I think the concept with launcher autohide should be rethought.
It doesn't appear soon enough when needed and, ironically, when not needed
it appears too soon.
I don't think it can be solved by merely adjusting timeouts.
I have previously suggested half-hidden launcher and would like to raise
There are a lot of packages even in Oneiric that are 1-2 versions behind
stable upstream.
I would suggest therefore that Software Center has a feature where users
will be able to tag certain packages as outdated like in arch.
Tagging should have the following benefits:
1) The number of
Seeing that there's a heavy fight for CD space for Oneiric, may I
suggest slimming down gedit.
Currently gedit as shipped by default looks more like an IDE than a
basic editor.
It pulls gtksourceview for syntax highlighting and a few plugins which
are only needed by very advanced users
appear to drag
the desired application to a compartment.
Of course, the mockup would benefit from someone with better artistic skills
:)
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 18:58, Erlan Sergaziev erlan.sergaz...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi everyone,
I would like to suggest a new way of handling launcher auto-hide
Hi everyone,
I would like to suggest a new way of handling launcher auto-hide.
First, some reasons:
1) When the launcher is hidden, the user is unable to quickly
switch/launch applications (so it's a regression for many against
old-style taskbar panel) and also misses the benefits of seeing
