I'm sure I'm doing something wrong, but not sure what.
I'm trying to just set up a launchpad build of two branches, one 'trunk'
that launchpad is pulling from an svn repo, and a packaging only branch.
I'm not quite sure why there would be expected to be a tag
'upstream-0.9.4+r4177' as that string
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012, James Westby wrote:
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012 17:15:24 -0500 (EST), Scott Moser smo...@ubuntu.com
wrote:
I'm sure I'm doing something wrong, but not sure what.
I'm trying to just set up a launchpad build of two branches, one 'trunk'
that launchpad is pulling from an svn
Hi Dieter,
I'm not sure I understand your request. The file you seem you mean is from
the Linux kernel package (linux_3.2.0-17.27.diff.gz), which collects all
the various patches Ubuntu carries for the kernel.
The routine you've quoted is from the NX-emulation patchset from:
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 12:56:13AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
Hi Gary,
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 05:08:36PM -0500, Gary Poster wrote:
aufs was reliable for us on Oneiric when creating ephemeral lxc
instances based on an underlying template. The most recent
overlayfs issue that we discovered
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 09:19:48AM +, Dieter Miosga wrote:
Please change in file linux_32.0-17.27.diff
at line 5268, and all following and preceding occurences , to
--- linux-3.2.0.orig/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
+++ linux-3.2.0/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
@@ -663,6 +663,16 @@
unsigned
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 03:27:33PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
Tim Edwards [2012-02-17 11:49 +0100]:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012, at 07:23 AM, Martin Pitt wrote:
linux-headers-* is already covered by apt-get autoremove, which is
good. Perhaps we can mark older kernels as auto-removable as well, so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Seems you are trying to be truly agile with a system that isn't :p I
have lost my fan-ness of the tools used during the development process
in the Ubuntu world myself. It is as fragmented as Linux is these
days. I have never been a fan of the
Scott Kitterman [2012-03-01 11:25 -0500]:
It was my understanding that the primary purpose of U/I and string freeze was
to allow documentation developers and translators time to get their work done.
Mine as well.
I was actually quite surprised when Rodney pointed out the ... in the
default
On Friday, March 02, 2012 05:15:36 PM Martin Pitt wrote:
Scott Kitterman [2012-03-01 11:25 -0500]:
It was my understanding that the primary purpose of U/I and string
freeze was to allow documentation developers and translators time to
get their work done.
Mine as well.
I was actually
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 08:55:58PM -0800, Chase Douglas wrote:
I'm beginning to think that this is all so complicated even when we
try to be verbose and convey things as accurately as possible that
nothing short of it just works perfectly and exactly how I wanted
will be good enough. Although
On 03/02/2012 10:14 AM, Bryce Harrington wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 08:55:58PM -0800, Chase Douglas wrote:
I'm beginning to think that this is all so complicated even when we
try to be verbose and convey things as accurately as possible that
nothing short of it just works perfectly and
On Mar 01, 2012, at 11:35 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
As a former tap-to-click hater who has come back around, I think this
was largely a result of the drivers being deficient at identifying
intentional vs. unintentional touches to the touchpad.
With each release, this behavior has gotten better.. in
On Feb 29, 2012, at 05:22 PM, Bryce Harrington wrote:
* There are several different loose categories of devices we're talking
about:
+ Integrated Apple pads in laptops
+ Apple magic touch mice, plugged in via USB(?)
+ Integrated pads in netbooks (like Dell Mini V)
+ Others?
Apple
13 matches
Mail list logo
