New Ubuntu Studio 16.04 is really beautiful.

New Ubuntu Studio 16.04 interface is really beautiful. I seriously think shifting to this distro later this autumn at least. Congratulations for the whole team you have done a good work! With Best Regards, Tommi P. Laiho Tel. +358-400-593477

about offline update

Has ubuntu implemented the offline update by systemd? yan...@iscas.ac.cn -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss

Re: mmutable Page

Alan Pope schreef op 22-04-16 00:11: > Thankfully you don't need to trust it for it to be true. We made a > rapid and logical decision to mitigate the relentless spam we were > getting. This isn't a perfect solution. It's now harder for people to > do drive by edits, and we (admins) are getting

Re: mmutable Page

Hi Ralf, On 21 April 2016 at 21:19, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 20:57:35 +0100, floccul...@gmx.co.uk wrote: >>Not sure that joining a LP group is really that much of a hardship >>tbh. >

Re: Immutable Page

On 21 April 2016 at 20:53, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Indeed, it changed, > https://help.ubuntu.com/community/WikiGuide#Contributing , but there's > no explanation why. > > I guess I will not continue to contribute to those pages. Is there valid > a reason to make it extra

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Immutable Page

On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 20:57:35 +0100, floccul...@gmx.co.uk wrote: >Not sure that joining a LP group is really that much of a hardship tbh. (https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-devel/2016-April/007640.html) Did you notice that e.g. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases was last edited

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Immutable Page

On 21/04/16 20:53, Ralf Mardorf wrote: On Thu, 2016-04-21 at 20:43 +0100, floccul...@gmx.co.uk wrote: as far as I am aware you need to be in the etherpad users launchpad group to edit https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-etherpad Thank you, when did this change? I always could log in with my

Re: Immutable Page

On Thu, 2016-04-21 at 20:43 +0100, floccul...@gmx.co.uk wrote: > as far as I am aware you need to be in the etherpad users launchpad  > group to edit > > https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-etherpad Thank you, when did this change? I always could log in with my launchpad/Ubuntu one account and edit

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Immutable Page

On Thu, 2016-04-21 at 20:43 +0100, floccul...@gmx.co.uk wrote: > as far as I am aware you need to be in the etherpad users launchpad  > group to edit > > https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-etherpad Thank you, when did this change? I always could log in with my launchpad/Ubuntu one account and edit

Re: Immutable Page

On 21/04/16 20:40, Ralf Mardorf wrote: Hi, I suspect that all Ubuntu Wiki and help pages aren't editable, due to the issues Ubuntu pages had a few days ago. Is there already a date, when those sites become editable again? Regards, Ralf as far as I am aware you need to be in the etherpad users

Immutable Page

Hi, I suspect that all Ubuntu Wiki and help pages aren't editable, due to the issues Ubuntu pages had a few days ago. Is there already a date, when those sites become editable again? Regards, Ralf -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or

[ubuntu-studio-devel] Immutable Page

Hi, I suspect that all Ubuntu Wiki and help pages aren't editable, due to the issues Ubuntu pages had a few days ago. Is there already a date, when those sites become editable again? Regards, Ralf -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or

Re: Default languages strategy for Ubuntu desktop CD

2016-04-21 10:59 GMT+03:00 Timo Jyrinki : > though, there may be new hurdles hurdles to overcome. I did a quick > test run yesterday evening but somehow it seemed unbootable ("Failed > to load ldlinux.c32"), I'll need to look into it during the weekend. Ehem, I looked at

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] 16.04 Release Candidate Testing - for release Thursday 21st

On Thu, 21 Apr 2016, Thomas Pfundt wrote: I have never had that happen. I do rename files, but from your comments further down not as much as you do. Were you able to reproduce this though? It can be done in a matter of seconds, in fact, probably even faster than me typing this. I'm really

Unblock p7zip 9.20.1~dfsg.1-5 from xenial-proposed

Dear all, p7zip has been stuck in xenial-proposed since 2016-01-31 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/p7zip It failed to build on ppc64el https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/p7zip/9.20.1~dfsg.1-5/+build/8920269 Could this be fixed and moved to released? Thanks, Amr --

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] 16.04 Release Candidate Testing - for release Thursday 21st

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016, at 10:41 PM, Thomas Pfundt wrote: >however I noticed that some of the titles in the slideshow that > are displayed while installing received line breaks, because apparently > the text is too long to be displayed in one line. The problem with this > is that the field in

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] 16.04 Release Candidate Testing - for release Thursday 21st

On Thu, Apr 21, 2016, at 02:30 PM, Thomas Pfundt wrote: > Hi Len, > > thanks for your reply. > > > Thankyou for testing in other languages. I have not noticed this on my > > system, but that is because I can only read english. > > Well, as far as languages go, I could only test Italian and

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] 16.04 Release Candidate Testing - for release Thursday 21st

Hi Len, thanks for your reply. > Thankyou for testing in other languages. I have not noticed this on my > system, but that is because I can only read english. Well, as far as languages go, I could only test Italian and maybe French in terms of spelling, but I guess it would just generally be

Re: Default languages strategy for Ubuntu desktop CD

2015-12-01 10:06 GMT+02:00 Didier Roche : > Some loco team used to have respin of the default localized ubuntu image. > Yours truly used to have handle this quite regularly for the french loco > team. I know that the italian and finnish locos used to do it as well (not > sure

Re: How to recompile 'gcc-4.9-4.9.2' package with different prefix?

Can I use something like this: apt-get build-dep -y gcc-4.9-multilib apt-get source -y gcc-4.9-multilib dpkg-source -x gcc-4.9_4.9.2-0ubuntu1~12.04.dsc cd gcc-4.9-4.9.2 *PF=opt/dev-tools-4.9* dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -b Or this: apt-get build-dep -y gcc-4.9-multilib apt-get source -y