+1 maintenance: June 24 - June 28

I focused on the NBS report, where I saw that a new poppler needed some reverse dependencies rebuilt. And they were not rebuilding. This is C++, and it takes a while to build, specially if the failing arch is armhf, which was the case of two packages. The common root issue was that poppler

+1 Maintenance report: week starting on 2024-02-19

My goal was to go through the python3-defaults transition and help to get it done. There was a lot of back and forth between attempt at fixes, triggers, re-runs,e tc. Here is just a summary. This is a report, not a diary :) # distutils deprecation I started going through the remaining python

Re: early +1 maintenance: jupyter-notebook FTBFS, jupyter-client update ahead of debian

Hi, On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 5:30 PM Andreas Hasenack wrote: > > Hi, > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 5:11 PM Steve Langasek > wrote: > > > > Hi Andreas, > > > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 05:05:00PM -0300, Andreas Hasenack wrote: > > > I started

Re: early +1 maintenance: jupyter-notebook FTBFS, jupyter-client update ahead of debian

Hi, On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 5:11 PM Steve Langasek wrote: > > Hi Andreas, > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 05:05:00PM -0300, Andreas Hasenack wrote: > > I started working on my +1 maintenance shift with the goal of > > trailblazing the python 3.12 migration. A few

early +1 maintenance: jupyter-notebook FTBFS, jupyter-client update ahead of debian

Hi, I started working on my +1 maintenance shift with the goal of trailblazing the python 3.12 migration. A few packages sorted already, but jupyter-notebook has me stumped, and I thought I would share this now instead of at the end of the shift. src:jupyter-notebook[1] is FTBFS[2] due to a test

Re: +1 maintenance report

Hi, On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 10:42 AM Andreas Hasenack wrote: > > Hi, > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 9:47 PM Pushkar Kulkarni > wrote: > > > > === freedombox/bootstrapform === > > The freedombox package depends on bootstrapform. Autopkgtests of the > > former fa

Re: git-ubuntu import service temporarily halted

This is now sorted and the service is running again. On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 10:34 AM Andreas Hasenack wrote: > > Hi, > > the git-ubuntu import service has been impacted by the recent outage, > and is currently not running. The service controller VM in prodstack > is in an &qu

Re: git-ubuntu import service temporarily halted

This is now sorted and the service is running again. On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 10:34 AM Andreas Hasenack wrote: > > Hi, > > the git-ubuntu import service has been impacted by the recent outage, > and is currently not running. The service controller VM in prodstack > is in an &qu

Re: +1 maintenance report

Hi, On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 9:47 PM Pushkar Kulkarni wrote: > > === freedombox/bootstrapform === > The freedombox package depends on bootstrapform. Autopkgtests of the > former fail because the latter imports distutils. I did a Debian MR > [15] to replace distutils.StrictVersion with

git-ubuntu import service temporarily halted

Hi, the git-ubuntu import service has been impacted by the recent outage, and is currently not running. The service controller VM in prodstack is in an "ERROR" state, and we need admin help to further troubleshoot it. A ticket[1] has been filed to try to address this. 1.

git-ubuntu import service temporarily halted

Hi, the git-ubuntu import service has been impacted by the recent outage, and is currently not running. The service controller VM in prodstack is in an "ERROR" state, and we need admin help to further troubleshoot it. A ticket[1] has been filed to try to address this. 1.

Re: Is there a good solution for this: release-upgrade with dependency moved to universe

Hi, On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 3:02 AM Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 11:05:24AM -0500, Nick Rosbrook wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I guess something in do-release-upgrade could be run to, when > encountering such a situation, automatically select > bin:samba-vfs-modules-extra for the

Re: Is there a good solution for this: release-upgrade with dependency moved to universe

Hi Nick, On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 1:05 PM Nick Rosbrook wrote: > Hi, > > > I guess something in do-release-upgrade could be run to, when > encountering such a situation, automatically select > bin:samba-vfs-modules-extra for the upgrade as well? Is it worth it? Is > there a precedence for

Is there a good solution for this: release-upgrade with dependency moved to universe

I have package bin:samba-vfs-modules which ships, among other things, a glusterfs module: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/samba/vfs/glusterfs.so /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/samba/vfs/glusterfs_fuse.so We intend[1] to demote glusterfs to Universe, and since bin:samba-vfs-modules is in main, one

