (2.12.0-0ubuntu3.8)
-> verified for all releases in service.
focal, jammy, mantic, and noble.
--- Comment From mhart...@de.ibm.com 2024-04-16 05:22 EDT---
Can you please pick this commit:
https://github.com/ibm-s390-linux/s390-tools/commit/f5744b95db93fa9d5cfd6fb206767ad2dcc3c804
?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin---
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2004
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056491
Title:
not able to install noble on PowerVM LPARs `Kernel
--- Comment From wint...@de.ibm.com 2024-04-15 02:52 EDT---
A reply I sent via email to Phoenix Cameron and others:
I had an look at the data attached to the bugzilla.
I don?t really understand the setup. Why do have 30 bridges on top of 30 VLAN
interfaces all connected to the same OSA
--- Comment From kowshik.j...@in.ibm.com 2024-04-13 14:05 EDT---
I have also verified that the installer is giving a clear message with correct
"--os-variant" i.e, "ubuntunoble" as minimum recommendation is 3072 MiB.
--- Comment From kowshik.j...@in.ibm.com 2024-04-13 13:57 EDT---
With the latest kernel, issue is not getting reproduced. Hence closing this bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--- Comment From steffen.ei...@ibm.com 2024-04-12 10:22 EDT---
Hi Frank,
An update from my side:
!SHORT:
GOOD:
noble(with a nit), mantic, jammy
BAD/not verifyable:
focal
!LONG:
Verified for:
* 24.04 (noble):
with today's (2024-apr-12) s390tools version from noble repository (after
** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-206037 severity-high
targetmilestone-inin---
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060939
Title:
s390x OSA bridging causes network issues
To
--- Comment From berg...@us.ibm.com 2024-04-11 15:57 EDT---
The upstream bugzilla has been closed as INVALID (ie, not a GCC bug). The
problem was tracked down to an aliasing violation in the sha2.c source file.
It seems the sha2.c file from dcfldd is shared among many different
--- Comment From berg...@us.ibm.com 2024-04-11 14:47 EDT---
This has been reported in the FSF GCC bugzilla here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/PR114698
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--- Comment From vasily.gor...@de.ibm.com 2024-04-11 05:50 EDT---
I've sent a fix proposal to mailing lists
https://lore.kernel.org/all/patch.git-0ff58649313e.your-ad-here.call-01712828617-ext-4049@work.hours/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
--- Comment From berg...@us.ibm.com 2024-04-10 18:42 EDT---
Doing a git bisect, it identified the following GCC commit as causing the bug:
64f3e71c302b4a13e61656ee509e7050b9bce978 is the first bad commit
commit 64f3e71c302b4a13e61656ee509e7050b9bce978
Author: Jan Hubicka
Date: Sun Nov
--- Comment From berg...@us.ibm.com 2024-04-10 16:19 EDT---
Confirmed. This seems to fail for gcc12 and later and passes for gcc11 and
earlier. I have confirmed that the source file that is mis-compiled is
src/sha2.c.
Compiling the entire package with -O2 and sha2.c with -O3 shows the
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2024-04-10 12:39 EDT---
*** Bug 205730 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055175
Title:
--- Comment From vasily.gor...@de.ibm.com 2024-04-10 11:16 EDT---
bisected it to commit fce7913b13d0 ("NFSD: Use a bitmask loop to encode FATTR4
results")
Looks like an unfixed endianness issue since v6.7.
commit fce7913b13d0270bcf926f986b7ef329e2e56eec
Author: Chuck Lever
Date: Mon
--- Comment From berg...@us.ibm.com 2024-04-10 10:36 EDT---
May I ask why the distro build is forcing the use of -fno-omit-frame-pointer on
ppc64le? It just leads to less efficient code on ppc64le.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
--- Comment From berg...@us.ibm.com 2024-04-10 10:18 EDT---
The consensus in the GCC bugzilla is that the inline asm used in greenlet is
itself buggy and this is not a compiler bug. A different solution to their
inline asm will need to be used.
