Jo-Erlend Schinstad [2012-04-20 1:56 +0200]:
> If this was going to be redesigned, I would rather see it as a "Hardware
> manager".
That's exactly what I want to avoid. If anything, the UI should become
easier, not more complex. Large trees with lots of technobabble and
incomprehensible hardware
Jo-Erlend Schinstad [2012-04-20 4:01 +0200]:
> Exactly. So why does "the driver application" currently not show any
> open drivers?
The only case when it does that right now is when there are open
source printer drivers available on openprinting.org for a printer you
are about to set up.
But the
Instead, we should provide an easy way of getting to the
manufacturers support site. This is helpful to the user, and
illustrates
who is to "blame" at the same time. That's what we call a Ubu/Ubu
situation.
As I mentioned, the application should have a Send To function. That
would enable you to
Den 22. april 2012 10:36, skrev Milan Bouchet-Valat:
>
> Looks like you're asking for something like suspend or hibernate to me.
> What's the point in replicating features that do this perfectly? Better
> spend your energy in fixing them if they don't work on your box.
No, I'm not talking about su
Le samedi 21 avril 2012 à 23:13 +0200, Jo-Erlend Schinstad a écrit :
> Application startup time is unnecessarily slow in a large number of
> instances. Can we see some improvement in that area in the Q cycle? The
> price of RAM has dropped dramatically, and usage has not increased all
> that much.
