On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:15:40PM -0700, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> I'm still confused here, since unless I'm mistaken I can link
> proprietary programs with LGPL-3+ software, but evidently not GPL 2
> programs?
> That implies there's something in the GPL-2 itself that prohibits
> such a thing, but I
On 7/31/12 9:05 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 31, 2012 08:36:59 PM Scott Ritchie wrote:
On 7/31/12 6:38 AM, Marc Deslauriers wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 15:25 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
Le 31/07/2012 15:22, Marc Deslauriers a écrit :
without checking licensing first.
Than
On Tuesday, July 31, 2012 08:36:59 PM Scott Ritchie wrote:
> On 7/31/12 6:38 AM, Marc Deslauriers wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 15:25 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> >> Le 31/07/2012 15:22, Marc Deslauriers a écrit :
> >>> without checking licensing first.
> >>
> >> Thanks for the reply, can y
On 7/31/12 6:38 AM, Marc Deslauriers wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 15:25 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
Le 31/07/2012 15:22, Marc Deslauriers a écrit :
without checking licensing first.
Thanks for the reply, can you give some specifics about the changes and
what to check?
gnutls went from LGP
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 5:26 AM, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I'm looking at merging the new gnutls26 and 28 from Debian, since our
> versions are a bit outdated, and I was wondering if we are holding on 26 by
> default for a reason or if just didn't happen yet because nobody got time
> for
= Meeting Minutes =
[[http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2012/07/31/%23ubuntu-meeting.txt|IRC Log of
the meeting.]]
[[http://voices.canonical.com/kernelteam|Meeting minutes.]]
== Agenda ==
[[https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Meeting#Tues, 31 Jul, 2012|20120731
Meeting Agenda]]
=== ARM Status
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 09:38:12AM -0400, Marc Deslauriers wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 15:25 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> > Le 31/07/2012 15:22, Marc Deslauriers a écrit :
> > > without checking licensing first.
> > Thanks for the reply, can you give some specifics about the changes and
> >
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 15:25 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le 31/07/2012 15:22, Marc Deslauriers a écrit :
> > without checking licensing first.
> Thanks for the reply, can you give some specifics about the changes and
> what to check?
gnutls went from LGPL-2.1+ to LGPL-3+, so it can't be linke
Le 31/07/2012 15:22, Marc Deslauriers a écrit :
without checking licensing first.
Thanks for the reply, can you give some specifics about the changes and
what to check?
--
Sebastien Bacher
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://l
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 11:26 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I'm looking at merging the new gnutls26 and 28 from Debian, since our
> versions are a bit outdated, and I was wondering if we are holding on 26
> by default for a reason or if just didn't happen yet because nobody got
> time
Today was my first Patch Pilot session, so was co-piloting with apw.
- https://bugs.launchpad.net/upstart/+bug/1018925
Reviewed and merged upstream.
- https://code.launchpad.net/~lool/upstart/document-stop-in-pre-start
Reviewed and merged upstream.
- https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source
Hey,
I'm looking at merging the new gnutls26 and 28 from Debian, since our
versions are a bit outdated, and I was wondering if we are holding on 26
by default for a reason or if just didn't happen yet because nobody got
time for it?
Debian made 28 the default over 6 months ago and it seems i
12 matches
Mail list logo
