Le 16/10/2012 06:08, Jeremy Bicha a écrit :
On 15 October 2012 13:50, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
That's going to be a controversial topic but I want to suggest we stay on
stable GNOME this cycle, the reasons are (in random order):
Well you've been following GNOME development for longer than many
Le 15/10/2012 22:14, Jorge O. Castro a écrit :
Hi everyone,
Some changes to unity this cycle means that "unity --reset" doesn't
work. Didrocks sort of explained what needed to happen to make it work
and J Phani Mahesh stepped up to the plate taking a stab at it.
-
https://bitbucket.org/jpmahes
On 16/10/12 15:08, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
>> One element to think about also is how that would impact the GNOME remix if
>> the plan there is not ship the latest GNOME...
> Seb, I blame the remix idea on you. ;) Anyway, if the GNOME remix
> becomes an official flavor, I was hoping to then ask for pe
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> The other big example this cycle is ibus. GNOME 3.6 doesn't work
> properly without a not-released-as-stable version of ibus.
> http://pad.lv/1045914
Have you contacted with IBus upstream?
Developers of IBus are mostly using Fedora, which shi
On 13 October 2012 04:57, Omer Akram wrote:
>> - GtkMenuButton needs to export its menus to dbus for use by the HUD
>
> there.. that is the thing that i don't like at all... we need to patch
> nautilus to show a complete menu bar. nautilus (and other gnome apps) with
> just one menu + settings cog
On 15 October 2012 13:50, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> That's going to be a controversial topic but I want to suggest we stay on
> stable GNOME this cycle, the reasons are (in random order):
Well you've been following GNOME development for longer than many of
us. What is it that's making GNOME 3 rel
I have three accessibility items.
First, I'd like to drop the HighContrastInverse & LowContrast themes.
GNOME dropped support for these two themes late this cycle and they
can no longer be set in an unpatched gnome-control-center. The idea is
that this one theme will be significantly better than t
On 16/10/12 08:19, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le 15/10/2012 21:10, Ted Gould a écrit :
>> I don't believe that
>> happened in the Q cycle, do we think that we could get upstart
> Hey,
>
> James pinged me recently because foundation is planning work for next
> cycle and wanted to know what's the most
On 16/10/12 09:23, Ted Gould wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 21:19 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
>> Le 15/10/2012 21:10, Ted Gould a écrit :
>>> I don't believe that
>>> happened in the Q cycle, do we think that we could get upstart
>> James pinged me recently because foundation is planning work fo
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Thanks for your email. Could you give details on what in ibus 1.5 is
> gnome-shell specific? Could it be adapted to work on other desktop
> environments?
http://desktopi18n.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/ibus-setup-for-1-5.png
( Compare with
On 15 October 2012 17:14, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le 03/10/2012 01:58, Ma Xiaojun a écrit :
>
>> IBus upstream is working on 1.5 branch which removed and changed some
>> feature to accommodate GNOME Shell.
>> So what about Unity?
>
> Hey,
>
> Thanks for your email. Could you give details on what
Le 03/10/2012 01:58, Ma Xiaojun a écrit :
IBus upstream is working on 1.5 branch which removed and changed some
feature to accommodate GNOME Shell.
So what about Unity?
Hey,
Thanks for your email. Could you give details on what in ibus 1.5 is
gnome-shell specific? Could it be adapted to work o
On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 21:19 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le 15/10/2012 21:10, Ted Gould a écrit :
> > I don't believe that
> > happened in the Q cycle, do we think that we could get upstart
>
> James pinged me recently because foundation is planning work for next
> cycle and wanted to know wha
Hi everyone,
Some changes to unity this cycle means that "unity --reset" doesn't
work. Didrocks sort of explained what needed to happen to make it work
and J Phani Mahesh stepped up to the plate taking a stab at it.
-
https://bitbucket.org/jpmahesh/unity-reset/src/00e73b345dae/reset-gio.py?at=ma
Le 13/10/2012 21:33, Dylan McCall a écrit :
I agree with you to the extent that Nautilus 3.6 doesn't fit well with
Unity, but this is not localized to Nautilus. This is _almost every
GNOME app going forwards_.
Right, at the same time I think you listed most of GNOME there, so going
"forwards" it
Le 15/10/2012 21:10, Ted Gould a écrit :
I don't believe that
happened in the Q cycle, do we think that we could get upstart
Hey,
James pinged me recently because foundation is planning work for next
cycle and wanted to know what's the most important on the list for
desktop. I said it would b
On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 09:02 +0200, Didier Roche wrote:
> In the past cycles, we saw our memory need for an user session
> increasing quite a lot. One of the consequence is that our battery life
> on laptop diminished.
> I think having a session discussing and trying to review if we can work
> on
I'm a fan of this for quality reasons.
Shipping very latest GNOME used to give Ubuntu a cutting edge feel, but
nowadays, shiny new Ubuntu features tend to come from Unity and
friends. The interesting new user-facing changes that GNOME brings are
(mostly) in Shell. So I don't think the defaul
Le 15/10/2012 19:50, Sebastien Bacher a écrit :
- the new version of libraries might have APIs our app writers might
want to use
On that I would note that we should keep a ppa for the unstable serie
packages, open to contributions. Most app writer do want to target users
of stable users out
Hey,
That's a "classic", we usually review our plans for GNOME for the next
cycle.
That's going to be a controversial topic but I want to suggest we stay
on stable GNOME this cycle, the reasons are (in random order):
- tracking unstable GNOME is taking lot of resources that we don't
invest
Adding ubuntu-doc to the CC list as this seems more a FF/UIFE
discussion than a -desktop discussion.
On 15 October 2012 03:43, Didier Roche wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> as you probably know already, PS is our upstream for a lot of desktop
> components nowadays (Unity, compiz, webapps, indicators, m
On 10/15/2012 02:43 AM, Didier Roche wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> as you probably know already, PS is our upstream for a lot of desktop
> components nowadays (Unity, compiz, webapps, indicators, multi touch
> stack...).
> The past cycle has been a real ride in term of features, which spawn
> the rele
In case anyone does not know what PS stands for (which I am sure many
don't). Its Product Strategy previously called DX-team.
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Didier Roche wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> as you probably know already, PS is our upstream for a lot of desktop
> components nowadays (Un
Hey everyone,
as you probably know already, PS is our upstream for a lot of desktop
components nowadays (Unity, compiz, webapps, indicators, multi touch
stack...).
The past cycle has been a real ride in term of features, which spawn the
release team, translation team and documentation team wit
Hey guys,
In the past cycles, we saw our memory need for an user session
increasing quite a lot. One of the consequence is that our battery life
on laptop diminished.
I think having a session discussing and trying to review if we can work
on the more offending daemons, disabling some plugins a
25 matches
Mail list logo
