On Tuesday, August 02, 2011 07:44:27 PM Nathan Handler wrote:
> Finally, I'd like to mention that there is nothing stopping a board
> member from doing some preliminary reviewing of an application prior
> to the meeting. If this is done, they can cast a vote ahead of time
> (if they have no further
On Tuesday, August 02, 2011 04:04:31 PM Chase Douglas wrote:
> On 08/02/2011 12:43 PM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Bryce Harrington
wrote:
> >> Sounds like a good idea to me. It makes it analogous to other processes
> >> such as the sponsorship, MIR, SRU, etc. pro
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Chase Douglas
wrote:
> True, but progress sometimes means change. I think this system would
> work better, and if proven right it could be a model for other boards to
> adopt. If it's worse, then the DMB can easily switch back. I would also
> be happy to be a guinea
Excerpts from Chase Douglas's message of Tue Aug 02 09:33:59 -0700 2011:
> Hi all,
>
> Yesterday I attempted to attend a DMB meeting, but unfortunately only
> two members showed so there wasn't a quorum. I think I've been to about
> an equal number of meetings where quorum has and has not been rea
A follow-up. It is the Indicator Applet Session that is not working. I
have tried removing/re-adding but this does not change the behavior.
However, as mentioned, I get Consolekit and dbus errors.
Also, please ignore my response on a different thread. I didn't mean
to duplicate this issue but forg
On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 13:26 -0700, Brad Figg wrote:
> For an example, take a look at any of the bugs referenced on the report:
> http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/reports/kernel-sru-workflow.html .
>
> Brad
> --
> Brad Figg brad.f...@canonical.com http://www.canonical.com
>
And at the risk o
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 01:28:54PM -0700, Chase Douglas wrote:
> On 08/02/2011 01:12 PM, Dan Chen wrote:
> > The only thing I add is that we should be cognizant of building a
> > timeout into the process using Launchpad so that applications don't
> > "spin indefinitely," e.g., "the stale five-digit
Thank you for the details. We have installed 10.04 but have an issue
at the thin clients. The logout button/menu doesn't work at the thin
clients. We get .xsession-errors entries that mention Consolekit and
also dbus issues. It is possible to right-click and add a logout icon
but that is just a
On 08/02/2011 01:38 PM, Chase Douglas wrote:
On 08/02/2011 01:26 PM, Brad Figg wrote:
On 08/02/2011 01:12 PM, Dan Chen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 16:04, Chase Douglas
wrote:
True, but progress sometimes means change. I think this system would
work better, and if proven right it could be
On 08/02/2011 01:26 PM, Brad Figg wrote:
> On 08/02/2011 01:12 PM, Dan Chen wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 16:04, Chase Douglas
>> wrote:
>>> True, but progress sometimes means change. I think this system would
>>> work better, and if proven right it could be a model for other boards to
>>> ado
On 08/02/2011 01:12 PM, Dan Chen wrote:
> The only thing I add is that we should be cognizant of building a
> timeout into the process using Launchpad so that applications don't
> "spin indefinitely," e.g., "the stale five-digit Launchpad bug
> report."
Launchpad can auto-expire bug reports that r
On 08/02/2011 01:12 PM, Dan Chen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 16:04, Chase Douglas wrote:
True, but progress sometimes means change. I think this system would
work better, and if proven right it could be a model for other boards to
adopt. If it's worse, then the DMB can easily switch back. I w
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 16:04, Chase Douglas wrote:
> True, but progress sometimes means change. I think this system would
> work better, and if proven right it could be a model for other boards to
> adopt. If it's worse, then the DMB can easily switch back. I would also
> be happy to be a guinea p
On 08/02/2011 12:43 PM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Bryce Harrington wrote:
>> Sounds like a good idea to me. It makes it analogous to other processes
>> such as the sponsorship, MIR, SRU, etc. processes that applicants may
>> already be familiar with.
>
> And drast
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> Sounds like a good idea to me. It makes it analogous to other processes
> such as the sponsorship, MIR, SRU, etc. processes that applicants may
> already be familiar with.
And drastically different from the other team membership processes
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 09:33:59AM -0700, Chase Douglas wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Yesterday I attempted to attend a DMB meeting, but unfortunately only
> two members showed so there wasn't a quorum. I think I've been to about
> an equal number of meetings where quorum has and has not been reached
> :(.
On Lucid, with a new install, the logout button (upper right) doesn't
work at the thin client. You get a very thin line, but no menu. This
makes it impossible for a user to log out. I am not sure why this
would happen at all. Clearing all the .gnome configuration files
doesn't correct the issue.
S
On 07/29/2011 11:24 AM, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
> Hola,
>
> On Fri, July 29, 2011 11:01 am, Michael Bienia wrote:
>> This leads to the next question: how much do you trust the person
>> writing the endorsement?
>>
>> Of course I trust endorsements from long-standing dev members with a
>> great reput
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Chase Douglas
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Yesterday I attempted to attend a DMB meeting, but unfortunately only
> two members showed so there wasn't a quorum. I think I've been to about
> an equal number of meetings where quorum has and has not been reached
> :(.
I just
Hi all,
Yesterday I attempted to attend a DMB meeting, but unfortunately only
two members showed so there wasn't a quorum. I think I've been to about
an equal number of meetings where quorum has and has not been reached
:(. This led me to think that there must be a better way to handle DMB
proceed
Hola,
On Fri, July 29, 2011 11:01 am, Michael Bienia wrote:
> This leads to the next question: how much do you trust the person
> writing the endorsement?
>
> Of course I trust endorsements from long-standing dev members with a
> great reputation where I trust their ability to judge the packaging
The new Ubuntu Packaging Guide is nearing completion but needs your help.
Browse it at http://developer.ubuntu.com/packaging/html/
Articles still to be written include
-traditional packaging
-working with Debian and upstreams
and in the knowledge base section articles needed on python, gnome,
Today's patch piloting involved lots of poking other people but I feel
was nonetheless productive:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-offline/+bug/819514
• ACK'd sync, subscribed archive. Contributor transitioned package to
dh_python2 in Debian, this is sync back to Ubuntu.
https://bu
23 matches
Mail list logo
