W dniu 08.10.2011 17:29, Frank pisze:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 11:59 PM, Shane Fagan
mailto:shanepatrickfa...@ubuntu.com>> wrote:
Hey Didier,
> People trying to use video have the same critics that when
> they don't look the audio support: slow to start, confusing
interface and
Le mercredi 05 octobre 2011 à 15:17 +1100, Robert Ancell a écrit :
> in a simple mode (much like Shotwell does for browsing photos) is can
> cover both the "managed" and "ad-hoc" use cases
One comment about "simple mode" or "easy and light preview" needs that
came a few times in the discussion, t
Le lundi 10 octobre 2011 à 11:03 +0200, Martin Pitt a écrit :
> My gut feeling is that introducing clutter into main, and dealing with
> all the fallout is not a good idea for LTS. If clutter is the future,
> then 12.10 is a good cycle to give it some testing.
Hum, I'm not sure I agree with that,
Sebastien Bacher [2011-10-04 20:49 +0200]:
> Should we go for the new version and deal with issues or stay safe with
> the old version using xv, or look for a different video player to use?
My gut feeling is that introducing clutter into main, and dealing with
all the fallout is not a good idea fo
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 11:59 PM, Shane Fagan
wrote:
> Hey Didier,
>
> > People trying to use video have the same critics that when
> > they don't look the audio support: slow to start, confusing interface and
> so
> > on.
>
> Well there is a bit of an interesting give and take here and it should
>
Shane Fagan wrote on 05/10/11 07:59:
>
Hey Didier,
People trying to use video have the same critics that when
they don't look the audio support: slow to start, confusing interface
and so on.
Well there is a bit of an interesting give and take here and it should
be talked about. The people who
I see no conflict between Totem and Banshee at all. I hadn't even
noticed that Banshee can be used for video at all, until very recently.
All labels everywhere refer to it as a music player.
I like Banshee for music. I've started testing it for videos as well and
it might be nice for that, eve
Hey Didier,
> People trying to use video have the same critics that when
> they don't look the audio support: slow to start, confusing interface and so
> on.
Well there is a bit of an interesting give and take here and it should
be talked about. The people who complain about a player being slow t
Le 05/10/2011 06:17, Robert Ancell a écrit On 05/10/11 10:07, Luke
Yelavich wrote:
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 06:41:17AM EST, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
On 4 October 2011 14:49, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
We probably don't want to switch video players in a lts cycle but not
sure if we should go with the ne
On 05/10/11 10:07, Luke Yelavich wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 06:41:17AM EST, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
>> On 4 October 2011 14:49, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
>>> We probably don't want to switch video players in a lts cycle but not
>>> sure if we should go with the new version (we staying on 3.0 which
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 06:41:17AM EST, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> On 4 October 2011 14:49, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> > We probably don't want to switch video players in a lts cycle but not
> > sure if we should go with the new version (we staying on 3.0 which still
> > uses xv for Oneiric). Clutter-gs
On 4 October 2011 14:49, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> We probably don't want to switch video players in a lts cycle but not
> sure if we should go with the new version (we staying on 3.0 which still
> uses xv for Oneiric). Clutter-gst might introduce issues (vblank was
> mentioning as a potential iss
Hey,
Not sure if that one should be in the GNOME spec, but totem 3.2 switched
to have only clutter-gst as a video playing backend (i.e no xv backend).
We probably don't want to switch video players in a lts cycle but not
sure if we should go with the new version (we staying on 3.0 which still
use
13 matches
Mail list logo
