Re: Patch Pilot Report 2011-10-25

2011-10-26 Thread Micah Gersten
On 10/25/2011 04:46 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote: Am Dienstag, den 25.10.2011, 12:47 -0500 schrieb Micah Gersten: On 10/25/2011 07:19 AM, James Page wrote: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apcalc/+bug/880074 Build OK - synced from Debian testing. Until we can sponsor syncs through the

Patch Pilot Report (2011-10-26)

2011-10-26 Thread Martin Pitt
My sponsoring shift today: icecc SRUs (LP #697788): uploaded checked gcc-mingw-w64 sync (#876930), gave instructions how to do this, closed as invalid ack courier-authlib sync (#881598) clean up ~pali's plymouth MP states jockey (#722936): already applied, unsubscribed sponsors libdbusmenu

Re: Patch Pilot Report 2011-10-25

2011-10-26 Thread Scott Kitterman
On 10/26/2011 04:22 AM, Benjamin Drung wrote: Am Mittwoch, den 26.10.2011, 03:07 -0500 schrieb Micah Gersten: On 10/25/2011 04:46 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote: Am Dienstag, den 25.10.2011, 12:47 -0500 schrieb Micah Gersten: On 10/25/2011 07:19 AM, James Page wrote:

Re: Patch Pilot Report 2011-10-25

2011-10-26 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi Scott (2011.10.26_16:01:15_+0200) One tool to rule them all. ;) It's probably a somewhat archaic view, but that's not a very Unix like approach to the problem. If I was going to work on syncing a package, I'd expect the tool for syncing packages to be the one I wanted to use ... But

Re: Patch Pilot Report 2011-10-25

2011-10-26 Thread Scott Kitterman
On 10/26/2011 10:07 AM, Stefano Rivera wrote: Hi Scott (2011.10.26_16:01:15_+0200) One tool to rule them all. ;) It's probably a somewhat archaic view, but that's not a very Unix like approach to the problem. If I was going to work on syncing a package, I'd expect the tool for syncing

Re: Patch Pilot Report 2011-10-25

2011-10-26 Thread Andrew Starr-Bochicchio
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Scott Kitterman ubu...@kitterman.com wrote: On 10/26/2011 10:07 AM, Stefano Rivera wrote: Hi Scott (2011.10.26_16:01:15_+0200) One tool to rule them all. ;) It's probably a somewhat archaic view, but that's not a very Unix like approach to the problem.  If

Re: Patch Pilot Report 2011-10-25

2011-10-26 Thread Benjamin Drung
Am Mittwoch, den 26.10.2011, 11:13 -0400 schrieb Andrew Starr-Bochicchio: On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Scott Kitterman ubu...@kitterman.com wrote: On 10/26/2011 10:07 AM, Stefano Rivera wrote: Hi Scott (2011.10.26_16:01:15_+0200) One tool to rule them all. ;) It's probably a

Re: Adding a feature to enable a third party repository to an application

2011-10-26 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Mario, On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 01:19:42PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote: In Mythbuntu we have a tool called Mythbuntu Control Centre (MCC) that has a pluggable infrastructure for adding support via other packages. One of the plugins available is a package called mythbuntu-repos. This

Re: Adding a feature to enable a third party repository to an application

2011-10-26 Thread Mario Limonciello
Hi Steve, It actually is done as a ppa, but we mirror it to other locale specific locations for speed purposes and use mcc to enable it for usability. I'll ask the mythbuntu folks at uds to join that session. I'll see you there. Thanks, On Oct 26, 2011 7:58 PM, Steve Langasek

ARM IRC Meeting Canceled Next Two Weeks

2011-10-26 Thread Michael Casadevall
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Due to the vast majority of regular team members being unavailable this week due to travel, the weekly IRC meeting has been canceled. In addition, due to UDS, next weeks meeting is also canceled. The next scheduled meeting will be 11/10/11.

Re: Adding a feature to enable a third party repository to an application

2011-10-26 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 09:20:09PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote: It actually is done as a ppa, but we mirror it to other locale specific locations for speed purposes and use mcc to enable it for usability. Oh, interesting. Perhaps we can extend apt-add-repository to handle the case of

Announcing the Next Ubuntu Bug Day! - Thursday 27 Oct 2011

2011-10-26 Thread Pedro Villavicencio
Fellow Ubuntu Triagers! This week's Bug Day target is *drum roll please* Nautilus! * 50 New bugs need a hug * 50 Incomplete bugs need a status check * 50 Confirmed bugs need a review Bookmark it, add it to your calendars, turn over those egg-timers! * Thursday 27 Oct 2011 *

Re: Ubuntu-devel-discuss Digest, Vol 59, Issue 18

2011-10-26 Thread Jeff Hanson
Lack of encryption is a security issue that's no different from any other protocol on a LAN (like NFS). If you don't trust the LAN then you tunnel the connection through SSH, VPN, etc. My major problem with scanner access is device permissions:

Re: libsane and acl group selection in udev rules

2011-10-26 Thread Jeff Hanson
Lack of encryption is a security issue that's no different from any other protocol on a LAN (like NFS). If you don't trust the LAN then you tunnel the connection through SSH, VPN, etc. My major problem with scanner access was the device permissions:

Re: libsane and acl group selection in udev rules

2011-10-26 Thread Martin Owens
On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 18:32 +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote: saned exists, it should not be used to share scanners over the network because sharing scanners is a bad idea that exposes every user of said scanners to data leak by just forgetting a sensitive document inside the scanner. Also, image

Re: libsane and acl group selection in udev rules

2011-10-26 Thread LD 'Gus' Landis
Hi, I have an HP3055 which we sometimes use to scan documents. The area is private, and tough nookies if you don't like the fact that we share it locally. If the decision is to be more secure, that is fine, BUT... Please do not break current network functionality without providing clear