Excerpts from Dave Walker's message of Mon Nov 28 16:50:07 -0800 2011:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 04:15:43PM -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > I was just reviewing the SRU's that Chuck Short uploaded for keystone,
> > nova, and glance to oneiric-proposed, and it strikes me that really
> > OpenStack core
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 04:15:43PM -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
> I was just reviewing the SRU's that Chuck Short uploaded for keystone,
> nova, and glance to oneiric-proposed, and it strikes me that really
> OpenStack core components should go through the MicroReleaseException
> process.
>
> Upstrea
On 11/28/2011 11:44 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 09:40:53AM -0700, Tim Gardner wrote:
non-pae has a ginormous and ugly NX emulation patch
This is about dropping non-PAE support, not dropping non-NX support. The NX
emulation patch must remain in the kernel since a large number o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Every Thursday at 15:00 UTC.
We'll be having the usual IRC meeting on #ubuntu-meeting, on
Thursday 2011-12-01 at 15:00 UTC.
The meeting agenda is available here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ARM/Meeting/2011/20111201
The meeting history p
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 09:40:53AM -0700, Tim Gardner wrote:
> non-pae has a ginormous and ugly NX emulation patch
This is about dropping non-PAE support, not dropping non-NX support. The NX
emulation patch must remain in the kernel since a large number of systems
have PAE but not NX.
You can see
On 11/14/2011 08:43 AM, Daniel Holbach wrote:
> Am 14.11.2011 17:36, schrieb Scott Kitterman:
>> On 11/14/2011 11:21 AM, Allison Randal wrote:
>>> I'll propose a compromise: how about we remove REVU from the
>>> documentation for new packagers, so we're not pointing people there
>>> first anymore.
On 11/28/2011 01:37 AM, Daniel Holbach wrote:
> Hello Martin,
>
> thanks for your reply.
>
> Am 28.11.2011 09:42, schrieb Martin Pool:
>>> I think it might be helpful to rename the Packaging Guide to something a
>>> bit more clear, like Ubuntu Platform Development Guide or Ubuntu
>>> Platform Gui
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Tim Gardner wrote:
> It is my recommendation that folks running PAE incapable CPUs stay on Lucid
> (10.04), a release for which they'll still receive more then 3 years of
> official support.
No longer matters for the 5 year old computer in my family (switching
ba
On 11/09/2011 02:43 PM, Tim Gardner wrote:
Per discussion at UDS the kernel team is proposing to drop the non-PAE
i386 flavour. The upgrade path for non-PAE users will be the PAE kernel.
Those CPUs that do not have i686 and PAE support will be orphaned. To
the best of my knowledge, these include
Hello Martin,
thanks for your reply.
Am 28.11.2011 09:42, schrieb Martin Pool:
>> I think it might be helpful to rename the Packaging Guide to something a
>> bit more clear, like Ubuntu Platform Development Guide or Ubuntu
>> Platform Guide or something along those lines.
>
> I think it probably
> The Packaging Guide received lots of fixes and improvements in the last
> few months and while packaging still is an important part of it, there
> is increasingly more content around dealing with the infrastructure or
> how development processes work.
>
> http://developer.ubuntu.com/packag
11 matches
Mail list logo