Re: Retention period for autopkgtest test logs

Hi, On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 3:56 PM Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 11:17:50AM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 10:23:36AM -0700, Brian Murray wrote: > > > Currently test results and log files for autopkgtest runs are kept until > > > the release for

Re: First Mantic Minotaur test rebuild

Hi Steve, On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 6:25 PM Steve Langasek wrote: > > Hi Andreas, > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 05:37:05PM -0300, Andreas Hasenack wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 6:19 AM Graham Inggs wrote: > > > > > > The first test reb

Re: First Mantic Minotaur test rebuild

Hi, On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 6:19 AM Graham Inggs wrote: > > The first test rebuild of Mantic Minotaur was started on August 30, > 2023 for all architectures, all components. The rebuild is finished > for the main component on all architectures except riscv64, and still > running for universe and

Re: +1 maintenance shift (07/AUG - 11/AUG)

Hi, On Sun, Aug 13, 2023 at 10:48 AM Shengjing Zhu wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 5:40 AM Andreas Hasenack > wrote: > [...] > > I spent the whole afternoon today trying to get an arm64 mantic VM to > > troubleshoot this (it has to be a VM), but that was very di

Re: +1 maintenance shift (07/AUG - 11/AUG)

Hi, On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 12:52 AM Steve Langasek wrote: > > Hi Andreas, > > On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 06:40:16PM -0300, Andreas Hasenack wrote: > > canonistack isn't an option. > > Why? Do we need to open RTs? It's unreliable and/or overcommitted. Sometimes you get a

+1 maintenance shift (07/AUG - 11/AUG)

# rust-phf & friends Had to rebuild rust-pallete, which was an FTBFS Filed https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1043222 and debian fixed it before I had to upload the package with a delta of our own. Then rust-markup5ever was failing to build. Traced to rust-tendril failing to build.

Re: SRU bug subscription for sponsors

Hi, On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 6:50 AM Sebastien Bacher wrote: > > Le 14/06/2023 à 22:32, Robie Basak a écrit : > > > > If sponsors aren't prepared to do this, I question whether what they are > > doing is actually useful. The harm is that they are leaving > > non-uploaders in the cold, and review

Re: Ubuntu 23.04 is Unusable with GNOME 44.0 Due to Major Bugs - Priority Must Be for GNOME 44.1 ASAP!

Do you have launchpad bugs for these issues? I do have freezes every now and then, and I have seen the cursor being stuck in the resize icon, and wanted to check if the reports match what I'm seeing on my system (xorg). On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 11:44 AM tothepoin...@gmail.com <

Re: +1 maintenance: 6-10 March 2023

Hi, On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 2:00 AM Steve Langasek wrote: > > Hi Andreas, > > I notice that most of these packages mentioned in your report are in main. > Were there particular reasons for you to focus on these during +1 > maintenance? (You mention "not so" random retries) I started with the

+1 maintenance: 6-10 March 2023

Hi, this is my report. I skipped March 9th to do some SRU work. # php-net-ldap2 blocking openldap bug #2008825, fixed and uploaded # strongswan DEP8 test I'm the one who introduced the new DEP8 tests to strongswan, and noticed some flakiness, but I believe this was caused by the overall

DEP8 timeouts on install phase

Hi, taking this as a sample: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/f/fdroidserver/lunar/ppc64el It looks like something got slower since a few days ago, and tests started being killed due to a timeout ("kind: install" timeout, which has a default of 3000s in autopkgtest). By the end of

dbconfig-common and local databases

Hi, Today, installs like below fail in Ubuntu because dbconfig-common is configured before a database is installed and configured: apt install rsyslog-mysql apt install rsyslog-pgsql apt install phpmyadmin #1438706 #1649265 apt install bacula-director-mysql bacula #1116634 apt install

Re: Upcoming change: rsyslog's apparmor enforced by default

Hi Steve, On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 2:48 AM Steve Langasek wrote: > > Hi Andreas, > > On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 02:45:17PM -0300, Andreas Hasenack wrote: > > Hi, > > > In the next few days, if all goes according to plan, I'll upload > > rsyslogd to lunar with a

Upcoming change: rsyslog's apparmor enforced by default

Hi, In the next few days, if all goes according to plan, I'll upload rsyslogd to lunar with a change[1] to the way its apparmor profile is applied. The confinement status won't be changed during upgrades, but fresh installs will have the apparmor profile enforced by default. Up until now, it's

+1 Maintenance report (2011-11-16 - ~2011-11-22)

