If this new minimal is a good idea - perhaps it would be better not to
need GNOME Initial Setup - otherwise there's going to be 'some ubiquity
version' which works for 1 flavour?
On 11/07/17 16:58, Carl Richell wrote:
Timezone is taken care of by GNOME Initial Setup. We'd like to remove
the
Correct, the current Ubiquity would remain close to the same with two
exceptions:
Move KB Layout after the Welcome screen
Move the hostname field to the Installation Type screen
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017, at 10:01 AM, Aaron Honeycutt wrote:
> But would this all be to the current minimal version of Ubi
Timezone is taken care of by GNOME Initial Setup. We'd like to remove the
duplication.
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017, at 09:54 AM, Aaron Honeycutt wrote:
> I'm curious on why you want to remove timezone selection. All the other
> changes sound great as I would like a better partitioning setup for encrypte
Thanks Carl for starting this conversation! I'm forwarding this to
ubuntu-devel for you so that this discussion can reach a wider
audience.
Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Carl Richell wrote:
> System76 would like to use GNOME Initial Setup for user configuration.
> Curren
System76 would like to use GNOME Initial Setup for user configuration.
Currently, there is duplication with Ubiquity.
We propose changing Ubiquity to add a “minimal” mode, triggered by a kernel
parameter (a flag similar to how OEM install is triggered now). This enables
flavors to use whichever