--
You received this bug notification
--- Comment From amit.machhi...@ibm.com 2024-04-10 08:59 EDT---
I continued to configure a guest (L2) on a Fedora LPAR (L1) with 1 GB of memory
and the virt-install command below, I could recreate this issue where the
installer froze for around 15 to 20 minutes post accepting a few inputs
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin---
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2004
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059303
Title:
[UBUNTU 20.04] SE-tooling: New IBM host-key subject
Public bug reported:
=== Description by ===
On s390x, if clone is called with NULL for child-function or stack argument,
then r7 is clobbered. This bug is needed for glibc 2.37, 2.38, 2.39. Please
pick the committed bugfix.
See
- glibc bugzilla:
Bug 31402 - clone (NULL, NULL, ...)
--- Comment From amit.machhi...@ibm.com 2024-04-10 08:18 EDT---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Hi,
>
> I could not reproduce this bug with the currently available ISOs below:
>
> https://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily-live/, the latest being the
> one
> generated on 04/09:
>
> Found
--- Comment From amit.machhi...@ibm.com 2024-04-10 06:35 EDT---
Hi,
I could not reproduce this bug with the currently available ISOs below:
https://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily-live/, the latest being the one
generated on 04/09:
Found label 'Ubuntu-Server 24.04 LTS _Noble
--- Comment From berg...@us.ibm.com 2024-04-09 22:30 EDT---
I opened an external GCC bug to track this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/PR114664
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060108
--- Comment From berg...@us.ibm.com 2024-04-09 13:07 EDT---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I've asked in the upstream issue for the preprocessed source file that I can
> recreate and debug with.
I was able to create a small reproducer myself. I'll have a look.
--
You received this bug
--- Comment From berg...@us.ibm.com 2024-04-09 12:50 EDT---
(In reply to comment #4)
> According to https://github.com/python-greenlet/greenlet/issues/395 this is
> the source with asm affected:
>
> https://github.com/python-greenlet/greenlet/blob/master/src/greenlet/
>
--- Comment From cha...@us.ibm.com 2024-04-09 11:22 EDT---
According to https://github.com/python-greenlet/greenlet/issues/395 this is the
source with asm affected:
https://github.com/python-
greenlet/greenlet/blob/master/src/greenlet/platform/switch_ppc64_linux.h
It is likely that r31
** Tags added: architecture-all bugnameltc-206019 severity-medium
targetmilestone-inin---
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060108
Title:
greenlet 3.0.3 fails to build on ppc64el (and
** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-206018 severity-high
targetmilestone-inin---
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060217
Title:
NFSv4 fails to mount in noble/s390x
To
--- Comment From hbath...@in.ibm.com 2024-04-08 07:09 EDT---
CONFIG_KFENCE is the config option that is increasing the memory requirement
significantly for radix MMU.
For radix MMU case, memory is direct mapped with 2MB size.
But when KFENCE is used, direct mapping is done at pagesize
--- Comment From cha...@us.ibm.com 2024-04-07 20:28 EDT---
This is great news but was there something in particular y'all are aware of
that fixed the issue?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2024-04-05 17:21 EDT---
Fix has been released. Thanks for all your work!
With that, we can close this bug.
Changing status to: "CLOSED"
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin---
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2404
--
You received this bug
--- Comment From steffen.ei...@ibm.com 2024-04-05 04:40 EDT---
(In reply to comment #15)
> Builds finally completed:
> noble: https://launchpad.net/~fheimes/+archive/ubuntu/lp2059303
> mantic, jammy, focal: https://launchpad.net/~fheimes/+archive/ubuntu/test
Hi Frank
Thank you for the
--- Comment From jldo...@us.ibm.com 2024-04-03 14:36 EDT---
I am very curious if anyone else has been able to work around this while
passing stdio as an argument. I just assumed socat was not a very popular
package. When I pass stdin (vs stdio) to socat within mkvterm it works.
