On 04/09/2017 20:18, Simon Quigley wrote:
> Hello Sebastian,
>
> On 09/04/2017 08:20 AM, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
>> The desktop team has been suggesting to remove firefox from those
>> architectures because we don't have the resources to work on those build
>> issues and we believe there are litt
On 05/12/13 05:26, Timo Jyrinki wrote:
2013/12/4 Dmitry Shachnev :
Also, IIRC, nothing was decided about the SONAME stuff (and I would really want
if we got synchronized with Debian on (not)doing the bump).
I'd go for not bumping SONAME and doing all rebuilds at once. Debian
should lead the way
On 28/02/13 15:31, Rick Spencer wrote:
= tl;dr =
Ubuntu has an amazing opportunity in the next 7-8 months to deliver a
Phone OS that will be widely adopted by users and industry while also
putting into place the foundation for a truly converged OS.
To succeed at this we will need both velocit
On 11/06/12 16:05, Chase Douglas wrote:
I would have assumed that language standard choices should be
intermixable across libraries. Is it possible this is merely a bug in GCC?
-- Chase
Hi Chase,
Matthias just pointed me to
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Cxx11AbiCompatibility on IRC, so it seems
Hi,
I've just finished debugging a Unity crash which occurs when we try a
test rebuild of Unity and Nux with GCC4.7 in quantal. Although the
original issue was caused by mixing 2 C++ ABI's (because libsigc hasn't
been rebuilt yet in quantal), it was no better even after rebuilding
libsigc with the
On 12/01/12 21:45, Angel Abad wrote:
thunderbird-couchdb (0.0.1-0ubuntu2) precise; urgency=low
* Rebuild against libedataserver-1.2-15.
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 22:39:46 +0100
Changed-By: Angel Abad
Maintainer: Chris Coulson
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+source/thunderbird-couchdb
On 06/08/11 23:46, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> In any case, these types of reports post-release are most useful in
> aggregate rather than as individual bug reports. If they were filed in
> some ultra simple crash database (with no signup required of the user)
> we could get most of the value without
the end of the week, I will assume that
nobody cares about the remaining packages and will start filing removal
requests for them.
Regards
Chris
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 15:53 +0100, Chris Coulson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At UDS we decided that we are no longer going to maintain XULRunner in
&
Hi,
At UDS we decided that we are no longer going to maintain XULRunner in
the Ubuntu archive from Oneiric onwards (although, this process already
started at the end of Natty when we did some last minute work to demote
it to universe). The reason for this is that the new rapid release
cadence for
