This is a daily health check report on the Ubuntu Studio CD images.
If you have any questions, contact Colin Watson cjwat...@ubuntu.com.
ubuntustudio/daily: Uninstallable packages:
lmms 0.4.7-2ubuntu1 produces uninstallable binaries:
* lmms (amd64 i386)
ubuntustudio-meta 0.75 produces
Is this something that will work with any of the Kernels that Ubuntu Studio
uses?
http://blogs.computerworld.com/node/17371/print
The *patch* [2] by Linux kernel developer Mike Galbraith adds a mere 233
lines of code to the kernel's scheduler, but it cuts desktop latency down by
a factor of ten.
= Meeting Minutes =
[[http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/11/16/%23ubuntu-meeting.txt|IRC Log of the
meeting.]]
BR
[[http://voices.canonical.com/kernelteam|Meeting minutes.]]
== Agenda ==
[[https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Meeting#Tues, 16 Nov, 2010|20101116
Meeting Agenda]]
=== ARM Status
On 11/15/2010 05:53 PM, Allison Randal wrote:
The fortnightly Tech Board meeting is tomorrow, and the ARB is conscious
of the fact that we're already a couple weeks out from UDS, and still
blocking all applications in our queue. So we're submitting this for
discussion in the meeting, with the
On 11/16/2010 11:38 AM, Rick Spencer wrote:
Does /opt/ubuntu/ perhaps suggest a bit of officialness or support
from the Ubuntu community, whereas these apps are specifically *not*
suppose to have such a connotation?
That was mentioned in the meeting. Also the possibility of going with
simply
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Kees Cook k...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Not a peep that I'm aware of. I am assuming that the verbose errors out
of strace, ltrace, and gdb were enough to address it, though maybe there
won't be noise until the restriction is in an LTS version.
I assume you're planning
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 13:16 -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:04:55PM +0100, Soren Hansen wrote:
On 16-11-2010 18:50, Kees Cook wrote:
I figure we could add a useful error message to dmesg to provide
education about the change, which would suggest using sudo or
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 15:42 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Tuesday, November 16, 2010 03:21:46 pm Allison Randal wrote:
On 11/16/2010 12:08 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
IIRC, FHS expects /opt/vendor/package. Perhaps Canonical should
register canonical if they haven't already and then
Since I've run into this problem myself:
http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/tips/7223/1/
This might be something to look for when building the oo3.3 packages for
11.04..
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
