On 5 February 2010 16:53, David A. Cobb wrote:
>
> Above all, never never compromise the principle that the user is the one to
> say what her experience should look like -- no matter what marketing choices
> Canonical gets involved in.
In principle, user is in charge of ~1 million settings. Obvio
2009/11/3 Jo-Erlend Schinstad :
> I've always felt that calling a computer system "intuitive" is, at best,
> misleading. My understanding of the word "intuition", is that it's some
> vague and abstract understanding of something. The use of a computer
> system should be based on a clear and precise
Hello
2009/6/17 Nordin Ingenieur
> For example, a year ago my brother ... get his wireless networkcard working.
I estimate your brother's card has neither free nor proprietary driver.
Unfortunately this case is not diagnosed to user (so he/she will
wonder what work remains to be done by an user)
Dereck
> "Software Library" reflects what it really is IMHO.
Or Program Catalog or Application Repository (a packager's preferred :-) ) or
Gadgets Database or some other combination. People usually do not care about
name of a tool as long as it does what they want. And as long as they can
find
2008/10/29 A. Walton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 12:21 PM, petr bug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 2008/10/29 A. Walton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> It's perfectly supported as designed. Put some template in ~/Templates
>>> and enj
Hi
Basically I see the "Create Document" menu equivalent (in
abuse-ability sense) to the "Main Menu" (the one in top left for
launching all the applications). Any package or user that can add item
there can abuse it.
So if ugly distro or super-user clutter either of the menus then
super-user can