Hi, this +1 maintenance shift was a bit less useful due to external interrupts and holidays, and of course large test queues, but I tried to make the most of it. Since the dep8 queue is clogged, I started by focusing on NBSs, and lastly FTBFs since the builders are fast: # gnuradio stack and

Re: Version string to auto-sync an Ubuntu delta (maysync1 vs ~willsync1)

Hi On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 12:28 PM Steve Langasek wrote: > > Hi Andreas, > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 10:24:31AM -0300, Andreas Hasenack wrote: > > > I thought of: > > a) bite the bullet. Upload 4.4.0-4ubuntu2 dropping the delta, > > subscribe to the tiff packag

Re: Version string to auto-sync an Ubuntu delta (maysync1 vs ~willsync1)

Oh, this is a rabbit hole... I'll just bite the bullet and drop the delta in 4ubuntu2, and watch for new debian uploads. On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 10:36 AM Marc Deslauriers wrote: > > On 2022-08-18 09:24, Andreas Hasenack wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 9:52

Re: Version string to auto-sync an Ubuntu delta (maysync1 vs ~willsync1)

And I forgot the links: 1. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tiff/4.4.0-4ubuntu1 2. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lerc/+bug/1977551 On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 10:24 AM Andreas Hasenack wrote: > > Hi, > > On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 9:52 AM Lukas Märdian wrote: > > >

Re: Version string to auto-sync an Ubuntu delta (maysync1 vs ~willsync1)

Hi, On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 9:52 AM Lukas Märdian wrote: > > Am 25.05.22 um 13:22 schrieb Marc Deslauriers: > > [...] > >> We needed a version that does not contain the word "ubuntu", so it can be > >> auto-synced, once the committed patch is uploaded into Debian. But at the > >> same > >> time

+1 maintenance report: 2022-08-08 through 2022-08-12

I started looking at some ffmpeg 5 rdeps, and moved on to pytest and others. I subscribed to the Debian tracker for all packages where I introduced delta, so I can sync them when Debian incorporates the changes or fixes the issue in some other way, or keep merging. # audacity ftbfs with

Re: rsyslog trigger?

Never mind, the trigger exists already :) On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 10:49 AM Andreas Hasenack wrote: > > Hi, > > I was working on a few packages that had bugs related to rsyslog > logging, and noticed that they don't seem to restart or reload rsyslog > after they install a conf

rsyslog trigger?

Hi, I was working on a few packages that had bugs related to rsyslog logging, and noticed that they don't seem to restart or reload rsyslog after they install a config snippet in /etc/rsyslog.d/*.conf. For example, haproxy even has this note in its README.Debian: ``` The default HAProxy

Re: LFS_CFLAGS on 32bits architectures

Hi, On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 8:29 PM Steve Langasek wrote: > > Hi Andreas, > > On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 02:16:59PM +0000, Andreas Hasenack wrote: > > I experimented a few things, and this got it building again: > > --- a/debian/rules > > +++ b/debian/rules

LFS_CFLAGS on 32bits architectures

Hi, on a pi3 (armhf): $ getconf LFS_CFLAGS -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 This only returns a value where it's needed, aka, 32bits (AFAIK). Shouldn't this be part of our default set of CFLAGS on 32bits architectures? The reason I ask is this old samba bug[1] ("64bits prototype not

Re: isc-dhcp: should we start phasing it out?

Hi, On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 2:34 PM Andreas Hasenack wrote: > Removing isc-dhcp would also allow us to reduce the need of old compat > src:bind9-libs package, probably even drop it. I just learned that upstream is now bundling the necessary bind9 libs into the upstream code:

isc-dhcp: should we start phasing it out?

Hi, isc-dhcp client[1] is no longer actively maintained upstream. The server still is, but upstream is clearly favoring the Kea[4] project for that. This blog post[2] from 2018, which announced that 4.4.x was going to be the last series, says: """ The 4.4 branch will be supported indefinitely –

Re: Log-rotation doesn't work for catalina.out in src:tomcat9 as intended

Hi, On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 10:53 AM Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > > Hi Andreas, > > On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 6:17 PM Andreas Hasenack > wrote: > > This reminded me that frr is also affected by this: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/frr/+bug/1958162 > >

Re: Log-rotation doesn't work for catalina.out in src:tomcat9 as intended

Hi, On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 5:07 AM Evren Yurtesen wrote: > > Hi Robie and Utkarsh, > > > This issue is not isolated to tomcat9 package. For example, jetty9 package > logging does not work. Rsyslog says: This reminded me that frr is also affected by this:

