-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17/02/11 18:02, Martin Pool wrote:
> I'd like to do a new feature in Launchpad to help Ubuntu, which is
> to allow packages to be built directly from source package
> branches. This would address one of the messy parts of source
> package branches
I'd like to do a new feature in Launchpad to help Ubuntu, which is to
allow packages to be built directly from source package branches.
This would address one of the messy parts of source package branches
at the moment, which is the need to upload the package, mark it
uploaded, and also push the br
Am Mittwoch, den 16.02.2011, 17:32 -0500 schrieb Andrew
Starr-Bochicchio:
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 1:58 AM, Emmet Hikory wrote:
> >The DMB will review the results of the poll at the next meeting
> > (14th February 2011, 12:00 UTC), and expects that the renewed board
> > will first meet sometim
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 1:58 AM, Emmet Hikory wrote:
> The DMB will review the results of the poll at the next meeting
> (14th February 2011, 12:00 UTC), and expects that the renewed board
> will first meet sometime around the end of the month (schedule to be
> determined based on availability o
A good days work . . .
Bug #688085 -- Guest kernel hang during boot when KVM is active on i386
host
* Fix has already been released - set to Released
Bug #153768 -- External SATA (eSATA) removable disk detected as
system-internal
* Patch has been rejected once by the upstream maintainer, and
Hi,
Every Thursday at 15:00 UTC.
We'll be having the usual IRC meeting on #ubuntu-meeting, on
Thursday 2011-02-17 at 15:00 UTC.
The meeting agenda is available here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MobileTeam/Meeting/2011/20110217
The meeting history page with links to prior meetings is at:
h
Hi
A few months back John Baer approacedh Edubuntu and offered some
assitance in creating a wallpaper for Edubuntu. He helped us create the
spec on the Ubuntu wiki[1], and since then, there have been a bunch of
submissions on the Flickr group[2].
>From the Edubuntu side we're happy to have receiv
On Feb 03, 2011, at 03:56 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>So now that Natty main support for Python 2.7 looks pretty good, the question
>is: do we drop Python 2.6 from Natty?
Just to bring closure to this thread: consensus is to keep Python 2.6 for
Natty and remove it early in Natty+1.
Thanks for your
Hello,
I received quite a few helpful suggestions about how one could partially
solve the problem I describe below so I am more confused than if there
were only one way to do it :)
For an ARM blueprint [1] concerning updating boot firmware on certain
boards, one of the requirements is to not