Let me
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2024-04-02 13:14 EDT---
Hi, yes, I used the upstream testcase there.
I just checked the C program with 4 levels of optimization, and it works fine
too.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
--- Comment From cha...@us.ibm.com 2024-04-02 11:43 EDT---
Can you check if vTPM is enabled and disable it and see if that allows you to
install?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "grub file"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060039/+attachment/5761301/+files/etc_default_grub.txt
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu on IBM Power Systems Bug Triage
(ubuntu-power-triage)
** Package changed: ubuntu =>
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "Console logs"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060039/+attachment/5761299/+files/Console_log.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "dmesg log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060039/+attachment/5761300/+files/dmesg_log.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060039
Public bug reported:
Problem description :
==
Triggered FADump with the recommended crash. L1 host got hung.
As per the public document
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ppc64el/Recommendations recommended crash kernel
size is 1024M for the system. But with 1024M and 2048M, the L1 is
--- Comment From steffen.ei...@ibm.com 2024-04-02 09:17 EDT---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Well, I already had a hard time to get the requested commits applied to
> noble (which is on 2.31.0).
>
> I figured out that:
> 1) commit f6c6f0cc712433221fb0588c754e0d09884453dd ("rust/pv/test: Code
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "Guest log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060020/+attachment/5761246/+files/Guest_log.txt
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu on IBM Power Systems Bug Triage
(ubuntu-power-triage)
** Package changed: ubuntu =>
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "dmesg log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060020/+attachment/5761245/+files/dmesg.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060020
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "Install log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060020/+attachment/5761244/+files/Install.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060020
Public bug reported:
== Comment: #0 - Kowshik Jois B S - 2024-03-24
10:14:39 ==
---Problem Description---
Unable to bring up a guest with 1GB RAM using virt-install
Machine Type = P10 Denali
---Steps to Reproduce---
Try to bring up a guest with 1GB RAM using virt-install. The installer
--- Comment From hariharan...@ibm.com 2024-04-01 04:37 EDT---
Kowshik, Can we close the defect.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059237
Title:
[Ubuntu-24.04]
--- Comment From jldo...@us.ibm.com 2024-03-29 11:18 EDT---
I tested to see if mkvterm was performing as expected with the kernel in
focal-proposed, and the behavior was correct. Ritu in Novalink did as well.
In addition to that, the kernel was installed on two different lpars,
and
--- Comment From kowshik.j...@in.ibm.com 2024-03-28 11:43 EDT---
(In reply to comment #13)
Hello Frank,
I upgraded the system to 6.8.0-20-generic kernel and the issue is not
seen even after multiple reboots.
Also. I took the source available here:
--- Comment From fre...@de.ibm.com 2024-03-28 03:42 EDT---
(In reply to comment #13)
> Well, I was not able to easily cherry-pick these t commits.
> I got merge conflicts due to several debug lines.
>
> After some investigations (using git blame) I found that the commits:
> 0ccac4529540
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2024-03-27 16:09 EDT---
Full list of patches:
a54daf459e7504c0f42d3eb028100b7ab07894ff ("pvattest: Fix root-ca parsing")
5e1cb58a21ae0707d1993de3c8fc078c5cffed88 ("libpv: Support `Armonk` in IBM
signing key subject")
--- Comment From kowshik.j...@in.ibm.com 2024-03-27 15:59 EDT---
>
> So it looks like this happens with a kernel 6.6 (info taken from LP#2052767:
> linux-6.6.0 - is this an upstream kernel build that you did by yourself?
> Since - afair - we never had a kernel 6.6 in noble/24.04, just a
Public bug reported:
Description: SE-tooling: New IBM host-key subject locality
Symptom:
On April 24 (z15) / March 29 (z16) user will notice that the
tooling for Secure execution will no longer detect that the provided
IBM signing key for that generation is a valid
Public bug reported:
== Comment:- Kowshik Jois B S ==
---Problem Description---
Below trace messges are observed in dmesg after every reboot.