Sending LTO delta to Debian

Hi, this came up again in a review, and I wanted to ask a broader audience. How to we send LTO[1] related delta to Debian, given that Debian isn't using LTO (yet)? Case in point was the ust package[2], which has this bit[3] part of the delta (just showing the first hunk): @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@

Re: Missiing bacula-fd for 9.6.7-3 Ubuntu 2204

It was later fixed in debian, and I synced it for ubuntu kinetic, but it's indeed missing from jammy: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bacula I suppose an SRU could reintroduce it? Any volunteers? On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 10:41 PM Alex Murray wrote: > > On Tue, 2022-05-03 at 10:48:21 -0400,

+1 maintenance report, 25 through 29/may/2022

Hi, this was a slow week, due to the post-release freeze still in effect. I grabbed these packages to work on: ## nmap ftbfs Submitted to debian via https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/nmap/-/merge_requests/3 And also uploaded the same fix to ubuntu. Once debian does a new upload, I'll

Re: I disabled lto, but it comes back in via -config --libs

Hi, On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 10:50 PM Steve Langasek wrote: > I think your main question has been addressed. But I want to ask, why is it a > problem to have part of this code with LTO enabled? Generally we disable > LTO only when it is causing build failures. Was that the case here? I

Re: I disabled lto, but it comes back in via -config --libs

Hi Sergio, thanks for the reply On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 3:14 PM Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > Either way, I believe this issue should be addressed in krb5 as I said > above. I haven't been able to find any bug about this in upstream's bug > tracker. I filed

Re: I disabled lto, but it comes back in via -config --libs

Same thing with -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2018-June/040371.html On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 10:50 AM Andreas Hasenack wrote: > > Hi, > > I disabled lto in a build according to the instructions from [1]: > > export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPT

I disabled lto, but it comes back in via -config --libs

Hi, I disabled lto in a build according to the instructions from [1]: export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS=optimize=-lto But I saw that it was still present in some steps of the build. Notably when krb5/gssapi was used: ... -- Found GSSAPI: -L/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/mit-krb5

Re: Call for votes: Developer Membership Board restaffing

Hi, On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 11:15 AM Dan Streetman wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 9:45 AM Robie Basak wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 09:19:31AM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote: > > > For example, in this situation; carrying out an election really > > > shouldn't be an exceptional event.

Re: Second Jammy Jellyfish test rebuild

On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 8:02 AM Graham Inggs wrote: > > Hi Christian > > On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 at 08:19, Christian Ehrhardt > wrote: > > - Dns-root-data is actually an issue in ldns fixed in jammy-proposed > ldns migrated, so I retried dns-root-data > > > - postgresql-14 was broken by llvm-14, a

default LLVM change

Hi, I was going over fixing the postgresql FTBFS[1] reported[2] in this list a few days ago, and saw that the failure was due to postgresql not yet supporting llvm-14. Current jammy build was using llvm-13. Ok, so looks like llvm-defaults changed from 13 to 14 with 0.51ubuntu1[3] on March 12th

Re: Should we change the behaviour of -P for lsblk in util-linux for Jammy?

Hi, On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 2:18 AM Bryce Harrington wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 01:00:07PM +1300, Matthew Ruffell wrote: > > 3) Revert the single patch which caused all of this, > > 58b510e580 libsmartcols: sanitize variable names on export output > > which is a tidier and well tested

Re: MIR question: upstream code in main pulled in code we have in universe

Hi, On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 1:33 PM Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 11:35:07AM -0300, Andreas Hasenack wrote: > > Hi, I have a question for the MIR (Main Inclusion Request) team members, > > > New version of nfs-utils upstream (src:nfs-utils in main)

MIR question: upstream code in main pulled in code we have in universe

Hi, I have a question for the MIR (Main Inclusion Request) team members, New version of nfs-utils upstream (src:nfs-utils in main) pulled[1] in code (regex.c file) from another upstream project[2], for which we have a package in universe: src:libnfsidmap-regex Would this require another MIR

nfs-utils update status

Hi, I just wrote a lengthy email to a debian bug (https://bugs.debian.org/1005236) and thought I should share it here too. CCing ubuntu-devel@ since this is not an Ubuntu Server package. This is the current situation with nfs-utils regarding LP bug #1878601[1]. I guess the most important part is

