On 10/25/2011 04:46 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 25.10.2011, 12:47 -0500 schrieb Micah Gersten:
On 10/25/2011 07:19 AM, James Page wrote:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apcalc/+bug/880074
Build OK - synced from Debian testing.
Until we can sponsor syncs through the
My sponsoring shift today:
icecc SRUs (LP #697788): uploaded
checked gcc-mingw-w64 sync (#876930), gave instructions how to do this, closed
as invalid
ack courier-authlib sync (#881598)
clean up ~pali's plymouth MP states
jockey (#722936): already applied, unsubscribed sponsors
libdbusmenu
On 10/26/2011 04:22 AM, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 26.10.2011, 03:07 -0500 schrieb Micah Gersten:
On 10/25/2011 04:46 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 25.10.2011, 12:47 -0500 schrieb Micah Gersten:
On 10/25/2011 07:19 AM, James Page wrote:
Hi Scott (2011.10.26_16:01:15_+0200)
One tool to rule them all. ;)
It's probably a somewhat archaic view, but that's not a very Unix
like approach to the problem. If I was going to work on syncing a
package, I'd expect the tool for syncing packages to be the one I
wanted to use ...
But
On 10/26/2011 10:07 AM, Stefano Rivera wrote:
Hi Scott (2011.10.26_16:01:15_+0200)
One tool to rule them all. ;)
It's probably a somewhat archaic view, but that's not a very Unix
like approach to the problem. If I was going to work on syncing a
package, I'd expect the tool for syncing
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Scott Kitterman ubu...@kitterman.com wrote:
On 10/26/2011 10:07 AM, Stefano Rivera wrote:
Hi Scott (2011.10.26_16:01:15_+0200)
One tool to rule them all. ;)
It's probably a somewhat archaic view, but that's not a very Unix
like approach to the problem. If
Am Mittwoch, den 26.10.2011, 11:13 -0400 schrieb Andrew
Starr-Bochicchio:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Scott Kitterman ubu...@kitterman.com
wrote:
On 10/26/2011 10:07 AM, Stefano Rivera wrote:
Hi Scott (2011.10.26_16:01:15_+0200)
One tool to rule them all. ;)
It's probably a
Hi Mario,
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 01:19:42PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
In Mythbuntu we have a tool called Mythbuntu Control Centre (MCC) that has a
pluggable infrastructure for adding support via other packages. One of the
plugins available is a package called mythbuntu-repos. This
Hi Steve,
It actually is done as a ppa, but we mirror it to other locale specific
locations for speed purposes and use mcc to enable it for usability.
I'll ask the mythbuntu folks at uds to join that session. I'll see you
there.
Thanks,
On Oct 26, 2011 7:58 PM, Steve Langasek
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Due to the vast majority of regular team members being unavailable
this week due to travel, the weekly IRC meeting has been canceled. In
addition, due to UDS, next weeks meeting is also canceled.
The next scheduled meeting will be 11/10/11.
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 09:20:09PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
It actually is done as a ppa, but we mirror it to other locale specific
locations for speed purposes and use mcc to enable it for usability.
Oh, interesting. Perhaps we can extend apt-add-repository to handle the
case of
Fellow Ubuntu Triagers!
This week's Bug Day target is *drum roll please* Nautilus!
* 50 New bugs need a hug
* 50 Incomplete bugs need a status check
* 50 Confirmed bugs need a review
Bookmark it, add it to your calendars, turn over those egg-timers!
* Thursday 27 Oct 2011
*
Lack of encryption is a security issue that's no different from any
other protocol on a LAN (like NFS). If you don't trust the LAN then
you tunnel the connection through SSH, VPN, etc. My major problem
with scanner access is device permissions:
Lack of encryption is a security issue that's no different from any
other protocol on a LAN (like NFS). If you don't trust the LAN then
you tunnel the connection through SSH, VPN, etc. My major problem
with scanner access was the device permissions:
On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 18:32 +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
saned exists, it should not be used to share scanners over the network
because sharing scanners is a bad idea that exposes every user of said
scanners to data leak by just forgetting a sensitive document inside
the
scanner. Also, image
Hi,
I have an HP3055 which we sometimes use to scan documents.
The area is private, and tough nookies if you don't like the
fact that we share it locally.
If the decision is to be more secure, that is fine, BUT...
Please do not break current network functionality without
providing clear
16 matches
Mail list logo