> > ... We are not going to completely
> overhaul
> > our development and maintenance practices and commit to a ton of
> extra
> > work (forever)...
>
> As far as I can tell, it's a gross misrepresentation of the situation
> for you to claim that this is required to del
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 05:43:33PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> ... We are not going to completely overhaul
> our development and maintenance practices and commit to a ton of extra
> work (forever)...
As far as I can tell, it's a gross misrepresentation of the situatio
> > The critical difference is that this is not a separate and
> standalone
> > utility...
>
> Yet this is the justification you're using as to why an SRU will be
> safe.
Runtime behaviour and maintenance/development workflows are very
separate and independent matters, and I've explained that at
> > The difference is that here it's the upstream maintainers asking
> for
> > this, not just users. From our point of view, not including repart
> in
> > Jammy was an oversight - there was really no reason to keep it
> > disabled, other than we noticed and asked for it too late, and we
> > should
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 05:02:32PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> The critical difference is that this is not a separate and standalone
> utility...
Yet this is the justification you're using as to why an SRU will be
safe.
It seems to me that it's perfectly possible for you to arrange a build
of a
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 03:09:45PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> The difference is that here it's the upstream maintainers asking for
> this, not just users. From our point of view, not including repart in
> Jammy was an oversight - there was really no reason to keep it
> disabled, other than we no
> > > > Unfortunately, they're currently blocked on this because 22.04
> > > doesn't
> > > > ship systemd-repart. The upstream CI uses Github Actions which
> runs
> > > on
> > > > Ubuntu Jammy and will do so until the next Ubuntu LTS is
> released.
> > >
> > > Can Github Actions not install softwa
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 7:13 PM Steve Langasek
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 11:29:34AM -0400, Nick Rosbrook wrote:
>
> > ## libxsmm FTBFS (https://pad.lv/1984111)
>
> > This FTBFS with an undefined reference to pthread_yield. Upstream
> > already has fixes for this, so I cherry-picked those.
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 02:02:57PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> It's really a lot of work for nothing,
> given the risk is really zero - it's a new command line program that is
> inhert and doesn't do anything until it's called manually...
On this point, I disagree.
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 02:02:57PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > > Unfortunately, they're currently blocked on this because 22.04
> > doesn't
> > > ship systemd-repart. The upstream CI uses Github Actions which runs
> > on
> > > Ubuntu Jammy and will do so until the next Ubuntu LTS is released.
>
> > Unfortunately, they're currently blocked on this because 22.04
> doesn't
> > ship systemd-repart. The upstream CI uses Github Actions which runs
> on
> > Ubuntu Jammy and will do so until the next Ubuntu LTS is released.
>
> Can Github Actions not install software from any other source? For
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