+1 maintenance report: 31/JAN - 04/FEV

Hi all, I worked mostly on the python3-default blockers. # fetchmail Just needed a retrigger # stunnel4 - DeprecationWarning: ssl.PROTOCOL_TLS is deprecated - FTBFS + DEP8 failures Fixed via https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/stunnel4/+bug/1959615 Sent to debian via

Re: A class of errors due to python 3.10: collections import

On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 3:38 PM Andreas Hasenack wrote: > > In general: > > change > > from collections import > > to > > from collections.abc import > > > This will list the culprits: > retry-autopkgtest-regressions --blocks python3-defaults --lo

+1maint: another class of py3.10 issues: "distutils is deprecated"

retry-autopkgtest-regressions --blocks python3-defaults --log-regex 'DeprecationWarning: The distutils package is deprecated' Which gives: ansible hy lazygal oz pytest-mpi q2-fragment-insertion q2-sample-classifier typer unicycler zope.testing I'm currently on lazygal. These links might be

A class of errors due to python 3.10: collections import

In general: change from collections import to from collections.abc import This will list the culprits: retry-autopkgtest-regressions --blocks python3-defaults --log-regex 'ImportError: cannot import name.*collections' keras python-furl python-opcua python-orderedmultidict pythonpy

Quagga removal, welcome frr

Hi all, quagga was removed[1] from Debian, and is unmaintained upstream. I'm working on a MIR[1] for frr which is a fork from quagga and replaces it. I don't know yet if it's a 100% drop-in replacement, and wanted to ask others at large how they would be impacted by the removal of quagga from

ust: mini transition

Hi, while following up on the migration[1] of my glusterfs upload, I spotted liburcu[2] which led me to ltt-control[3] which isn't building because of a missing dependency[4]: Missing build dependencies: liblttng-ust-dev (>= 2.13.0~) I then went ahead and tried to update ust to 2.13.0, via a

Re: git-ubuntu rich history beta

Hi Dan, On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 7:42 PM Dan Streetman wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 12:52 PM Robie Basak wrote: > > > > git-ubuntu is now able to accept rich history directly from any uploader. > > > > The CLI is in beta and subject to change. Feedback appreciated! > > > > # Summary > > > >

Re: OpenLDAP 2.5 transition plan

Great! Please take this opportunity of a soname change to drop some of our old delta ;) On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 12:25 PM Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > Hi folks, > > I have been working on getting OpenLDAP 2.5 ready to start the > transition process in impish. Ryan Tandy (Debian's OpenLDAP

nfs-common won't restart all services after upgrade

Hi, tl;dr I filed https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/1928259 found while testing https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/1927745 and verifying that rpc.gssd was not restarted after a package upgrade. Which means the fix wasn't available until the service

Re: dpkg -V does not consider path-exclude config, fails on ubuntu-minimal

Hi, On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 1:25 PM Balint Reczey wrote: > > Hi Andreas, > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 3:29 PM Andreas Hasenack > wrote: > > Shouldn't `dpkg -V` take the path-{exclude,include} into > > consideration? Is this just a bug (which I can file), or was

dpkg -V does not consider path-exclude config, fails on ubuntu-minimal

Hi, I noticed that `dpkg -V` does not take into consideration potential exclusions defined in its configuration. An ubuntu-minimal image, for example, has this: ``` $ cat /etc/dpkg/dpkg.cfg.d/excludes # Drop all man pages path-exclude=/usr/share/man/* # Drop all translations

Kerberos ccache in /tmp, why not kernel keyring?

Hi, any idea why debian and ubuntu do not use the kernel keyring as the default storage for the kerberos credentials cache? We still use files in /tmp, like /tmp/krb5cc_1000 for a user with uid 1000. Is it because of heimdal compatibility? Its keyring support was merged in 2018[1], but doesn't

Re: Second Groovy Gorilla test rebuild

Hello, On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 7:29 AM Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > And we are by pushing glibc2.32 late in groovy we are forcing everything that > is left to resolve the same now. I'm not sure should glibc provide a compat > path - I assume this was made so that every project has to make a

Re: Bileto and RiscV64

Taking openldap as an example: amd64 build: ~1h arm64 build: ~1h30 i386: ~1h armhf build: ~2h ppc64el: ~1h s390x: ~1h riscv64 build: 8h and still going No tests have started yet as a result. On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 6:00 PM Andreas Hasenack wrote: > > Hi, > > The builders for risc

