As of about two minutes ago, zesty has entered the final beta freeze,
with a goal of releasing Final Beta images sometime late Thursday.
The queue freeze will last from now until final release in April,
which means that all seeded packages will now need a spot-check and
review in the queue from a
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=847099
On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 21:18:22 -0600 Patrick Beeson wrote:
> Bump. At the very least the single line change needs to be made to imp.h
>
> https://github.com/jbeder/yaml-cpp/pull/303/files
HELP!!!
You have more than
I'm pleased to announce that the DMB voted to grant Ross Gammon
Contributing Developer on 2017-02-27.
Welcome Ross, and sorry for the late announcement.
On behalf of the DMB,
Robie
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 09:32:38AM -0500, Eric Desrochers wrote:
> Yes, I'll prepare my application for the sru-uploader team for the next DMB
> meeting.
The DMB considered Eric's application on 13 March and I'm pleased to
report that it was successful with a unanimous vote.
Eric is the first
On 02/23/2017 12:47 AM, Seth Arnold wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 04:42:46PM -0300, Till Kamppeter wrote:
So it looks like that we need to work with an extra interface (dummy0 with
IPv6) and find a way to let Avahi broadcast the interface's own host name or
Would you mind changing the name
Андрей Воронов wrote:
> I use VirtualBox 5.1 from repository:
> deb http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/debian xenial contrib
> but the package virtualbox-ext-pack is trying download version 5.0:
> Is it scenario incorrect code or may you advise me way to avoid this
> fault?
I think this
On Mon, 20 Mar 2017 11:12:09 +0300, Андрей Воронов wrote:
>I use VirtualBox 5.1 from repository:
>
>deb http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/debian xenial contrib
>
>but the package virtualbox-ext-pack is trying download version 5.0:
Hi,
you are using a third party repository.
It's not an
Hello
I use VirtualBox 5.1 from repository:
deb http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/debian xenial contrib
but the package virtualbox-ext-pack is trying download version 5.0:
===
LANG=C apt-get dist-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state
I'll try to join.
-serge
Quoting Michael Terry (michael.te...@canonical.com):
> I'd be happy to help. I can do the 29th.
>
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Steve Langasek
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 02:02:28PM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> > > On Fri,
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> I believe aptdaemon is effectively abandoned. It's been removed from Debian
> but it's still hanging around in Ubuntu due to a few reverse dependencies:
>
> % reverse-depends aptdaemon
> Reverse-Depends
> ===
>
Hello,
When I tried to run the perf performance analysis tool (which is a part of
the kernel) on kernel v4.9.x or v4.10.x, I realized that the linux-tools
package of the respective kernel versions on which it depends are not yet
included in the Ubuntu repository. Also, I could not find them
== Meeting information ==
* #ubuntu-meeting: ubuntu-server-team, 21 Feb at 16:00 16:31 UTC
* Full logs at
[[http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2017/ubuntu-meeting.2017-02-21-16.00.log.html]]
== Meeting summary ==
=== Review ACTION points from previous meeting ===
The
2017-03-15 20:44 GMT+01:00 Barry Warsaw :
> I believe aptdaemon is effectively abandoned. It's been removed from Debian
> but it's still hanging around in Ubuntu due to a few reverse dependencies:
>
> % reverse-depends aptdaemon
> Reverse-Depends
> ===
> *
Minutes and action times from today's server team meeting are now posted
available here:
https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2017/ubuntu-meeting.2017-02-28-16.00.html
Next week's agenda is available here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/Meeting
Thanks!
---
Joshua Powers
Just piping in to voice that oem-config-gtk is currently quite essential
to system vendors shipping Ubuntu Desktop. Any action taken here should
avoid breaking oem installs for 17.04, 17.10, etc. Whether that means
keeping aptdaemon around or porting oem-config-gtk, I don't have a clear
opinion
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 06:24:21PM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> > I think the gnome-software dependency is unnecessary.
>
> Ok, I dropped the aptdaemon depends from the gnome-software bzr
> packaging repository.
I think
16 matches
Mail list logo