[0.474287] integrity: Unable to open file: /etc/keys/x509_evm.der (-2)
[0.475750] Freeing unused kernel image (initmem) memory: 8832K
[
--- Comment From kowshik.j...@in.ibm.com 2024-03-26 13:55 EDT---
I tried just now with the latest ISO image available on the site on a P10
Denali LPAR and still facing the same issue.
---
error: out of memory.
--- Comment From iranna.an...@in.ibm.com 2024-03-26 10:05 EDT---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Hi Chavez, thanks for checking it. I see this output:
> ```
> Memory Keyboard Network Speaker ok
> 0 > printenv real-base
> -- Partition: common Signature: 0x70
** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-205913 severity-medium
targetmilestone-inin---
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058742
Title:
libalog and dbusada ftbfs on s390x with
Public bug reported:
== - 2024-03-25 05:51:16 ==
---Description---
Description: dbginfo.sh: incompatible commands with /bin/dash shell
Symptom: script brakes on file copy
Problem: unpacked data collection
Solution: rewrite in compatible way
Component: s390-tools
the
--- Comment From jldo...@us.ibm.com 2024-03-19 20:42 EDT---
*** Bug 205873 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056491
Title:
not
--- Comment From cha...@us.ibm.com 2024-03-19 14:42 EDT---
Regarding the main issue with the unable to mount to root, do you get the same
errors prior to it as in the working installation? Are the kernel commandline
the same? Any other differences?
--
You received this bug notification
--- Comment From cha...@us.ibm.com 2024-03-19 14:32 EDT---
error: out of memory.
Press any key to continue...
The above messages are likely coming from the bootloader (grub2). Which
version of grub2 is being used? How exactly is the install being done,
e.g. via USB or some other method?
--- Comment From david_pa...@uk.ibm.com 2024-03-19 13:53 EDT---
Is there an update from Canonical please? Can we provide any further
information or trace to help diagnose this issue ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
** Tags added: architecture-ppc64le bugnameltc-205876 severity-medium
targetmilestone-inin---
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056491
Title:
not able to install noble on PowerVM LPARs
--- Comment From gcwil...@us.ibm.com 2024-03-12 17:33 EDT---
Closing on our side as ALT_SOLUTION_AVAIL.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903289
Title:
[24.04] Power guest
--- Comment From gcwil...@us.ibm.com 2024-03-12 17:34 EDT---
Closing on our side as ALT_SOLUTION_AVAIL.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903288
Title:
[24.04] Power guest
--- Comment From jldo...@us.ibm.com 2024-03-11 14:00 EDT---
Thank you Frank for providing a test kernel! I have installed the test kernel
and everything appears to be working smoothly.
---
root@neop91:/home/neo# mkvterm --id 2
vterm for partition 2 is active. Press Control+] to exit.
--- Comment From jldo...@us.ibm.com 2024-03-11 14:03 EDT---
Test build of socat provided by Frank is showing the expected behavior of socat.
1) Ctrl-] closes the connection
2) Ctrl-c does not close the connection
3) Password is not being displayed
4) Up arrow is working correctly, and not
--- Comment From david_pa...@uk.ibm.com 2024-03-11 03:51 EDT---
Has there been any further progress on this issue from the Linux NFS
development team ?
The AIX NFS development team will not progress the problem from their
side until they understand why the BAD_SEQID errors has been
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "ss2"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056574/+attachment/5754069/+files/Captura_de_pantalla_2024-03-06_202037.png
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu on IBM Power Systems Bug Triage
(ubuntu-power-triage)
** Package
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "error bot from san"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056574/+attachment/5754067/+files/Captura_de_pantalla_2024-03-06_201758.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
1 - 100 of 14228 matches
Mail list logo