Bileto and RiscV64

Hi, The builders for riscv64 are very slow, and since bileto wails for all builds to be ready, each ticket can take dozens of hours. Even if I disable that arch in the ppa (via a #webops request), bileto later enables it again. Could we do one of the following: - disable riscv64 by default on

Re: Removing nss overlay ("nssov") from openldap, pre/postinst considerations

. On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 10:57 AM Andreas Hasenack wrote: > > Hello, > > On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 10:45 AM Robie Basak wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 02:27:48PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote: > > > We implemented a least-worst solution there, involving IIR

Re: Removing nss overlay ("nssov") from openldap, pre/postinst considerations

Hello, On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 10:45 AM Robie Basak wrote: > > On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 02:27:48PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote: > > We implemented a least-worst solution there, involving IIRC a > > critical debconf prompt. I don't remember the details, but that might be > > relevant. > >

Re: Removing nss overlay ("nssov") from openldap, pre/postinst considerations

Hello, thanks for your feedback On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 10:27 AM Robie Basak wrote: > > One of the options outlined > > in [4] is an exit 1 in preinst. That would leave the previous package > > installed, the daemon running, and the original

Removing nss overlay ("nssov") from openldap, pre/postinst considerations

Hi, I would like to stop building the nss overlay in openldap[1][2], and proposed a change[3] for that. One of the comments I got from the Debian Maintainer is that this would break an upgrade for whoever was using that module, as slapd (the daemon) would refuse to start if the module is

Re: Bug Reports - network-manager-openvpn-gnome

For network-manager-openvpn-gnome, use https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-openvpn/+filebug On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 1:15 PM Umair Ashraf wrote: > How can I report a bug in a package? > > Bug Reports >

[URGENT] Key Server license

GLAT is not scam. You have to purchase a license for every GNU/Linux copy you use. -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

[URGENT] Key Server license

We are required to purchase GNU/Linux Activation Technologies Key Server license for $4999 so we need your donations. More information at https://notabug.org/Licensing/howtotell We need 0.619876 bitcoin sent to address bc1q6dzd2evszfrv6e96rutz3qf244vya257vwrqw3. -- ubuntu-devel mailing list

Re: i386 autopkgtest [Re: i386 in focal: an update]

Hello, On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 4:04 PM Steve Langasek wrote: > > team, and 68% still need investigation. Details, including a list of > packages to investigate, produced by the attached script: > > success:74 > blacklisted:26 > failed, needs

Re: selective sync from debian: haproxy case

2:08PM -0300, Andreas Hasenack wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 3:35 PM Steve Langasek > > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 03:03:01PM -0300, Andreas Hasenack wrote: > > > > haproxy is currently a sync in ubuntu, at version 2.0.10-1. The 2.0.x > > >

Re: selective sync from debian: haproxy case

Hi Steve, On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 3:35 PM Steve Langasek wrote: > > Hi Andreas, > > On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 03:03:01PM -0300, Andreas Hasenack wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > haproxy is currently a sync in ubuntu, at version 2.0.10-1. The 2.0.x > > line is upstream

selective sync from debian: haproxy case

Hi all, haproxy is currently a sync in ubuntu, at version 2.0.10-1. The 2.0.x line is upstream's stable LTS line, and I would like to stay there. Debian experimental already has 2.1.0-2, which is also an upstream stable line, but not an LTS. I would prefer that we don't move to 2.1.0 for the

On the py2 topic: DEP8 tests

Hello, I just got an email from Debian asking about porting to py3 one of the dep8 tests we have in postfix, and it occurred to me that we probably have many such tests written with just py2 in mind. The postfix test in question actually came from the qa-regression-testing[1][2] repository a

Issues changing an ubuntu package from native to non-native?

