Re: Packaging policy discussion: After=network-online.target

2021-05-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 10:07:39AM +1000, Christopher James Halse Rogers wrote: > > However, I still have the same question - what if network connectivity > > drops & gets re-established? Should we bounce the > > network-online.target (aka restart it)? We can declare for units to be > > restarted,

Re: Packaging policy discussion: After=network-online.target

2021-05-13 Thread Christopher James Halse Rogers
On Thu, May 13 2021 at 17:34:58 +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 4:12 PM Steve Langasek wrote: Hi there, On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 05:52:07PM +1000, Christopher James Halse Rogers wrote: > There's an nfs-utils SRU¹ hanging around waiting for a policy decision

Bug#986512: libunity: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 check VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2

2021-05-13 Thread Baptiste Beauplat
On 2021/05/11 11:00 PM, Baptiste Beauplat wrote: > The issue may be related to this upstream issue: > > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/vala/-/issues/1167 > > I'll test using a patched version of vala and reassign if needed. The pachted version of vala in sid works and libunity build correctly

Re: Packaging policy discussion: After=network-online.target

2021-05-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 05:34:58PM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > However, I still have the same question - what if network connectivity > drops & gets re-established? Should we bounce the > network-online.target (aka restart it)? We can declare for units to be > restarted, when

Re: Packaging policy discussion: After=network-online.target

2021-05-13 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 4:12 PM Steve Langasek wrote: > > Hi there, > > On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 05:52:07PM +1000, Christopher James Halse Rogers > wrote: > > There's an nfs-utils SRU¹ hanging around waiting for a policy decision on > > use of the After=network-online.target systemd unit

Re: Packaging policy discussion: After=network-online.target

2021-05-13 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi there, On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 05:52:07PM +1000, Christopher James Halse Rogers wrote: > There's an nfs-utils SRU¹ hanging around waiting for a policy decision on > use of the After=network-online.target systemd unit dependency. I'm not an > expert here, but it looks like part of my SRU

Re: Packaging policy discussion: After=network-online.target

2021-05-13 Thread Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 12:59:39PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote: > On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 08:53:28AM -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote: > > Take kdump-tools, for example. After a system crash, it will reboot into a > > mode > > that collects a memory dump and reboot. Some times, it is

nfs-common won't restart all services after upgrade

2021-05-13 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hi, tl;dr I filed https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/1928259 found while testing https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/1927745 and verifying that rpc.gssd was not restarted after a package upgrade. Which means the fix wasn't available until the service

Re: Packaging policy discussion: After=network-online.target

2021-05-13 Thread Robie Basak
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 08:53:28AM -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote: > Take kdump-tools, for example. After a system crash, it will reboot into a > mode > that collects a memory dump and reboot. Some times, it is configured to send > the dump through the network. If the network does not

Re: Packaging policy discussion: After=network-online.target

2021-05-13 Thread Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 05:52:07PM +1000, Christopher James Halse Rogers wrote: > Hello everyone, > > There's an nfs-utils SRU¹ hanging around waiting for a policy decision on > use of the After=network-online.target systemd unit dependency. I'm not an > expert here, but it looks like part of my

Re: Packaging policy discussion: After=network-online.target

2021-05-13 Thread Robie Basak
Hi, Thank you for raising this! I have half a draft that I was preparing to debian-devel@ to try and seek consensus there on this. Since we inherit most of our packaging from Debian, I thought I'd try there in the first instance, as otherwise whatever we do in Ubuntu may end up being

Fwd: ceph: dropping support for armhf

2021-05-13 Thread James Page
Forwarding to -devel for wider discussion -- Forwarded message - From: James Page Date: Wed, May 12, 2021 at 10:00 AM Subject: ceph: dropping support for armhf To: ubuntu-server Hi -server Every cycle we go through a bit/lot of pain as new versions of Ceph are released; the

Re: Missing critical patches of several high-risk bugs

2021-05-13 Thread Seth Arnold
On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 05:47:51PM -0700, SyzScope wrote: > This is SyzScope, a research project that aims to reveal high-risk > primitives from a low-risk bug. Hello, this is pretty cool stuff. Continuing on 'executing' beyond the point when ASAN has given up has given some pretty cool results.