Hi, I would like to change a source package in ubuntu from native to non-native. The main reason is that I personally have a hard time dealing with native package, specially one that spawns multiple ubuntu releases. While I could perhaps be convinced to keep it as is, or learn how to properly

Re: apache2 package and continued Certbot compatibility

And these are the current tests: https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/tree/debian/tests On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 11:19 AM Robie Basak wrote: > > Hi, > > Thank you for getting in touch. > > I'm not sure that our test infrastructure currently allows for emails to > be sent to third

Re: Patch Pilot Report for May 11th, 2019

Thanks for this work! Could you perhaps include a link in your template to the report that shows bugs needing sponsorship? People can get curious, take a look, see a package they are familiar with, ..., profit! :) On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 3:45 PM Simon Quigley wrote: > > Hello, > > I did another

Re: etherape - deb package - incorrect dependency

Thanks, looks like this was filed as a bug already: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/etherape/+bug/1752712 On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 6:26 PM Greg W wrote: > > > Hi, > > etherape package requires "libgnomeui-0" deb as dependency in order to run. > Currently this is not defined and

going ahead of Debian with a dfsg orig tarball

Hi, I find myself in the situation where we want to go ahead of debian for a package (samba), but it's a dfsg tarball. Debian doesn't have it anywhere yet, so I produced the tarball according to the exclude rules in debian/gbp.conf. I'm wondering, however, if some mistake happens, or something

Re: libnfsidmap2 libnfsidmap-dev

On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 12:22 PM Robie Basak wrote: > > Hi, > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 01:19:29PM +, Michael Barkdoll wrote: > > Can someone please update package libnfsidmap2 and libnfsidmap-dev to v0.26: > > In a stable Ubuntu release? That's not necessarily appropriate depending > on any

Re: arch triplet: "-" <> "_"

On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 9:53 PM Colin Watson wrote: > This seems OK. If you wanted to be more precise, then you could > calculate the appropriate respelling of the architecture name in > debian/rules, stash it in an environment variable, and substitute that > using dh-exec (see

arch triplet: "-" <> "_"

Hi, I'm working on the talloc package, and it installs this file when building python3 bindings: usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpytalloc-util.cpython-37m-x86-64-linux-gnu.so.2.1.16 I can't put that literally in a d/.install file, because of the architecture. The path component after usr/lib can be

Re: authbind in platform/supported-sysadmin-common

Thanks for the extra tracking! :) On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 10:46 AM Jeremy Bicha wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 7:10 AM Andreas Hasenack > wrote: > > while investigating removing authbind from the server-ship seed[1], we > > noticed it's still included via platfo

authbind in platform/supported-sysadmin-common

Hi, while investigating removing authbind from the server-ship seed[1], we noticed it's still included via platform/supported-sysadmin-common. I tracked this back to 2008 when the file was created already with that content, so no particular reasoning was logged in the commit. authbind has:

Re: samba 4.9 in disco

Upstream provided a patch that fixes the issue. This is the MP to land it in ubuntu disco: https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/samba/+git/samba/+merge/361241 On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 3:05 PM Andreas Hasenack wrote: > > Hi, > > I just wanted to email the list explaini

Re: autopkgtest verision deployed on production infrastructure updated

On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 8:11 AM Iain Lane wrote: > > +skippable > +The test might need to be skipped for reasons that cannot be > +described by an existing restriction such as isolation-machine or > +breaks-testbed, but must instead be detected at runtime. If the > +test exits

samba 4.9 in disco

Hi, I just wanted to email the list explaining why samba 4.9 is not yet in disco. It's also blocking the ldb migration. The samba DEP8 tests pass, but one of the triggered tests (freeipa) actually showed what we think is a valid bug, or at least significant change in behavior, in samba[1].

Re: help with sbuild dep8 failures on i386/bionic

On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 7:54 PM Colin Watson wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 05:04:35PM -0200, Andreas Hasenack wrote: > > The test basically uses sbuild to build procenv on the current devel > > version of ubuntu. Today, that's disco. At the end of the build, it > > tr

help with sbuild dep8 failures on i386/bionic

Hi, I have a couple of SRUs that are triggering sbuild DEP8 runs on bionic and these are only failing on i386: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/s/sbuild/bionic/i386 http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/s/sbuild/bionic/amd64 I triggered those using debootstrap from proposed, otherwise we

Re: /usr-merge by default for new installations, with backwards compat

On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 3:03 PM Andreas Hasenack wrote: > DEP8 is clean except for sbuild/0.75.0-1ubuntu1: > http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/bionic/update_excuses.html#exim4 > > This is the failure in sbuild's test: > autopkgtest [16:51:16]: tes

Re: /usr-merge by default for new installations, with backwards compat

On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 9:22 AM Robie Basak wrote: > > Hi Dimitri, > > I see that you blocked the SRU for debootstrap in LP: #1773496 / LP: > #1800945 on a usr-merge problem. Please can you resolve this, given that > you chose to drive this change in Ubuntu? I believe this is what is > causing the

  1   2   >